Ellmeister Posted January 21, 2012 Posted January 21, 2012 Another crazy theory from Professor Charlie on how to catch those lonely girls in the club. Can't wait...
Mr_Odwin Posted January 21, 2012 Posted January 21, 2012 Step 1: Isolation Step 2: Persuasion Step 3: When words don't work Step 4: A hammer will
MoogleViper Posted January 21, 2012 Posted January 21, 2012 Last night, whilst unable to sleep, I developed a new theory on girls. Stay tuned for more info. I'm going to refine it whilst at work today and post it this evening. Prepare for your minds to be blown.
ReZourceman Posted January 21, 2012 Posted January 21, 2012 Oh lord, Charlie has discovered Rohypnol. Goafer, man, you just gave me a boner with that Teddy Roosevelt quote. Yeah Gofer, you just gave me a boner
Goafer Posted January 21, 2012 Posted January 21, 2012 Oh lord, Charlie has discovered Rohypnol. Or as he likes to call it "My Chemical Romance". Women of N-E, I'd get scared/offended in advance to save time.
Raining_again Posted January 21, 2012 Posted January 21, 2012 gender switch but still applicable.... he's more of a blumin wimmen than I am... >_>
EddieColeslaw Posted January 21, 2012 Posted January 21, 2012 I strongly believe that people who buy into the ladder theory/friend zone bs theories have the complete wrong mindset when it comes to ~*girls*~. Yes, girls and guys are different (physically, chemically, etc.), but they are still people. Read some Dale Carnegie, treat people (which includes subsets female people and male people) how you would like to be treated. Maybe I am just obliviously lucky in whatever way(s), but it really confuses me, how dramatic this subject can get - and the amount of theories that spin out of it, when it's just a question of dealing with people! To reiterate slightly, the comic Raining posted doesn't describe "friend zoning" - instead of latching on to the thinking of "that girl put me in the friend zone", you should think "that girl is clearly stupidly self-contradictory, or just doesn't like me. MOVING ON!". Ahem...I look forward to reviewing Charlie's theory :p
Wesley Posted January 21, 2012 Posted January 21, 2012 I can't stand the "theories" and techniques that people buy/fall into. It's just fucking dumb. If you're looking at potential relationships in that perspective then you're probably viewing the whole thing as some kinda warped game that you feel the need to play. Just be a fucking human.
EddieColeslaw Posted January 21, 2012 Posted January 21, 2012 I can't stand the "theories" and techniques that people buy/fall into. It's just fucking dumb. If you're looking at potential relationships in that perspective then you're probably viewing the whole thing as some kinda warped game that you feel the need to play. Just be a fucking human. Was it your intention to succintly summarise my messy post? (If so, well done )
Wesley Posted January 21, 2012 Posted January 21, 2012 (edited) No I'm playing a game where I copy females' posts to become more attractive to them. EDIT: I felt super creepy after saying that. I was obviously joking, I'm not into females, only little boys. *feels better* Edited January 21, 2012 by Wesley
Raining_again Posted January 21, 2012 Posted January 21, 2012 its a meme, just for shits and giggles you know :p
Wesley Posted January 21, 2012 Posted January 21, 2012 My reply was just in response to Charlie's thing really. Not the image. And not just to Charlie, but also to things "negging" and other stupid shit.
Magnus Posted January 21, 2012 Posted January 21, 2012 Relationships are a game. The only way to win is not to play.
heroicjanitor Posted January 21, 2012 Posted January 21, 2012 Whenever people mention a game lately I think of Triple H's theme song :/
MoogleViper Posted January 21, 2012 Posted January 21, 2012 Sadly we're in the friend zone because our friend's don't find us attractive. FUCKING SHALLOW BITCHES I'LL KILL THEM ALL!!!
Grazza Posted January 21, 2012 Posted January 21, 2012 Don't let them put you off, @Charlie. I want to hear your theory!
