Nicktendo Posted October 16, 2009 Posted October 16, 2009 Ahhh, channel 5 - When the highlight of my week was looking in the TV Guide for the Friday night movie dubbed "erotic thriller" The ups and downs of a handyman. Magical times.
Dannyboy-the-Dane Posted October 16, 2009 Posted October 16, 2009 I guess it's a certain genre - but I find it mighty strange to look at. And for the love of God, get Mulder out of there!
Retro_Link Posted October 16, 2009 Posted October 16, 2009 (edited) Ahhh, channel 5 - When the highlight of my week was looking in the TV Guide for the Friday night movie dubbed "erotic thriller" The ups and downs of a handyman. Magical times. haha yeah, and they always used to show those crazy Russ Meyer films featuring women with large breast, like Faster Pussycat Kill Kill etc... oh and films like Vixen and Barbarella. lol... Edited October 16, 2009 by Retro_Link
Dannyboy-the-Dane Posted October 16, 2009 Posted October 16, 2009 haha yeah, and they always used to show those crazy Russ Meyer films featuring women with large breast, like Faster Pussycat Kill Kill etc... oh and films like Vixen and Barbarella. lol... Jesus, that is so cheesy! And a classic example of "movies that tell you the whole plot in the trailer". I never really got what's so appealing about large breasts. They just look ... disproportionate.
Grazza Posted October 16, 2009 Posted October 16, 2009 I never really got what's so appealing about large breasts. They just look ... disproportionate. Oh yeah, definitely. Breasts are nice, but it's mainly the hips, waist, thighs, buttocks etc that make women attractive. To me, anyway. Each to his own! Being older, I'm having a good laugh reading the descriptions in this thread about finding old porno mags in bushes and the old rubbish they used to put on Channel 5!
SPAMBOT4000 Posted October 16, 2009 Posted October 16, 2009 Seriously though why were porno mags always found in bushes?! It's absolutely mind boggling?! Surely people don't sit in a bush jerking off to a porno?! Sure some brit comedian did something on porno mag bushes not so long ago in his stand up but can't remember who.
EEVILMURRAY Posted October 16, 2009 Posted October 16, 2009 I've never encountered a porno when walking past bushes. Mainly because I haven't tried looking.
Paj! Posted October 16, 2009 Posted October 16, 2009 When a friend and I were in like...P6 (10 years old, primary school whatever), we were walking from school to his house after games (Rugby), which was pretty near, and I stopped us both, as I noticed a magazine lying under a car, but visible. We picked it up, and it was like...some sort of leaflet thing, with women kinda advertising themselves? It was only a few pages long, but had these girls naked in nothing but high heels and stroking their vajoes and various other things. Thing is, we were more excited/screaming about the fact we found something illicit and innapropriate than the actual thing. We took it back with us, and then showed his dad, who took it away (we didn't care, as i said, it was more the fun of finding something cool and forbidden. I don't recall ever having sexual urges of any sort at that age).
Dannyboy-the-Dane Posted October 16, 2009 Posted October 16, 2009 Oh yeah, definitely. Breasts are nice, but it's mainly the hips, waist, thighs, buttocks etc that make women attractive. To me, anyway. Each to his own! Being older, I'm having a good laugh reading the descriptions in this thread about finding old porno mags in bushes and the old rubbish they used to put on Channel 5! Oh, I disagree, I find breasts very beautiful - just like the rest of the female body. But I don't like a larger-than-average ass or breasts that could kill you if applied enough force. The more proportionate the individual parts of female body are to each other, the more beautiful the body is in my opinion.
Grazza Posted October 16, 2009 Posted October 16, 2009 Seriously though why were porno mags always found in bushes?! It's absolutely mind boggling?! Surely people don't sit in a bush jerking off to a porno?! Sure some brit comedian did something on porno mag bushes not so long ago in his stand up but can't remember who. Well, it's basically because when we were 13 we wouldn't have been allowed them in the house, so your friends always knew where some were hidden in the woods or in someone's garden etc! Once a friend and I pretended to play American Football so that I could "accidentally" throw the ball over a wall and he climbed over and retrieved it... as well as a secret stash of porno mags! Ah, I'm glad we didn't have the internet... Oh, I disagree, I find breasts very beautiful - just like the rest of the female body. But I don't like a larger-than-average ass or breasts that could kill you if applied enough force. The more proportionate the individual parts of female body are to each other, the more beautiful the body is in my opinion. I totally agree with you, but what I mean is that breasts don't actually have that much influence on the whole body shape (because they're best when they're smaller than people think they ought to be - goes back to proportions). Bones like ribs and hips have a much greater role in setting the proportions, then muscles such as thighs, buttocks etc.
