Dannyboy-the-Dane Posted February 5, 2009 Share Posted February 5, 2009 Its obviously not aimed for actual massages.. Sure it is! Just not the "conventional" ones ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan_Dare Posted February 6, 2009 Share Posted February 6, 2009 I came across the subject of 'political lesbianism' this week. It's a radical feminist thing that calls for all femenists to become lesbians because sleeping with men is counter to their beliefs pretty weird if you ask me. For one thing, it identifies all men as violent women haters. I dunno. Discuss? I'll try and link the articles I read later. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daft Posted February 6, 2009 Share Posted February 6, 2009 Can only women be feminists? That's pretty sexist. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris the great Posted February 6, 2009 Share Posted February 6, 2009 I came across the subject of 'political lesbianism' this week. It's a radical feminist thing that calls for all femenists to become lesbians because sleeping with men is counter to their beliefs pretty weird if you ask me. For one thing, it identifies all men as violent women haters. I dunno. Discuss? I'll try and link the articles I read later. its just some crafty dyke trying to get some tounge time. i might start a political group were i encourage all girls to sleep with me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ashley Posted February 6, 2009 Share Posted February 6, 2009 Radical feminists are by definition wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chairdriver Posted February 6, 2009 Share Posted February 6, 2009 You know how those Catholic Girls can be... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pookiablo Posted February 7, 2009 Share Posted February 7, 2009 You know how those Catholic Girls can be... You're still on about the Catholic girls!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nightwolf Posted February 7, 2009 Share Posted February 7, 2009 I came across the subject of 'political lesbianism' this week. It's a radical feminist thing that calls for all femenists to become lesbians because sleeping with men is counter to their beliefs pretty weird if you ask me. For one thing, it identifies all men as violent women haters. I dunno. Discuss? I'll try and link the articles I read later. Boo, men are pretty awesome sometimes! Femenists annoy me as a whole, it seems somewhat ridiculous to thinking of men as violent women haters and such, calling them inferior also, which leads to hypocrisy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jav_NE Posted February 7, 2009 Share Posted February 7, 2009 Yeah, they are hypocrits. Feminists who are for equal rights are good, and i support them, but the moment it gets to being more supreme or whatever, they're just as bad as men were back in the day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dannyboy-the-Dane Posted February 7, 2009 Share Posted February 7, 2009 Yeah, they are hypocrits. Feminists who are for equal rights are good, and i support them, but the moment it gets to being more supreme or whatever, they're just as bad as men were back in the day. Quoted for truth. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris the great Posted February 7, 2009 Share Posted February 7, 2009 Femenists annoy me as a whole, it seems somewhat ridiculous to thinking of men as violent women haters and such, calling them inferior also, which leads to hypocrisy. feminists are using evolutionaty psychology to claim men are geneticaly prove to be violent. which is fair enough. however, women are just as likly to be agressive, though its usualy in a subtler way, making rival females seem less desirable via bitching etc. i interesting topic i read was that men are argualy less violent all in all, sure, when we are violent, we tend to be pshycial, but men are less likly to keep it prolonged or to harbour grudges. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ashley Posted February 8, 2009 Share Posted February 8, 2009 Furries creep me out/scare me. Its just...yeah :/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris the great Posted February 8, 2009 Share Posted February 8, 2009 Furries creep me out/scare me. Its just...yeah :/ its a pretty wierd one alright. never do i look at a woman and think "if only she was dressed as a cow" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eenuh Posted February 8, 2009 Share Posted February 8, 2009 Heh, I once mentioned furries to Flinky, and he thought it meant people with lots of hair on their bodies. X3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gaggle64 Posted February 8, 2009 Share Posted February 8, 2009 Furries creep me out/scare me. Its just...yeah :/ I get the impression there's a back-story to this somewhere... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ashley Posted February 8, 2009 Share Posted February 8, 2009 Kristen Bell was talking about it in an interview I was watching. And this which has remained ingrained in my mind; Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mr_bogus Posted February 12, 2009 Share Posted February 12, 2009 Furri Tori Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nightwolf Posted February 12, 2009 Share Posted February 12, 2009 I recently found out their is a difference between furries and pet play though. Don't ask me the difference, but for some reason furries are incredibly weird whereas pet play isn't as bad (and no pet play isn't beastality!) