Wesley Posted May 3, 2011 Share Posted May 3, 2011 I wish I'd never seen Scrubs; such shit... Anyway: Woo! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EEVILMURRAY Posted May 3, 2011 Share Posted May 3, 2011 I can understand why they'd want to show the Americans going overkill on Osama, but why is he portrayed as being some hardcore Jack Daniels addict? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Iun Posted May 3, 2011 Share Posted May 3, 2011 I can understand why they'd want to show the Americans going overkill on Osama, but why is he portrayed as being some hardcore Jack Daniels addict? If there's two things that we knew for a FACT about Osama Bin Laden: (1) He needed a drop of Dutch courage before making an inflammatory anti-West Video (2) He loved the pussy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EEVILMURRAY Posted May 3, 2011 Share Posted May 3, 2011 (2) He loved the pussy. Aaaah, that's probably why he didn't seem keen on being ass slammed by that pig! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Mad Monkey Posted May 3, 2011 Share Posted May 3, 2011 2)believe it or not, a mans DNA is not identical to his dads. He also has some DNA from a being known as his "Mother". This means his DNA will be close, but not identical, to his dad's. Funny, I thought the DNA was tasted against his sisters, not his. The death of a sister of Osama bin Laden at Massachusetts General Hospital allowed the United States to confirm bin Laden's death, ABC News reported. When his sister died in Boston, tissue from her body was taken by government officials for DNA testing, ABC News correspondent Brian Ross reported. A source told NewsCenter 5 that bin Laden's sister died in Boston about a year ago. The tissue sample was used to match the DNA found on the man killed by special forces troops who conducted the raid on bin Laden's Pakistani compound. So it was, so they'd only be able to confirm family member status from a DNA test, not his actual identity. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EEVILMURRAY Posted May 3, 2011 Share Posted May 3, 2011 Funny, I thought the DNA was tasted against his sisters, not his. Proof enough for me! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pestneb Posted May 3, 2011 Share Posted May 3, 2011 Funny, I thought the DNA was tasted against his sisters, not his. So it was, so they'd only be able to confirm family member status from a DNA test, not his actual identity. full sister or half? I cba to find out myself, but presuming it's full sister so closest to him they share a mum and dad, so fair enough, a fair chunk of similarity (DNA people know what %?) But unless Laden's son was the result of incestuous relations with one of his sister, the son will still only have 50% of his DNA coming from Laden family. Either way, if you are going conspiracy theory I still stand by my initial stance, why do a test at all, just say you did it, and then "some admin idiot destroyed it". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Supergrunch Posted May 3, 2011 Share Posted May 3, 2011 Assuming she's a full sister, then the average shared genetic material would be 50%, but with siblings it can vary massively. Which is not to say the test is bad - there's an extremely high likelihood of some shared DNA, which would make a postive result pretty likely. In one of the news articles I saw, it said that there was a 99.9% chance it was correct, which is way above the 95% "reasonable doubt" margin. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
arab_freak Posted May 3, 2011 Share Posted May 3, 2011 (edited) lol Edited May 3, 2011 by Supergrunch Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dannyboy-the-Dane Posted May 3, 2011 Share Posted May 3, 2011 I love how conspiracy theorists are always capable of denying any evidence found as inconclusive or fabricated. Conspiracy theories work exactly because they're self-sustaining: Any and every proof, explanation and piece of evidence (or, indeed, lack thereof) provided will be used as proof that something is going on that someone is trying to cover up, Occam's razor be damned. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Murr Posted May 3, 2011 Share Posted May 3, 2011 Really doesn't take long does for the memes to appear does it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shorty Posted May 3, 2011 Share Posted May 3, 2011 I prefer this: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flameboy Posted May 3, 2011 Share Posted May 3, 2011 I prefer this: me too!:bouncy: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Charlie Posted May 3, 2011 Share Posted May 3, 2011 And also blatantly stealing Arab_Freaks find which is my personal favourite. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rummy Posted May 3, 2011 Share Posted May 3, 2011 I haven't followed the news on this at all because I don't really care because I don't really think it's going to make anything change, as a result I never bothered checking, but did they offer some solid proof this actually happened? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dannyboy-the-Dane Posted May 3, 2011 Share Posted May 3, 2011 I just remembered something I read somewhere: some religious scholars pointed out that the way in which they disposed of the body was not in accordance with Islamic traditions. Does anyone know anything about that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ReZourceman Posted May 3, 2011 Share Posted May 3, 2011 I prefer this: There is a better one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Emasher Posted May 3, 2011 Share Posted May 3, 2011 I love how conspiracy theorists are always capable of denying any evidence found as inconclusive or fabricated. Conspiracy theories work exactly because they're self-sustaining: Any and every proof, explanation and piece of evidence (or, indeed, lack thereof) provided will be used as proof that something is going on that someone is trying to cover up, Occam's razor be damned. Isn't denial the first stage of grief? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dannyboy-the-Dane Posted May 3, 2011 Share Posted May 3, 2011 Isn't denial the first stage of grief? Hm? I'm afraid I don't follow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
arab_freak Posted May 3, 2011 Share Posted May 3, 2011 (edited) Found this: Edited May 3, 2011 by Supergrunch Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Emasher Posted May 3, 2011 Share Posted May 3, 2011 Hm? I'm afraid I don't follow. It was a bad joke. I was suggesting that the conspiracy theorists were grieving Osama. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dannyboy-the-Dane Posted May 3, 2011 Share Posted May 3, 2011 (edited) It was a bad joke. I was suggesting that the conspiracy theorists were grieving Osama. Ohhhhh, I see. Found this: Hm, it does match with the reports of them shooting him above his left eye. Edited May 3, 2011 by Dannyboy-the-Dane Automerged Doublepost Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flameboy Posted May 3, 2011 Share Posted May 3, 2011 Ohhhhh, I see. Hm, it does match with the reports of them shooting him above his left eye. is not just a more bloody version of the other image thats already been outed as fake? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dannyboy-the-Dane Posted May 3, 2011 Share Posted May 3, 2011 is not just a more bloody version of the other image thats already been outed as fake? Possibly, I didn't study it closely. I thought it looked different, but I could easily be wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Emasher Posted May 3, 2011 Share Posted May 3, 2011 If the Americans had released the pictures I think we'd be seeing something official by now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts