Iun Posted November 10, 2011 Posted November 10, 2011 (edited) For the first time in a while I'm quite looking forward to the games. Firstly because we get to see Spain in all their free flowing glory and secondly I've managed to score free tickets to the Sweden game by schmoozing the boss. Someone pass Fresh the Kleenex....ew. Anyway, hear that the naming rights to St James' Park re up for grabs. It's a terrible shame that it has gone so far that we need to seek financial stability through renaming the oldest stadium in the north. But, such is the nature of the times. Edited November 10, 2011 by Iun
MadDog Posted November 10, 2011 Posted November 10, 2011 Spain are going to destroy us. 3/4-0 i think.
Mokong Posted November 10, 2011 Posted November 10, 2011 I'm fully hyped for the internationals as always, especially seeing as Ireland are in the damned play-offs. Will be glued to the TV Friday evening for the 1st leg in Estonia, then I got tickets for the 2nd leg in Dublin... WOOT. Kinda hoping for a 1 - 1 draw in the 1st leg to add some extra excitement for the 2nd leg (And hopfully extra amazing celebrations if we do qualify) Though I had a dream last night the 1st leg ended 2 - 0 to Ireland
Zell Posted November 10, 2011 Posted November 10, 2011 This Luton fan clearly isn't very happy with his team's performance this year. http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Luton-Town-season-ticket-/190597986818?pt=UK_SportsMemorabilia_Football_Memorabilia_ET&hash=item2c60867a02#ht_525wt_1139&clk_rvr_id=281777309881&clk_rvr_id=282368751384 Make sure you read the description.
Charlie Posted November 10, 2011 Posted November 10, 2011 Someone pass Fresh the Kleenex....ew. Anyway, hear that the naming rights to St James' Park re up for grabs. It's a terrible shame that it has gone so far that we need to seek financial stability through renaming the oldest stadium in the north. But, such is the nature of the times. I can't think of any reason other than nostalgia why people would think renaming their stadium is a bad idea. It's basically free money. Who cares what it's called? Every Newcastle will still call it St James' Park. Renaming the stadium will give the club a lot of money which can be reinvested into the team.
jayseven Posted November 11, 2011 Posted November 11, 2011 Just finished my shift at the Community Centre stadium, where it was an England U19 international against Denmark. It's farily impressive for a few reasons; AmEx stadium is only 6 months old, yet it's hosting international-level (kinda) games - something many, many other stadiums cannot boast. It also had the biggest crowd for an U19 squad for a couple of decades - and our 2nd-biggest crowd since the opening game. No idea what the score was, but the 'fans' were a fine bunch of arseholes who clearly didn't go to see much football. Tickets were like 50p each or something ridiculous. Monster of a shift. Arg.
Mokong Posted November 11, 2011 Posted November 11, 2011 (edited) COME ON IRELAND 3 - 0 up with 25mins to go... Estonia seemed more dangerous in the first 20mins of the 2nd half but Ireland just pulled 2 goals from almost nowhere. In full control now. EDIT: DAMN, Estonia now down to 9 men, they are not having a good night EDIT2 OH MY GOD 4 - 0 Robbie Keane from the penalty spot. We should be all but in the pot for the Euro 2012 now. Only thing I'm worried about now is that Ireland might sit back in the 2nd leg in Dublin (since I'll be there), hopefully not and the match is equally as good, but either way there should be celebrations after it Edited November 11, 2011 by Mokong
Emerald Emblem Posted November 11, 2011 Posted November 11, 2011 And you Irish were worried. :p Would take something special for Ireland to fuck it up now.
Mokong Posted November 11, 2011 Posted November 11, 2011 And you Irish were worried. :pWould take something special for Ireland to fuck it up now. Haha, yeah. Well we tend to be jinxed whenever we are considered favourites for something and tend to play our best when we are considered underdogs. Oh man I can't wait for tuesdays match. Be my first time in the new Aviva Stadium and my first Irish game since 1997 so this should be (bar a miricle of a fuck up) hell of great night
spirited away Posted November 12, 2011 Posted November 12, 2011 http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/sport/football/3930351/Arsenal-news-Research-claims-fans-are-to-blame-for-poor-Emirates-Stadium-atmosphere.html Why was a study conducted to discover what we already know?
Ramar Posted November 12, 2011 Posted November 12, 2011 http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/sport/football/3930351/Arsenal-news-Research-claims-fans-are-to-blame-for-poor-Emirates-Stadium-atmosphere.html Why was a study conducted to discover what we already know? I don't disagree with what that says about a lot of our home crowd, it's the same at Old Trafford (even if that article suggests otherwise).
spirited away Posted November 12, 2011 Posted November 12, 2011 I don't disagree with what that says about a lot of our home crowd, it's the same at Old Trafford (even if that article suggests otherwise). Good point. I worry the same thing will happen when we get round to building a new stadium.
jayseven Posted November 12, 2011 Posted November 12, 2011 Well teh england game wasn't tooo bad to watch. 2nd half was a great improvement, but the fact that it was ITV commentary really annoyed me throughout. Too much over-zealous patriotism and spin. While Spaid did play a fairly strong team, the fact is that they have a fairly strong squad anyway. England's squad did show decent strength - Lescott did brilliantly and Parker obviously put in the time, too, but the first half was ridiculous - so many times we'd get the ball and you'd see the rest of the team just running up rather than supporting, or going into space, and too much long ball.
Fierce_LiNk Posted November 14, 2011 Posted November 14, 2011 I don't disagree with what that says about a lot of our home crowd, it's the same at Old Trafford (even if that article suggests otherwise). The article was focusing on the Stretford End in particular, and the Kop End at Anfield. Hard to argue that those two sections are quiet. Checked the BBC Sport site this morning to see that Carlos Tevez has yet again failed to turn up to training. I find it funny how it's not even a big issue anymore. It's almost the expected thing. "Yeah, he's in Argentina, agaaaain. He'll go soon, we promise, we just need someone to come in with a 50 million bid....any minuuute now."
bob Posted November 15, 2011 Posted November 15, 2011 Carlos Tevez reminds me of Charizard; ignoring commands and making Ash look like a fool. He'll start obeying Mancini once he gains the relevant Gym badge. In other words, if Man City need to win some silverware to keep him.
Ramar Posted November 15, 2011 Posted November 15, 2011 The article was focusing on the Stretford End in particular, and the Kop End at Anfield. Hard to argue that those two sections are quiet. I've been to Old Trafford three times now and the fans have never been particularly loud, the PA on the other hand. A few mates have told me they didn't think much of the Kop when they've been up to Anfield. I would say it's no different at Arsenal than for any other top club. High ticket prices don't help your average working class bloke, who will shout and scream what ever the weather. Unfortunately this leaves opportunities for day trippers, tourists and tarquins (suits). Who don't really get involved all that much. 1)Stoke City 101.8 Decibels 2) Spurs 97.58 DB 3)Liverpool 95.40 DB 4)Portsmouth 94.30 DB 5)Newcastle 94.06 DB 6)Aston Villa 92.20 DB 7)Chelsea 92.06 DB 8)Middlesborough 91.30 DB 9)Arsenal 90.80 Db 10)WBA 90.26 DB 11)Everton 89.98 DB 12)Blackburn 89.30 DB 13)Bolton 88.00 DB 14) Man City 87.25 DB 15 Fulham 87.00 Db 16)Man Utd 86.50 DB 17) West Ham 86.15 DB 18) Wigan 86.10 DB 19) Hull City 84.60 DB 20) Sunderland 84.05 DB 101.8 - Stoke City 97.58 - Tottenham Hotspur 95.40 - Liverpool 94.30 - Portsmouth 94.06 - Newcastle 92.20 - Aston Villa 92.06 – Chelsea 91.30 – Middlesborough 90.80 – Aresenal 90.26 – West Brom Liverpool, 97 decibels Man United, 94 decibels Aston Villa, 89 decibels Everton, 86 decibels Blackpool, 85 decibels Stoke City, 83 decibels Newcastle, 82 decibels West Ham, 81 decibels Chelsea, 80 decibels Sunderland, 80 decibels Arsenal, 77 decibels Wigan, 72 decibels Man City, 71 decibels Tottenham, 70 decibels Birmingham, 70 decibels Bolton, 69 decibels Wolves, 69 decibels Blackburn, 67 decibels West Brom, 67 decibels Fulham, 65 decibels Only the 2011 numbers show us up. But louder than City and Spurs who both claim to have loud home support?
spirited away Posted November 15, 2011 Posted November 15, 2011 I've been to Old Trafford three times now and the fans have never been particularly loud, the PA on the other hand. A few mates have told me they didn't think much of the Kop when they've been up to Anfield. I would say it's no different at Arsenal than for any other top club. High ticket prices don't help your average working class bloke, who will shout and scream what ever the weather. Unfortunately this leaves opportunities for day trippers, tourists and tarquins (suits). Who don't really get involved all that much. 1)Stoke City 101.8 Decibels 2) Spurs 97.58 DB 3)Liverpool 95.40 DB 4)Portsmouth 94.30 DB 5)Newcastle 94.06 DB 6)Aston Villa 92.20 DB 7)Chelsea 92.06 DB 8)Middlesborough 91.30 DB 9)Arsenal 90.80 Db 10)WBA 90.26 DB 11)Everton 89.98 DB 12)Blackburn 89.30 DB 13)Bolton 88.00 DB 14) Man City 87.25 DB 15 Fulham 87.00 Db 16)Man Utd 86.50 DB 17) West Ham 86.15 DB 18) Wigan 86.10 DB 19) Hull City 84.60 DB 20) Sunderland 84.05 DB 101.8 - Stoke City 97.58 - Tottenham Hotspur 95.40 - Liverpool 94.30 - Portsmouth 94.06 - Newcastle 92.20 - Aston Villa 92.06 – Chelsea 91.30 – Middlesborough 90.80 – Aresenal 90.26 – West Brom Liverpool, 97 decibels Man United, 94 decibels Aston Villa, 89 decibels Everton, 86 decibels Blackpool, 85 decibels Stoke City, 83 decibels Newcastle, 82 decibels West Ham, 81 decibels Chelsea, 80 decibels Sunderland, 80 decibels Arsenal, 77 decibels Wigan, 72 decibels Man City, 71 decibels Tottenham, 70 decibels Birmingham, 70 decibels Bolton, 69 decibels Wolves, 69 decibels Blackburn, 67 decibels West Brom, 67 decibels Fulham, 65 decibels Only the 2011 numbers show us up. But louder than City and Spurs who both claim to have loud home support? What a load of bollocks, what do those stats even mean? So they measure the sound at a random point during a game, or across every minute of every game across the whole season? Forgetting the fact that stadiums have different capacities anyway.
MadDog Posted November 15, 2011 Posted November 15, 2011 What a load of bollocks, what do those stats even mean? So they measure the sound at a random point during a game, or across every minute of every game across the whole season? Forgetting the fact that stadiums have different capacities anyway. I agree, obviously 75k at Old Trafford should be louder than Craven Cottage.
Ramar Posted November 15, 2011 Posted November 15, 2011 What a load of bollocks, what do those stats even mean? So they measure the sound at a random point during a game, or across every minute of every game across the whole season? Forgetting the fact that stadiums have different capacities anyway. Honestly I can't tell you how they conduct the survey, however they back up my point about all clubs being in the same boat.
spirited away Posted November 15, 2011 Posted November 15, 2011 2 England friendlies, 2 Tottenham players get MOTM. A nice surprise. Kyle Walker has to start ahead of Johnson in my eyes.
MadDog Posted November 15, 2011 Posted November 15, 2011 2 England friendlies, 2 Tottenham players get MOTM. A nice surprise. Kyle Walker has to start ahead of Johnson in my eyes. After one game? I'd put Kelly ahead of Walker, nevermind Johnson. Against Spain Johnson and Parker were are best players, now after Walker has one good game for England against Sweden he should now be ahead of our established RB?
Ramar Posted November 15, 2011 Posted November 15, 2011 After one game? I'd put Kelly ahead of Walker, nevermind Johnson. Against Spain Johnson and Parker were are best players, now after Walker has one good game for England against Sweden he should now be ahead of our established RB? How Johnson and Walker got a nod ahead of Micah Richards only Capello knows.
jayseven Posted November 15, 2011 Posted November 15, 2011 RE: Decibels; Technically, when using the decibel to make comparisons, the original unit of measurement should always be given to make sense of the comparison: if someone tells you that one banana is 10 more than another banana, do they mean ten times the weight, or 10 times the price (or just 10g heavier)? In practice, however, the unit of measurement is often left out in decibel values, and in sound systems this is no great disaster. If bananas are sold by weight, ten times the weight is ten times the price, and vice versa. In sound systems, similarly, differences in one part of the system generally translate directly to other parts of the system. Without compression or expansion, a 3dB difference in the volume of an instrument will produce a 3dB difference at the microphone, a 3dB difference at the mixer channel, a 3dB difference at the amplifier, and a 3dB difference at the listener's ears, even though these may all have different reference points and use different units of measurement. So yeah. Measuring the intensity of sound is, frankly. a really really stupid and hugely subjective thing to do, and in no way should be taken to represent general support for a club. It's just a ridiculous thing to even attempt to compare!
spirited away Posted November 16, 2011 Posted November 16, 2011 (edited) After one game? I'd put Kelly ahead of Walker, nevermind Johnson. Against Spain Johnson and Parker were are best players, now after Walker has one good game for England against Sweden he should now be ahead of our established RB? I don't rate Johnson at all. Put it this way, would Johnson usurp Walker in our starting 11? No. Oh, and Ramar, I agree that Micah Richards should be our number 1 right back. Edited November 16, 2011 by spirited away
MadDog Posted November 16, 2011 Posted November 16, 2011 I don't rate Johnson at all. Put it this way, would Johnson usurp Walker in our starting 11? No. Oh, and Ramar, I agree that Micah Richards should be our number 1 right back. Offensively Johnson is brilliant, and his defensive ability is underrated, he's really not as bad as is made out.
Recommended Posts