Jump to content
N-Europe

Recommended Posts

Posted
  somme said:
  Reveal hidden contents
Posted
  Reveal hidden contents
Posted

Popped in to see this yesterday, i enjoyed it. To me though, it wasn't as good as the original trilogy but was a lot better than the prequel trilogy. Only had a few niggles, which were

 

  Reveal hidden contents
Posted

Luke never flew an X-Wing before Yavin as far as I'm aware, plus Obi Wan's training was pretty short and shitty yet he seemed to use the Force enough to destroy the Death Star - I'm not sure what people are having a gripe about, because it certainly wasn't explained how/why in A New Hope.

Posted

I've found these days that people like to think just enough to ruin it for themselves. If they thought a little more they could work out these "plot holes" for themselves, and if they thought a little less they wouldn't even realise.

 

There may well be a very good reason for Rey being so attuned with the force. Remember Anakin? He flew that podracer pretty well for a sport no other human could do, and he could pilot a fighter at the age of what, 10?

 

When Rey got out of that cell she could hardly believe it worked herself, she later said to Finn when he asked how she escaped, "I can't explain it." She'd obviously heard myths about Jedi mind tricks and about how they did them but didn't really expect it to work.

 

Who knows, a lot of this could be beginners luck. The harder she tries in the next film, the harder it may be for her to pull off.

Posted

I'm with you guys, it was never considered in previous films, Luke flew a T-16 skyhopper and shot womprats (no bigger than 1m) in a new hope, then became an expert X-wing pilot in the length of time it took them to get to Yavin IV

Anakin was equally skilled thru the force with technology

I have no issue with Rey being able to fly or tap into the force once she'd awakened to the force

Posted
  somme said:
Remember Anakin? He flew that podracer pretty well for a sport no other human could do, and he could pilot a fighter at the age of what, 10?

Yeah - Because of "Jedi reflexes", which I think is a bit of a cop-out. Flying a spaceship looks more faster and complicated.

 

The explanation behind being able to pilot a ship was due to his fapping about in Watto's workshop - he did built Threepio after all, so he is familiar with various technology. Rey could be as well, it just did fuck all about establishing any backstory.

  somme said:
I've found these days that people like to think just enough to ruin it for themselves.

I think because I'm not thinking about it enough is why I'm finding the film all "meh".

Posted

Rey found a flight simulator on one of her scavenging runs. She had a lot of practice in that.

 

That bit of backstory isn't important to the story, so they left it for other media to tell.

Posted (edited)

I have to say that the film does hold up well on a second viewing (went to see it again a few days ago).

 

The sheer amount of plot convinience still peeves me something fierce, but it's still a very fun watch. I'm still not a fan of the lightning fast pace of the movie, but it flows well and the script/acting/dialogue is really so very on point! It's great!

 

Yeah it's basically a remake of A New Hope with some choice bits from ESB and ROTJ sprinkled in for good measure, but it's still good on its own merits. Still feels like a fan movie (which makes sense, considering that it basically is), but it's a very good one.

 

Hope that Episode 8 actually takes its time to explain things better and establish more of the worlds/characters/lore before diving into the action though. It can stand to slow down a bit now that we have the ball rolling I reckon!

Edited by Dcubed
Posted
  EEVILMURRAY said:
Yeah - Because of "Jedi reflexes", which I think is a bit of a cop-out. Flying a spaceship looks more faster and complicated.

 

The explanation behind being able to pilot a ship was due to his fapping about in Watto's workshop - he did built Threepio after all, so he is familiar with various technology. Rey could be as well, it just did fuck all about establishing any backstory.

 

I think because I'm not thinking about it enough is why I'm finding the film all "meh".

 

Well that's down to you, not the film.

 

NYE was pretty great for me, as the bell struck midnight we played the "medal ceremony" music from A New Hope. That was pretty cool. :D

Posted
  Emasher said:
  Reveal hidden contents
Posted

We saw this for a second time. This time, on New Year's Eve with a few of our good friends to celebrate one of their birthdays.

 

I definitely feel that I enjoyed the film more the second time around. I'd had time to digest the plot and new characters and I think you always enjoy the story better the second time around because you're less tense about "what's going to happen next?" and can just sit back and enjoy things more.

 

  Reveal hidden contents
Posted

I've now seen it three times' probably a couple more to come. Absolutely love it...

 

  Reveal hidden contents
Posted
  dazzybee said:
I've now seen it three times' probably a couple more to come. Absolutely love it...

 

  Reveal hidden contents
Posted

Bizarre. Game of thrones is 90% awful performances :) And yeah, 1 dimensional panto villain Hux would maybe fit in in the original trilogy. But in this film, when the characters are so much more complex, he stands out a mile.

Posted
  dazzybee said:
Bizarre. Game of thrones is 90% awful performances :) And yeah, 1 dimensional panto villain Hux would maybe fit in in the original trilogy. But in this film, when the characters are so much more complex, he stands out a mile.

 

It really isn't.

 

And I think you mean two-dimensional. One-dimensionality exists only in theory as a mathematical value. ;)

Posted
  somme said:
It really isn't.

 

And I think you mean two-dimensional. One-dimensionality exists only in theory as a mathematical value. ;)

 

Two dimensional is giving him one dimension too many :)

 

PS You're wrong on the meaning of one dimensional

Posted (edited)
  dazzybee said:
Bizarre. Game of thrones is 90% awful performances :) And yeah, 1 dimensional panto villain Hux would maybe fit in in the original trilogy. But in this film, when the characters are so much more complex, he stands out a mile.

 

Not sure if srs. I reckon you must be having us on here. :D

 

Edit: I'm willing to bet that the cast of Game of Thrones have won tons of acting awards. Probably over a hundred nominations. Never heard anyone call the acting awful before! Lena Headey alone is fantastic.

Edited by Fierce_LiNk
Posted
  Dcubed said:
I have to say that the film does hold up well on a second viewing (went to see it again a few days ago).

Agree to a degree, mainly because I knew what was going to happen and nothing new was going to surprise/disappoint me. After reading the IMDb trivia after watching it the first time (a tradition I do after nearly every film I watch now) and random news articles, it was nice to notice some of the quirky things I missed first time/didn't know (ie Daniel Craig.)

 

However I only went to watch it a second time because I had to take the missus with me, who had been most displeased that I had been to see it without her - even though I hadn't exactly said I would go with her in the first place. The things I do for love.

  dazzybee said:
But in this film, when the characters are so much more complex, he stands out a mile.

They're not really though.

 

Poe: Best Pilot. No other information given. Gives jacket away.

Finn: Bred in a lab. Complete pussy. Gets free jacket.

Rey: Freelance young Anakin Skywalker (in the sense that she messes with fucked up old machinery). Yes she has things unexplained, but things shrouded in mystery do not equal "complex".

 

Chewie: Raaaarrrghh.

Han Solo: Han Solo.

Princess General Leia: Doing the same thing even though it appeared to be abolished 30-or-whatever years ago - effectively pissing on the whole efforts of the original trilogy.

×
×
  • Create New...