MoogleViper Posted November 19, 2007 Share Posted November 19, 2007 It's borh of your fault so if they are asking for the money then give them half of it. Can't say fairer than that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daft Posted November 19, 2007 Share Posted November 19, 2007 I think its mainly Party A's fault simply because Party A had more input into the whole scenario. Party B's act, an act without intent, was simply the last part to the equation. Verdict: Technoslaughter *proceeds to look for a not guilty gif...* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rummy Posted November 19, 2007 Share Posted November 19, 2007 Hahaha, what an excellent thread through the efforts of Daft! Personally though, I'd say blame lies with both parties, but in the end I would put the blame on Party B as it was Party B's actions that directly caused the incidence, whereas Party A's actions led to the scenario, Party B actually made it happen. I think Party A was negligent to not consider the risks of said wobbly draws and pint of water in relation to the phone though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest bluey Posted November 19, 2007 Share Posted November 19, 2007 judge judy would say it was B's fault... but phoenix wright would say A... and since i like phoenix wright more than judge judy - i'ma say: *tickertape* (http://www.court-records.net/manga/JFAmanualENG1.jpg) *behind the scenes:* Missile: wuf wuf ruf woof awoooo!* *= ehehe i got away with it - teh foolz!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strider Posted November 19, 2007 Share Posted November 19, 2007 Well i say it's party A's fault. If they we're daft enough to leave it there in the first place they deserve for it to fall. Oh and has it been dried out? I dropped my phone in water and it started working again after a while of being on the radiator. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jonnas Posted November 19, 2007 Share Posted November 19, 2007 Party A's fault. If he left the phone in potential danger, it's his fault he left it there, specially while knowing somebody else used said drawer frequently. Unless the glass was small. If the phone fell on a small glass of water, it was an unlucky accident and no one should be blamed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tapedeck Posted November 20, 2007 Share Posted November 20, 2007 Both parties should do the obvious: Put this despute behind them by... "BOTH PAYING HALF FOR A NEW PHONE" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McPhee Posted November 20, 2007 Share Posted November 20, 2007 It's party B's fault. Sure party A should have been more careful with his/her stuff, but party B was the catalyst. The fact that such detail is put in to how it could be party A's fault and so little is put in to how it could be party B's fault (i.e. the whole 'how the phone actually fell off' bit) makes me think that Rez knows party B is to blame but hopes to influence the opinions stated in this thread. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Supergrunch Posted November 20, 2007 Share Posted November 20, 2007 And yeah, it's party A's fault. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ReZourceman Posted November 20, 2007 Author Share Posted November 20, 2007 It's party B's fault. Sure party A should have been more careful with his/her stuff, but party B was the catalyst. The fact that such detail is put in to how it could be party A's fault and so little is put in to how it could be party B's fault (i.e. the whole 'how the phone actually fell off' bit) makes me think that Rez knows party B is to blame but hopes to influence the opinions stated in this thread. Nah, I thought it was obvious how it fell off. As I closed the draw (made of friction tastic straw) the thing wobbled and it fell off. Also you cant call me the catalyst ; a person or thing acting as the stimulus in bringing about or hastening a result Both parties were catalysts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EEVILMURRAY Posted November 20, 2007 Share Posted November 20, 2007 Party B could have done it to prove a point to Party A that the stability was inaccurate, thus was a casuality of war to save something much more valuable being broken. Party A should be thanking you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cube Posted November 20, 2007 Share Posted November 20, 2007 Both parties were catalysts. Party A was the chemical reaction Party B was the catalyst, and simply sped up what would have happened. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Charlie Posted November 20, 2007 Share Posted November 20, 2007 Party B. Put it this way, is it the builders fault that the terrorists knocked over their building by flying a plane into it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ReZourceman Posted November 20, 2007 Author Share Posted November 20, 2007 Party B. Put it this way, is it the builders fault that the terrorists knocked over their building by flying a plane into it? ....So...Im a terrorist? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jonnas Posted November 20, 2007 Share Posted November 20, 2007 Party A was the chemical reaction Party B was the catalyst, and simply sped up what would have happened. Therefore, Party B is the scapegoat for something that's Party A's fault to begin with. Put it this way, is it the builders fault that the terrorists knocked over their building by flying a plane into it? [ATTACH]1687[/ATTACH] ReZ would be a terrorist if he dropped the phone on purpose. Better analogy: If a building suddenly collapses because a vital (but weak) pillar fell, is the guilty party: -The normal guy who ran into the weaker pillar by accident; -The lousy engineer that didn't think such a vital pillar should be stronger. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ReZourceman Posted November 20, 2007 Author Share Posted November 20, 2007 The above post FTW. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dyson Posted November 20, 2007 Share Posted November 20, 2007 I wanted to be a part of things, sorry. Lmao at Protesto. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daft Posted November 20, 2007 Share Posted November 20, 2007 I wanted to be a part of things, sorry. Lmao at Protesto. Another random interruption like that and you'll be held in contempt of court!! I just wanted to be part of things as well!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MoogleViper Posted November 20, 2007 Share Posted November 20, 2007 It's borh of your fault so if they are asking for the money then give them half of it. Can't say fairer than that. Both parties should do the obvious: Put this despute behind them by... "BOTH PAYING HALF FOR A NEW PHONE" De ja vu? Am I invisible? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McPhee Posted November 20, 2007 Share Posted November 20, 2007 Nah, I thought it was obvious how it fell off. As I closed the draw (made of friction tastic straw) the thing wobbled and it fell off. Also you cant call me the catalyst ; a person or thing acting as the stimulus in bringing about or hastening a result Both parties were catalysts. Party B was the stimulus. The situation was already set up, but without the actions of Party B nothing would have happened. The phone can't fall by itself. Sure, Party A was pretty stupid to leave his/her phone there, but it was Party B's actions that created an incident. Without action by Party B the phone may never have fallen and may never have broken. Both parties are at fault, but the responsibility for the incident falls to party B Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daft Posted November 20, 2007 Share Posted November 20, 2007 Both parties are at fault, but the responsibility for the incident falls to party B Surely Party A is responsible for looking after their own phone. Party A should be charged for negligence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ReZourceman Posted November 20, 2007 Author Share Posted November 20, 2007 Both parties are at fault, but the responsibility for the incident falls to party B Isnt that an oxymoron? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stalin Posted November 20, 2007 Share Posted November 20, 2007 This thread is full of gay. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr_Odwin Posted November 20, 2007 Share Posted November 20, 2007 This thread is full of gay. Yellow Infraction issued. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stalin Posted November 20, 2007 Share Posted November 20, 2007 You sure like giving out infractions don't you Odwin? ****. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts