Leaderboard

From Polygon: I don't know who decided to wake up at Konami over the last couple of years, but damn, this is shaping up to be one hell of a window we're in now for their back catalogue. Suikoden I + II, Silent Hill 2 Remake, Metal Gear Solid Δ: Snake Eater, and now this all seemingly taking aim at 2024 releases, after recently releasing the Metal Gear Solid Master Collection Vol. 1 (to mixed reception, but it's being patched, which is...something?). And a new announcement for another Carbon Engine collab with LRG a month and a half from now. Did we swap timelines?

Always appreciate these threads but forget spoiler tags, I'm screaming my favourite games and GOTYs for the year from the rooftops, as I think we all should be I'm going to tweak it slightly so that my favourite first-plays of older games aren't mixed in with the rankings for new releases, but I will say what was my favourite game - new or old - that I played in 2023. Because it's not even close to being a question for me. More fleshed out thoughts in my final 2023 Gaming Diary update, but to keep it to a line or two for each of my favourite games this year; I'm also going to start with highlighting what I didn't get to because, well, *heightened drama* Games I didn't get to/complete in 2023 So, early honourable mention to Baldur's Gate 3 here as it was one of my favourite gaming experiences of 2023 playing with friends in a multiplayer campaign, even just up to wherever we are some nearly 50 hours into our campaign I've had a blast as my Half Wood-Elf Bard with Fireball who plays his flute in the middle of combat just because I can, and with some mean dice rolls to boot. I regret not completing this game in single player, though, as multiplayer is definitely a very different experience (and despite that, if I had to rank it - which I won't, because I haven't finished it - it would already be challenging around the 3rd or 4th spots of my favourite games of the year) and I do think it could have been one of my favourite games of the year; that being said, having played enough of BG3 to know what it is about and having completed my GOTY, I know that in my heart of hearts that there's little BG3 could do to move into top spot simply because my favourite game of the year does one of my favourite things in games, and that is something this game is pretty much mechanically incapable of. Also: still really gutted about no height slider. Really wanted to be a Dwarf-height Dragonborn Bard The big hitters I feel I missed playing through in 2023 are Metroid Prime Remastered and Hi-Fi Rush. I have a sneaking suspicion I would enjoy both a whole lot and for very different reasons, but unfortunately, I didn't get around to either. Also gutted I didn't get to Jusant, that just really seems to vibe with the sort of experiences I look for in games. I did a lot of research into indies towards the end of the year, and so to just quickly reel off a few of the ones I regret not getting to and would love to check out in 2024 or beyond (there's more to the list but it would get very long if I didn't stop myself at some point ): A Space for the Unbound - on my console all year but just didn't get to it and had my eye on it well before it even released, so I'm sorry. Venba - dude: vibes. and awesome food vibes throwing you into a certain culture, too! Chants of Senaar - seen it described as Duolingo Souls, which I am so down for! Planet of Lana - Ghibli vibes + Playdead-ish inspired puzzle platformer? I mean, yeah, it's me bait. Videoverse - I feel like so many people here would appreciate this, as it looks back at the older days of the internet and the early days of things like forums, and makes it part of a game. Only on PC atm, so really hope we see it come to consoles and that it gets some love in 2024. Cocoon - I mean, it was a GOTY contender for a lot of people who played it, and I need to know what's up with that. Viewfinder - love me a good puzzle, and this has always looked super unique. Tchia - jolly vibes with mechanics stolen from Uncharted and Zelda. As you do. Dredge - seems very...moreish, which I definitely have a penchant of buying into. Gravity Circuit - beautiful pixel art, from what I've seen of it there seems to be some really cool ideas going on mechanically, but yeah, didn't get to it. Anyways, @Glen-i rightly mentioned we didn't have a thread like this for 2022, so I'm going to sneak those (just the titles, no explanation) into spoiler tags. I'll make both Top 3s, for the sake of brevity (and totally not because I didn't play enough new good games in 2022 where I couldn't come up with a list long enough to feel like more than a Top 3 was deserved ) And now that that's out of the way... Favourite releases of 2023 5. Like a Dragon Gaiden: The Man Who Erased His Name Bite-sized, Dragon of Dojima madness and despair which sees a return to the brawler combat of older Yakuza titles while adding Spider-Man abilities. I mean, c'mon. 4. Marvel's Spider-Man 2 Best side quests of the year no doubt, awesome soundtrack, and traversal which somehow manages to improve on the original formula with the addition of Web Wings, more momentum-based swinging, and just a greater sense of speed. I think the 2018 game has a more consistent and cohesive plot, whereas this seems to get a little lost in the epicness of its final act, which is why it isn't higher. 3. Final Fantasy XVI Best soundtrack and best boss fights of the year for me with awesome characters and a really well-paced first half, but unfortunately it just gets lost in the winding and meandering of side quests and fetch quests turning up in the main quest, completely tanking the pacing when combined with a trope which most FF games I've played seem to end up succumbing to when it comes to its main story: third act dumb stuff. 2. Armored Core VI: Fires of Rubicon My GOTY until around a week ago, the customisation options are absurd and I spent 10+ hours with them designing and testing tens of ACs, I love the mission-based structure of the game allowing you to hop in and hop out with purpose and ease, which is great as it very quickly became a moreish game for me as I played through this game at least four times - and could easily see myself returning to for a single playthrough just for the hell of it. Really hope they figure out a better balance for the sake of single- and multiplayer enjoyment in whatever comes next, be it a sequel or DLC, though. ~ My 2023 Game of the Year ~ 1. The Legend of Zelda: Tears of the Kingdom A flawed but overall brilliant game maybe described better as a masterful experience, and also which is, perhaps, more of an enhanced and definitive edition of its predecessor, with a bunch of half steps taken across the board rather than making any giant leaps. Some issues from before still remain - be it combat peaking 20 hours in, menus and inventory management taking up way too much of your time for a game like this, or one new area growing a bit stale due to the sameyness of it all - but this is the single greatest adventure game I've ever played thanks to the constant uncovering of new discoveries and things to do coupled with a more precise and tactile toolbox at your disposal. It also has some excellent new music (and many more opportunities to encounter music than in the last game), boss fights, and a finale which I do think will go down amongst the greats of this generation of games. How the hell this thing manages to run on the Switch - and run well; almost flawlessly, in fact - is beyond my comprehension and deserves special recognition. Favourite first-plays of games released before 2023 3. Dark Souls: Artorias of the Abyss Amazing DLC for an amazing game with awesome new locales and backstory to explore and unravel, great boss fights (with a higher hit rate than the base game), more excellent music, and just more excellent ideas. Weirdest way I've ever accessed DLC in a game, mind you. 2. Yakuza: Like a Dragon I think there's an argument for this game being the best example of a successful extreme genre switch in gaming, period. To go from a brawler to a turn- and job-based JRPG?! RGG are mad, but thankfully, it paid off, because this game is amazing. Stellar cast as always but this time at the front of the pack is a new protagonist who just hits every. single. mark. and effortlessly took the reins from his predecessor after a decade a half. Best side activity content I experienced this year, brutal twists and turns as expected in the series, great moments for longtime fans but also potentially a really solid introduction to newcomers, this is one of the best JRPGs of the modern era. ~ My 2023 New-to-Me Game of the Year ~ 1. Bloodborne Bloodborne isn't just my New-to-Me GOTY, nor is it just my favourite game that I played in 2023 new or old: it is one of my new favourite games of all-time. Blemishes in the form of not-so-great framerate and Chalice Dungeons aside, I think this is the best From Software game (of the ones I've played so far) to date, and the closest they've come to perfection. The world drips with atmosphere which is all-consuming in its malice and cruelty, there's its gripping narrative and lore, the amazing mechanics of its combat and its ludonarrative consistency within the world that the game takes place, the epic boss fights and this haunting gothic orchestral soundtrack which just sweeps you away every single chance it gets. And then in its DLC you get even better music, some of the best bosses in the entire game, and cool new shiny weapons in a more linear experience which streamlines an already near-perfect experience even more? Bloodborne is one of the best games I've ever played, and The Old Hunters is, undoubtedly, the best DLC I've ever played. This is undoubtedly and without question one of the greats, and, thus, my overall 2023 GOTY.

Some quite close racing there tonight. Great games.

Mario Kart 64 JP release: 13th December 1996 NA release: 10th February 1997 PAL release: 24th June 1997 Developer: Nintendo Publisher: Nintendo N64 Magazine Score: 91% Part of me was dreading replaying this. I have a lot of fond childhood memories of Mario Kart 64, but is it something that still holds up today? I did find a texture mod that makes the game look incredibly crisp (they re-created the original models the sprites were based on and took cleaner images of them), yet still retains its look, but it’s all about the gameplay. Mario Kart has changed so much since then. After actually playing Mario Kart 64 again, the amount of changes to Mario Kart over the years actually keeps Mario Kart 64 still hugely enjoyable – the newer games aren’t simply better, they’re all quite different. The simplicity of Mario Kart 64 really helps it stand out from the others, and the handing still feels great. My biggest criticism of Mario Kart 64 is the lack of singleplayer modes, just GP races and time trial, you can’t even pick single races, but most Mario Karts have similar issues. There is a mirror mode to unlock (which has the true version of Toad’s Turnpike) by completing all GPs on the highest difficulty, but that’s about it. Mario Kart 64’s true wonder is in the multiplayer mode, which is still a lot of fun. The weapons make it hectic, but also allow people to catch up. You can spend hours and hours just playing races and I really like that you just pick a race and play, you’re not forced to do a tournament or anything like that. Battle mode was also amazing in this game, and has not been properly replicated since (with newer games favouring points-based rather than elimination). When a player has been eliminated, they turn into a bomb and can try and screw over a player of their choosing. This wouldn’t work in a more serious setting, but for Mario Kart, it’s perfect. Mario Kart 64 is still an immense joy to play, and is still worth going back to due to how different other Mario Kart games are. It really does deserve a re-release similar to the version I ended up playing: widescreen and with nicer textures, but without changing too much. Remake or Remaster? A remaster with new sprites similar to the texture pack would be great for Mario Kart 64. Official Ways to get the game There is no way to buy a new copy of Mario Kart 64, the only official way to play is to rent it via the Nintendo Switch Online + Expansion Pak. Re-releases 2003: iQue 2007: Wii Virtual Console 2016: Wii U Virtual Console 2021: Nintendo Switch Online (subscription only)

Though I've recently bought a PS5, I'm glad that I won't be buying into the online memberships for it, or the Xbox consoles again any time soon. NSO is justified, as I genuinely play the console online every week, and I play some of the games which get added, but PS Plus? There's nothing for me... Even less with Xbox, as I don't want Games Pass, because I like physical games. (even if they are glorified unlock keys for the content at this point, you can still sell them... well, until their value quickly depreciates... partly due to Games Pass)

Possible that the next wave of GBA games will be announced soon. Hopefully Golden Sun will finally make an appearance.

My personal GOTY of 2023 is one with a deep narrative, amazing gameplay mechanics and graphics that really pushed the PS5.

Absolutely! Think I've seen my Switch Pro controller say it's low on battery just twice the entire time I've had it (nearly 5 years), whereas I can sometimes get that message for my DualSenses the same number of times in a single week. Totally has nothing to do with me not playing on my Switch all that much, no siree So, I guess this was a lie

People, you should buy longer USB-C cables But yeah, longer battery life is always better. Not necessary for me though, because I'm a cool guy who uses a LONG USB-C CABLE. Interesting. Thanks for the heads-up. That time limit always seemed like something to annoy me so it's nice to see it's a little more forgiving.

Oh no, don't say that... I was going to pass it up, and maybe pick it up later, now I'm thinking of buying it 'just in case' to play at an 'unspecified date' between now and never. Edit - I ordered it... happy? Good!

We now have our Dina in Isabela Merced: Okay, then yeah: in terms of public Zeitgeist and awareness, I think it's honestly pretty much already supplanted the game, though I think there's a huge asterisk next to that in that I'm not sure if it will have the staying power to remain that way in the same way the game has for over a decade. This is a game regularly featured in Top 10 lists for greatest of all-time in the medium and the first to really nail serious storytelling in a way, whereas the show, while a great adaptation, is yet another dark, gritty, dour tale set in a zombie apocalypse in that particular space. The only real differentiator and pull factor, honestly, if you haven't played the game and are fully casual when it comes to TV and hames (and away from the hive mind of the public consciousness), is that it's an adaptation of a video game's story. Totally get where you're coming from, and I think it's a great though experiment, but honestly? I think it's the other way around, as you kind of touched upon. The games simply take too long to make and are far too expensive to be relegated to becoming spin-off material for a show which - while very popular, critically acclaimed, a great video game adaptation, etc. - is absolutely not at the forefront of television in the same way these games are for the video game industry. At the moment it looks like Part III is going to continue the cadence we have of getting a game in the series once per generation, one every seven years, and at the tail end of each generation, no less! I do think Part III gets adapted after it releases, but I also think that project's wheels were spinning long before the TV series was a guaranteed success. The only way the games become spin-offs - and I mean even if there's a possibility of spin-offs in both mediums - is I think if PlayStation somehow go against the very trends rotting their core away: bloated AAA budgets with increasingly long development time. I look at DC since James Gunn has taken over and laugh at this idea that they're planning games between films when dev on the games has barely started and the films are well under way; you can knock out a blockbuster in three years, two years if you're really pushing it, and that's assuming cast/director overlap. Games? You know this, the AAA ones take way longer to develop and are far, far more likely to hit blocks in the road as a result of the tech being used, moving deadlines thanks to corporate reshuffles, are often more open to cancellations or complete overhauls, etc. I really can't see PlayStation prioritising Part III's show over the game, but I do think there's plenty of room to flesh out the world in spin-off TV series; as you say, they're generally more affordable and can be put out at a faster rate, and I do genuinely think there are plenty of story opportunities you could take there which would be a pain to develop an entire game for - reused assets or not, this is Naughty Dog we're talking about, not Insomniac. I think the answer to your question of what happens when the show catches up is that the shows are to build popularity for the games, where they can make much more money from sales, and that they slow down and spread out with spin-offs in the TV space; which, very importantly, they can do without risking the brand image of the games or the particular seasons/show based on certain games. If a spin-off TV show flops? Eh, typical Hollywood, they could've done X, Y, Z better. If a spin-off game which takes Naughty Dog away from other projects bottles? Then man, you've got people questioning the entire pipeline - which is way more malleable than a TV show pipeline because of comparatively shorter production times, etc. So yeah, I do agree with your suggestion of it going the spin-off route more than any other. I think it gives them the most opportunity to explore new ideas in a way which can be profitable but also cause the least impact if things don't go their way. I think the TV shows becomes what keeps people engaged between the tentpole releases which are the games, which is what's really making PlayStation the money. (I was quoting you part at a time so we kind of came to the conclusion from different perspectives on the games being tentpoles here naturally, which is super interesting) Man, it's really hard to say. On the one hand, I'm sure Naughty Dog are looking over at what Remedy has been doing lately and going "holy shoot, we have way more money in our purses, we can do something with that sort of mindset and aim but in a way which is uniquely ND and impactful in the same way our other projects have been", but on the other, they kind of have a set tone with Uncharted and TLOU which I'm increasingly getting the impression that they want to break out of – or, at least, take a break from. I like the idea of the games being tentpoles and having the show between be less what I was suggesting in terms of being a "let's keep them engaged" sort of sense and more "let's bridge the gap between these two stories", but again, the only thing that gives me pause - as much as I think ND could do that better than most - is that, well, it's the time it takes to develop a game. Part II had this fervour around it purely because it was a sequel to a damn near-perfect game in my eyes and the hunger of nothing between releases kept people wanting, whereas a great hypothetical First Game in some original, cross-media game trilogy followed by a middling story bridging the gap in TV really puts Second Game in an odd spot, and makes a show between Second Game and Third Game, well, a really questionable decision. There's also the fact that if you don't AAA and at the level that Naughty Dog has made us expect then that's at least a decade+ commitment. Again, I just think it adds too much risk to the brand, whatever brand that would be. I think it really comes down to Neil, at this point after Factions got closed down I feel like he and Naughty Dog taking a hard stance against PlayStation's/Jim Ryan's push for live Service and giving the reasons they did (which were likely BS, but whatever) shows that they don't care what the mandate is, if a project isn't work or is jeopardising something else in the pipeline they'll be able to argue a way out of doing it. They have that deserved pedigree and level of respect within PlayStation. Going back to Part III to wrap up: the other thing is that Neil is a huge Godfather fan, you can tell from Part I and Part II of TLOU if you've seen the first two Godfather films, and he'll have seen what a mess Part III was, for a number of reasons, growing up, let alone every other film trilogy which has more often than not turned out to not be the strongest in the trilogy. Would he then jeopardise the third and I reckon final act in Ellie's story? I think he'd rather leave the company, to be honest with you, if they start to strong-arm him into making certain story decisions, I really do.

Amazing! I loved Rocket Knight Adventures but never got to play Sparkster. Just a shame Limited Run have got these.

It's already up on PlayStation over here, so I'm guessing someone over our side of the pond at Ninty has forgot to press the button I just checked the eShop myself and it showed the demo tab over the game, but then it vanished when I opened it up. I'm sure it'll be sorted in a bit Anyways, reviews for the game are dropping and it's currently at an 87 on both OpenCritic and Metacritic. Some reviews: Seems like we've got our first great game of the year already (on paper, at least ) That demo + review drop combo is spicy, love to see it!

Welp, if there was ever a time to bust open the "gift" @Dcubed got me for Christmas 2022...

I miss Elimination Battle Mode so much. It’s just never been the same since they changed it over to Points scoring from MK Wii onwards (which also disastrously forced Team Battle only; which sucked green shells). MK64 probably has the best traditional battle mode in the series. Just four karts in an arena, infinitely bouncing green shells that never stop until they hit something, bomb buggies, and glorious screen watching. Bliss. I also really like the freeform physics in this game. I just love how the game allows you to jump over stuff and skip huge chunks of the track. Newer games became very restrictive in that regard, with even the slightest veering off of the track causing Lakitu to void you out back on the track as a huge over-correction from MK64. I get why they made this change, but I love being able to knock other players off the ramp in Wario Stadium and making my opponents have to repeat half the entire track again! Bring that back Nintendo!

Really I was thinking in terms of both the public zeitgeist (as you correctly hit on), and in terms of the creative process. The issue of “quality” or how well each medium tells the story is neither here nor there. If Season 3 does indeed end up coming out before TLOU 3 (as the current schedule seems to be veering towards happening), one has to wonder if the story will start being written with the idea of it being made for TV first and then a game secondary. TV is much quicker to make than a modern AAA video game, so if PlayStation/Naughty Dog intend on continuing TLOU as a series? They’re inevitably going to have to deal with what happens when the TV show overtakes the video game series. Will TLOU the TV series become the main product where the game is relegated to becoming supplementary material? Or will the TV series have to start veering away from pure adaptation into going down its own timeline? Or perhaps they’ll have to start looking at spinoff series or perhaps “filler” material? (Much like how anime adaptations of manga make up their own “filler” arcs while they wait for the manga to catch up). Personally? At some point, I think that the TV series will become the main product, and the video game series will just become the supplementary material; with extra story content that helps to fill in blanks left by the TV show. I also think that when Naughty Dog do end up working on a new IP? I think it’ll be a cross media series from the beginning; with the story being written for TV first, and the games being like “event movies” that the TV show leads up to. Seems to be the direction that Sony is heading towards in general, with them trying to create better synergy between their different divisions, and with PlayStation heavily leaning towards turning their various franchises into TV & Film. In fact, I’m surprised that they’ve never really done this before in earnest (Rachet & Clank notwithstanding; they didn’t put nearly enough effort & budget into that experiment). But now with the success of TLOU? (And to a lesser extent Twisted Metal, Uncharted and Gran Turismo). It seems inevitable that this is the road they’re going down next.

Pff...making others do your dirty work? NO WAY. Sure, I'll share my thoughts

Demo will most likely release at midnight tonight. Time to fire up my PS5 after a bit of a hiatus

Ehhh... It's better then Super Mario Kart at least.

Player's Choice tonight at 8pm.

We've not got it quite as bad over here yet. I couldn't believe the number of streaming services over in the US. We currently only have 4 or 5 proper ones that have pretty much everything available. Agreed that it's 3 or 4 too many, but we aren't anywhere near the level that the Americans are at. We started pausing our D+ subscription because there wasn't much on it to watch beyond the new Marvel stuff, but now our oldest is starting to get into Disney (Frozen had been watched at least once per day), we feel like we can't stop it now! We're really want to get rid of Amazon Prime, as it's definitely the worst one, but it's annoyingly bundled into the shopping/free delivery. However, since they also just announced a price rise, the next time that is up for renewal, we're going to see how we get on without it and see how annoying/ expensive it gets.

Its a big reason why i've started buying movies and TV shows digitally again now. I'd rather know I can access them in just the one place.

Watched this today and he's spot on. It's ridiculous how spread out things have become across all these streaming services. You've also got companies raising the prices but offering less or worse content, cutting access to account sharing and then adding adverts to shows and movies. The whole thing is a mess and it's no surprise that piracy is on the rise again. My D+ subscription runs out in March and I'm not sure if I'll renew it. I've dropped off on all the Marvel stuff (haven't bothered watching Secret Invasion, Loki season 2, Echo or What If? season 2) and their future line up doesn't fill me with confidence. At the moment it is essentially a Simpsons streaming service for me.

