Shino Posted February 13, 2009 Share Posted February 13, 2009 Oh I remember being 12, the thought of sex was so cruelly constant. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dannyboy-the-Dane Posted February 13, 2009 Share Posted February 13, 2009 Well they shouldn't be, otherwise shit like this happens! And interested in girls at 12 yes, [i remember really liking a girl in my first year of school at 5], but sleeping with girls at 12! no! I honestly can't believe I'm hearing this! Kids are curious, we can't really change that fact. Children as young as 3 play doctor and the like - it's not exactly harmful. Agreed, it gets problematic at this age, as they are then able to "do some damage", but I really don't see the harm in them being curious about it. When you get sex ed at this young an age, there's a reason for it: Because kids start experimenting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Retro_Link Posted February 13, 2009 Share Posted February 13, 2009 Kids are curious, we can't really change that fact. Children as young as 3 play doctor and the like - it's not exactly harmful. Agreed, it gets problematic at this age, as they are then able to "do some damage", but I really don't see the harm in them being curious about it. When you get sex ed at this young an age, there's a reason for it: Because kids start experimenting.Yeah kids might start to hit puberty at this time which is why it's taught from that age to make them aware. Curiousity I get, I get it, but I can't believe you'd say you wouldn't consider sex wrong for a 12yr old! They're nothing but a child ffs! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EEVILMURRAY Posted February 13, 2009 Author Share Posted February 13, 2009 Yeah kids might start to hit puberty at this time which is why it's taught from that age to make them aware. Curiousity I get, I get it, but I can't believe you'd say you wouldn't consider sex wrong for a 12yr old! They're nothing but a child ffs! What if they're both 14? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dannyboy-the-Dane Posted February 13, 2009 Share Posted February 13, 2009 Yeah kids might start to hit puberty at this time which is why it's taught from that age to make them aware. Curiousity I get, I get it, but I can't believe you'd say you wouldn't consider sex wrong for a 12yr old! They're nothing but a child ffs! Hm, I see what you mean. Indeed, many that young are far from mentally mature enough about it. I dunno, perhaps I've just seen too many young people get at it at that age. Perhaps my view is skewered a little. :| Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raining_again Posted February 13, 2009 Share Posted February 13, 2009 Actually I remember my friend saying she lost her virginity when she was 9. I don't think she even had her period by then.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shino Posted February 13, 2009 Share Posted February 13, 2009 Actually I remember my friend saying she lost her virginity when she was 9. I don't think she even had her period by then.. To what? . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Retro_Link Posted February 13, 2009 Share Posted February 13, 2009 What if they're both 14?Hmm, I see your point, in that 14 is still considered a child... well actually it's not; you're a teenager which is a time when you're known to hit puberty and expected to start being curious and exploring sexual behaviour.So that is something I understand. And it's a stage of life differentiated between for a reason. I think I'm also looking at it from the fact that parents should be far more aware and responsible. Because at 12, yes some [and I believe it's gotta be few at that age] kids might get sexually curious. But they have no true understanding at that age of what the repercussion can be and thus it shouldn't be allowed to happen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raining_again Posted February 13, 2009 Share Posted February 13, 2009 To what? . lol... I dread to think what you meant by that :P I think he (as in a boy ) was about 9 or 10 as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DuD Posted February 13, 2009 Share Posted February 13, 2009 To what? . lol on a serious note, it's such a harsh reality for all the people invoved. I couldn't imagine how many sacrifices i'd have to make to have a child at this point in my life, and i've got a decade on Alfie's years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluey Posted February 13, 2009 Share Posted February 13, 2009 eew eew EEW!! >__< he looks about 8 years old and she's fuuuuuuuu-gleeee. the most annoying thing is that these two are probably not gunna have to worry about getting jobs any time soon 'cause they'll be classed as "young parents" till the brat is claiming jobseeker's herself. woo-yaaay..... u___u serious note!! fugly was on the pill and "forgot to take one", right? while i think it's great that contraception is provided even for girls that age ~ it's FREAKIN AWFUL that girls arent being TOLD that they should double up and use condoms still. the pill works really well, i know - but it doesnt protect them from STDs and idiocy. i'm never reading another newspaper ever again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cube Posted February 13, 2009 Share Posted February 13, 2009 lol... I dread to think what you meant by that :P I think he (as in a boy ) was about 9 or 10 as well. I've heard about people that age having sex, although they were around 10 and 11. And brother and sister. And their mum walked in on them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dog-amoto Posted February 13, 2009 Share Posted February 13, 2009 That's really fucked up. I'm 30 and still think I'm too young to have kids! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Maase Posted February 13, 2009 Share Posted February 13, 2009 As a kid around the age of these two idiots, I think I have the right to say: WTF? Don't get me wrong, having sex is not bad for that age, and altough having a baby at that age is fucked up, I think there is a far worse this in this matter: Is just that: 1)The girl is fucking ugly and looks like a men. 2)15 Year old Girls NEVER LOOK BELOW, ONLY ABOVE. 