ReZourceman Posted March 22, 2012 Share Posted March 22, 2012 Oh. If Rummy is the one who vote blocked, then yes. That is suspicious. Its mildly curious that it would be used so early though... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nintendohnut Posted March 22, 2012 Share Posted March 22, 2012 @Jimbob - I don't understand how you got two lots of information on night 2. You said you were blocked one night, but you now have two pieces of information - how? And what kind of pointless role is a role blocker that doesn't actually role block? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
heroicjanitor Posted March 22, 2012 Share Posted March 22, 2012 @Jimbob - I don't understand how you got two lots of information on night 2. You said you were blocked one night, but you now have two pieces of information - how? And what kind of pointless role is a role blocker that doesn't actually role block? It seems he receives delayed results? Tales was the one who targeted Jimbob last night btw, and since Jimbob said he was blocked and Rummy didn't mention anything I assumed Tales was a roleblocker, which he isn't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Diageo Posted March 22, 2012 Share Posted March 22, 2012 I think that At least for now, not enough people think rummy is Evil enough to vote for him. which is Understandable enough. I'll take my vote away for today. remove vote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dannyboy-the-Dane Posted March 22, 2012 Share Posted March 22, 2012 I must admit Rummy is starting to sound more suspicious, but I don't really know what to think yet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MadDog Posted March 22, 2012 Share Posted March 22, 2012 I'd vote for Rummy if i could. I think he needs to be lynched. He's going to target nobody tonight, and every townie is going to target him and drag us all away from the rest of the mafia, while they go about their business easily, we will gain nothing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Peeps Posted March 23, 2012 Author Share Posted March 23, 2012 DAY THREE IS OVER 16 Players: @Dannyboy\-the\-Dane @mr\-paul @Nintendohnut @ReZourceman @Rummy @Tales @Yvonne 1 dead: DuD NIGHT THREE STARTS NOW Please send in your PMs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rummy Posted March 23, 2012 Share Posted March 23, 2012 Guessing characters could help with identification but in a game where a pink blob could be anything at all its stabbing in the dark. On the Rummy score. He's always inclined to be a little bit difficult and play devils advocate so the "tone" of his play doesn't bother me at the moment. He does seem to be labouring the ReZ point a bit though. I was a little suspicious but all it needed was "hey, ReZ hasn't been cleared" rather than this ongoing accusation. If his power is determined by other peoples actions sounds defensive. Could go either way. Rummy, would it be a problem to know who your reactive power targeted on the first night? Gaaah, I didn't focus on ReZ! I mentioned what I found curious(If i was focusing on him I would have voted), but then I just mentioned it as what I found strange. Then people kept asking me why, or mentioning why, or the fact I did, and so I responded! I'm not focusing on him, people keep mentioning it in the context of me and I feel compelled to point out that I'm not massively bothered by it. Just compared to everything else I have, it bothes me more! I'm starting to feel like I'm being painted Yes, you have explained your reasons, and all I'm saying is that I just don't follow them. I don't see anything strange about clearing a silent player (which you really don't have to be a cop to do), and to be fair pretty much everything is unconfirmed at this stage in the game. I find it's you who keep focusing on ReZ and his apparent suspiciousness, and since I don't follow your logic, that's what I've been focusing on. For the record I don't suspect you of anything or believe you to be mafia. In fact I'm more inclined to believe you're town since you're always so paranoid when town. Anyway, are these all the leads we have for today? Nothing I find immediately suspicious, I'm afraid. And all I'm saying is that I'm responding to the constant 'oh I find it suss why are you goingt hat rummy' to say that I only find it curious and not that big a deal! See above. Sure, you don't follow them, but if you keep pointing that out, I'm inclined to point out why I'm saying it and the lack of severity with which I'm saying them. I'm just talking frommy own point of view if I was in that situation. Really? No one thinks a vote blocking power is at least a little suspicious? I guarantee you, *I* didn't do that. Maybe I lead to it, but that was out of my hands completely. Soz @The Peeps, posted while you posted :x Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Peeps Posted March 23, 2012 Author Share Posted March 23, 2012 ^I'll allow it. Times check out :p Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Diageo Posted March 23, 2012 Share Posted March 23, 2012 Does it? You posted at 12:10 where he posted at 12:14. That is understandable if the post was large, but additionally. After completing the first post, he added a second post, that automerged at 12:20. I believe the second post is a little more dubious in nature. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Peeps Posted March 23, 2012 Author Share Posted March 23, 2012 I'm assuming the automerge was him adding the mention to me and apologising because obviously he wouldn't have seen my post until he had already posted and he can't edit. I'm giving him the benefit of the doubt, if he started his post in the same minute as I posted, it took him 4 minutes to post what he did - finding 3 quotes and responding to each point and proof reading. I think it's fine. But you tell me, what time does it say he quoted you? You can check it in your profile. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Diageo Posted March 23, 2012 Share Posted March 23, 2012 12:14. The automerge appears to be the apology. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rummy Posted March 23, 2012 Share Posted March 23, 2012 I'm sorry I was actually cheating please ban me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nintendohnut Posted March 23, 2012 Share Posted March 23, 2012 Does it?You posted at 12:10 where he posted at 12:14. That is understandable if the post was large, but additionally. After completing the first post, he added a second post, that automerged at 12:20. I believe the second post is a little more dubious in nature. NOT. COOL. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Diageo Posted March 23, 2012 Share Posted March 23, 2012 NOT. COOL. Says the guy that was convinced that I deleted a post in a past mafia game, and even got mods involved. :p Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cube Posted March 23, 2012 Share Posted March 23, 2012 Can we all just forget about it and go to sleep? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Diageo Posted March 23, 2012 Share Posted March 23, 2012 I'm sorry. Is my talking getting in the way of you waiting for the next day to happen? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Peeps Posted March 23, 2012 Author Share Posted March 23, 2012 No one likes it when people enforce the rules of the game :p If someone cheats it should be called out tbh, no need to get on his case. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jonnas Posted March 23, 2012 Share Posted March 23, 2012 True, not even the mods like enforcing rules, at times But really, automerge. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nintendohnut Posted March 24, 2012 Share Posted March 24, 2012 Yeah, but when the GM has clearly said he's letting it off, yet you still pursue it. It's not the same situation, really. And it's not cool. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EEVILMURRAY Posted March 24, 2012 Share Posted March 24, 2012 Yeah, but when the GM has clearly said he's letting it off, yet you still pursue it. It's not the same situation, really. And it's not cool. It undermines the rules that exist if they won't be enforced. Not Rummy's as it looks like a geniune mistake, but the ensuing conversation (and indeed this post, I accept any punishment) was clearly a breach with complete disregard for the rules. But anyways, moving on. MAKE THE DAY START! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nintendohnut Posted March 24, 2012 Share Posted March 24, 2012 Not really, we're not discussing the game itself. We're discussing whether Rummy posting at pretty much the same time as the day ended was okay. Diageo seemed to be making an effort to ensure Rummy was punished, despite the GM saying he understood about the timing and was letting it go. Rummy broke the rules, but it was a complete accident. But yes, I agree - DAY TIME. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Diageo Posted March 24, 2012 Share Posted March 24, 2012 I completely agreed that the first post was a mistake. I was questioning the post that came afterwards and was automerged. The Peeps made me aware that the quotes are time marked on the page of whoever was quoted, and we were able to conclude that the added bit was the apology. It therefore ended and everyone was happy. I don't see why you needed to inject any drama into it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Peeps Posted March 24, 2012 Author Share Posted March 24, 2012 As I said, no need to get on anyone's case :p I will attempt to start the day tonight after work. It will either be midnight tonight or midday tomorrow. Sorry4neglect Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EEVILMURRAY Posted March 24, 2012 Share Posted March 24, 2012 I don't see why you needed to inject any drama into it. You're right, I should remind people of past scandals in previous mafia games instead. Not to worry, I understand your point. No need to reply, it'd cause more drama. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts