Rummy Posted May 11, 2011 Posted May 11, 2011 ReZ, it kind of popped up earlier, but why WERE you so insistent on finding out who targetted you on Night 1?
ReZourceman Posted May 11, 2011 Posted May 11, 2011 ReZ, it kind of popped up earlier, but why WERE you so insistent on finding out who targetted you on Night 1? That was night 2 that I was so insistent, and it was because I reverse tracked myself and was attempting to catch out (liars).
Rummy Posted May 11, 2011 Posted May 11, 2011 As I've already said, I am talking about Night 1. It was Night 1.
Jonnas Posted May 11, 2011 Author Posted May 11, 2011 Vote Standings Dannyboy-the-Dane (1): Ellmeister Cube (2): Dyson, Esequiel Majority is 11
ReZourceman Posted May 11, 2011 Posted May 11, 2011 As I've already said, I am talking about Night 1. It was Night 1. Can you quote the posts? I don't remember specifically being so insistent, but if I was I can only think it would have been because of my "inconclusive" result on Nintendohnut, to see if anyone might have done anything that screwed with it. Oh I just found it. It says in the post why I needed to know.... Tis the upmost of importance that if you targeted me I know immediately. (Obviously a request the mafia won't oblige) and tis' likely I was targeted by a mafia. For this very night I behested my trust unto one of my many companions, and may I add my most competent of companions. Searching for the truth my companion returned confused. I am willing to reveal more if some time passes with no confession of meddling, and in this case questions will be asked by me unto another player.
Nintendohnut Posted May 11, 2011 Posted May 11, 2011 Thanks for the clearing ell. I guess you targeted me last night? Eenuh, who did you target last night?
Tales Posted May 11, 2011 Posted May 11, 2011 So Nintendohnut spends 48 pages telling us how they are going to prove they're town and then don't do it? Right. *Nintendohnut and dannyboy.
Ellmeister Posted May 11, 2011 Posted May 11, 2011 Basically, I did target Nintendohnut to jailkeep, yet he instead used traps (I wasn't sure what the final "plan" was) so instead I was caught in a trap. So all I can really verify is that Nintendohnut does use traps like he has said all along. Eenuh if you were caught in traps, did you target Nintendohnut? What were you trying to do?
Beast Posted May 11, 2011 Posted May 11, 2011 Rummy, I need to know if you agree to do what I said on the last part of Day 5...just a simple 'yes' or 'no'. Also, I've got nothing, the results still come up as Good only this time, I know it's the truth!
Rummy Posted May 11, 2011 Posted May 11, 2011 Can you quote the posts? I don't remember specifically being so insistent, but if I was I can only think it would have been because of my "inconclusive" result on Nintendohnut, to see if anyone might have done anything that screwed with it. Oh I just found it. It says in the post why I needed to know.... Yeah there was a couple of them(and I remember because as I said I targetted you that night), then I saw the one explaining why, but then I also realised I was like half hour late for work so I didn't post, scuse my questions :x
Beast Posted May 11, 2011 Posted May 11, 2011 Rummy, would really like to know if you agree or not, lmao.
Rummy Posted May 11, 2011 Posted May 11, 2011 Well, I think I just about got what you were saying, and I'm willing, but things might have gotten a bit tricky.
chairdriver Posted May 11, 2011 Posted May 11, 2011 Everyone should go back and read the thread to look at who did/didn't vote for Marcamillian.
ReZourceman Posted May 11, 2011 Posted May 11, 2011 Did vote for Marcamillian; Diageo Dyson Tales EddieColeslaw aqui1a Dannyboy-the-Dane ReZourceman Jayseven Flinky Esequiel Nintendohnut Cube Did not vote for Marcamillian aqui1a chairdriver Dazz Eenuh Ellmeister MadDog (deceased) Rummy Sméagol The Peeps Zell Voted for Mundi but not Marcamillian; The Peeps aqui1a Dazz Ellmeister Apart from Diageo have we actually 100% cleared anyone as good? (As close to 100% as likely/possible/etc)
Rummy Posted May 11, 2011 Posted May 11, 2011 I DID vote for him, just after majority. I'd stated earlier when I was planning to, I just wished to give him time to check the thread after working. A rather rushed lynch with no time to defend/talk for yourself is quite annoying. Though in his case the bastard deserved it :p
ReZourceman Posted May 11, 2011 Posted May 11, 2011 Vote after majority means nothing in my book. If anything it makes you more suspicious. But I don't want to start a rumble with Lord Rummilicious. :p
Cube Posted May 11, 2011 Posted May 11, 2011 I'm to lazy to do this myself. Can you do a list of people who did vote for Marcamillian but didn't vote for Mundi?
Rummy Posted May 11, 2011 Posted May 11, 2011 Well how about the fact I didn't vote for Mundi despite everyone being convinced he was evil? Or does that count for less than my voting(and expressing clear intention) to vote for Marcamillian. Or did I somehow predict the future and did the former JUST to futureproof against this very situation when I KNEW Marcamillian would end up on a vote and use this as my defense of being innocent. Oh wait, that's ridiculous.
ReZourceman Posted May 11, 2011 Posted May 11, 2011 I'm to lazy to do this myself. Can you do a list of people who did vote for Marcamillian but didn't vote for Mundi? How would that help? Well how about the fact I didn't vote for Mundi despite everyone being convinced he was evil? Or does that count for less than my voting(and expressing clear intention) to vote for Marcamillian. Or did I somehow predict the future and did the former JUST to futureproof against this very situation when I KNEW Marcamillian would end up on a vote and use this as my defense of being innocent. Oh wait, that's ridiculous. All I was saying is that mafia can EASILY vote after majority has been reached and pretend they didn't realise it had already been reached, and so in my eyes voting after majority has been reached doesn't mean a damn in regards to voting patterns, which is what we're currently looking at.
Rummy Posted May 11, 2011 Posted May 11, 2011 And all I'm saying is I didn't want to rush a lynch on someone KNOWING they weren't able to come online and check the thread.
Aqui1a Posted May 11, 2011 Posted May 11, 2011 Did not vote for Marcamillian aqui1a chairdriver Dazz Eenuh Ellmeister MadDog (deceased) Rummy Sméagol The Peeps Zell Voted for Mundi but not Marcamillian; The Peeps aqui1a Dazz Ellmeister Apart from Diageo have we actually 100% cleared anyone as good? (As close to 100% as likely/possible/etc) lawl, Please don't falsely incriminate me Rez! I voted for Mundi AND Marca.
ReZourceman Posted May 11, 2011 Posted May 11, 2011 And all I'm saying is I didn't want to rush a lynch on someone KNOWING they weren't able to come online and check the thread. Okay but I didn't bring that up.
chairdriver Posted May 11, 2011 Posted May 11, 2011 Copy n pasting a list isn't really the same. [i, for one, was one was like "realistically let's vote for him".]
Recommended Posts