3)She (?) had to rape that guy to have sex with him, as Girls normally (at least around where I live) find this type of boys cute enough for a kiss or something. Analyzing each point: 1)Looks like a man 2)Doesn't look above like a normal woman would do. 3)Raped someone, something not usual on a woman. This is a gay relationship. /thread Inb4 "WHAT'S THE PROBLEM WITH GAY RELATIONSHIPS" I'm just joking, bro's Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nolan Posted February 14, 2009 Share Posted February 14, 2009 I remember back when I thought it would be a good idea to have a baby........then I decided I should stop smoking Heroin. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jonnas Posted February 14, 2009 Share Posted February 14, 2009 I think I'm also looking at it from the fact that parents should be far more aware and responsible. Because at 12, yes some [and I believe it's gotta be few at that age] kids might get sexually curious. But they have no true understanding at that age of what the repercussion can be and thus it shouldn't be allowed to happen. Of course. It doesn't usually happen a 12 year old kid managing to get laid, that's why nobody usually gives them the "birds and bees" story at that age. And I don't think puberty at 12 is that uncommon. Most of my classmates started getting curious at that age (maybe 11, even) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slaggis Posted February 14, 2009 Share Posted February 14, 2009 Just proves that the sex education system in this country is absolute fucking shite. I mean, yes most of us are intelligent enough to know when we're ready to/have safe sex...but the ones that obviously aren't need educating properly, now. It needs to be from a young age, screw all this "we cant teach it to kids, because they need to be "kids" for as long as possible" shit, if they're having children at this age what difference does it make other than saving a child from being brought up my a couple un-educated parents that will most likely have lived off benefits all their life. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris the great Posted February 14, 2009 Share Posted February 14, 2009 bottom line, if your not old enough to see all the films at the cinema, don't have kids. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Maase Posted February 14, 2009 Share Posted February 14, 2009 Of course. It doesn't usually happen a 12 year old kid managing to get laid, that's why nobody usually gives them the "birds and bees" story at that age. And I don't think puberty at 12 is that uncommon. Most of my classmates started getting curious at that age (maybe 11, even) For god's sake. My friends started talking about Titfuck at the 3rd Class because of a girl who had boobs slightly bigger than the other girls. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nolan Posted February 14, 2009 Share Posted February 14, 2009 My own local school had 3-4 girls pregnant in 8th grade(approx. 12) my year of graduation, highschool pregnancies are semi common, but that's fricken middle school just out of puberty. Christ guys, wear a rubber. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jonnas Posted February 14, 2009 Share Posted February 14, 2009 For god's sake.My friends started talking about Titfuck at the 3rd Class because of a girl who had boobs slightly bigger than the other girls. I don't doubt it. It's pretty normal. (Although that was bit more knowledge than I expected them to have) For the record, when I said "getting curious", I meant for real. As in, starting to truly realize why it's enjoyable. My friends and I had heard (or seen) plenty of things before, but nobody talked for long about that. Those kids may have heard of those things before, but most of them aren't actually interested in trying it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shino Posted February 14, 2009 Share Posted February 14, 2009 For god's sake.My friends started talking about Titfuck at the 3rd Class because of a girl who had boobs slightly bigger than the other girls. I drew a picture in the 3rd or 4th grade about butt sex. My colleague didn't share my enthusiasm about it and showed it to the teacher. She blushed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
soag Posted February 14, 2009 Share Posted February 14, 2009 this story IMO is just sick and wrong on so many levels, at that age all I wanted to do was play with lego. I'm going to be a dad at 25 and I think thats too young. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Emasher Posted February 14, 2009 Share Posted February 14, 2009 When I was 11 about a week before we started "sex" education at school, some kid in my class told us all that babies were made when a Man stuck his penis into a woman's vagina and then pissed in it. Then we learned that it was actually sperm, not piss a week later and everyone thought it was gross. That was until a year later when we all started looking and pornos and wanted to have sex, though nobody did. But we never really learned about sex at all during sexual education. They just told us the very basics, they didn't even tell us what condoms or anything were. And 2 years latter when we had sexual education again, they still didn't say much more. By then a few kids were in "serious" relationships, but nobody had sex then, it was still something people made fun of. Though that was the last set of sexual education for 3 years, which brings us to today. I've pretty much learned everything from websites (Not the ones you're probably thinking of now), but I'm sure there are kids who haven't. My point is that we never learned about sex at all in so called "sex" education, and I'm surprised something like this hasn't happened at my school. 12 is probably too young to be having sex, and while I know I wanted to at that age, the exact same thing probably would have happened to me, As I just didn't know anything at that age. The fact that it was a 15 year old makes it worse as they should have known better. She must have been pretty desperate. If it was a 15 and a 14+ year old, fine, but 12 crosses that invisible line. Although, I'm glad they did the right thing and decided not to have an abortion. 15 is probably old enough to have sex though (provided its with someone 14+) I know by 15 I probably knew enough. Obviously this girl didn't, but again, I don't think its her fault. Its this crappy education system. There is a lot of pressure on kids today to have sex and be in relationships also. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dyson Posted February 14, 2009 Share Posted February 14, 2009 Although, I'm glad they did the right thing and decided not to have an abortion. Arguably. Can you imagine what the rest of their lives are going to be like? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts