Dannyboy-the-Dane Posted February 5, 2009 Posted February 5, 2009 Its obviously not aimed for actual massages.. Sure it is! Just not the "conventional" ones ...
Dan_Dare Posted February 6, 2009 Posted February 6, 2009 I came across the subject of 'political lesbianism' this week. It's a radical feminist thing that calls for all femenists to become lesbians because sleeping with men is counter to their beliefs pretty weird if you ask me. For one thing, it identifies all men as violent women haters. I dunno. Discuss? I'll try and link the articles I read later.
Daft Posted February 6, 2009 Posted February 6, 2009 Can only women be feminists? That's pretty sexist.
Chris the great Posted February 6, 2009 Posted February 6, 2009 I came across the subject of 'political lesbianism' this week. It's a radical feminist thing that calls for all femenists to become lesbians because sleeping with men is counter to their beliefs pretty weird if you ask me. For one thing, it identifies all men as violent women haters. I dunno. Discuss? I'll try and link the articles I read later. its just some crafty dyke trying to get some tounge time. i might start a political group were i encourage all girls to sleep with me.
chairdriver Posted February 6, 2009 Posted February 6, 2009 You know how those Catholic Girls can be...
Pookiablo Posted February 7, 2009 Posted February 7, 2009 You know how those Catholic Girls can be... You're still on about the Catholic girls!!!
nightwolf Posted February 7, 2009 Posted February 7, 2009 I came across the subject of 'political lesbianism' this week. It's a radical feminist thing that calls for all femenists to become lesbians because sleeping with men is counter to their beliefs pretty weird if you ask me. For one thing, it identifies all men as violent women haters. I dunno. Discuss? I'll try and link the articles I read later. Boo, men are pretty awesome sometimes! Femenists annoy me as a whole, it seems somewhat ridiculous to thinking of men as violent women haters and such, calling them inferior also, which leads to hypocrisy.
Jav_NE Posted February 7, 2009 Posted February 7, 2009 Yeah, they are hypocrits. Feminists who are for equal rights are good, and i support them, but the moment it gets to being more supreme or whatever, they're just as bad as men were back in the day.
Dannyboy-the-Dane Posted February 7, 2009 Posted February 7, 2009 Yeah, they are hypocrits. Feminists who are for equal rights are good, and i support them, but the moment it gets to being more supreme or whatever, they're just as bad as men were back in the day. Quoted for truth.
Chris the great Posted February 7, 2009 Posted February 7, 2009 Femenists annoy me as a whole, it seems somewhat ridiculous to thinking of men as violent women haters and such, calling them inferior also, which leads to hypocrisy. feminists are using evolutionaty psychology to claim men are geneticaly prove to be violent. which is fair enough. however, women are just as likly to be agressive, though its usualy in a subtler way, making rival females seem less desirable via bitching etc. i interesting topic i read was that men are argualy less violent all in all, sure, when we are violent, we tend to be pshycial, but men are less likly to keep it prolonged or to harbour grudges.
Ashley Posted February 8, 2009 Posted February 8, 2009 Furries creep me out/scare me. Its just...yeah :/
Chris the great Posted February 8, 2009 Posted February 8, 2009 Furries creep me out/scare me. Its just...yeah :/ its a pretty wierd one alright. never do i look at a woman and think "if only she was dressed as a cow"
Eenuh Posted February 8, 2009 Posted February 8, 2009 Heh, I once mentioned furries to Flinky, and he thought it meant people with lots of hair on their bodies. X3
gaggle64 Posted February 8, 2009 Posted February 8, 2009 Furries creep me out/scare me. Its just...yeah :/ I get the impression there's a back-story to this somewhere...
Ashley Posted February 8, 2009 Posted February 8, 2009 Kristen Bell was talking about it in an interview I was watching. And this which has remained ingrained in my mind;
nightwolf Posted February 12, 2009 Posted February 12, 2009 I recently found out their is a difference between furries and pet play though. Don't ask me the difference, but for some reason furries are incredibly weird whereas pet play isn't as bad (and no pet play isn't beastality!)
