See, I don't get this almost egotistical view of ourselves that some people have. We're animals. We still have animal urges and that's why we kill animals that have done nothing to us. Yet people have a problem with killing murderers who would only spend the rest of their days pointlessly rotting inside a concrete prison anyway. Baffling.
NO. If they killed someone, they didn't give the victim a chance. Why should they be allowed a chance? And in ALL cases the murderer kills the victim in a far less humane and more barbaric process than the, dare I say it, almost slap on the wrists death they get through the death penalty.
At the very least there is a) one less piece of scum on Earth, b) a huge consolation to the victim's families, and c) no silly **** out on the street in 15 years time!
I knew it! I knew the saying "an eye for an eye" would get used. Why is this saying used? What purpose do sayings even have? We just use them and expect people to just accept these silly sayings at face value, even though we all know the world literally can't go blind so have no real clue as to what the real consequence for vengeance really is.
We should kill people who have carried out a premeditated murder and are of an age and mentality to understand their actions. If you take someone's life, you have no right to yours. You don't even have the right to change, since you didn't give the victim a chance to do anything, either. Chances are a luxury, not an essential.