Magnus Posted January 21, 2012 Posted January 21, 2012 I want to hear Charlie's theory, too! Call it morbid curiosity.
Charlie Posted January 21, 2012 Posted January 21, 2012 I knew that would stir everything up a bit. It's not a theory on how to get girls as such, more the girl you want to find and how mathematically the girl exists. But I'm too tired and on the iPad right now.
MoogleViper Posted January 21, 2012 Posted January 21, 2012 But I'm too tired and on the iPad right now. Is that a geeky euphemism for PMT?
Charlie Posted January 21, 2012 Posted January 21, 2012 The SS Theory What this isn't: A method to get a girlfriend or significant other A method to hook up with a girl What this is: Describing the girl you need to find for a ONS The average number of sexual partners for a man is 13. The average number of sexual partners for a woman is 7 (BBC, 2012 and The Guardian, 2011). Th deficit of 6 tells me something. There must be a lot of woman out there who have significantly more than 13 sexual partners. I believe there are 2 types of these women. That girl who is *always* seeing someone or *always* in a relationship (and is absolutely not a slut). Girls who are up for a ONS. Girls who fall into category 2 are the ones that you need to try and find on a night out because you can be assured of what you'll be getting. Further research is required on how to identify said category 2 girls. I personally know of 1 girl who is definitely cat 1 and know of another who is cat 2. I also know another who is bang in the middle. From this I can make one observation; they could be anywhere! ------ Not what I'm guessing all of you were expecting as its just putting into words what others in the past have though but... Let the backlash commence! I strongly believe that people who buy into the ladder theory/friend zone bs theories have the complete wrong mindset when it comes to ~*girls*~. Yes, girls and guys are different (physically, chemically, etc.), but they are still people. Read some Dale Carnegie, treat people (which includes subsets female people and male people) how you would like to be treated. Maybe I am just obliviously lucky in whatever way(s), but it really confuses me, how dramatic this subject can get - and the amount of theories that spin out of it, when it's just a question of dealing with people! To reiterate slightly, the comic Raining posted doesn't describe "friend zoning" - instead of latching on to the thinking of "that girl put me in the friend zone", you should think "that girl is clearly stupidly self-contradictory, or just doesn't like me. MOVING ON!". Ahem...I look forward to reviewing Charlie's theory :p I can't stand the "theories" and techniques that people buy/fall into. It's just fucking dumb. If you're looking at potential relationships in that perspective then you're probably viewing the whole thing as some kinda warped game that you feel the need to play. Just be a fucking human. I never have said, and never will say, my theories and tips are to get a girlfriend because they're absolutely not. The majority are based on basic psychology. Whether you like it or not, your mind does work this way and does fall for these 'tricks'. Personally, I wouldn't describe myself as a 'player' at all and wouldnt think that anyone else does either. I like going out, having a good time, talking to girls and see what happens. Anything I say in this thread on the matter is very obviously meant to be in jest and taken lightly. Although one masterful tip I will leave for you, @Serebii, is always dance with your back to th DJ booth (or wherever the majority of the lights are coming from). It will make your head silhouetted and shut out any bad features (a few spots, in my case) and only show your positives.
chairdriver Posted January 21, 2012 Posted January 21, 2012 The average number of sexual partners for a man is 13. lol, that's comically small.
heroicjanitor Posted January 21, 2012 Posted January 21, 2012 What the difference tells me is that guys either exaggerate their number, or girls pretend they had less, or both.
EddieColeslaw Posted January 21, 2012 Posted January 21, 2012 @Charlie, my post wasn't directed at you. It's just that when you mentioned you had a theory, I was reminded of my dislike for past "theories" I've read (there are official sites for them). I absolutely did not mean to direct any of my annoyance at you, before you even posted your theory (and I'm not ignorant enough to pass judgement on people I don't even know)
Eenuh Posted January 21, 2012 Posted January 21, 2012 Now I feel like a weirdo with just my 2 partners... Not even 2 at the same time.
Recommended Posts