Blackfox Posted October 19, 2005 Posted October 19, 2005 I was browsing around on another forum and came across this site. Its pretty interesting to read. It has videos and testimonies of people who basically say that the Twin Towers didn't collaspe through the aircarft - they were brought down by a different explosion... Now, i know its sound a bit wacko-conspiracy theorist, but some of the articles do provide to be compelling reading. And has certainly made me wonder. While Im on the topic, there is this site and this animation. All seem pretty convincing. So what do you guys think? Conspiracy wackos, or was 9/11 something fabricated and carried out by the US in order to jusify a war? Opinions please.
Marshmellow Posted October 19, 2005 Posted October 19, 2005 i think thier crazy and planes did cause the towers to fall... but of course i didnt read the links
Raining_again Posted October 19, 2005 Posted October 19, 2005 ooo thats actually really interesting! yeah i wondered how it managed to fall perfectly but i think it was on tv that it was designed to fall like that so it didnt take the surrounding buildings with it. i love a good conspiracy tho
Cube Posted October 19, 2005 Posted October 19, 2005 Well, they would of had to sneak in explosives to a load of different places (of which they would have to work out exactly), without been noticed. Also making shure that noone noticed them (Public or not). Also, the buildings had some design flaws, which was the cause of the collapse The pentagon is a different story tho...
Ramar Posted October 19, 2005 Posted October 19, 2005 Not convinced about the World Trade Centres, but after watching the animation of the Pentagon, have different views on the situation. I never did know much about what happened at the Pentagon. I just assumed by the tv and newspaper articles that a plane hit it, the animation leaves me to believe otherwise.
Guest Jordan Posted October 19, 2005 Posted October 19, 2005 Conspiracy theories, i ignore most simply because there is other back up evidance as to why its true. But this guy has some real points, i mean that building shouldn't have fallen so fast. And yeah, have you ever seen such a neat hole in the pentagon? Remember, America is incredibly corrupt in places.
Mr_Odwin Posted October 19, 2005 Posted October 19, 2005 Remember, America is incredibly corrupt in places. It's true! I read it on the internet.
Jon Posted October 19, 2005 Posted October 19, 2005 I like a good conspiracy theory, but even I sturggle to belive that. Although With the pentagon thats a different matter.
RoadKill Posted October 19, 2005 Posted October 19, 2005 I've seen videos of these theories ages ago.
The3rdChildren Posted October 19, 2005 Posted October 19, 2005 Interesting theories, although I think it's a bit tasteless to doubt what really happened when so many lives were lost.
|Laguna| Posted October 19, 2005 Posted October 19, 2005 Gotta love conspiracy. Oh and the mysertys behind WHY 9/11? Mohammed's birth is celebrated on the 11th day of the 9th month September 11th is the 254th day of the year: 2 + 5 + 4 = 11. After September 11th there are 111 days left to the end of the year. 119 is the area code to Iraq/Iran. 1 + 1 + 9 = 11. Twin Towers - standing side by side, looks like the number 11. The number of stories is 110 (2x) 110 - 110 Remember that the zero "0" is not a number, so we have 11:11 The number of Tower windows = 21,800 2+1+8+0+0 = 11 The third building #7 to fall had 47 stories = 4+7=11 The first plane to hit the towers was Flight 11 American Airlines number1-800-245-0999 1+8+0+0+2+4+5+0+9+9+9=47 = 11 State of New York - The 11th State added to the Union etc
Charlie Posted October 19, 2005 Posted October 19, 2005 I heard about the missile theory a couple of years ago and I believe it. A 757 would've made a much bigger hole in the Pentagon.
Guest Offerman Posted October 19, 2005 Posted October 19, 2005 I don't believe any of these theorys. I'm not surprised the buildings collapsed so soon, infact I'm surprised they lasted that long. When your talking of a Boeing 757 that weights between 100 to 125 Metric Tonnes, depending on its load and the fact its doing about 180-200 MPH; considering it had just lost alot of height. Then you are talking about such a force it takes some serious maths to even comprehend it. Seriously, very few structures that man could build could withstand a plane hitting it - infact I think it will take a very long time before man could build something that could withstand this.
Grebe Posted October 19, 2005 Posted October 19, 2005 So Blackfox, you're for the war, yet you condemn the twin towers attack? Racist
Gaijin von Snikbah Posted October 19, 2005 Posted October 19, 2005 I dont think president Bush, or the US government, would have dared to commit such a conspiracy. I find it highly unlikely.
mario114 Posted October 19, 2005 Posted October 19, 2005 It's a load of rubbish, who could actually belive that stuff.
Blackfox Posted October 19, 2005 Author Posted October 19, 2005 So Blackfox, you're for the war, yet you condemn the twin towers attack? Racist Not really. I was for the war but now i belive it was a whole waste of time. As for the towers i have mixed feelings. I sympathise with the families to those who were lost, yet find it ironic that companies based in those towers helped cause yet more poverty in the third world. (World Bank, IMF etc) Im still open minded about the towers, but the Pentagon one is just too patchy to believe that terrorists crashed into it.
Ramar Posted October 19, 2005 Posted October 19, 2005 So Blackfox, you're for the war, yet you condemn the twin towers attack? Racist Racist.. wtf.. how on earth does that make him racist?..
Bowser57 Posted October 19, 2005 Posted October 19, 2005 Racist.. wtf.. how on earth does that make him racist?.. For you to even say such a thing you're clearly a racist yourself.
Charlie Posted October 19, 2005 Posted October 19, 2005 It's a load of rubbish, who could actually belive that stuff. Me............. (15)
Raining_again Posted October 19, 2005 Posted October 19, 2005 its not like they are ...."ZOMG so planned they all out to get us oh noess!11!!!!!" they actually made quite a well thought out theory IMO, they gave plenty of reasoning and vids/reports etc. i dont know whether to believe it or not, i think i might sit on the fence....for now.
Grebe Posted October 19, 2005 Posted October 19, 2005 Not really. I was for the war but now i belive it was a whole waste of time. As for the towers i have mixed feelings. I sympathise with the families to those who were lost, yet find it ironic that companies based in those towers helped cause yet more poverty in the third world. (World Bank, IMF etc) Im still open minded about the towers, but the Pentagon one is just too patchy to believe that terrorists crashed into it. 'Fcuk-ing' Racist
dabookerman Posted October 19, 2005 Posted October 19, 2005 i dont agree with the war...because...thsi country needs sotrin out first, then you can invade who the hell u want for all i care:P
Recommended Posts