Jump to content
N-Europe

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
  Reveal hidden contents
Edited by Kav
  • Replies 637
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

Out of the movies Kav mentioned I would probably rank them:

 

Spider-Man 3

Batman v Superman

Daredevil

Amazing Spider-Man 2.

 

 

As I said, I thought Batman v Superman was crap but I didnt exactly elaborate on that. I thought it was a crap movie which had great visuals and interesting moments interspersed throughout.

 

  Reveal hidden contents
Posted

Saw it tonight, some thoughts

 

  Reveal hidden contents
Posted

Going to see it again this morning. Perhaps it's one of those films that needs a second viewing, like Man of Steel? I'm not too sure yet, it currently stands at a 7/10 for myself.

Posted
  Cube said:
Saw it tonight, some thoughts

 

  Reveal hidden contents
Posted
  MindFreak said:
Bar a few of the points (soundtrack was quite alright but didn't pay much attention to it to be honest), I think we pretty much agree on this.

 

I must also say that giving this movie 1/10 is just wrong. Almost no movie deserves this score in my opinion. That is neglecting everything that the movie actually did quite alright and just being angry with it, putting emotion before objectivity and reasoning in a review and judgement.

 

But that's fair. As a medium it's supposed to make you feel, so if you feel angry than you can score it how you see fit. I'm not judging it critically, I'm judging it how it felt to me personally. So 1/10 is fair.

 

Sure, by all means disagree, but it still holds steady at a 1 for me for ruining what meant something to me.

Posted

Finally got around to seeing this today. It was ok.

Dragged a bit too much.

Thought it'd work better without Batman. He was a bit pointless and shit, really. The film stalled whenever it went to a Batman scene.

Then when it came to Batman v Superman:

 

  Reveal hidden contents
Posted

I saw this again and I'm now in love with the film. It flew by the second time around...I could have easily sat through double the running time.

 

There's one thing I missed out on first time around that I feel helps me appreciate Lex a lot more:

 

  Reveal hidden contents
Posted
  Reveal hidden contents
Posted
  Ashley said:
  Reveal hidden contents
Posted

I've seen it yesterday and I don't know what to say. I loved the acting, I think that they were really good, I like most of the scenes as scenes, but I don't like how it was connected.

 

I didn't like Luthers character (I like the acting, he did his job great) as he didn't make any sense to me.

 

The movie has the same problem as Marvel with the stand alone films, but I'll have to live with that.

Posted

I saw the film yesterday; after reading some of the comments in here (while trying to avoid most spoilers), I was expecting a train wreck... but it didn't end up being all that bad. I quite enjoyed it. :)

 

  Reveal hidden contents
Posted
  kav82 said:
Lex's motivations were understandable but Eisenburg did a horrific job portraying him! Truly horrific!

 

  Reveal hidden contents
Posted

I finally got to see it last night. Screw the haters, I thought it was great!

 

  Reveal hidden contents
Posted
  kav82 said:
Lex's motivations were understandable but Eisenburg did a horrific job portraying him! Truly horrific!

 

I'm not usually a fan of Eisenberg, but I loved what he did here. He made the Lex character his own.

 

  Hero-of-Time said:
I finally got to see it last night. Screw the haters, I thought it was great!

 

  Reveal hidden contents
Posted
  Fierce_LiNk said:
I'm not usually a fan of Eisenberg, but I loved what he did here. He made the Lex character his own...

 

He definitely did, but unfortunately it was a pile of his own excrement that he made.

 

 

I mostly think those that like it are easily pleased. I just don't see how anyone could consider this any good... I just can't see it at all. ::shrug:

Posted
  kav82 said:
He definitely did, but unfortunately it was a pile of his own excrement that he made.

 

 

I mostly think those that like it are easily pleased. I just don't see how anyone could consider this any good... I just can't see it at all. ::shrug:

 

I tried to share my point through a spoiler tag, but alas.

 

Jesse Eisenberg isn't playing Lex from the comics, he's playing Lex Luthor Jr. Yes, they have similar names and similar stories, but they clearly aren't like-for-like.

 

I'm still on the fence. Jesse's portrayal was good of the character he was given, but it clearly isn't Lex, but that isn't a problem that should be directed at Jesse but in fact at the casting director. This guy was lined up to play Jimmy Olsen and Cranston was in line to be Lex.

Posted
  Julius Caesar said:
I tried to share my point through a spoiler tag, but alas.

 

Jesse Eisenberg isn't playing Lex from the comics, he's playing Lex Luthor Jr. Yes, they have similar names and similar stories, but they clearly aren't like-for-like.

 

I'm still on the fence. Jesse's portrayal was good of the character he was given, but it clearly isn't Lex, but that isn't a problem that should be directed at Jesse but in fact at the casting director. This guy was lined up to play Jimmy Olsen and Cranston was in line to be Lex.

 

Yeah I saw, but it didn't stop me thinking his portayal was shit. That's what I'm getting at, not just because he's playing Luthor, but because it's a terrible performance for any sort of villain.

Hell, any sort of role, it was hammy, it was off, it was annoying, it was so bad.

Posted

I just found it so grating! From the tone of his voice, his mannerisms, even his rambling dialogue, I REALLY disliked everything about it.

Plus it did feel very hammy, like he was trying too hard and went a little over the top.

Posted

This Lex made sense to me as someone who just had the rug swept up from him by the appearance of the Superman. And basically everything happens in the film because of him. People have compared him to the Joker, but Joker was just an agent of anarchy – Lex on the other hand has everything planned. And contingencies, too. Except he never really plans to come up against someone like Steppenwolf or Darkseid. And he fails at tipping Batman or Superman over the edge...because they're Batman and Superman.

 

I didn't think the descent into madness worked. With the deleted scene being the only thing that really makes that start to make sense. If there was, or is more of that, in the Ultimate cut I'll be happy.

 

I don't think a stoic Lex makes much sense in this film's context. I think we'll see the character change over time, though. I think we'll eventually see him run for president.

Posted
  Happenstance said:
Yeah it was just a crap performance either way. Still though, I see no reason to think that he isnt the Lex from the comics just because his father has the same name.

 

From his sharing of the Alexander name to the past with his father, as well as many of the events outlined in that promotional interview, they've tried to make it pretty clear that he isn't Lex Luthor, like-for-like, from the comics, from his intellect to the way he acts, to his physicality, and so on.


×
×
  • Create New...