Elsewhere, yesterday Young Manazino was cast as Jesse: I think that would be expected as things stand - seeing as, without trying to spoil anything, TLOU2 is more than big enough to warrant two seasons by itself. Before the strikes I believe HBO announced S2 as coming in 2025, but given how everything has been pushed back and that we're only just starting to get casting announcements, I wouldn't be shocked if it slipped into 2026; whenever S2 lands, I'd be shocked if S3 (so, TLOU2's second half) didn't arrive a year later. Compare this to TLOU3, which is very likely a game for the end of the generation and potentially cross-gen, so I'm expecting that in 2027/2028. It's hard to say where Naughty Dog's new IP will land given we have no idea what sort of scale it is going to be on, but I have to imagine - and hope - that it lands before Part III does, either next year or in 2026. Crazy to think that excluding remake.remaster projects, they're going to release two brand new titles this gen at best at worst, I wouldn't be shocked if their new IP got canned in favour of TLOU3 taking priority after the mess that Factions has been. It depends what we're talking about, I feel. If we're talking about public mindshare? I'd say the TV show has already supplanted the games when it comes to general awareness; amongst the most casual, it's "that TV show based on a game" with little context for what the game even is and how it plays (Despite obviously being one of PlayStation's best-selling first party titles...ever?), and I think what's maybe more concerning is that I haven't seen the show bring anyone else new into the game, at least not in waves as I imagine Sony probably wanted part of the end result to be for this project. Maybe it's just me squirreled away in my own corner on the internet, but I was shocked to not have my YouTube feed filled with recommendations along the lines of 'SO, I PLAYED THE GAME', 'SHOULD YOU PLAY THE LAST OF US AFTER WATCHING THE SHOW?', 'CONTINUING THE FIGHT: PLAYING THE LAST OF US PART II', etc. If we're talking about actual perceived quality and what is, perhaps, a better experience? I mostly really enjoyed S1, heck I even loved certain parts - especially what they added to the lore and how they fleshed out certain characters - but it is a truncated adaptation of a story which misses the mark on its pacing and some major beats compared with the game. Bit of a tangent, but I also maintain that the endings and the aims of the ending for both the first and second game - and I would argue the ENTIRE POINT OF THEM FROM A NARRATIVE GAMING POV - is completely lost in a passive medium such as television; yes, you can hit the same beats, you can tell the same story, you can not pull the same punches and you can say the exact same lines, but if you played through either game's ending and came away with just a seed of doubt over a character's actions, recognising you hesitated for just a moment while filling the shoes of a character - that is the entire point of those games and why TLOU is as beloved and criticially acclaimed in the space. From that perspective, I struggle to see how the shows could ever supplant the games (and which is why I think they've leaned on fleshing out what they could elsewhere in the story, to try to coax those emotions out of you elsewhere).

I subscribe to PS+ purely for the promise of PSOne games. Some of them have been locked behind the service. I did put a lot of time into PS+ games last year mainly due to my trophy hunting ways and playing games I would never buy...looking at you Peppa Pig (GOTY material) and Paw Patrol. Most of the must have games on there I have already played or own myself. My NSO subscription is very similar to PS+ in that I have it to play the classic games and because I can't buy them from the eShop, my hand is essentially forced to sign up in order to play them.

Yeah, these memberships truly only make sense if you actually play a lot on your console of choice. But then they usually are worth the money (unless you subbed to PS+ Premium ).

Finally!. It's ridiculous you need to have 2 controllers in rotation if having an all day gaming session on the PS5. This new battery should have been there from the start. Plenty to keep you busy with there.

I've currently got twenty (soon to be twenty-one) sealed games for the PS5, and the console out of the box but not connected, which has been that way for a few months now. For me, it's not the justifying of the console purchase, but finding the time to set it up properly to play it. Tekken 8 may finally be the game which will make me want to set it up. Oh... @Hero-of-Time I seem to remember you were asking which games I;d got for the system, though I likely didn't say at the time (busy) but here goes... Alex Kidd in Miracle World Devil May Cry 5 Special Edtion Double Dragon Gaiden: Rise of the Dragon Hades Initial Drift: Twilight Rivals Edition NFS Unbound Puyo Puyo Tetris 2 R-Type Final 3 Evolved Raiden III x Mikado Maniax Raiden IV x Mikado remix Sonic Frontiers Sonic Origins Plus Sonic Superstars Soph Star (limited release) Stray Street Fighter 6 Tactics Ogre: Reborn Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles: Shredders Revenge Tekken 8 (soon...) The King of Fighters XV Vengeful Guardian:Moonrider So, just a few games really. I think that justifies the purchase of the console, once I legitimately start playing a game on it.

It's been slow going but I'm getting there. There are a couple of miscellaneous tasks to do but the rest of them are time trial based. Some of them have taken me an hour to just do one. You have to use every shortcut and trick in the book to achieve them. It feels like trying to get the licenses on a Gran Turismo game. Kirby Air Ride = The Dark Souls of racing games.

One for @Cube... https://www.timeextension.com/news/2024/01/a-sonic-mobile-card-game-from-the-2000s-has-just-been-preserved I told you before...

Just wanted to note that The Swords of Ditto is currently on sale for £3.24 until 18th Jan. I've been playing it a fair bit and it's quite fun, and reminiscent of top-down Zelda games. I've read that it used to be more unforgiving with a time limit (which is factored into most reviews) and they since patched the game, so it's really not an issue I've found. And the art style is brilliant. I mean, look at this.

It's time to bring this up-to-date and finish the fight in this thread. I've posted once or twice here already, so if you want the complete picture: for the first game I played in 2023, the Artorias of the Abyss DLC for Dark Souls, go here; and for some thoughts about Storyteller and SANABI, two brilliant, short, and rarely discussed indie titles released in 2023, go here. Obviously, I'm not going to go out of my way to spoil games - in particular, I've tried to leave story elements and some other things which I think are best saved for when someone experiences the game for themselves completely out of my diary entry - but there are some games I will be talking about where I think discussion of certain elements - mainly mechanics - not necessarily advertised before a game's release are essential to discussion about the game. Everyone's gauge for things being spoiled is going to be different, so consider yourself kindly warned I'm also going to be going a bit more in-depth on some games than others, especially considering that there are some games I've talked about quite a bit in their own dedicated threads, so if there's a crazy variety of write-up lengths, that's why Anyways, enough talk; let's mosey. Bloodborne | 2015 Bloodborne is a living nightmare of a game. Beasts drunk on blood prowl the streets of Yharnam, a pretty traditionally gothic settlement all things considered, with ornate buildings and the spires of cathedrals and clock towers piercing through its dark, foggy skies. You, a Hunter from a foreign land, take to these streets with jagged and clunky weapons, tasked with unraveling the many mysteries of this place and finding a cure for the disease which has seen it all fall from grace. Blood splatters over you as you tear through beast and man alike, drenching your jacket and the cobblestone streets in crimson, you being kept on high alert as danger lurks around every darkened corner - eyes scanning constantly from right to left and back again - before the wretched blood-curdling screams of unholy creatures of all sorts take hold of the night. The few people you do meet - can they be trusted? The places you go, the things you hear - do they unsettle you? The few answers you do find - are they really answers, or just the beginning of a deeper dive into the abyss that is the foils and folly of man? What I love about Bloodborne is that, unlike so many other From Software games of this ilk, it provides you with much more story and context this time around - and yet you are kept guessing by the answers you don't have, and the greater truth you find yourself seeking about the nature of this world and its inhabitants, man and beast alike. This game's narrative wraps you around its finger and slyly grins at you, as you find yourself diving deeper, and deeper, and deeper yet into the cruelty depicted - how could anyone commit such inhumane acts? And, perhaps more importantly: why? - and just when you start to think you have some understanding of what's going on, it rapidly unfurls, pulling the rug from under you and unveiling something so much more. It's rare that a game with so few answers is able to grip me with its story so tightly, and yet here I am, nearly a full year after starting the game, still watching videos and reading articles on different interpretations of the game's events, its characters, and its place. The way in which the unveiling of this through certain mechanics and triggers in the game astounds me, and perhaps my only regret with the game in this regard is that those same mechanics and triggers weren't applied more widely to the game. Bloodborne takes after Demon's Souls and Dark Souls both in its level design; like Demon's Souls, there is a hub you will regularly return to in the form of The Hunter's Dream in order to level up and craft your weapons, whereas, more like Dark Souls, there is also an intricate web of exploration spun by the streets, paths, and buildings you come across your journey, and there were several instances I found myself grinning from ear-to-ear at the absurdity of realising that certain places link to others, and then thinking about it deeper - why, contextually, these places are linked, and why it makes perfect sense. The game does an excellent job of funnelling you in the right direction despite it often feeling so unnervingly cramped, especially while you find yourself in Yharnam early on, and despite the game being so visually dark, it does such a great job of making new areas feel unique in how you explore them. Yharnam as a whole - from top to bottom - might be my favourite place in a From Software game period just for how much is hidden away and overlapping, and I am also a very big fan of Castle Cainhurst and just how different it looks and feels: like a truly gruesome realisation of the Castlevania art I've seen so much of. More than any other game of From's that I've played, it really does realise so much of that Metroidvania-style DNA and apply it in wonderful fashion to what From Software wanted to achieve with this game. The crazy thing is, I've already highlighted a bunch of excellent things about this game, but there is so much more to get to - such as this game's combat! In Demon's Souls, Dark Souls, and Elden Ring, I found myself playing slowly and meticulously, a sword in one hand and a shield raised in the other - not necessarily how I wanted to play those games, as that is not really my style of play given the option, but with how overwhelming those games and their enemies can be at times, and the bosses in particular, it is the path I think most first-timers will find themselves taking. Bloodborne, on the other hand, plays exactly how I wanted to be playing in those other games, which made my time with the game much smoother of an affair than what I'd encountered in From's earlier games - and it achieves this with combat which is fast and fluid, heavily reliant on parrying and dodging, and begging you to slash away at whatever you come across. It does this in a few ways: firstly, there is one shield to find in the entire game, you can't start with it, and it's pretty much a joke just how useless it is. Because of this, dodging is a necessity, and coupled with some wonderful i-frames and how quickly you can dodge from side-to-side, it feels great to dance around an enemy and have that flow and back and forth to battle where stepping in and out of their reach, darting around the place, feels so damn satisfying. But you know what's more satisfying than dodging? Visceral attacks. Either through staggering them after a long beatdown or a well-timed shot of your offhand weapon (most likely a gun of some sort; for me, this was the good old faithful Blunderbuss) enemies will keel over, allowing you to run up to them and jam your weapon into them to deliver a visceral attack, which does an insane amount of damage to them, more often than not resulting in blood spraying all over the place and soaking you red. All weapons are trick weapons, too, meaning that your right-hand weapon of choice comes with additional variety, such as the Saw Cleaver being able to extend out for greater range and reach, but this comes at the cost of delivering slightly less damage - a wonderful give-and-take which keeps every weapon feeling fresh and unique from others. Now, all of this is all well and good - in fact, it's great - and perhaps would have already been enough for Bloodborne to differentiate itself from its predecessors and everything which has come since, but there is one more mechanic in the game which truly ups the ante on how great the combat flows, and breaks you out of the mould of From's previous titles: and that is with the rally system. For a brief period after taking damage, so long as you have not been killed, the health you lost from an attack of an enemy's will be highlighted orange on your otherwise red health bar, and you have the opportunity to regain that health by slicing away at them in turn. This risk/reward system doesn't just feel great by itself, but it ties into the game's core of going wild with bloodlust, in the same way that the visceral attacks deliver on the promise of exacting cruelty with a heavy hand. This is genuinely some of my favourite combat in all of gaming. And, well, what is great combat without great bosses in games like these? And Bloodborne delivers with all of its bosses, whether it be from a narrative perspective in learning something new about the truth that you seek or simply in delivering the thrill of the hunt. Bosses takes all shapes and forms in this games, whether it be a human or a beast, a massive spider or something else all together. One boss in particular is probably the weak link here, but is an optional boss, and I don't think does anything at all to drag the rest of the game's excellently designed boss's down. I won't go into particular boss names simply to avoid spoiling anything, but something I really liked in this game is that I could contextually figure out the best effect to use an enemy from their environment or the enemy type themselves: beasts being burned at stakes implied that beasts take more damage from fire-infused attacks, and other enemies surrounded by water would clearly be weak to lightning-infused hits. This is of course helpful to know during most of the main game against some awesome compositions of mobs, but it's especially useful and unique, I find, for a game like this to do such a great job of subtly telegraphing the best way forward. The music, for me, is also the best in any From Software game I've played - I'm a big fan of classical music and bombastic choirs, and the overwhelming majority of this game's bosses have epic tracks which just fit the bill so well for me and my tastes, and there's an easy argument to be made that some particular tracks could well be some of the best gaming compositions of the 2010s. This game isn't quite flawless, but it is pretty damn close. I think the biggest issue with this game is simply its performance: it struggles, at times, to run at even a solid 30 fps, which is what it caps out at. This is despite numerous patches since its release, and in a game like this, performing so poorly really could have hindered my enjoyment of the game. Thankfully, for me, it didn't get in the way of my enjoyment of the game because I didn't run into issue at vital points, but if I did - in a game as brutal as this one can be - I could see it being very frustrating. I don't know if I agree that this game needs a remake, and I'm aware that there are some technical hurdles getting in the way of this, but that it hasn't yet received a 60 fps re-release despite every other modern From Software title being available to experience in that way in some form or another is a travesty, in my eyes. The other issue I have with this game is the totally optional Chalice Dungeons - they have some cool new bosses and unique enemies down there which tie into certain parts of the main game's lore, but they feel like prototype takes on Elden Ring's catacombs and are generally just a bit of a slog to get through, with some having strange effects in play to try and shake things up as you hunt down particular materials to explore other Dungeons and eventually come face-to-face with a boss hinted at being heavily tied into the main game. Still, it's more Bloodborne and it can be played with friends, so for some people I'm sure it will be less of an issue and more of a lure, but for me it was the only hold-up in me completing the hunt. I do want to speak about the DLC for this game briefly, and that is of course The Old Hunters. This piece of DLC is much more linear in its design than the base game, though it does stick to having some hidden areas and paths to take which overlap at times, but this is excellent in that it provides you with a push to explore new locales with some incredibly strong examples of more excellent level design, fight new and unique enemies - many of whom, as you might have guessed, are hunters; or were, at some point or another - and experience a number of new boss fights, three of which I'd argue are three of the best in the game, and also just three of the best bosses in From Software's tapestry of greats, and, well, gaming in general. The music, once again, is brilliant here, and while I don't want to name bosses or tracks, I do need to highlight the two best tracks I'd argue are the greatest in the game: this one and this one. To provide a little bit of context for those who haven't played the game or this DLC, the first depicts a struggle and dance between a beast and man, whereas the second depicts one of the strongest hunters in the game intent on keeping her secret safe, both doing incredibly interesting things in terms of their composition that I think make them worth listening to even if you haven't played the game or this DLC, especially if you never plan to. The Old Hunters has ruined the bar for what I expect from a DLC - and is, quite easily, the best piece of DLC I've played through, just again for how much it adds to the main game in how it recontextualises certain events and provides a new lens to see the game and some of its characters through. Taking a look at Bloodborne as a whole, I'd say that you don't even need to closely examine Bloodborne to find that every facet - every seam, every thread - of this game is masterfully crafted and beautifully realised, but what ensures its timelessness, relevance, and greatness is that once you start pulling on those seams and those threads, there is so much more for you to discover. Having played them I understand how great Demon's Souls and Dark Souls were before this, so for From Software to then take the risk and violently shake up so much of that tried and true formula really speaks to the talent and ambition of Hidetaka Miyazaki and everyone else over there - to then do it to this degree, and to such a degree that I would declare that Bloodborne doesn't just escape the shadow of the great games before it but usurps those games and overshadows them in almost every way, for me, leaves me simply speechless. Bloodborne is, quite simply, a dream of a game, and if these types games are for you, then I implore you: just go out there and kill a few beasts, it's for your own good. Go ahead, and join the hunt. Sniper Elite V2 | 2012 To avoid sullying the Favourite Games of 2023 thread and to not waste anyone's time here, I'm just going to come out and say it: this was the worst game I played last year. No, I don't mean weakest, in that everything else I played just so happened to be better - this is the worst by merit. The enemy AI sucks. The story and characters are one-note, entirely derivative and very easily forgettable. The enemy AI sucks. The flashback, "I remember the day when..." voiceovers are boring and lifeless as all hell for a guy who was a sniper in WWII. The enemy AI sucks. The level design is about as bland as it could possibly be in a game like this. The enemy AI sucks. You can't change difficulty after starting and realising that the enemy AI sucks. Oh, and the enemy AI sucks. The kill animations where time slows down and you watch a bullet pop through someone and bust their guts out while their bones get crushed are pretty sweet, though. And hearing better things about its sequels and being sure I'll be looking for dumb fun at some point or another, I'm sure I'll get to them...eventually. Maybe. Hmm. Star Wars Jedi: Survivor | 2023 I found Star Wars Jedi: Survivor to be a game of blissfully high highs, but host to a weird and overwhelming amount of middling lows. The highs: Stephen Barton and Gordy Haab returning to compose the score, building on the extremely solid foundation they laid in Fallen Order back in 2019, with Fields of Dusk being my favourite track in the game; the story getting its hooks into me much, much earlier than it did in Fallen Order, albeit after a bit of a slow start; some excellent character work with some great emotional and epic beats throughout the course of the story; plenty of new and fun characters (Turgle and Pili being the standouts for me); getting to see and hear High Republic era stuff in action (!) at long last; excellent antagonists, some of the best we've had in a Star Wars game in a very long time, in fact; some particular fun challenges via the optional Force Tears; it's one of the best-looking third party titles to date; and one of my favourite boss fights in the last few years at the time I played the game (don't worry - we're getting there). Fast Travel with plenty of Fast Travel points, a vastly improved map, unlockable map upgrades for the completionist in all of us, and other general QoL improvements made the game a much, much smoother ride than Fallen Order often was. The customisation options here are once again great for Cal and BD-1, but stealing the show is the level of detail and options available when customising your very own lightsaber. And now, for the lows: as I was concerned about going in, a whole lot of bloat to experience when you start dabbling with the game's side content and trying to explore 100%, made worse, perhaps, by areas being more wide open with some really poor level design outside of the occasional isolated puzzle, meaning the game - by design - can lead you down the wrong path more than once or twice, with a few occasions where I found myself asking "okay, game, where do you want me?" while staring at the map (ahem, Koboh); a hilariously excessive amount of foreshadowing of its Metroidvania elements, coming across tens if not hundreds of opportunities to use an ability you won't get until hours down the line, and not at all being subtle about it in the way the better games with Metroidvania elements handle these moments of foreshadowing; the return of traversal jank from Fallen Order, such as floaty platforming, weird moments where it can be tough to judge distances and falling to your death, to being able to very jankily make your way to somewhere you aren't supposed to be by committing to jumping up an enbankment, for example. There's also the combat, which feels so incredibly unreactive - why no animation cancelling available across the board (apparently it is available for a certain lightsaber stance? But whatever, it rquires a block and isn't at all in line with what I think this game calls for when it comes to animation cancelling) in a game where my character has Force abilities, why no i-frame dodges in bosses clearly calling for it, why am I getting stunlocked by stormtroopers of all things - when I'm playing the role of a heroic acrobatic space wizard with a glowstick capable of disembowling any- and everyone which I can pull from across the room? It's really bizarre to so clearly take inspiration from From Software titles and then completely miss the mark. While this game got a six week delay, it should have been delayed further. Playing it at launch I experienced a crash just five minutes in, and experienced several throughout my playthrough, whether it be during cutscenes, during or event after completing puzzles (again, take from From Software, add fast travel points and treat them as bonfires/lanterns - but then no auto-save on your multi-hundred-million dollar AAA game which crashes all the time, meaning you need to go through things again?). At the time I also experienced some really egregious pop-in, devastating framerate drops (to the -teens, and very much reproducible), and screen-tearing for the first time ever in a game released on PS4 or PS5, on what at the time was a next-gen exclusive, mind you! Shocking that it's since been announced that it will be getting a last-gen version, when by all accounts, it seems like it still isn't quite up to snuff for this gen. It was absolutely embarrasing how much of a mess this game was back at launch. This game isn't a masterpiece, by any means, but it deserved so much more time and attention than it clearly got, and really should have been delayed further, in my opinion. I've railed on the game a good bit, but I did really enjoy my time with it. If you're a Star Wars fan or just someone looking for a summer blockbuster type of game, I think this game is good fun and a great escape, but I still find myself all these months later scratching my head at how this game received the review scores that it did. With Stig Asmussen, director of both Fallen Order and Survivor, having left EA since this game launched, I am very curious to see how the third (and presumably final?) entry in the Jedi series shakes out under new direction. Final Fantasy XVI | 2023 Final Fantasy XVI is, hands-down, not just one of the most epic games I played in 2023, but one of the most epic games I've ever had the pleasure of playing through. I really do think that it's set a new bar for how epic a game can be, and there were times where I could just sense how much it was trying to push the PS5, and squeeze every last drop out of it - the first and so far only game I feel I've really had that experience with a console I've now been playing on for a bit over three years. The music, the boss fights and their varied approaches (ranging from an on-rails experience to a 3D brawler), the story, the pre-rendered cutscenes weaved between and around in-engine cutscenes almost seamlessly, it all just comes together to create an epic experience which is gripping from the very early hours of the game. Active Time Lore (or ATL), a feature which you can access during cutscenes to view details on characters, events, or locations present or referenced, is an awesome addition which I hope more RPGs take note of moving forwards. And yet, as a Final Fantasy game, it feels deeply flawed in some pretty important ways, which splits it fairly down the middle for me across the board - ironic, I think, given that the game flows so well in its first half in and out of different locales, story beats, and forms of play, but the second half of the game lags behind in comparison, feeling more like a checklist of activities between the game's mesmerising setpieces and boss battles. Perhaps this is in part down to Creative Business Unit III's storied history with Final Fantasy XIV, but the vast majority of quests are stale and relatively lifeless outside of a few at the very backend of the game - at which point you might have, understandably, given up on them; on the other hand, some really cool MMO-like elements, like attacks being telegraphed with patterns and lines drawn across from the floor, feel really fresh to the space, whereas as QoL features clearly inspired from their learnings with XIV, like quest markers and just overall quest tracking, are very welcome. The main draw for me with the game, though, which I've said it before, and I'll gladly say it again, is its soundtrack: it's the best OST for a game I've heard in a very, very long time, and Soken knocked it out of the park with his variety of approaches to the game's soundscape with a diverse approach to genres on display between tentpole bombastic displays of orchestral mastery during the game's key moments, and boss fights in particular. To name a few favourites, there's Away (the theme of Phoenix); the main battle theme, Sixteen Bells, which I think is up there with some of the best in Final Fantasy; Catacecaumene; Winter's Bound; Find the Flame; To Sail Forbidden Seas; A Far Cry From Heaven; Hide, Hideaway; All as One; and Lovely, Dark, and Deep, a wondrous forest theme. My favourite track in the entire game, though, has to be Ascension, a track heard partially in one of the game's trailers before release, which punctuates the most intense and epic boss battle of all in the game, and just the way the strings and choir escalate...it's just perfect. What makes this soundtrack so strong, as well, is that while it certainly pushes for fresh and new, it makes sure to pay homage to the feel and styles of older Final Fantasy games. Masayoshi Soken nailed it, as he has for years now in XIV, and I'm so glad that he finally got to put his stamp on a mainline, single-player Final Fantasy with XVI. I also just have to mention how masterfully the environmental tracks seamlessly transition into their respective battle theme variants, and also how the game handles its boss fight music, balancing the point at which you reach a battle cutscene and altering the music to allow it to catch up. The biggest problems with the game are that it lacks the levity and fun distractions of past Final Fantasy titles to break up the pacing and the oftentimes incredibly heavy plot; the combat lacks any serious depth and need for variety, even with flashy and fun combat, it rings hollow when there isn't much else to it and I can spend the entirety of the game with the abilities I pick up and have selected by default as the story progresses, which is doubled down on by the lack of weaknesses and strengths to elements as we've come to expect not just from Final Fantasy but of the genre as whole; and its abhorrent lack of any real sense of RPGness - story, characters, and music aside, there isn't much RPG to experience in this Final Fantasy, whether it be experimenting with different builds or really having an in-depth armour system, which is a huge letdown. Final Fantasy XVI can be a bit of a mixed experience; though at times brilliant, what it lacks so much is the mechanics and subtle mini-joys of a great Final Fantasy, because everything else which makes this series great is here. It has the soul, but not the body, of a brilliant Final Fantasy game. As a first crack, I think Creative Business Unit III did an excellent job and I think this is a really solid foundation to build from, so I can't wait to see what they could possibly do for mainline single-player Final Fantasy next, having seen how keen they are to learn from their perceived shortcomings at times with XIV. Armored Core VI | 2023 Let's not beat around the bush with Armored Core VI - I absolutely adored it. It took a little while to get to grips with the game, simply because it plays and feels so different to what I've come to be used to from the From Software titles I have played through, not to mention the slew of options at your disposal from relatively early on in the game to head towards a particular build for your bot; the almost overwhelming level of customisation you can do to your AC unit is incredible, and would be something I'd love to see translate over to other From titles (I mean, come on, at least let me re-colour everything so that it all somewhat matches!). Legs dictate your maximum load, your generator dictates your energy supply to keep everything turned on, you can equip a variety of weapons to your arms and shoulders, there's the core and arms which determine proficiency with weapons and obviously can add weight, there's the booster to help thrust you up into the air or to support your legs with dodges, the FCS (Fire Control System - essentially the main CPU in your AC, determining things like lock-on time and weapon range), as well as the head unit, which stores visual sensors. What you're left with, should you choose to play around with it, is an opportunity to create a mech perfect for your style of play - for me, based on what I love about mechs in anime and what I find cool in combat scenarios, was a focus on speed and flashiness, delivering precise blows and looking awesome while doing so. I probably spent upwards of 10 hours in the game designing mech after mech, tweaking colours, metallics, and the luster to create some designs I adored, all of which was a whole lot of fun! While combat is present throughout the game, it really comes to the fore in one-on-one scenarios, either against other AC pilots (my personal favourite fights) or in boss fights. This is where I think Armored Core VI shines and where I think the most fun comes from mastering the game and, similar to other From games, how you master your mech, learning rough times for deploying your arsenal, reloading, and the like as the game goes on. The game is heavily reliant on staggering your opponents and delivering heavy blows, and some AC and boss fights were absolutely awesome in that I found myself tweaking my AC unit further, perhaps needing a little more speed or sliding in a new generator for more power, but then perhaps this is offset by needing heavier legs to support the weapons I fitted the generator for, and so on. Now, while there is a need to learn enemy patterns and to learn your build (certainly one or two bosses feeling more like they'd belong in a Souls game rather tahn this one), what makes Armored Core so unique compared to other From games is that they are truly three-dimensional, in that they are omni-directional battles - for example, think back to other From titles (or most titles these days, honestly) and battles may be presented in a three-dimensional way, but they'll be completely two-dimensional in design, focusing mainly on the horizontal component of a battle, such as circling an opponent and dodging their attacks, making use of terrain, and so on. In Armored Core VI, however, verticality comes into play, as so many bosses and enemy units will fly around and take the battle into the air, and when combined with having so much to keep track of - your energy, your AP (health), your ammo.capacity for four different armaments, keeping your enemy centred, paying attention to audio cues - it can get very overwhelming at times, and there were definitely moments in first encounters with particular ACs or bosses where I felt a bit lost and found myself spamming buttons a bit. This is where a bit of a problem in AC's design shows itself: an almost one-size-fits-all solution is to get into the face of enemy ACs and just start wailing on them with heavy attacks, which is especially effective if you have a highly defensive and heavy build, with powerful armaments attached. This is a problem in a way because it removes the vertical component of combat, and heavier builds, by their very nature - big legs, tank tracks, quadripeds - have a much higher carry capacity - missiles, machine guns, etc. - and also a much higher health pool; this isn't how I approached the game, at all, but I've played around with heavy builds in revisiting the campaign and online, and I think while you should play how you want to play, it's a good way to get the least enjoyment of the game for someone like me. If you're a function over form type of person aiming to simply beat the game, then have at it, but for me, I found that this game is much more enjoyable with lighter builds and more of a focus on skill when it comes to dodge and attack timing. I played with a friend in 1v1 PvP and beat him for a few hours straight while playing with my lighter build from the very start of the game, before he eventually started to lean towards testing a heavier build, which ultimately meant that the tables turned: my weapons were effectively useless, my speed didn't matter, and his health pool and damage output and range from heavy armament attacks simply meant that he could fly up into the air and rain terror down on me. It took a lot of fun out of duking it out for the both of us, but then, why should my friend rely on a weaker build when he's having trouble fighting me or bosses? Similar to Elden Ring at launch, certain builds and weapons are very simply broken in AC VI, and so I seriously hope that whatever's next for AC, they do a better job of balancing things so that everyone can enjoy the approach they choose to take with the game. To touch briefly on the mission structure, this game felt like an old-school PS2 game, loading into individual missions, at times getting the chance to choose missions from branching paths, and this all feeds into earning more credits to spend on your AC. Missions aren't particularly long - perhaps 15 minutes or so at their longest, if there's a particularly tough boss you come across? - which means the game can probably be beat your first time around in 10 to 20 hours (depending on skill level, and obviously much, much longer if you love to customise your AC!), with alternate endings available through NG+ and NG++, both of which I throughly enjoyed. Replaying the missions you can also go for S-ranks based on the time it takes to complete the mission and credits earned (balanced out by credits spent on your loadout usage - for example, missiles can be pretty costly to use, as can aimlessly unloading a chaingun!), and while some of these can be a bit of a pain because there'll be some trick to getting the highest rank, I had loads of fun going through this game, what, at least four times? NG, NG+, NG++, S-ranks in all missions, not to forget the missions I replayed and didn't S-rank first time. The characters in this game and the overarching narrative from NG to NG++ is really intriguing, I loved learning new bits about certain characters or seeing how different endings played out by aligning with a different faction, and this is all propped up on the shoulders of perhaps modern From Software's best character dialogue (in fairness, driven by a lot more character interaction than in their other games) and some wonderful lines delivered by voice actors who seemed like they were simply having a blast in the booth, with a great sense of levity rarely - if ever - touched upon in their other titles. Armored Core VI was my first Armored Core game, and it certainly won't be my last. This has me interested in seeking out some of the older titles, and praying that substantial DLC or a sequel is already in the works so that I won't be waiting too long for my next mission. Marvel's Spider-Man | 2018 We can keep this one short, I think, seeing as it's a game I've spoken about before when replaying it in the Gaming Diary 2020 thread in preparation for its spin-off/sequel as well as initially playing it back when it launched in 2018, and that is of course Marvel's Spider-Man (the PS5 remaster, which looks awesome). Guess what? It's still awesome. Snappy combat, awesome soundtrack by John Paesano, some really great story beats which still get me emotional returning to the game now, addictively good web-swinging which is a good enough reason to visit everything highlighted on your map, and some awesome voice and motion-capture performances. It also has the same problems as before, such as the pacing tanking early into its final act due to certain world changes slowing your traversal down at times, and a silly amount of crimes to resolve becoming available for the first time in said third and final act. I also replayed and 100%'d The City That Never Sleeps DLC, bridging the gap between this game and Miles, and well, it was more Spider-Man, albeit in bite-sized chunks with some new enemies changing how you approach fights in very subtle ways, which I thought was really awesome. Also, getting more Black Cat was awesome. The Order: 1886 | 2015 Ready at Dawn made The Order: 1886 look absolutely incredible - in fact, it still looks visually better than most games releasing today. You work in an elite taskforce in an alternative world's London, tackling rebellions and hunting beasts as a conspiracy unfolds which threatens to tear London down, and all at the same time Jack the Ripper is lurking the streets. This all comes with some really fun and unique weapons available at times, such as an a thermite gun or a lightning-casting gun, and generally fun gunplay - but, weirdly for a cover-based shooter, enemies are out of focus when taking aim and the camera can often be so close you can barely see where around your cover. There's some stealth gameplay, too, and a uniqe mechanic I haven't come across in other stealth games where the takedown is tied to timing your attack with a repeatedly converging circle - it's a very small thing, but it just adds some stakes and an opportunity for failure, so I'm surprised we haven't seen this implemented in other games of the like. And speaking of other games of the like, it is very much a Naughty Dog-type game, sharing a lot of similarities for me with the first Uncharted - some great ideas, but not stellar execution, but a clearly defined direction, albeit with some shaky and uneven pacing. Considering the leap Uncharted made to Uncharted 2, it's a real shame, then, that this game was perfectly set up for a sequel we'll likely never get. Marvel's Spider-Man: Miles Morales | 2020 Another game I revisited in preparation for Spider-Man 2 is, of course, Marvel's Spider-Man: Miles Morales, which shares so much of its DNA with the first game that, well, you'll need to forgive me for repeating: it's still awesome. Snappy combat, awesome soundtrack by John Paesano (and some excellent new energy infused with the licensed songs added for the game), some really great story beats which still get me emotional returning to the game now, addictively good web-swinging which is a good enough reason to visit everything highlighted on your map, and some awesome voice and motion-capture performances. It is a bite-sized version of its predecessor, and this in some ways allowed Insomniac to react to the lapsed pacing in the final act of the first game, or the insane level of crimes, which you can now trigger at will rather than needing to wait for RNG to come into play. I don't think it's as strong as the first game, but it's still brilliant, and was an incredibly fun way to keep us somewhat occupied while waiting for the sequel. Marvel's Spider-Man 2 | 2023 Spider-Man 2 is a technical marvel, being one of the prettiest games to release on the current generation of consoles. The lighting, the shadows, those traced rays! It's simply beautiful, and I took plenty of screenshots throughout my time with the game. Haptics and adaptive triggers got special attention this time around, and were a noticeable step up from playing the Remastered version of the first game and Miles Morales. I rarely used it - because traversal is so fun in this game - but the speed of fast travel from one area of the map to another in this game is simply astonishing, as are the transitions from playing as Peter to Miles and back again. In terms of gameplay, while they definitely took a minute to get used to, I grew to love the Web Wings - it's just such a pleasant thing to glide around New York, and especially with the map being bigger this time around, the added speed included thanks to the game being exclusive to current consoles is very much warranted. The decision on top of this to do away with Ubisoft-style towers and instead have a map which unravels bit by bit as you see and explore new areas was a really smart move to keep this game feeling fresh compared to its contemporaries, and there's so much to naturally find yourself swinging towards thanks to some awesome environmental cues; I will say, though, that New York felt different this time around, and despite having completed 10 playthroughs in Insomniac's New York between Spider-Man and Miles Morales replays, there were times where I found myself feeling a bit lost. Is it the bigger map? The new coat of paint and new engine? The faster travel? Or is it simply a case of not having got used to this particular NY in this particular game? I'm not sure - maybe my next replay will help me figure that part out. I also adored being able to thread my own web lines across hideouts, which made engaging with the game's stealth so much more free and rewarding than I found it to be in the earlier two games. I was also a big fan of how they decided to shake up the MJ sections returning from the first game, with TLOU-lite sequences, and I'd genuinely be down for a little bit of DLC which fleshed this out some more. Something I found to be pretty hit-and-miss in the game, though, was its newly introduced Parry system, as it seemed superfluous as a mechanic everywhere but in particular boss fights where you had no choice but to rely on it. It can lead to some cool combat moments, but the game simply doesn't call for this added layer of mechanical depth in the way other games might, so I didn't feel a need to learn how to use it because it didn't feel like I was gaining much from using it, which made it even more jarring when I was being forced to use it. This in turn isn't helped by it most commonly being appropriate to use in instances where you're facing off against brutes and a swarm of grunts, who are going to overwhelm you while you try to use a Parry on the brute. I also wasn't a big fan of the AoE attacks that required you to jump to avoid them; perhaps it's because I've spent so long with the first two games now, but while I get it's a fresh idea, I again don't think it was a necessary addition and that dodging would have been fine in those moments. The game's story and characters are once again greatly realised, and I love so much of it that I think it's a bit of a shame that I found it falling apart - in its pacing, in its absurd scale, and in its character motivations (especially a certain one following the final battle) - in the final act. That aside, though, it feels so much like the Spidey I grew up with in the Raimi films, the 90s Animated Series, and the PS1 games, to the point that I'm happy to forgive it. This game also had the best side quests of the year last year, in my opinion, because I was surprised again and again by the direction they would take in setting things up for the future, the pay-off/time investment ratio felt super high (and thus they often felt incredibly rewarding), or just how much they would emotionally resonate with me. They just hit hard in ways I simply didn't expect, some of these quests will stay with me for a long, long time. Peter and Miles also felt much more involved in their communities, too, and the way the game weaves their inclusion and some great moments of inclusivity around this was great to see, on one occasion in particular in a way perhaps only video games can do. I had an absolute blast playing through this game, and it was yet another diamond in the crown that was 2023 for gaming. I can't wait to see what Insomniac do next. Yakuza: Like a Dragon | 2020 I love the Yakuza games; many of us here do. So, when it was announced that the next main series title, Yakuza: Like a Dragon, would be a job-centric, turn-based JRPG way back in 2019, a colossal change in genre and mechanics from the brawler routes of the series, while I think it's probably a bit harsh to say that we were scepitcal, we were certainly taken aback and a bit confused by the prospect - I mean, how couldn't you be? And yet, by and large, as Ryu ga Gotoku's first attempt at a JRPG, the game hit the mark. Almost all of them, in fact. It was certainly helped by the series's long and loud history with the gaudy and peculiar, reeling you in with laughter before punching you in the emotional gut and masterfully dancing between these two extemes, meaning that virtually nothing about the game's tone needed changing in the transition to JRPG-hood as might have been the case for other series making such a drastic leap. Substories were already a natural stand-in for typical side quests, as were many of the long-form side activities available, and in this game they're all a doozy: a business management mini-game which feels like a mobile gaming great without any of the trappings, the wacky and wonderful Mario Kart-like Dragon Kart, the many quizzes of a vocational school, a particularly fun reaction-based game where you need to stave off goats trying to make you fall asleep in the cinema, and a game about racing around on a bike to pick bottles and cans up to recycle. All of this generously feeds into the natural JRPG progession of obtaining money (boatloads, in the case of the management game, fairly early into the game's story), gaining EXP and levelling up (be it your character or their assigned Job), or forming meaningful bonds with your party to perform absurd team attacks. What's more, so much of this is contextualised, with you changing Jobs at a job centre, silly names akin to Dragon Quest being assigned to enemies and Ichiban's role as a hero clearly paying homage to that series through RGG's and Ichiban's clear affinity for those games, the turn-based nature all being a reflection of Ichiban's love for DQ too...it's simply wonderful. To briefly touch on the story - I think it's the best I've played through in the series since Kiwami 2, and probably right up there alongside 0 as the best paced, presented, and told. It benefits greatly from being slowed down by the turn-based nature of the game at times, and in a series at this point known for stunning twists, it perhaps manages to outdo even the best in the series in this regard. I was left floored by the end of the game. Now, there are some elements of this game I'd certainly question or describe as being rough around the edges: there are simply far too many street battles; the combat is pretty boring for the first two thirds of the game, until the difficulty begins to pick up and you have access to more healing and elemental attacks; one particular job having a fairly important out-of-combat ability tied to them but not being pointed out to you, the Foreman, which allows you to break through weak walls/obstacles with a hammer but is accessible by simply swapping to that job and back again, making me question why we need to bother with that at all; the battle menus need some serious tuning up, especially the items; dungeon design is, for the most part, incredibly bland, mostly comprising of a bunch of lifeless hallways; and Part-Time Hero is a bit of a lazy excuse to include fetch quests and have a stupid amount of collectables and craftables in the game. There are points in the game with difficulty spikes which will catch you out if you aren't immediately making your way to dungeons - while the game does point you towards these, they might as well have been made mandatory. I do also think that as the series's first jump into the genre that, and I say this simply because I have a friend who has played through all the other Yakuza games up to this point but had never played a JRPG before, perhaps the game could do a better job of introducing players to the genre, and while I love how it turned out by the game's last act, I do think that there's an argument to be made that, as the first game in the transition to JRPGs for the series, characters should have been assigned particular roles as you'd expect in an entry-level JRPG, and that the job system should have been saved for the next game. The lack of any true post-game leaves you with a bit of a mountain to overcome in terms of grinding when it comes to taking on the post-game dungeon, especially in its second form, and so I hope that Infinte Wealth does a better job of bridging the gap. The game walks the fine line of managing to take from and reference so many of the greatest JRPGs - be it Dragon Quest, Persona, Final Fantasy, or many others - in what should end up being a messy and confused Frankenstein of conflicting styles and aims, but the love and attention given to the game and the clear understanding of what makes a JRPG great means that you do end up with a game much greater than the sum of its parts. It beats out pretty much every other game available today for fun side content; the best way I can describe it is that it's the fun and addicting rewards of the early days of mobile gaming, without all of the gross baggage that comes with modern mobile gaming. The substories remain stellar beacons of hope that a side quest doesn't need to be longer than 5 minutes to make you feel something, and that you can have a side quest have both payoff now and a further 15 hours from now, but that a long string of quests should not be the norm to get to the heart of its message. If you take their not-so-subtle hints and grind when they want you to (when introducing new locations for the first time with a very obvious grind attached to the invite), it's really well paced and a decent enough challenge just at or a bit below the level they want you at. The story, while structurally not too far out from what we've come to expect from RGG, is arguably their most refined since 0, with twists and turns constantly bonking (honk-honking?) you on the head, knowing just when to pull you up for air before throwing you back into its deep end. The characters and all of the ways you can interact with them make you feel like you're actually on a modern day adventure, and they're all so perfectly captured in their voice and motion capture performances. The bow on top of all of this is that it's all stitched together with the soul of a hearty bowl of ramen. Like a Dragon is one of the best turn-based JRPGs to release in a long time, and a serious contender for being one of the best modern JRPGs. This game - and this series - is something special; they continue to cheer me up whenever I'm down, and, for me, I can't think of any greater testament to what this game and RGG continue to achieve and the message they seemingly strive to get across than the way they always make me feel: that there is no price to be put on a lasting smile. Like a Dragon Gaiden: The Man Who Erased His Name | 2023 And after Like a Dragon, it was a blast to the past - in both story and returning brawler mechanics - to Like a Dragon Gaiden: The Man Who Erased His Name. The game focuses on the fallout of Yakuza 6, and what Kiryu has been up to in the gap between 6 and Like a Dragon, as well as during the events of LAD. This game is awesome, and yet there's not so much I really feel driven to say about it? It's by far the shortest Yakuza game since 4, yet despite this is once again another great addition to the series with a stellar - but fairly silly, melodramatic, and at times pretty stupid - story which left me weeping by the time credits rolled, propped up by some fun side content (especially The Castle - well, for the most part), which certainly made up the bulk of my time with the game, as well as some awesome arcade escapes. Swinging guys around with Spider-Man like powers as Kiryu is so daft but just feels so satisfying, too, and I'm excited to see where the customisation options for outfits goes from here. Amazing ensemble, as always in these games, but special shoutout to Takaya Kurada's VA performance as Kiryu in this game; he's aways great, but this time it felt like he crushed this opportunity to show off some greater range and subtle differences to his performance, meaning no punches were pulled in the more exciting and heavier moments in the game. This all being said, there's some weirdness to this outing. The live-action footage being blended in during the game's opening was actually really cool - and smart, I feel - but encounters with real-life hostesses often felt out of place and eerie, a ring light clearly reflecting in their eyes and their performances felt rather stilted. It probably saves them money on developing models and animations for the game - or means that they can put that money towards the girls they want in these games - but the end result has you swinging through this awkward uncanny valley time and again. Overall, this was a worthy and relatively fast escape back into the shoes of the Dragon of Dojima, and a worthy title to bridge the gap between 6, Like a Dragon, and plant the seeds for whatever comes next in Infinite Wealth. I'm really excited to see if RGG decide to pursue another Gaiden outing at some point with a different character, because I think this would be an excellent way to return to and flesh out some previously playable characters, as well as see some new perspectives in the world of Yakuza/Like a Dragon. It's dangerous to go alone! Read this! Going into this last game in particular, I want to reiterate that while I won't be going out of my way to spoil things (particularly in terms of story beats), I will be talking about parts of the game not shown in pre-release footage - both in terms of my experiences, and in a more general sense. If somehow you've successfully actively avoided Tears of the Kingdom until now as part of some sort of media blackout, I suggest coming back to read this if and when you play the game for yourself, if you'd like to read my thoughts on it. I'd hate to spoil something for you, but it's impossible to talk about this game analytically without considering what it does and does not do differently to its predecessor, Breath of the Wild. The Legend of Zelda: Tears of the Kingdom | 2023 The Legend of Zelda: Breath of the Wild was a game which came out to much critical acclaim back in 2017 for the way that it tackled its open world, rewarding players for their exploration and giving them the freedom to traverse Hyrule, complete puzzles, and handle combat situations how they saw fit. However, here at N-E, the game split opinion, and I'd go so far as to venture that there are likely more people here who weren't fans than were, whether it be down to the combat, the menus, the overarching narrative being weak and scattered, the open nature of puzzle solutions, the game's perceived poor excuses for dungeons, the overwhelming silence of much of Hyrule during your adventure compared to Zelda soundtracks of old, the game feeling pointlessly vast and wide, and much more. While I don't agree with all of the criticisms I've seen of Breath of the Wild on here, I can certainly sympathise for longtime fans of the series who came away underwhelmed, and after experiencing the game for myself back in 2019, I do share the sentiment that there were a number of ways the game's sequel could look to improve on the foundation set by Breath of the Wild. I've said it before, but for me, Breath of the Wild is a good, if not great, game, overshadowed by it being a truly magnificent and unique experience in the landscape of gaming. The Legend of Zelda: Tears of the Kingdom, then, I found to be a sequel filled with having taken half-steps forward in some spots, and strides forward in others, held back at times by the familiar. Tears of the Kingdom borrows much from Breath of the Wild's open world Hyrule at the surface level; though the world has started to change and rebuild in the wake of Breath of the Wild's Great Calamity, though, the vast majority of these changes just don't feel as meaningful and plentiful as they perhaps should do. Vast plains and fields often remain vast plains and fields, and though changes in the world, like pirates taking hold of Lurelin Village seeing its inhabitants scattered across Hyrule while their home remains unsafe, many of these changes are tied to quests and are often short-lived. In the few places where changes have been made, though, they are stark and heavily contrast with Breath of the Wild, injecting some much-needed freshness to the world and adventure of Tears of the Kingdom. My favourite addition to the land of Hyrule was with its caves,which felt like mini-adventures for me to experience along my stay in Hyrule, and which repeatedly wowed me into realising new things about the game or viewing how to traverse the world slightly differently might give me more options for exploration. Which leads us to the game's Sky Islands, where your journey truly begins, and a plane which you will often find yourself returning to, which I personally loved to explore. Seeing certain spots above the clouds from up in the sky or even down at ground level adds this feeling of cohesion to the world, where you can find yourself seamlessly thrown up into the air and gliding blindly through a storm, adding a whole new layer of "what if I do this?" when it comes to exploration and traversing this enormous world. The game also smartly uses a unique mix of white stone and golden leaves and grass on the Sky Islands to make these locations feel so distinct visually from what is at ground level, as well as taking a softer approach to its music here with subtle shifts in composition to, again, retain that sense of identity for this particular plane. I loved diving off the edge of a Sky Island to swiftly make my way to the ground below, as well as many of the unique challenges found in the skies above Hyrule, and, for me, the Sky Islands never once got old during my playthrough. The way the structures and islands in the sky also interact with the sun rising or setting, or the Blood Moon taking hold of the sky, casting shadows across the land, just felt amazing to witness at times. This is all in stark contrast to The Depths, the black-as-night underbelly of Hyrule introduced to players relatively early on into the game. Chasms emanating gloom - this game's rebranding of malice from Breath of the Wild, I guess, because it is visually almost identical in appearance as a dark sludge giving off wisps of red - are easily identifiable on ground and at sky level, and diving into these chasms take you into an underground section you'll soon discover is as large as the entire map of Hyrule. Brightbloom Seeds acquired elsewhere in the game can be used to light up small areas in this abyss, surely one of the visually darkest areas in gaming in a very long time to the extent it almost feels like it was a risk to have this plane exist, and during your travels down in The Depths you'll find Lightroots which, when interacted with, will light up a pretty large area and unravel some of The Depths in your map. The place is infested with unique flora, such as a tree which looks like it blooms with the feathers of peacocks, and it all just adds to this sense that perhaps you shouldn't be down there. It would almost always be a relief to find Lightroots because of this, and similar to how I would go about marking Skyview Towers when in view and adding them to my map to seek out later on in my journey at the ground level, I also did the same here for Lightroots, their soft orange hue subtly piercing the dreadful black of the underground area. The Depths is filled with hard-hitting enemies, especially at the start of the game when