Jump to content
N-Europe

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

Neutrals

 

Dazz, you are Boris Grishenko, a computer hacker from Russia.

 

Boris.gif

You love to plays wordgames, giving computer programmers a chance to guess your passwords.

(Trickster) Each night, you will send me a riddle or word game (I will decide if it is useable/too ridiculously difficult), which will be posted at the end of the night’s write-up.

You will win the game if the town fails to correctly answer 5 times (the game will continue but you will win)

If the town answers correctly, your computer will be hacked and a little information may be leaked from it.

Example: It’s what I sit on, but I don’t take it with me = A chair

You are Neutral. You win if the other players fail to guess five of your riddles.

 

  Reveal hidden contents
Posted

Great game Nintendohnut!

 

I liked my role but wasn't sure about what I could do to protect myself with my story.

 

Also, I protected Yvonne from a kill (I'm pretty sure I did) and yet she thought I was suspicious!

 

Well done town :) Great twist having a protector as mafia!

Posted

very well done nintendohnut, ambitious but run well and very easy for me to get into it as I am somewhat familiar with the bondiverse. Some really cool mechanics came into play and its only a shame that some of the other cool mechanics didn't, but that's mafia!

 

  ReZourceman said:
Oh...Yvonne played a god damn disgustingly good game.

 

hehe cheers mate, I surprised I survived as long as I did!

 

Also I totally called jaws :)

 

  Fierce_LiNk said:
Yvonne...you better stay around on the forums now.

 

OR ELSE YOU WILL DIE.

 

I'm signed up to the DIY already :D

 

Also I should be coming down for the meet next weekend

Posted

yes -- props to yvonne. Really did us a good service. Re-reading the thread, yvonne's comments really helped me decide who was good or bad. Mostly :P Certainly could've faced more suspicion if I wasn't in yvonne's faith for some minute comment I made :)

 

Sorry I never used the disappearing act - because I wouldn't know the results of its use (and I didn't really realise it was a jailkeep!) I refrained from using it. I Would've used it more earlier on, I think, had I not known.

 

What would've happened if Rummy had targetted me, out of interest? (secret communiqué)

Posted

Debate over Trevelyan's alignment was mostly sparked by us (and EEVIL :D). I think the role fit him perfectly, even if it was damn near impossible to win! :p

 

Oh, yes, and Yvonne did indeed play incredibly well for a beginner. :) Why on earth didn't we take her out sooner, again? :heh:

Posted

It was indeed impossible for me to reach my goal. I wanted to kill people but couldn't because no names were being given (apart from Bond but it would've been pointless to go for him). So I spent the game just sorta watching until my name got found out and I got lynched.

Posted (edited)

SMERSH (Smert Shpionam - 'Death to Spies')

 

Dannyboy, you are Ernst Stavro Blofeld, the mysterious leader of SMERSH.

 

Blofelds.jpg

(Invisible) Because nobody knows the real identity of Blofeld (he has several body doubles) you are untraceable to role investigators and alignment investigators. You can, however, be tracked.

(Double Vote) You are also extremely influential within SMERSH, so you have the power of a double vote during the day.

(Impersonation) Each night you must target someone, and you will then disguise yourself as that person, which should confuse things somewhat. You will not be informed whom you are impersonating.

 

  Reveal hidden contents
Edited by Nintendohnut
Posted

It was pretty much uphill after ReZ died. We knew we were on the back foot since that point. When we lost a second mafia, that's when we realised how tough it would be.

 

There was one golden part in the game where I think we got 3 quick kills or something? Well done to the mafia for working well as a team.

 

Townies played well. Annoyingly so, particularly that last day phase. I still maintain you had little on me. :heh:

Posted

Other comments:

 

- I wasn't sure about balancing. There were a LOT of info-gathering roles on the townie side and I felt a little sorry for the mafia - it would have been really difficult to go a night without someone in the town getting SOMETHING on one of you. In the end, though, it worked out pretty well.

 

- I wasn't sure about write-ups - I wanted to make them descriptive, but in the end that helped the town again. As you can see, towards the end I started getting a lot more vague and I think it helped with the tension. In the end I was pretty happy with it all.

 

- I'm properly pissed off that I forgot to put music in the night write-ups.

 

- I'm not sure about a sequel just yet - I'll have a break then see what roles I can write. It's a shame I used so many awesome ones straight away - the next may have less well-known characters I'm afraid, but we'll see how it goes. I have had a few ideas already.

 

- There was one day where the mafia could have lynched someone (it was two/three from majority and danny and one other hadn't voted) but they didn't want to look evil. If they had managed it and killed that night they would have only needed to convince one person to vote with them the next day to get a lynch and they would have won. I would have been jumping around if I was playing as mafia at that point, but they went for a more stealthy approach. What happened that day could have literally changed the entire game.

