LazyBoy Posted September 11, 2007 Posted September 11, 2007 It wasn't Bush per-say, but it was that camp of people.
Tellyn Posted September 11, 2007 Posted September 11, 2007 Silly conspiracy. Obviously terrorist-work. If this guy was president tho, I might change my mind. I was actually about to post something about Logan.
UK Posted September 11, 2007 Author Posted September 11, 2007 Silly conspiracy. Obviously terrorist-work. If this guy was president tho, I might change my mind. Isn't he from 24?
BeerMonkey Posted September 11, 2007 Posted September 11, 2007 You are a fucking moron, simple as that. us goverment was a option in the vote and get called a moron for not putting bin laden and actually admitting it nice.....just nice
The fish Posted September 11, 2007 Posted September 11, 2007 The only conspiracy involved is the one of the US covering it's tracks to stop people asking why it wasn't prevented.
Daft Posted September 11, 2007 Posted September 11, 2007 I find it hard to believe the US Government could coordinate a precision attack on this scale yet not be able to tell the difference between allied forces and the actual enemies in Iraq.
Mikey Posted September 11, 2007 Posted September 11, 2007 You want something even more stupid than the government theory? LOL
Fanelia Posted September 11, 2007 Posted September 11, 2007 http://www.zeitgeistmovie.com anybody seen this?
LazyBoy Posted September 11, 2007 Posted September 11, 2007 http://www.zeitgeistmovie.com anybody seen this? Brilliant, all of it. They should play it at cinemas and on TV.
Emasher Posted September 11, 2007 Posted September 11, 2007 I blame Canada. Anyway, I thought Bin Laden owned up to it? WHAT! WHAT DID WE HAVE TO DO WITH IT! I remember someone saying the attacks were supposed to put bush to the test as they happened in his first year in office. I bet people would still be talking about that russian spy who was an FBI member if the 911 attacks never happened.
Happenstance Posted September 11, 2007 Posted September 11, 2007 Why attack UK? He says that he completely thinks this was terrorists, you quoted it yourself.
Fields Posted September 12, 2007 Posted September 12, 2007 Why attack UK? He says that he completely thinks this was terrorists, you quoted it yourself. Because he started this ridiculous fucking thread, and in doing so has dragged N-E to a yet another new low
Happenstance Posted September 12, 2007 Posted September 12, 2007 Come on Fields, its just a discussion. Its not exactly dragging the forum down, its just one thread where people who are interested can talk.
Fields Posted September 12, 2007 Posted September 12, 2007 No, Im sorry, it's embarrasing. We used to have some good discussions on here, now a poll asking us who 9/11's 'real villain' is, accompanied by a thread completely devoid of any sensible, thought provoking debate.
Happenstance Posted September 12, 2007 Posted September 12, 2007 Well then start a thread to have a discussion you are interested in. I can totally understand if you dont like this thread or even think its stupid but why just complain in it?
UK Posted September 12, 2007 Author Posted September 12, 2007 No, Im sorry, it's embarrasing. We used to have some good discussions on here, now a poll asking us who 9/11's 'real villain' is, accompanied by a thread completely devoid of any sensible, thought provoking debate. Can I just say what's really embarrasing? Your account- no avatar, sig or good posts. This is called a forum, where people say there opinion- so fuck off, you pointless waste of space.
Cube Posted September 12, 2007 Posted September 12, 2007 Can I just say what's really embarrasing? Your account- no avatar, sig or good posts. This is called a forum, where people say there opinion- so fuck off, you pointless waste of space. Stop talking like you know this forum. You clearly don't.
Tellyn Posted September 12, 2007 Posted September 12, 2007 Can I just say what's really embarrasing? Your account- no avatar, sig or good posts. This is called a forum, where people say there opinion- so fuck off, you pointless waste of space. Completely offside compared to what Fields said. Tone it down and stop reacting like you've just been shat on all the time.
BeerMonkey Posted September 12, 2007 Posted September 12, 2007 so if what hobs is saying about the programme and that the conspiracy thoeorys are bogus then yea id say its the terrorists. Just i saw sooooooo many clips on youtube etc (and a micheal moore thingy)saying this and that and it really makes you think. well for me it did anyway. i havent seen any progs proving the therorys wrong. i guess i dont know what to beleive with this. fields is out of order.
Chuck Posted September 12, 2007 Posted September 12, 2007 8 people think Bush had something to do with it becuase he carried on reading a childrens book for 7 minutes?
UK Posted September 12, 2007 Author Posted September 12, 2007 so if what hobs is saying about the programme and that the conspiracy thoeorys are bogus then yea id say its the terrorists.Just i saw sooooooo many clips on youtube etc (and a micheal moore thingy)saying this and that and it really makes you think. well for me it did anyway. i havent seen any progs proving the therorys wrong. i guess i dont know what to beleive with this. fields is out of order. Damn bloody right he is. You, me and the bard should start the 'against fields' club'. 'Cos that's what thread ruining bastards deserve : peace: Stop talking like you know this forum. You clearly don't. LOL, that's what aficionado means- knowelagble about something specific. And I'm an n-europe aficionado. The custom title NEVER LIES
Tellyn Posted September 12, 2007 Posted September 12, 2007 Damn bloody right he is. You, me and the bard should start the 'against fields' club'. 'Cos that's what thread ruining bastards deserve : peace: LOL, that's what aficionado means- knowelagble about something specific. And I'm an n-europe aficionado. The custom title NEVER LIES 1. Stop with the hatred. 2. An aficionado means you have 1000 posts, nothing more, nothing less.
Recommended Posts