Nolan

They probably realize that, but I'm guessing that the limitations of Nintendo's Wi-Fi network makes doing this correctly rather hard. At least ending the game and bringing everyone back into the same lobby is a step in the right direction.

Ah, well I won't spoil anything for you, but you should go play through Defiance.

Completely irrelevant to my question. I'm wondering why they'd remove it, not whether or not it's a good feature that people like.

everything looks good.

Your both Idiots. Ha! I win. Also, Irony

Open those programs one at a time and check whether or not they keep your memory in use after closing. If not, open them all up or in pairs or however until you find the combination that uses all the ram even after closing. After that, open up taskmanager and look under Processes(first Priority) and Services(likely not needed). Find the culprit and right-click End Process/Stop Service. If you can't tell what a program is by the info Taskmanager gives you, Don't Close It! If you do, it'll generally be a BSOD, followed by restart and you should be okay, but it's better to just not risk that. Generally though, the descriptions are fairly useful in telling you what everything is as opposed to the processes name. Like Avast is names ashWebSv... This won't truly fix the problem, it's more of just a workaround to avoid restarting. It's what I do for my memory leak with my Audio, it'll leak upto 1GB at which point my audio quits working, so I just end it and restart the corresponding services, much quicker than restarting like I use to.

Rather than further derailment, I'll stick with I think that could make a good discussion.

To be fair though, how much of a Villain is Kain? In a way he is terribly selfish and evil, yet....he had a plan in which the end result could be better than if he was selfless.

I'd like to change my vote to Killface.

Wut? Any Idea exactly what they mean by this?

Dr. Frank-N-Furter

>_> I know you're just joking, but it's not like I wouldn't want to goto the UK it's a matter of funds and time and all that jazz. Think of this too, I've driven from the North end of the US all the way South, and from Michigan to the East Coast, The distance traveled just in the US could easily be construed as being similar to driving from Scotland to France and over to Germany. The difference being I'm crossing State Lines in a Country not Country Lines on a Continent/Island/Channel. Also, the countryside may differ more than what I've gone through. It really all looks the same other than flat or hills, although Florida is jungle. Out West though really starts to diversify from what I'm use to.

errr Yea...I'm 2 hours from Canada and never been there, just the US and Bahamas. Although, living in MI, I just got back from a trip to New Hampshire on the East Coast, and I've been down to Florida. This is usually from Driving. So I've seen a chunk of the countryside.

I think I puked a little.

>_> This push for 3D is plain dumb at the moment. IIRC there are about 3 different ways to accomplish 3D, at least 2 of them require the user to pay a absurd amount of cash for the appropriate TV and Glasses. It's all well and good until the industry decides against the idea as a whole or changes technology leaving you with the proverbial betamax or HDDVD.

I believe I said very similar statements

You could have said hi...

I'm going to chalk this up to you being tired but...I haven't disputed what guns are or what they are designed for, just that you think they can only cause harm. A weapon that's never been fired hasn't caused direct harm, or a weapon only ever fired at non living targets.

I never said it did, I just disagreed with you saying Gun can only cause harm. Fact, my local town has a cannon from the turn of the 19th century (not sure of the exact date) but it's never been fired, and now it's a historic monument in the center of town and will never be fired. That means it didn't cause harm. After the first sentence you quit being coherent. "It's only cause harm" Guns only purpose is to cause harm, is that what you meant? See above. "It would be easier if criminals didn't have guns..." What is 'it' exactly? As to our right to bear arms, that was placed into the Bill of Rights, to grant citizens the right to defend themselves against the British during the war. While it's true that the Second Amendment doesn't have nearly as much reason behind today, American citizens are not quick on giving up freedoms they currently have. Most states it's illegal to have a concealed weapon knife or gun, some states need a permit to do so but it's legal. Problem with Crime is it's not immediately apparent to anyone whether or not a suspect is carrying a concealed weapon, and the police can't just stop everyone in town to check them for weapons. Even if it became completely illegal for the public to own guns, criminals would still get them and use them. That leaves the public defenseless, of course you don't often hear about people holding robbers at gunpoint.

Isn't "Worst Drunk" a bit of an oxymoron? It can easily mean when you get drunk you're just terrible, or it could mean that you are just terrible at getting drunk, staying sober or just skipping straight to the passed out phase.

Oh, quiet you we don't need to scare off newcomers until at least the second day.

Hardly, Guns are designed to cause harm, but I could easily get a gun and just have fun shooting inanimate targets out in the woods and derive pleasure from it. To get really nitpicky, stores use 'Priceguns" to mark the price stickers onto products. Those aren't even meant to do with harm. :p Also, in the army your gun is your penis and your weapon/gun is a rifle. I'll agree though that a guns most common use is causing harm as it was intended for, but that's not all they can cause.

ooo Nice System Shock 2 avy.

That was so incredibly awesome, no one has any excuse not to buy this game, even if they don't have a Wii they should buy it.