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paj! Posted February 12, 2009 Share Posted February 12, 2009 Furri Tori lolwut. In other news, I love that song. It was a crime it was taken off BFP for the Widow remix. Really pointless, considering ITSOHV was actually a single too.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Iun Posted February 13, 2009 Share Posted February 13, 2009 i interesting topic i read was that men are argualy less violent all in all, sure, when we are violent, we tend to be pshycial, but men are less likly to keep it prolonged or to harbour grudges. Yep. It's the one thing I don't like about working in a practically all-female environment. If you piss one of the girls here off, you can guarantee problems for at least a week. All male environments are bad too, as there's often no motivation. Mixed environments work best, but it's interesting how people perceive conflict resolution. I would accept man on man violence, because it normally resolves a dispute permanently. Female on female violence only makes things escalte, but then again so does the back biting and bitching. Interestingly, I've seen women in my life have major arguments with each other, one has physically attacked the other and beaten them. You'd expect that to be an end to it, but no. The victor has inevitably gone back to the violence time and again with the same victim. Similarly, it's rather annoying to get bitchy men. You just want to smack them in the mouth and tell them to get that sand out of their vagina. I'm all for calling women equal to men, and even superior to men in some cases. But it can't be done until I can get the same 6 months paid maternity leave as women at random inconvenient intervals for my company. Oh wait, I can't because I'm not a woman... our bodies are different and our psychological make-up (and facial make up) is different too. Guess we're not actually equal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chairdriver Posted February 13, 2009 Share Posted February 13, 2009 You just want to smack them in the mouth and tell them to get that sand out of their vagina. . I am so badly using that line sometime. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dannyboy-the-Dane Posted February 13, 2009 Share Posted February 13, 2009 I also find it interesting how boyish girls are generally much more accepted than girlish boys. If a girl plays with toy soldiers and climbing trees - no probs. If a boy plays with dolls - *SMACK* "QUEER!" (Even if he's not.) It's the same with grown-ups. Women watching a male strip show - free and independent spirits. Men watching a female strip show - perverted bastards. It's like the fight for equality has given women a head start in the breaking down of gender roles. Note: These are generalisations based on my personal impression of how things are at the moment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eenuh Posted February 13, 2009 Share Posted February 13, 2009 I also find it interesting how boyish girls are generally much more accepted than girlish boys. If a girl plays with toy soldiers and climbing trees - no probs. If a boy plays with dolls - *SMACK* "QUEER!" (Even if he's not.) It's the same with grown-ups. Women watching a male strip show - free and independent spirits. Men watching a female strip show - perverted bastards. It's like the fight for equality has given women a head start in the breaking down of gender roles. Note: These are generalisations based on my personal impression of how things are at the moment. Yeah but it also works the other way around with the age old: man sleeping with lots of women = awesome! Woman sleeping with lots of men = slut! I don't think gender roles can ever really be left behind, they're always going to exist to some extent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dannyboy-the-Dane Posted February 13, 2009 Share Posted February 13, 2009 Yeah but it also works the other way around with the age old: man sleeping with lots of women = awesome!Woman sleeping with lots of men = slut! I don't think gender roles can ever really be left behind, they're always going to exist to some extent. The problem is not that there are natural patterns of behaviour for the genders, but that breaks in these patterns aren't always accepted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roostophe Posted February 13, 2009 Share Posted February 13, 2009 You could put that down towards a woman's biological clock, and that people generally feel women shouldn't have babies after the menopause. Whereas men seem to have an ability to impregnate a woman from the moment they make their first sex wee. If an old man was to become a father again, a lot of people would congratulate him and say "Well done, still got a lot of lead in your pencil, I see.". But if an old woman has a child, people would say to her "You're breaking the laws of nature, you slag.". Another reason could be down to how men become repulsed at the thought of an old woman's vagina, even comparing it to a Pork Pie (How you've got to bite through the crust and the jelly to get to the meat.). Even those who like Pork Pies become nauseous at the image of a grey-haired ladies' bajingo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts