Jump to content
N-Europe

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
Sony will probably be releasing Neo about 3.5 to 4 years after the original PS4.

 

Since the Pro is likely out this November, it would make 3 years.

 

Which is quite long enough between hardware releases, if you ask me.

Edited by Daft
  • Replies 253
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

I always think of it as a game in itself, finding which thread the argument has moved to! :D

 

Personally I couldn't give a toss about being "shafted" by the Neo. My PS4 works great, I don't have a 4K TV and am able to play all the games on what I've got.

Posted
Worth a read @Ronnie, it may ease any annoyance about Neo.

 

Very interesting read.

 

Personally, I enjoy having the clutter and different consoles kicking about, just like I enjoy physical goods over digital. I like looking at a game or console on the shelf and getting an instant nostalgic feeling, something that just isn't the same when looking at the same game but in digital form.

Posted

The only thing that interests, and will annoy, me is how the Neo will effect competitive online multiplayer gaming. If it gives Neo gamers an advantage, then I'd be pissed off.

Posted
The only thing that interests, and will annoy, me is how the Neo will effect competitive online multiplayer gaming. If it gives Neo gamers an advantage, then I'd be pissed off.

 

I wonder how that stuff works now with PCs. Given that the PC platform is probably the more used when it comes to eSports and competitive gaming it either must not cause that much hassle or a solution is around.

Posted
The only thing that interests, and will annoy, me is how the Neo will effect competitive online multiplayer gaming. If it gives Neo gamers an advantage, then I'd be pissed off.

But this is what PC gamers have had for years, except they have to manage their own options.

 

If a game is optimised to run at 60fps on the Neo, but the standard system can't manage that, then I assume it will have to have a reduced-visuals mode so that standard PS4 players can have the same experience.

 

If developers don't want to deal with this discrepancy, I imagine they'll just limit the framerate in multiplayer to the lowest common denominator.

Posted
But this is what PC gamers have had for years, except they have to manage their own options.

 

If a game is optimised to run at 60fps on the Neo, but the standard system can't manage that, then I assume it will have to have a reduced-visuals mode so that standard PS4 players can have the same experience.

 

If developers don't want to deal with this discrepancy, I imagine they'll just limit the framerate in multiplayer to the lowest common denominator.

 

Which is why I've always gamed on console. I prefer the generational set up so that I don't need to faff around with upgrades etc.

If Sony are looking to rid consoles of generations (as such) then I'd probably end up going to PC going forward.

 

Although as I have a PS4, I hope that something is done to keep online gaming a level playing field this "gen".

Posted

The big story for me isn't the NEO, it's the Slim. It's the console that will lead the line for PS4 in the coming years and if they can release it for a competitive price, they'll continue to get closer and closer to the 100m sales mark.

 

As for PS4K, people are being way too dramatic over it. It's not replacing the PS4 Slim, it will exist alongside it and it will also cost a LOT more (we'll find out the exact amount today). The only way that this could ever be a bad thing for the industry is if Sony somehow sold about 70m NEO consoles within 12 months, because that would make 3rd parties build games around that spec first, dragging down performance on the slim or OG. Of course, this won't happen because the Slim will likely sell significantly more units than it.

 

It's a luxury product for those that want it. It doesn't effect anyone that doesn't purchase it.

Posted
The big story for me isn't the NEO, it's the Slim. It's the console that will lead the line for PS4 in the coming years and if they can release it for a competitive price, they'll continue to get closer and closer to the 100m sales mark.

 

How much do you think the Slim will cost? It's a bit stupid to speculate because we'll probably know in 3 hours but still :D

 

You can get a 500GB PS4 for 300€ in Germany in certain places. So a 250€ price point would be reasonable?

Posted
How much do you think the Slim will cost? It's a bit stupid to speculate because we'll probably know in 3 hours but still :D

 

You can get a 500GB PS4 for 300€ in Germany in certain places. So a 250€ price point would be reasonable?

 

Well you can get a Xbox One Slim for £249 with FIFA here in the UK, and you can currently buy the OG PS4 with games for well under £199 (likely due to the incoming Slim). Given Sony's track record I can see it being available for around £199/£229, which would give them huge sales going forward.

 

As for the NEO, I expect something around £349/399. Let's see :)

Posted
Which is why I've always gamed on console. I prefer the generational set up so that I don't need to faff around with upgrades etc.

If Sony are looking to rid consoles of generations (as such) then I'd probably end up going to PC going forward.

My point wasn't about upgrading hardware but more that you don't really see people claiming that multiplayer gaming is "unfair" because their system isn't as good.

Posted
My point wasn't about upgrading hardware but more that you don't really see people claiming that multiplayer gaming is "unfair" because their system isn't as good.

 

But I was speaking of myself, not others. As I said, it's what I'm interested in.


×
×
  • Create New...