Paj! Posted February 12, 2009 Posted February 12, 2009 Furri Tori lolwut. In other news, I love that song. It was a crime it was taken off BFP for the Widow remix. Really pointless, considering ITSOHV was actually a single too..
Iun Posted February 13, 2009 Posted February 13, 2009 i interesting topic i read was that men are argualy less violent all in all, sure, when we are violent, we tend to be pshycial, but men are less likly to keep it prolonged or to harbour grudges. Yep. It's the one thing I don't like about working in a practically all-female environment. If you piss one of the girls here off, you can guarantee problems for at least a week. All male environments are bad too, as there's often no motivation. Mixed environments work best, but it's interesting how people perceive conflict resolution. I would accept man on man violence, because it normally resolves a dispute permanently. Female on female violence only makes things escalte, but then again so does the back biting and bitching. Interestingly, I've seen women in my life have major arguments with each other, one has physically attacked the other and beaten them. You'd expect that to be an end to it, but no. The victor has inevitably gone back to the violence time and again with the same victim. Similarly, it's rather annoying to get bitchy men. You just want to smack them in the mouth and tell them to get that sand out of their vagina. I'm all for calling women equal to men, and even superior to men in some cases. But it can't be done until I can get the same 6 months paid maternity leave as women at random inconvenient intervals for my company. Oh wait, I can't because I'm not a woman... our bodies are different and our psychological make-up (and facial make up) is different too. Guess we're not actually equal.
chairdriver Posted February 13, 2009 Posted February 13, 2009 You just want to smack them in the mouth and tell them to get that sand out of their vagina. . I am so badly using that line sometime.
Dannyboy-the-Dane Posted February 13, 2009 Posted February 13, 2009 I also find it interesting how boyish girls are generally much more accepted than girlish boys. If a girl plays with toy soldiers and climbing trees - no probs. If a boy plays with dolls - *SMACK* "QUEER!" (Even if he's not.) It's the same with grown-ups. Women watching a male strip show - free and independent spirits. Men watching a female strip show - perverted bastards. It's like the fight for equality has given women a head start in the breaking down of gender roles. Note: These are generalisations based on my personal impression of how things are at the moment.
Eenuh Posted February 13, 2009 Posted February 13, 2009 I also find it interesting how boyish girls are generally much more accepted than girlish boys. If a girl plays with toy soldiers and climbing trees - no probs. If a boy plays with dolls - *SMACK* "QUEER!" (Even if he's not.) It's the same with grown-ups. Women watching a male strip show - free and independent spirits. Men watching a female strip show - perverted bastards. It's like the fight for equality has given women a head start in the breaking down of gender roles. Note: These are generalisations based on my personal impression of how things are at the moment. Yeah but it also works the other way around with the age old: man sleeping with lots of women = awesome! Woman sleeping with lots of men = slut! I don't think gender roles can ever really be left behind, they're always going to exist to some extent.
Dannyboy-the-Dane Posted February 13, 2009 Posted February 13, 2009 Yeah but it also works the other way around with the age old: man sleeping with lots of women = awesome!Woman sleeping with lots of men = slut! I don't think gender roles can ever really be left behind, they're always going to exist to some extent. The problem is not that there are natural patterns of behaviour for the genders, but that breaks in these patterns aren't always accepted.
Roostophe Posted February 13, 2009 Posted February 13, 2009 You could put that down towards a woman's biological clock, and that people generally feel women shouldn't have babies after the menopause. Whereas men seem to have an ability to impregnate a woman from the moment they make their first sex wee. If an old man was to become a father again, a lot of people would congratulate him and say "Well done, still got a lot of lead in your pencil, I see.". But if an old woman has a child, people would say to her "You're breaking the laws of nature, you slag.". Another reason could be down to how men become repulsed at the thought of an old woman's vagina, even comparing it to a Pork Pie (How you've got to bite through the crust and the jelly to get to the meat.). Even those who like Pork Pies become nauseous at the image of a grey-haired ladies' bajingo.
Recommended Posts