you'll have very few hearts and little stamina to use to run away, and to make matters worse, each strike by an enemy down there will temporarily disable your hearts for the damage dealt until you either interact with a Lightroot , make your way back up to the surface, or through eating food cooked up with a certain ingredient for the desired effect of restoring these temporarily disabled hearts. This results in needing to cautiously make your way from one Lightroot or point of interest to another, and for me in particular, this meant treating The Depths more as something to be charted and traversed - like planning your route up a mountain face - rather than somewhere I would be going out of my way to seek out fights. There are many benefits to exploring The Depths, such as finding legendary armour and clothes previously tied to amiibo in Breath of the Wild, as well as finding rare items, unique enemies, tough challenges, but I think I only really see one unique biome while I was down there. Because of the approach I felt the game coaxed me towards - planning routes from Lightroot to Lightroot while avoiding combat - as well as the lack of diversity to the place, I honestly probably had most of my fill of The Depths some 5 or 10 hours into exploring it, and in later parts of the game this resulted in me only diving down chasms to light up the nearest Lightroot, see if anything interesting took my fancy in the immediate vicinity, and if not, to then move on, rather than taking the slow and measured approach of charting paths from one Lightroot to another to uncover large swathes of the underground map. It's a bit of a shame, really, and ultimately I understand Nintendo's decision to not reveal this before the game in pre-release footage because that initial "oh, wait, they did what?!" moment was amazing for me, but I find myself wishing there was more diversity to the biomes found in The Depths and would much rather they were dedicated pockets designed with certain ideas in mind rather than what they ended up being, which in turn might have freed up some resources to make more drastic changes to the ground level of this game. This brings me onto the new abilities introduced in the game, which were so vital to this adventure. I loved them. Perhaps it's just the way my mind works or how I've grown as a player since my last visit to Hyrule, but I much prefer the abilities added in this game to those present in Breath of the Wild. In Breath of the Wild, with the Bombs in particular, I found myself having rough ideas but having a bit of a finicky time executing on them, whereas there is very little room for interpretation when it came to realising what I was trying to do in Tears of the Kingdom, whether it be using Recall to summon a thrown weapon from across the room to catch it mid-fight or grab onto a chunk of rock recently fallen from the sky to ride it back up for a better view and an angle to glide down form; using Ultrahand to carefully place objects or items where and how I wanted, and construct structures, vehicles and weapons of varying degrees of craziness and mass destruction; or using Ascend to quickly make my way up to the summit of a mountain from a cave deep in its underbelly. What I loved most, though, was using all of these in conjunction with one another; one combination I found relatively early on in the game which supported much of my puzzle-solving throughout was to use Ultrahand to have, for example, a plank of wood move from one area to another carefully from the ground and through the air, before then climbing on top of it and using Recall to take it back through that line of movement, and hop off at a higher point and then glide down, oftentimes to open up a chest I had trouble reaching otherwise. Zonai devices being gacha'd out to you throughout the game are really fun to use on the fly, and while it does take a bit of time to get used to Ultrahand, once it clicks, I found myself constructing exactly what I wanted within the space of a minute, and then being able to test it out. I loved that these devices weren't doled out without care, but instead that accessing more of them were paced with your exploration, meaning that unless you were grinding for the currency required to use the ancient Zonai gacha towers, you typically found yourself in a risk/reward situation of deciding whether or not you wanted to make use of, say, your rockets, which almost definitely would get you to where you want to go...but I would find myself second-guessing those plans, asking if it was worth risking being wrong about that and losing out on using these rockets later? The other ability in the game, Fuse, is also a really interesting idea, giving you a way to add item effects to arrows during combat, or to recover the durability of a weapon (by fusing it with another), but because you find yourself inundated with weapons as reward for your exploration throughout the game, you often don't have any choice but to fuse weapons together long before the message pops up about them being at risk of breaking, meaning that this supposed workaround and fix for one of Breath of the Wild's biggest issues - weapon durability - isn't well, fixed. Adding item effects to an arrow is cool, and can be down by holding up on the D-pad with an arrow being aimed, but because you end up with so many types of items throughout the course of your journey and because Nintendo want to give you the option to do whatever you want, you end up needing to swipe right or left through a temporary menu of tens of items to decide what to attach; and, sure, you can sort by most used or most powerful, but this then almost immediately narrows down the options you'll have visible and will be likely to use, thus going away from the central idea at the core of these new abilities, which is to try new ideas out. Along similar lines, to fuse weapons together, one must be equipped and the other must be on the ground, meaning that you'll either be accessing the sub-menu which pops up when you aim to throw an item and then swipe around to select and throw a weapon you want to fuse at the floor, or just going through the standard menu and selecting an item to drop on the ground before fusing it with the weapon already equipped. Unfortunately, this slows down the possibility of creativity when it comes to Fuse greatly when compared with the other new abilities, and I found myself questioning why you couldn't save certain weapon fusions in a similar way to how at some point you unlock the ability to save items crafted with the Ultrahand, then use materials to build those saved fused weapons immediately. But then...why not just use the blacksmith strengthening idea so many of us hoped for after experiencing weapon durability in Breath of the Wild? I get what they were trying to go for, but I said it when it was first unveiled - this is the most Nintendo-like solution to this particular criticism, and having now played the game, I think it falls far short of having truly solved the issue so many had with weapon durability from before. Some other abilities you gain access to elsewhere in the game are good, but perhaps not all-around as strong as their Breath of the Wild counterparts, and needing to dig into menus to constantly to turn these particular abilities on and off was nothing short of an absolute pain. With the talk about abilities out of the way, I want to move onto Shrines: which, generally speaking, I think were just as good as, if not overall better than, their alternatives in Breath of the Wild. This, of course, is down in large part to me preferring the abilities available to Link from the start of the game this time around, but I also think the ideas showcased were unique and fresh in the face of being a sequel to a game which was already host to a crazy number of these things. Learning perhaps from how Eventide Island was such a widely talked about place in Breath of the Wild with how it took away your items and weapons, a number of Shrines in this game do the same for some short-lived Eventide-like challenges, but fall far short of the overall challenge and freshness Eventide Island injected into Breath of the Wild when compared with almost every other location in that game. Temples, on the other hand, weren't very well represented back in Breath of the Wild, with many - myself included, despite Breath of the Wild being the first Zelda game I saw to completion - left gutted by the shared design tenets across the Divine Beasts meaning they lacked any real traits which made them each feel unique, the sameyness of the bosses which lacked any serious challenge, and disappointing music. Tears of the Kingdom, thankfully, fixes much of that, and while I don't think these will go down collectively as the greatest temples in a Zelda game, the gauntlets leading up to each temple, seeing how the events of each temple was impacting the locals, their design philosophies and themes, puzzles and use of unique abilities means that it does signify something of a return to form, or at least the regularly scheduled programming, when it comes to temples. One temple in particular outshined the rest, though, and even has a boss theme which could well go down as the most memorable we've encountered in this version of Hyrule; I know my hairs were left standing on end when it finally kicked into high gear! What's perhaps most interesting, though, is that this is likely the first temple most players will reach first, purely down to the game seemingly pushing you towards it early on, which does does mean that the experience in temples in this game probably peaked for most with the first one. I mentioned before when talking about abilities that Ultrahand + Recall could be an OP combo throughout the game, and one minor annoyance when it comes to the temples is that with some smart use of these abilities, you really could find yourself completing a number of puzzles without needing to follow the intended path; similarly, in one or two instances, I would be able to awkwardly angle myself so that I could use Ascend to skip following the clearly intended path. Personally, I don't think this takes away from my experience with these temples or that it makes them broken simply because it was clear to me what was being asked of me, I just had a completely different answer to what was being asked, but I can imagine this might not be for everyone. To speak to this game's combat for a moment, I feel that it shares a very similar problem with the combat found in Breath of the Wild, with it probably peaking for each person's playthrough about 10 to 20 hours in and then becoming a chore, because it lacks any serious depth; although, this time around, I will say, I personally felt much more comfortable and confident in my ability to parry or time a dodge just right in order to gain access to a Flurry Rush. Similar to how I ended up avoiding fights in The Depths, I found myself eventually just skirting on by the majority of encounters simply because it seemed like a waste of resources and weapon durability, and also got in the way of me exploring, which is honestly a much bigger draw for me. They did, however, add much greater enemy variety this time around, with plenty of new and unique enemies found on each plane of this world, which is why I can't sit here and say that I could immediately pick up the combat where I left it in Breath of the Wild, because there was still more to see and new enemies to face down. The true highlight of the combat this time around was the bosses, whether it be in temples or just while roaming the overworld, with small but meaningful tweaks made to a lot of returning mini-bosses, and some really cool and unique ideas to be found in newly introduced mini-bosses. I particularly want to highlight Flux Constructs, because I would seek them out for bouts when I could see them off in the distance, as these battles felt much more in tune with what I thought the Divine Beasts would be like in Breath of the Wild, allowing you to use your abilities on these mini-bosses in a number of ways to gain the upper hand in puzzle-like showdowns, perhaps more akin to Shadow of the Colossus than anything else. Safe to say, I was a big fan! A lot of discourse around Breath of the Wild was centred around its story, or rather, its overwhelming absence of one. While I don't think every game needs a strong narrative, given that this is a series with a long history of clearly pushing hard for strong character moments and memorable story beats, going into Tears of the Kingdom, seeing the changes they made to their approach with the story was high on my list, and I think they genuinely delivered this time around. While there are still beats for you to experience through flashbacks obtained through interacting with certain elements out in the wide and sprawling open world, the decision to have players locate these through tracking down a spot on a geoglyph visible from tall mountains and up in the sky made it a much smoother experience than it was last time around in Breath of the Wild with its approach to visit previously photographed locations housed on the Sheikah Slate. There are a number of main quest lines in this game to shoot yourself down, too, some intertwining with others, and all giving you a great sense of direction should you want it, which I do feel the previous game was sorely lacking - despite loving the freedom I found myself with, a self-driven adventure can be a very difficult to push forwards with if you simply aren't in the mood. With Breath of the Wild I fell off some 40 hours into the game before returning to it later on that same year, whereas with Tears of the Kingdom I found myself falling off (due to other games coming out which seemed a bit more focused in terms of narrative) some 60 hours in, before returning to devour what was left of the game. A number of characters returned from Breath of the Wild, and I felt that they were all fleshed out much more than they were during that particular adventure, with some fun VA performances given across the board and every member of the secondary cast seemingly getting at least one moment to shine. This was reinforced by some wonderful updated music for a number of them, with the highlights for me being those for Sidon and Yunobu, and to touch on the music in a more general sense, while still absent during general exploration, I feel that this game did a much better job of providing you with a lot more moments to come across some excellent musical moments, as well as punctuating important story beats and boss fights with some great compositions, too. The sense of being a hero and trying to rebuild Hyrule is revisited regularly throughout the game with how frequently you end up helping out the strangers you come across, much more so than I felt was the case in Breath of the Wild, and this happens often in a variety of unique ways, which I really appreciated. I think the biggest problem I have with this game's story - and perhaps, even, the game overall - is just how little it acknowledges of Breath of the Wild. Long gone are the Sheikah Slate, the Sheikah Towers, the Sheikah Shrines, and the Guardians, having miraculously disappeared over night, but there's also so little said about the Great Calamity, and heck, even a number of characters will act like they've never seen Link before. For me, this results in the game at times feeling more like an enhanced, 2.0 version of Breath of the Wild rather than a true sequel, which I found disappointing, as I was really looking forward to seeing and feeling the impact Link and Zelda had been able to have in the time between the two games. While this is something I do not want to speak about with any real sense of depth - I think I'll dedicate some time to doing that in the game's own thread, in spoiler tags - I do need to touch on this game's ending, which for me, was an epic culmination more than worthy of the adventure I'd been on. The story, characters, and certain game mechanics are weaved into the narrative so tightly at the end of this game that it felt so incredibly satisfying and rewarding to see it all play out, with my jaw left agape at certain points as credits neared because of what I was experiencing, and I seriously think this will be an ending remembered for a very long time. For me, having only finished Ocarina of Time outside of Breath of the Wild before this (I know...) but seeing how much that game nailed its ending - I think this one lives up to the legacy of the series. Ultimately, I find myself reflecting on my time with Tears of the Kingdom incredibly fondly, especially in the early going; just thinking about certain moments in this game restores a sense of childlike awe and wonderment in me. There's a level of cohesion and forward-thinking here that I adore, and the few times where the game mixed interactivity between the different layers of the world, or figuring out certain connections between the Lightroots and this game's Shrines, were probably the highlights of my 100+ hours with - and 118 shrines completed - in the game. I will also reiterate comments I've made before about how I found I enjoyed Breath of the Wild most by playing a certain way, because in this game I once again found the most joy by turning off the Shrine Sensor and turning the Pro HUD on (which thankfully excludes health until in combat, this time around, making for some cleaner screenshots!); I'm of the opinion that this is the best, and perhaps even intended, way to experience the game, as so much more of this game's excellent design becomes apparent once you've freed yourself of the burden that is being turned onto everything around you, and simply enjoying the journey you're on. I am also very firm in saying that this game's sequel - or the next Zelda, seemingly destined to follow in the open world footsteps of Breath of the Wild and Tears of the Kingdom - cannot be set in this world again. It just can't. I think some of the magic was lost this time around with so much of the world being so similar, and while I think this was made up for more often than not by the new additions made as well as the new layers added, I came away feeling that this was the definitive way to experience this version of Hyrule, with the game perhaps serving more as an enhanced adventure rather than a fresh one which boldly and loudly continued on from what came before. Like Breath of the Wild, I think it is a great but flawed game at times overwhelmed and held back by its most simple functions, yet an experience truly unique unto itself, and I still find myself absolutely awestruck by some of the ideas I witnessed coming to fruition in this game, and that final stretch of the game was on a whole other level for me - it's going to be one talked about for a long time, I'm sure. There are very few experiences to be found in gaming like Breath of the Wild, and even fewer that I feel surpass the sense of freedom, adventure and respect afforded to you by that game, and yet here I am, willing and confident in saying that, while not perfect, I think Tears of the Kingdom did just that - and then some. And that does it for me and 2023. To anyone crazy enough to read all that, thanks, and I look forward to talking games and what I'm playing in 2024!

