Jump to content
N-Europe

Iwata Re-Elected as Nintendo President


Serebii

Recommended Posts

I don't think you'd find one person who in their heart of hearts believed SMK was more accessible or noob friendly than MK Wii. Genuinely seemed like Serebii was dismissing an entire post (note he called it bullshit, yet you called me out) based on a nuance within the game, which didn't even discredit the point I was making. He was just being awkward.

 

Of course not, but in the context of 1992, with the games available, in relative terms they could be considered in the same place in terms of accessibility.

 

Equally, as that judgement is based on personal experience, opinions and ideas....

It could lead to an interesting thread possibly, I guess

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 83
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Genuinely seemed like Serebii was dismissing an entire post (note that he called it bullshit) based on a nuance within the game, which didn't even discredit the point I was making. He was just being awkward.

 

Serebii's post wasn't in good behaviour, either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

my nephew was the same, the game was too hard so it wasn't fun, he quit before he completed a single lap, then I suggested he tried playing as toad. He now chooses to play smk as often as mk8.

 

Wait until he wants to play 1500cc as a quicker character like Bowser. VERY difficult.

 

Funnily enough I only completed 100cc in SMK for the first time this year...owned it for 5 years but just couldn't nail star cup! Damn you, Vanilla Dome lol.

 

Edit. Oh and thanks H-o-T for your fantastic post on the previous page..anyone who thinks the GC and N64 failed because of their power and targeting western gamers is missing a lot of info.

Edited by Goron_3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Edit. Oh and thanks H-o-T for your fantastic post on the previous page..anyone who thinks the GC and N64 failed because of their power and targeting western gamers is missing a lot of info.

 

One thing that should be noted regarding this topic is that Nintendo's lack of success with those consoles, while it didn't happen because of their power, it happened despite it.

 

Nintendo has other problems it needs to address, but power isn't a problem solver, either (at least not by itself). If Nintendo can address its issues with online, westernization, marketing, etc. then it can succeed despite console power, too.

 

I like Bosman's comparison with a clumsy elephant doing their own thing, finding their successes in ways that other companies can't, because it's not only true now, it has always been true in so many ways.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Iwatas approval went up 3%, everyone else's went down by various amounts.

 

Miyamotos dropped by 6%. I guess they also weren't impressed by his E3 offerings. :D

 

Interesting that everyone else has dropped but Iwata has went up. Some are speculating that maybe the blame is now being spread out across the board, rather than just pinning it in Iwata.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Iwatas approval went up 3%, everyone else's went down by various amounts.

 

Miyamotos dropped by 6%. I guess they also weren't impressed by his E3 offerings. :D

 

Interesting that everyone else has dropped but Iwata has went up. Some are speculating that maybe the blame is now being spread out across the board, rather than just pinning it in Iwata.

 

I can't imagine all of Nintendo's failings can be down to a singular individual in such a large company. The other big wigs have to take collective responsibility.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Iwatas approval went up 3%, everyone else's went down by various amounts.

 

Miyamotos dropped by 6%. I guess they also weren't impressed by his E3 offerings. :D

 

Interesting that everyone else has dropped but Iwata has went up. Some are speculating that maybe the blame is now being spread out across the board, rather than just pinning it in Iwata.

People say this as if an 80%+ approval rating across the board is a bad thing. It's not that common in big companies.

Edited by Serebii
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't imagine all of Nintendo's failings can be down to a singular individual in such a large company. The other big wigs have to take collective responsibility.

 

I can see both sides of the argument. Some would agree with you, while others would say seeing as he's in change he is responsible for the company as a whole.

 

Either way i'm not really fussed. Everyone is still in the same positions. Whether this is a good thing remains to be seen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

These circular arguments involving un-definable words and concepts like "Hardcore gamer" and "Mature audience" are nonsensical and I can't believe they are still on going.

 

While it's impossible to draw a pin-sharp line between core and casual, mature and children, these terms aren't nonsense.

These are terms used by people within the game business, from developers to publishers to marketing. When developing a game, you need to target an audience, and make the whole experience catered towards that audience.

 

And I think that Miyamoto's reduced approval is so slight, I'd call it within a reasonable error margin. It is sad to see a legend like Miyamoto working on these cheap-feeling minigames, rather than trying to push the bounds of the videogame medium.

Edited by Hogge
Link to comment
Share on other sites

While it's impossible to draw a pin-sharp line between core and casual, mature and children, these terms aren't nonsense.

These are terms used by people within the game business, from developers to publishers to marketing. When developing a game, you need to target an audience, and make the whole experience catered towards that audience.

 

And I think that Miyamoto's reduced approval is so slight, I'd call it within a reasonable error margin. It is sad to see a legend like Miyamoto working on these cheap-feeling minigames, rather than trying to push the bounds of the videogame medium.

You could argue that that is what he is doing. Not everything is about story.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah worrying about the state of the industry based on GAF posts is like worrying about the potential for cancer based on The Daily Mail.

Wait, you mean that crossing the road when not at the crossing doesn't cause cancer?

 

Well damn...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Work at home, get bored in the day. What do you expect me to do? Go outside? Pah.

 

That's not really what I'm getting at. (Although, go outside. Bournemouth's weather is great this time of year, it all comes alive) If I was getting wound up by stuff that somebody or someplace was posting, I'd either stop reading it and ignore it or learn to live with it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's not really what I'm getting at. (Although, go outside. Bournemouth's weather is great this time of year, it all comes alive) If I was getting wound up by stuff that somebody or someplace was posting, I'd either stop reading it and ignore it or learn to live with it.

 

Basically this.

 

I would laugh if people on Neogaf read Serebii's posts on N-E and make the exact same comments over there.

 

"Have you heard this one about Serebii and earthquakes..."

 

:shakehead

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's not really what I'm getting at. (Although, go outside. Bournemouth's weather is great this time of year, it all comes alive) If I was getting wound up by stuff that somebody or someplace was posting, I'd either stop reading it and ignore it or learn to live with it.

Don't know where you're getting that I was getting wound up by it. All I said was that people were serious in saying similar things on GAF.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


×
×
  • Create New...