 

  jayseven said:
yes -- props to yvonne. Really did us a good service. Re-reading the thread, yvonne's comments really helped me decide who was good or bad. Mostly :P Certainly could've faced more suspicion if I wasn't in yvonne's faith for some minute comment I made :)

 

Sorry I never used the disappearing act - because I wouldn't know the results of its use (and I didn't really realise it was a jailkeep!) I refrained from using it. I Would've used it more earlier on, I think, had I not known.

 

What would've happened if Rummy had targetted me, out of interest? (secret communiqué)

 

You would have found out who he was (i.e. his character and a few hints at his power/s). When I said it would be deadly, I meant that the mafia would likely kill him if they found him.

 

  Fierce_LiNk said:
Will there be a sequel, Donut?

 

If so, I sign up nawww.

 

It's possible, but not just yet. Still, thanks :)

 

  Dannyboy-the-Dane said:
Pretty much all of the roles in this game were amazingly awesome, and the balancing was also pretty spot on. This also totally got me into a Bond mood again, which I haven't been for ages, so thanks for that, Dohnut! :D

 

Thanks! I was totally in the bond mood before this - I had the album of all the theme tunes on repeat to get ready for it :)

 

  Eenuh said:
It was indeed impossible for me to reach my goal. I wanted to kill people but couldn't because no names were being given (apart from Bond but it would've been pointless to go for him). So I spent the game just sorta watching until my name got found out and I got lynched.

 

Yeah, it was a really tough role, sorry Eenuh. In retrospect I should have just given you the role to kill ONE British Citizen and then survive - it would have been tough but a lot easier than killing three. :blush:

Posted
  Nintendohnut said:

 

 

- There was one day where the mafia could have lynched someone (it was two/three from majority and danny and one other hadn't voted) but they didn't want to look evil. If they had managed it and killed that night they would have only needed to convince one person to vote with them the next day to get a lynch and they would have won. I would have been jumping around if I was playing as mafia at that point, but they went for a more stealthy approach. What happened that day could have literally changed the entire game.

 

 

 

I remember this one. I think it was Danny and the Arbitor, pretty sure we were the only three left at that point. I was expecting us to put a vote down but we didn't. I remember wanting to rage-quit my life that day.

Posted
  Fierce_LiNk said:
I remember this one. I think it was Danny and the Arbitor, pretty sure we were the only three left at that point. I was expecting us to put a vote down but we didn't. I remember wanting to rage-quit my life that day.

 

Gah, fuck, I remember that! For some reason I was certain we couldn't reach majority, and I didn't notice it until it was too late! Another one of those moments of pure bad luck for the mafia. :heh:

 

The_Arbitor did indeed play very well for a first game, too. :) Two awesome mafia newbies! :D

Posted

I died early, so I've only been paying half-attention to this game. It seemed very good, yes, too bad I couldn't get into it much. Flinky did play well, I was certain it was EEVIL.

 

So, whoever was it that failed to pay the ransom? I promise I won't hurt you while I am killing you in the next game

Posted
  Yvonne said:
I think mafia were just sending the notes to jaws...nice trick!

 

*Cracks knuckles* Yeeeaaaahhh.

 

  Yvonne said:
I think mafia were just sending the notes to jaws...nice trick!

 

*Cracks knuckles* Yeeeaaaahhh.

Posted

Good game. Shame I died so early on.

 

  ReZourceman said:
I dislike being redirected to kill myself.

 

Sorry about that (well, not really as you were mafia).

Posted
  heroicjanitor said:
So Tales was actually a townie then? What was your argument about?

 

Answeeerr :p Or not. Probably settled now.

 

Sending ransoms to their own player when the ransom has no punishment just means two kills per night doesn't it?

Posted

Yeah it was a little broken, but to be honest I hadn't even thought about it so when they did I thought I'd let them do it because they had had a great idea. I suppose it was a little unfair, but it only happened twice luckily :-)

 

Tales was good but appeared neutral.

 

The 'argument' was because

 

1) the night that he shot the Arbitor, he appeared in the writeup (because of his neutral appearance I showed him using it). He sent me a message saying something along the lines of "oh awesome that doesn't make me look guilty at all".

 

2) I didn't respond to that, but the NEXT day he posted about how he hadn't been given a choice about whether or not to enter EEVIL's phone booth and how he wanted me to give him a choice.

 

I messaged him saying that there are reasons why the things are the way they are and that he needed to stop getting so pissed off about it. I said there were reasons that I was doing it. He responded with something like 'I'm not getting pissed, stop making up how I feel, they were just comments' and ended the message with "so stfu and gtfo", which I considered to prove that he WAS pissed off. From there it went in discussions about tone and whether or not he was being sarcastic/joking, or whether he was just 'adding to the conversation in the thread', but I was saying if he went to the effort of PMing, he was clearly rather annoyed.

 

Anyway, that was basically it, and after that we got on just fine.


×
×
  • Create New...