Shorty Posted November 18, 2007 Posted November 18, 2007 And there´s no possible way for us to know if Eenuh isn´t telling the truth True, to be honest I was kinda just hoping you'd be lynched and turn out to be evil, then we might know the truth about Eenuh and she could find out a few more names I just want to see things move forward....
gaggle64 Posted November 18, 2007 Posted November 18, 2007 And there´s no possible way for us to know if Eenuh isn´t telling the truth All the evidence suggests to me that Eenuh's character is fair of heart, but damaged of brain.
Mundi Posted November 18, 2007 Posted November 18, 2007 True, to be honest I was kinda just hoping you'd be lynched and turn out to be evil, then we might know the truth about Eenuh and she could find out a few more names I just want to see things move forward.... And it really dosen´t help when were lynch someone on vague information in pure desperation
jayseven Posted November 18, 2007 Posted November 18, 2007 Hmmm... The Fish; what's your information? Who have you had information on before? I'm going to go for vote mundi for now. Too much idling.
Jonnas Posted November 18, 2007 Posted November 18, 2007 I can only guess as you. As I said, there were three at the scene. It seems likely that at least one was good and one evil. We know Eenuh's information to be deeply perverted, so evidentially Mundi is "Neutral" or "Evil." What scene? Enlighten me: Who did Eenuh originally register as neutral and how was it confirmed? Cube. He turned out to be good, although PoP has a dark side...
gaggle64 Posted November 18, 2007 Posted November 18, 2007 I think I shall have to lay my cards on the table and give the other two names if no one comes forward with anything else in the next couple of hours.
chairdriver Posted November 18, 2007 Author Posted November 18, 2007 Votes (14 is a majority) No Lynch (3) jayseven, mundi, The fish Mundi (6) Jonnas, Ellmeister, AshMat, Tellyn, Shorty, jayseven
Mundi Posted November 18, 2007 Posted November 18, 2007 I´ll admit i was at the scene gaggle64 mention and if Zelda wouldn´t have died yesterday i would have someone for the gallows.
Ellmeister Posted November 18, 2007 Posted November 18, 2007 I´ll admit i was at the scene gaggle64 mention and if Zelda wouldn´t have died yesterday i would have someone for the gallows. So he's a killer then? Hmm lynch him!
Mundi Posted November 18, 2007 Posted November 18, 2007 I didn´t mean it like that it has to do with my power. I used my powers with coolness lasnt night but because he didn´t die my power didn´t work
jayseven Posted November 18, 2007 Posted November 18, 2007 who? what? I'm confused. Mundi and two other people visited teh same person, gaggle saw it, or visited them too, and reckons mundi is innocent because mindi didn't kill this person - but then gaggle claims there was someone evil that was there too, so why didn't they kill this person either? That doesn't wash. I need some sense here!
Shino Posted November 18, 2007 Posted November 18, 2007 Personally I just don't want to see another 'no lynch' day followed by a hero-dies night :/ Eenuh's info is the closest thing to a lead so far. I'm 100% with you, just seems like Mundi is getting used. So he's a killer then? Hmm lynch him! See?
Ellmeister Posted November 18, 2007 Posted November 18, 2007 Shino, jayseven is giving a reason to your question earlier. Hes saying the reason hes lynching now is because another day of not going on a lead means more chance for evil. He just admitted hes a killer! Why should I not say lynch him :S
Ellmeister Posted November 18, 2007 Posted November 18, 2007 I´ll admit i was at the scene gaggle64 mention and if Zelda wouldn´t have died yesterday i would have someone for the gallows. Doesn't that say you was going to kill someone if not for another event?
Mundi Posted November 18, 2007 Posted November 18, 2007 No... I can watch people over nights and if they are killed i know who killed them. I was at that site because i thought a certain person would die over the night. But he didn´t so my power didn´t work. That was what i meant
gaggle64 Posted November 18, 2007 Posted November 18, 2007 who? what? I'm confused. Mundi and two other people visited teh same person, gaggle saw it, or visited them too, and reckons mundi is innocent because mindi didn't kill this person - but then gaggle claims there was someone evil that was there too, so why didn't they kill this person either? That doesn't wash. I need some sense here! It was a deduction: I find it highly unlikely that the bad guys would not have sent someone to investigate and confirm, but likely that they figured there would be others there to protect him. I think I'd better just go right ahead and reveal all, though I suspect I myself will be targeted as a result - Three people targeted Coolness Bears last night. They were: Mundi Tellyn Gizmo Since, as I recall, Coolness is all but outed as Link, I find it almost impossible to believe that the villains would not want to at least confirm their suspicions.
Mundi Posted November 18, 2007 Posted November 18, 2007 And now you can see why i used my power on him! With Zelda dying and someone saying Coolness is Link i had this crazy idea someone was going to kill Link and this was my only good lead to bust someone
The fish Posted November 18, 2007 Posted November 18, 2007 Hmmm... The Fish; what's your information? Who have you had information on before? I happen to know he is part of a special "inner circle" of neutral inclined people. He's nothing to do with Mario's murder, or his murderer, but he's not going to try and stop him/her for the sake of stopping them. And I know of a couple of others who were involved, but at least one of them is dead...
gaggle64 Posted November 18, 2007 Posted November 18, 2007 I think people need to start being specific here - I suspect some are saying "good" when they mean "neutral" when discussing other people's motives, and the difference could be absolutely vital to successful deduction.
Dyson Posted November 18, 2007 Posted November 18, 2007 Three people targeted Coolness Bears last night. They were: Mundi Tellyn Gizmo Interesting. Any other news regarding Gizmo and Tellyn?
jayseven Posted November 18, 2007 Posted November 18, 2007 I happen to know he is part of a special "inner circle" of neutral inclined people. He's nothing to do with Mario's murder, or his murderer, but he's not going to try and stop him/her for the sake of stopping them. And I know of a couple of others who were involved, but at least one of them is dead... who's the dead one? Why 'at least'?
Jonnas Posted November 18, 2007 Posted November 18, 2007 If Mundi is neutral, my triangle theory is correct. Eenuh, didn't you investigate Tellyn or Gizmo?
Eenuh Posted November 18, 2007 Posted November 18, 2007 If Mundi is neutral, my triangle theory is correct. Eenuh, didn't you investigate Tellyn or Gizmo? No, I have no information on either.
gaggle64 Posted November 18, 2007 Posted November 18, 2007 Eenuh, could you run me past who've you investigated so far and what you got again?
Recommended Posts