mcj metroid

I don't know man. All anyone seems to pick out as good hardcore matches in the WM17 one you mentioned. It was a great title UNTIL crash holly and that stupid 24/7 rule ( which was entertaining for a slight bit) I could name you about 7 good hardcore title matches. it's a good idea if done right but in it's later years it was shocking bad.

I mean I know besides to make money. Why the fuck is this film being made?

Added the bold ones from the list from Cube

Megadrive and snes had their strengths but I believe the Megadrive wins outright in the multiplayer department. So many classic fun with friends back in the day.

It started off strong, it lagged in the middle and ended well. I think your main problem was sugar rush...Not the best setting in my opinion. Probably a better idea to have Ralph fight those game aliens( ?) in a few different settings and ended it with sugar rush. At times the film was wacky like cloudy with a chance of meatballs but sometimes pixarish like toy story.. so what we got was an awkward mix of both at times. also that "duty" joke fell right on its arse. That only works in the US. It's not perfect but I did really enjoy it.

Metroid Prime isn't for everyone. It is a game that demands your every bit of attention. If you stop playing metroid for a few weeks or months you are fucked. Prime is my favourite gamecube game, but yet I would consider resident evil 4 to be the best. I would hesitate to recommend prime to some gamers, especially these days to the average "call of duty" player and so on. It's an experience all about isolation, the controls are tailor made for the game, there is no plot, etc. I'm actually surprised how well this sold actually considering all this. It is in the top 10 gamecube sales. There simply isn't anything out there like the metroid prime games.

I have 2 youtube channels. One for myself and one for my music( which is the one in my signature and logo in my avatar) http://www.youtube.com/user/turrattack/videos The name turrattack is a mixture between the videogames "turrican' and "pacattack... or tetris attack or whatever) I'm using this account to showcase my more retro electronic tracks like so but I haven't really given it enough time to advertise it or promote. What i've done in this very post is the most I've ever done to help myself. I just dont like bothering people... I always wanted to wait until I have perfected my composition skill too. But i never seem to have time these days.

haha awesome and so true too Some people need to grow up. Sometimes maybe take a moment to realise that you're not as smart as you think you are ...maybe...?

Ok I take it we are going with studio versions here as oppose to live versions otherwise I'd be all over katie price's "whole new world" I'm not sure what people expect from covers though. I believe the best covers do something new to the original song, like a re-imagining but some people hate the original song altered in anyway. A bad cover to me is one that sounds extremely similar One exception though. Doesn't sound anything like the original and isn't very good.....

You know I kinda miss when these companies used to take slight jabs at each other during the Ps2/Xbox/Gamecube era. Made things more funny.

I'm sure if he was preaching the opposite. Like "religion is a load of wank" then he would be "disturbing the piece"... especially under our new RIDICULOUS blasphemy laws.

Not to keep banging on about this but The GT score seems a lot more realistic based on what was being said about the game than IGN's score. I will say though that GT's score is still a very good score. I will most certainly be buying this eventually. I've decided I will indeed buy a WiiU next year at some point. Wonder where 3d mario will go next though

This one nearly killed me haha

No you're right, I haven't been keeping up to date to be honest. I have watched the IGN review and had watched the trailer at launch. Call me a person looking at this from the outside point. I haven't posted on this Wii forum for a long while and I'm looking to see if I'm interested in buying this new fangled WiiU console. I know the basics of the console and I am willing to put a bit of research into seeing if the console is for me. my conclusion is: I would buy this game if it was on the regular wii and I would expect many of these features on the Wii version( Except HD which thankfully you didn't list), but this is a brand new console and this is a launch game from a first party. I would expect a game like this to show off what the new console has to offer. I don't necessarily mean force touch screen into it or whatever. To it's credit the game is using almost all the console to it's potential without ruining it it seems. I guess what I'm looking for is not new features.. it seems to have that but I want what it has to be polished to a Ps3 or 360 level graphically and audio wise. This isn't the wii anymore guys... Even though on the Wii we expected these features too.. The Wiiu is a system released 6 or 7 years after the 360 and if it's first party developer is not up to the task of propelling it's main franchise to use the system to it's potential then who is? I don't doubt this is a very fun game and I will end up playing it and loving it ..but it hasn't sold me on the WIIU just yet. Does this make sense? Just my thoughts, I'm not really in a position of knowledge to argue to be honest. I was never sure why they couldn't ever make these 2d mario games as epic as the excellent galaxy games. This does seem to be going on the right track with it's "world" map. That's one of my complaints on the "new" games scratched off at least.

In all fairness though 91% does seem awfully high for a game that's lacking quite a bit. But if it's a recommendation based on the games available on that system at this point in time( let's face it this or nintendoland) then I suppose it's hard to argue it. On the other hand a person looking at the WiiU console as a purchase will be looking at this as well. It doesn't do anything the wii version doesn't really

It;s not. I just wrote it in a rush I just meant to say something like racial and gay humour or something ha.

Ha that's no trouble. Let me explain I'm in work between breaks and am typing rather fast and if my image posts are offending or whatever just delete them. I have a morederanged humour than most I find don't really have the time to worry about grammer.

Wow you're funny... maybe you should post in the funny thread...

just a little bit pedantic now don't you think. Just a tad bit.

homophobic and racist humour. Good lord I'm full of it today

Ya I would say that was the weakest too. It felt like an episode from series 1 and that's not a good thing...

misty by me haha

l I don't know. if they made this with completely new characters with slight throwbacks to the originals( I'm talking planet references) then it has a good chance, but if they have a CGI'd elderly Luke Skywalker training someone or some shit I will puke my ring. we all know george's problem was he had too much power and was surrounded by too many "yes" people that were afraid to challenge him whenever he made stupid decisions( you know like the entire episode of 2) With new younger blood this could be awesome but this NEEDS to be live action.

You know series 8 had some very good episodes too and had some great side characters. Captain Holister was great and Mr acherman( sp?) as well as Kill crazy. Cassandra was the best episode of that series and it had some great moments. Classic scene right here. But series 8 had the first proper BAD episodes of red dwarf though. Back to the Red part 3 was WEIRD and stupid!