Shorty Posted July 22, 2006 Posted July 22, 2006 Well. That's just super. What bothers me the most is you know there'll be people who'll watch/buy/download this movie just for the first one. *sigh* What is this world coming to when we need to go this far for uniqueness or entertainment
dabookerman Posted July 22, 2006 Author Posted July 22, 2006 What gets me is, why in gods name must they even shoot it, they can easily have a child rape in a film, by merely having a man walk with a child to a room, close the door, thats enough to disturb the viewer (the normal ones)
Dan_Dare Posted July 22, 2006 Posted July 22, 2006 that's....very wrong. Like you say it's not hard to suggest rather than be explicit. look at The Woodsman for proof. that film marked the line at suggestion and it's both excellent and blood curdling at the same time. This smells like reactionary bullshit to me.
conzer16 Posted July 22, 2006 Posted July 22, 2006 The 12 year old actress has already filmed the "rape" scene........wtf???? How can you actually film a child rape?????
MoogleViper Posted July 22, 2006 Posted July 22, 2006 Americans like to have things spelt out for them.
Haden Posted July 22, 2006 Posted July 22, 2006 Fun for all the family! lol classic. Sierously though as previously said it would be better and simpler to have door closing with adult walking in. Imagination does the rest. Seems very unesscary but maybe it will work out. I know for sure though I would feel uncomftable going to a cinema and watching it. Theres advances that should be done pushing the boundries etc but this may just be the eqvilent of an ultra gory movie but much more taboo. Be intrested to see how this works out.
Bowser57 Posted July 22, 2006 Posted July 22, 2006 I'm going to go out on a limb and suggest The Daily Mail is sensationalising things a little and making much more of certain elements said to appear in the film, and that in reality it'll be nothing like they're making out (and hoping).
gaggle64 Posted July 22, 2006 Posted July 22, 2006 I agree with you guys above, the only reason you would have child rape scene, even in a film about peadophillia, would be for pure, stupid, shock value. It's not big and it's not clever.
James Posted July 22, 2006 Posted July 22, 2006 You gave a link to the Daily Mail, they will have upped the bullshit in the article tenfold. Plus I doubt young mega star actress Dakota Fanning is going to do something apparently this controversial.
Jack Posted July 22, 2006 Posted July 22, 2006 Raping children and killing animals Sounds like a slow Tuesday afternoon.
triforcemario Posted July 22, 2006 Posted July 22, 2006 and I thought the nearly-rape scene in "28 days later" was disturbing...
Hero-of-Time Posted July 22, 2006 Posted July 22, 2006 This is just sick and wrong. I personally dont think that there should be any form of rape scenes in any film. I go to the cinema to be entertained and if watching someone get raped, child or otherwise, is some peoples idea of entertainment they are just wrong in the head.
BlueStar Posted July 22, 2006 Posted July 22, 2006 Thought I was in the Wii section when I first read the topic and was wondering if they'd come up with some innovative new uses for the Wiimote. True about killing animals being taboo in Holywood, was in Pearl Harbour where that ship got blown up, loads of people died, but they made a point of showing that the dog got out OK.
MunKy Posted July 22, 2006 Posted July 22, 2006 Cannibal Holocaust has real footage of animals being killed. It was made in the 70s and the director had to go to court to prove that the actors werent actually murdered. It probably wont be that explicit, they just want notoriety (sp?) before the film comes outso people will see what all the fuss is about.
Zombie_Fan Posted July 22, 2006 Posted July 22, 2006 Hay guys I’m back for a short time. I don't like the idea of people making a movie like this. Instead of using a real kid for a rape scene they should use CGI. MoogleViper, I don't need some dumb ass movie to spell out things to me.
dabookerman Posted July 22, 2006 Author Posted July 22, 2006 Hay guys I’m back for a short time. I don't like the idea of people making a movie like this. Instead of using a real kid for a rape scene they should use CGI. MoogleViper, I don't need some dumb ass movie to spell out things to me. That reminds me, ever seen irreversible? Well his Blood and Cum covered penis was CGed
Zombie_Fan Posted July 22, 2006 Posted July 22, 2006 That reminds me, ever seen irreversible? Well his penis was CGed No, I never saw that movie.
MoogleViper Posted July 22, 2006 Posted July 22, 2006 MoogleViper, I don't need some dumb ass movie to spell out things to me. Maybe not all Americans do but you have to admit that things are spelt out clearly in american movies.
dabookerman Posted July 22, 2006 Author Posted July 22, 2006 No, I never saw that movie. The actual scene is on youtube.
Shino Posted July 22, 2006 Posted July 22, 2006 Yeah, being CGI wouldn't make me feel bad after watching it.
Domstercool Posted July 22, 2006 Posted July 22, 2006 It's the use of Shock-Horror tactics. It's something that a few Japanese directors use as well. Takeshi Miike for one.
Recommended Posts