Dannyboy-the-Dane Posted October 16, 2009 Posted October 16, 2009 I totally agree with you, but what I mean is that breasts don't actually have that much influence on the whole body shape (because they're best when they're smaller than people think they ought to be - goes back to proportions). Bones like ribs and hips have a much greater role in setting the proportions, then muscles such as thighs, buttocks etc. I'd say that breats are a defining part of the body and its shape. But maybe I just really like breats.
MoogleViper Posted October 16, 2009 Posted October 16, 2009 The shape of breasts are much more important than size. Breasts of all different sizes can look amazing.
jayseven Posted October 16, 2009 Posted October 16, 2009 Oh, I disagree, I find breasts very beautiful - just like the rest of the female body. But I don't like a larger-than-average ass or breasts that could kill you if applied enough force. The more proportionate the individual parts of female body are to each other, the more beautiful the body is in my opinion. What is this golden ratio you speak of? :P Threads like this are the reasons girls don't use the intarnat, btw. They read this shit and have an uncontrollable facepalm fit.
Dannyboy-the-Dane Posted October 16, 2009 Posted October 16, 2009 What is this golden ratio you speak of? :P Threads like this are the reasons girls don't use the intarnat, btw. They read this shit and have an uncontrollable facepalm fit. I don't know the exact numbers, I must admit. :p I don't think we're being that bad, to be honest. I could imagine much worse scenarios.
Nolan Posted October 17, 2009 Posted October 17, 2009 36-24-36 Somethings special bout her personality Somethings special bout her psysiology I hope someone gets that.
S.C.G Posted October 17, 2009 Posted October 17, 2009 (edited) '36-24-36 Somethings special bout her personality Somethings special bout her psysiology' I hope someone gets that. '36-24-36 I want lots of pretty chicks 36-24-36 I want lots of pretty chicks 36-24-36 I want lots of pretty chicks 36-24-36 I want lots of...' Edited October 17, 2009 by S.C.G
The fish Posted October 18, 2009 Posted October 18, 2009 I used to like porn, but not it just doesn't appeal to me. I reckon it's down to the fact that I have an attitude more commonly found in women when it comes to sex - what I really get out of it is the emotional bond, and the satisfaction of satisfying. That said, boobs are awesome. On a tangentially related note, two friends and I held a £5-each Seinfeld-style contest - one was out within 24 hours, and the other lasted a good five weeks until he hooked up with another friend of ours (the fact that I nudged them together after weeks of them both um-ing and err-ing had nothing to do with the money...). Whilst I'm known (somehow) amongst my friends for 'endurance', apparently the latter of my two fellow-competitors, whenever feeling the need, instead attempted to do 50 press-ups straight, and, if he didn't collapse in pain and exhaustion first (he's got a remarkably good body for someone so, so unfit), he'd have lost the feeling once he finished. So, if you're trying to cut down on the old porn-watching, switch to press-ups when you get the urge, and it'll help your arms as well! Oh, and Jayseven is right - this thread has gone from quite interesting to facepalmilicious.
Dannyboy-the-Dane Posted October 18, 2009 Posted October 18, 2009 To be fair, I know girls who agree that the female body is beautiful. So it's not all girls we're scaring away. :p
Dan_Dare Posted October 18, 2009 Posted October 18, 2009 This thread, like most porn, is totally lame
jayseven Posted October 18, 2009 Posted October 18, 2009 Can I lock this yet? Somebody make a half-decent debate/argument/point, and I'll slink off.
MoogleViper Posted October 18, 2009 Posted October 18, 2009 Can I lock this yet? Somebody make a half-decent debate/argument/point, and I'll slink off. So you're going to lock the internet?
Eenuh Posted October 18, 2009 Posted October 18, 2009 To be fair, I know girls who agree that the female body is beautiful. So it's not all girls we're scaring away. :p That doesn't have much to do with pornography though. I know lots of people (lots of women/girls) who agree that the female body is more beautiful to look at than the male's body. Because it simply is more appealing to the eye.
jayseven Posted October 18, 2009 Posted October 18, 2009 So you're going to lock the internet? So you're going to look a sheep leap about with your logic? That doesn't have much to do with pornography though. I know lots of people (lots of women/girls) who agree that the female body is more beautiful to look at than the male's body. Because it simply is more appealing to the eye. Why, though :P I mean, why is a curved figure more appealing to all humans? Is it the instinctual recognition of a caring mother shape? Or are women prey to the same manipulation that men have been through when it comes to advertising, and the use of the female form. While sex has been used to sell anything in the past, notably because men were the moneyholders, the 'degrading' of women as sex objects conversely also empowers them with control of men, albeit through sex. So the female form is attractive both to men as a sex object, but also to women as a means to get what they want with men :P How's that for a debate/argument/point, moogle? Or should I use puppets next time?
Recommended Posts