ipaul Posted May 6, 2011 Posted May 6, 2011 Literally a sig-worthy post. Literally a sig-worthy post.
Supergrunch Posted May 6, 2011 Posted May 6, 2011 If SNP get a majority I'm touching myself in the street. Off you go then.
The Peeps Posted May 6, 2011 Posted May 6, 2011 Off you go then. The Scottish National Party will form Scotland's first ever majority government after a stunning election victory. It's like they wrote it just for you, Chair!
Rummy Posted May 6, 2011 Author Posted May 6, 2011 Literally a jig-worthy coast. But yes, as ReZinald guessed...I war artijoking. Though I WAS drunk when I made my post, I had voted earlier in the day when I was sober, as I was driving my car at the time. Genuinely I did vote a bit off my schedule, as things got held up and confused and then I sort of drove past my polling station by accident and decided to pull up(terribly) there and then. I won't deny I sell myself pretty short for drink(im actually well drunk right now) but I'm not sure I'd ever sell out my beliefs. Not unless the girl was pretty enough, anyway. So actually yes, yes I would. I think I was trying to highlight the apathy of people and how amazed I am by it, though tbh I'm not really sure...I was drunk. So, I did vote Yes to AV, though it is pretty much gonna lose, but meh, I tried. Not like I'm any worse off, in the relative run. (I was going to append this with something massively racist, but decided it's still too soon and I like you guys too much to get b&) ((Ftr I am massively racist)) EDIT: LOL just realised >implies I only ever drive my car when sober. Not that I don't, constable.
McPhee Posted May 6, 2011 Posted May 6, 2011 How many weeks do you think Nick Clegg will last as Lib Dem leader then? I'd wager the coalition will fall too not long after he departs. Not sure who would replace him though. I'd like to say Paddy Ashdown, but isn't that impossible with him being a Lord and all? I guess that leaves Chris Hulne and Danny Alexander. Oh joy... Also, congrats to the SNP! a fell fought campaign
The Mad Monkey Posted May 6, 2011 Posted May 6, 2011 I'd wager the coalition will fall too not long after he departs. Would that force a premature election? Common sense says it would, but politics and common sense tend not to see eye to eye.
Debug Mode Posted May 6, 2011 Posted May 6, 2011 2 voting area's have declared.. Currently 60.72% are against AV.
The Mad Monkey Posted May 6, 2011 Posted May 6, 2011 2 voting area's have declared.. Currently 60.72% are against AV. And rising. 69.86% against now.
Debug Mode Posted May 6, 2011 Posted May 6, 2011 Ah well, even though there's only 27 areas declared so far, I wasn't expecting anything to happen in AV's favour. It'll just end up as a landslide.
The Mad Monkey Posted May 6, 2011 Posted May 6, 2011 AV was never going to happen, blame it on whatever you like, but the fact is people don't like change.
Diageo Posted May 6, 2011 Posted May 6, 2011 Politicians who like to keep winning don't like change, and people are stupid.
The Mad Monkey Posted May 6, 2011 Posted May 6, 2011 Politicians who like to keep winning don't like change. Not sure which party you are talking about there. Labour and the Conservatives have both had long running reigns.
flameboy Posted May 6, 2011 Posted May 6, 2011 Politicians who like to keep winning don't like change, and people are stupid. true...thats why we've seen the scaremongering tactics about how AV could be bad for the country etc....and like you said some people are stupid and just believe all these unsubstantiated claims about the costs and risks of hung parliament (which we have anyway) etc...
Diageo Posted May 6, 2011 Posted May 6, 2011 I'm just echoing sentiments of the thread as I know nothing of English politics except for what the cats have told me.
The Mad Monkey Posted May 6, 2011 Posted May 6, 2011 I'm just echoing sentiments of the thread as I know nothing of English politics except for what the cats have told me. Maybe, but long winning politicians who don't like to lose sounds more Labour than Conservative to me. Surprized they weren't supporting AV more really, being the big losers last time they have the most ground to make up.
Diageo Posted May 6, 2011 Posted May 6, 2011 ... Surprized they ... Just an ironic joke after what you did to Murr.
Jonnas Posted May 6, 2011 Posted May 6, 2011 Maybe, but long winning politicians who don't like to lose sounds like any long winning politician to me Fixed. Diageo wasn't referring to a specific party, only to what would be true, regardless of country.
Rummy Posted May 6, 2011 Author Posted May 6, 2011 Yeah you can't tell you're still drunk. Don't be silly, I sober at some point. I beleieve they call it 1992?
McPhee Posted May 6, 2011 Posted May 6, 2011 (edited) Maybe, but long winning politicians who don't like to lose sounds more Labour than Conservative to me. Surprized they weren't supporting AV more really, being the big losers last time they have the most ground to make up. The Conservatives don't want AV because the party would be fucked under that system. How many Labour/Lib Dem/Green voters do you know who would put the Tories as their second choice? They'd lose in almost every marginal. We'd likely never see a Conservative majority government ever again! Kinda an unfair system in that regard really. Then again, if Scotland winds up Independent then FPTP will give us the opposite, constant Tory governments with a weak Labour opposition. We'd then either have to increase the number of constituencies in the North of England or move t a new voting system. Edited May 6, 2011 by McPhee
The Mad Monkey Posted May 6, 2011 Posted May 6, 2011 Fixed. Diageo wasn't referring to a specific party, only to what would be true, regardless of country. Which in this country at this time would be Labour.
Sheikah Posted May 6, 2011 Posted May 6, 2011 It was pretty obvious that AV wouldn't win, aside from people on here I hadn't heard of anyone in favour of it. Not really a better system than what's in place, and it sure didn't help being spearheaded by a party leader as charismatic as Robert Mugabe.
McPhee Posted May 6, 2011 Posted May 6, 2011 It was pretty obvious that AV wouldn't win, aside from people on here I hadn't heard of anyone in favour of it. Not really a better system than what's in place, and it sure didn't help being spearheaded by a party leader as charismatic as Robert Mugabe. That's a bit unfair on poor Ed :p
gaggle64 Posted May 6, 2011 Posted May 6, 2011 I'm delighted for the SNP success but the AV result although expected is still bitter, especially given the polls from no more then two or three months ago. Next person I meet who claims voting never changed anything is going to get vomited on.
Mr-Paul Posted May 6, 2011 Posted May 6, 2011 Well, I've had a bit of a disaster voting. I didn't get to vote. I applied for a postal vote ages ago, to be sent to my London address. They sent it to my home address. My mum posts it up to me but it goes missing in the post. Phone up on Tuesday to see if there's anything they can do. They say if I come home and go to the council office, they can give me new voting papers on the day. I get a train home, phone up to let them know I was coming. I'm then told they can only give them out before 5pm. This is at 5:15pm. Would have been nice if they told me this when I talked to them on Tuesday. Very angry, will be writing many letters of complaint and asking for them to pay for my train ticket. My vote wouldn't have made a difference (my council now has 54 Con, 6 Lib) and New Forest voted down AV 75% to 25%, but I believe in democracy and hate that I didn't get to have my say. I'm very proud of where I live in London, Islington one of the few places in the country to vote YES to AV.
Recommended Posts