Maybe everyone needs to just be more of a morning person? I've not done anything yet as I'm away for a few days, but does seem to suggest it's a server thing (or at least out of our hands). Will try and keep an eye on what visitor numbers are like during slow and not slow times as that could potentially be an issue.

I'll be mainly focusing on my N64 games, but I will be playing a few odd ones. Finished Alan Wake II on the 1st then moved on to Sonic Superstars (which I'll post here rather than bumping the All Sonic games thread) Alan Wake II Release Date: 27th October 2023 Developer: Remedy Games Publisher: Epic Games Platforms: PC, PS5, Xbox Series Version Played: Xbox Series S I enjoyed the first Alan Wake a lot. Even though the gameplay wasn’t anything special – it was a decent action game – there was something about the atmosphere that captured me. It told the story of a writer that ends up getting his horror story twisted by a “dark presence” and finding himself getting trapped in it. A sequel was eagerly awaited and then teased inside Quantum Break, although it still didn’t come until after Control – however, Control had more direct links and even an appearance from Alan Wake in one of its DLCs. Now, 13 years later, we finally get a sequel to Alan Wake and it’s even better than I could have imagined. The combat is much smoother (although still not something that could hold up a game on its own), but the story and atmosphere are where the game truly shines. This time, you play as two characters, with Alan Wake’s part taking place in the dark place as he tries to rewrite his stories to escape, and FBI agent Saga Anderson investigating some murders happening in the town of Bright Falls. On top of Saga’s surname ringing a bell for fans of the series, her partner is Alex Casey, who coincidentally (or perhaps not) shares a name with the fictional detective in Alan Wake’s earlier books. He was originally a reference to Max Payne, renamed due to rights, and this is even more solidified by casting the same voice actor as Max Payne (James McCaffrey) while creative lead Sam Lake provides the voice model, just like he did from Max Payne. There are also a few characters from Quantum Break that are in a way reused in Alan Wake II in different ways – but it isn’t just lazy reuse, as different revisions is a big theme of the game. I won’t get into too many details of the actual story. It does leave a lot of unanswered questions, but all the inconsistencies and oddities along the way all seem important and purposeful – one character from the first game is completely redefined, for example. On top of that, while the first game was horror-themed, this one is an actual horror game. The game uses every method to create a sense of unease. While the game does utilise jump scares, the jump scares themselves aren’t supposed to scare you, they’re just part of the atmosphere to create the feel of the game – the only jump scare that made me leap on its own wasn’t even a horror moment. Other parts of the cauldron are the lighting and shadows – with the shadows moving – and sound effects. In the first game, you knew to expect an enemy after each “talkie” bit, but in Alan Wake II you don’t always encounter one (and in some cases, can be actually avoided), yet it’s a much scarier as a result. The possibility of an encounter with something unknown is immensely more frightening than a fight with another generic enemy. But it’s not just the horror feeling that’s done using a mixture of different parts, the story itself is told in many different ways. The game mixes in live action parts (which, due to the graphics, blend in surprisingly well), such as a talk show and a 15 minute Finnish short film. Music also plays a large part, both within gameplay, with my favourite band Poets of the Fall reprising their role as Old Gods of Asgard – this time even portraying their live action versions, which was partly foreshadowed in American Nightmare – and some songs from other characters, with one particular moment causing me to create a separate save file just so I can go through that section whenever I want. The songs played at the end of chapters are also very important to the game and, if you pay attention to the lyrics, can reveal new details, as most were specifically created for the game. Alan Wake II is a phenomenal experience. It’s packed with details and is incredibly suspenseful the entire way though. I’m already eagerly awaiting the DLC, Control 2 and the next Alan Wake to find out more about this bizarre and wonderful universe. Alan Wake II is easily one of my favourite gaming experiences. (I had issues with screenshots at some points, due to sharing settings not being right, plus for a lot of it I was so immersed I forgot to take screenshots) --- Sonic Superstars Release Date: 17th October 2023 Developer: Arzest, Sonic Team Publisher: Sega Platforms: PC, PS5/5, Xbox One/Series, Switch Version Played: Xbox Series S Sonic Superstars is a new 2D Sonic game, but in a wonderful looking 3D visual style. The core gameplay is similar to the original Sonic games, with Sonic’s movement and physics replicated extremely well, making Sonic Superstars feel right at home to fans of the originals. While the game is designed for local co-op, the levels in the game don’t feel compromised in any way and work perfectly well when playing on your own. You can also swap characters between levels if you wish, and a few bonus acts focus on specific characters, being fully built around their traits. Level design is great in Superstars, having lots of alternative routes and featuring lots of gimmicks. There is no reliance on blind jumps, although some obstacles can be difficult to avoid. Most missed jumps and falls will send you down to slower routes. You will eventually reach bottomless pits, but they feel well deserved rather than cheap tricks. Chaos Emeralds have a bigger use in gameplay than in previous games, as each one (found by entering hidden rings and completing a decent special stage) will provide Sonic (or Tails, Knuckles or Amy – plus a new character you can unlock) with a new ability, which can be activated during a stage. These abilities are interesting and fun, but aren’t integrated into the game very well and I found myself completely forgetting about the system – but on the other side of things, it also means they don’t get in the way either (in a way that some people feel Wisps did). The biggest issue with Sonic Superstars is the bosses. In terms of design, they’re a nice mix of different and interesting bosses, however as the game was designed for co-op, you can only hit them once during an attack sequence – no getting any sneaky extra hits in. The bosses spend most of their time invincible as you wait far too long between potential attacks. To make matters worse, some bosses are extremely long with platforming sections in between each stage, with no checkpoints throughout the entire thing. The frustrating thing is that it wouldn’t take much to change the bosses into incredibly fun ones. Sonic Superstars is an extremely solid 2D Sonic game and feels like a great modern take on that style of gameplay (as opposed to Mania keeping things more in the past). It’s a shame that the bosses spoil the fun, as if those were improved, Superstars would be among the best Sonic games.

My favourite yearly gaming vid has arrived. Love seeing what classic these guys delved into over the course of the year.