Mundi Posted March 11, 2008 Posted March 11, 2008 http://uk.rottentomatoes.com/m/jurassic_park_4/news/1662545/ Seriously... what the hell? For lazy people, it says that the dinosaurs in Jurassic Park 4 will have guns...
Slaggis Posted March 11, 2008 Posted March 11, 2008 http://uk.rottentomatoes.com/m/jurassic_park_4/news/1662545/ Seriously... what the hell? For lazy people, it says that the dinosaurs in Jurassic Park 4 will have guns... There's no way in hell thats real, the "leaked info" will be fake. They wouldn't be that stupid would they?
Mundi Posted March 11, 2008 Posted March 11, 2008 I´m hoping it´s fake but seeing how the last two were I think this was the only way to make it crappier :/
Ashley Posted March 11, 2008 Posted March 11, 2008 Mila Kunis can't be hot, she is voicing Meg, it's not possible! This certainly defies a physical law :P In other news: Jet Li is in the third mummy film. Read it in some paper lately. Seth Green voices Chris, and Seth Green is, as we all know, the epitome of cool.
killthenet Posted March 11, 2008 Posted March 11, 2008 I doubt they'll actually be holding guns and pulling the trigger, most likely they'll have them mounted to their heads and they'll be controlled by remote, but somehow they'll figure out how to use them themselves. I also hear that the dinosaurs legs will be replaced with those things that Oscar Pistorious uses, so that they can run faster and jump higher and shoot things better.
killthenet Posted March 11, 2008 Posted March 11, 2008 I know what you mean. After the ending of "Jurassic Park 3" I was incredibly optimistic for Jurassic Park 4. It seemed like things were going to get interesting, with the dinosaurs migrating off island and becoming part of the natural world again. Hopefully they'll still do some interesting stuff in that vein, because there's definately a lot that they can do with it. But I guess that would mean dealing with issues too serious for the majority of the movie going public.
ReZourceman Posted March 11, 2008 Posted March 11, 2008 Theres no way they'll let happen. JP3 was amazing IMO, and as KTN said I was very optimistic. Having said that JP4 has been "in production" or "coming soon" for years now.
killthenet Posted March 11, 2008 Posted March 11, 2008 Since when have I been KTN? There are at least 4 more letters in there somewhere.
ReZourceman Posted March 11, 2008 Posted March 11, 2008 Couldn't be bothered to type the full name. KTN sounds cool.
LazyBoy Posted March 11, 2008 Posted March 11, 2008 Ha, Rezourceman, i'm all for opinions and stuff, but JP2&3 were shit. The first however was legendary. I remember every bit of seeing that for the first time.
ReZourceman Posted March 11, 2008 Posted March 11, 2008 Ha, Rezourceman, i'm all for opinions and stuff, but JP2&3 were shit. Not true. Simply not true. Do they pail in comparison to Jurassic Park? Of course, because it was amazing. Literally amazing, but to say The Lost World and 3 were shit is just false. They were both good and entertaining movies.
LazyBoy Posted March 11, 2008 Posted March 11, 2008 Not true. Simply not true. Do they pail in comparison to Jurassic Park? Of course, because it was amazing. Literally amazing, but to say The Lost World and 3 were shit is just false. They were both good and entertaining movies. "What does it mean" "The five deaths" OMFG the five deaths thats bad shit.
Mundi Posted March 11, 2008 Posted March 11, 2008 I think it´s very obvious... it´s just a bad movie.
ReZourceman Posted March 11, 2008 Posted March 11, 2008 Surely theres other people besides me who liked it?
Cube Posted March 11, 2008 Posted March 11, 2008 Surely theres other people besides me who liked it? *Waves hand*
ReZourceman Posted March 11, 2008 Posted March 11, 2008 See! The bird cage bit was undeniably awesome.
Cube Posted March 11, 2008 Posted March 11, 2008 See! The bird cage bit was undeniably awesome. Yea. It had loads of entertaining bits, as did the second. They just weren't sewn together very well and so pale in comparison to the first film. Which itself pales in comparison to the book.
ReZourceman Posted March 11, 2008 Posted March 11, 2008 Yea. It had loads of entertaining bits, as did the second. They just weren't sewn together very well and so pale in comparison to the first film. Which itself pales in comparison to the book. A) Agreed 100% (Apart from book as I havnt read it) B) I just realised I wrote pale wrong in my above post. Heh.
Oxigen_Waste Posted March 11, 2008 Posted March 11, 2008 Not true. Simply not true. Do they pail in comparison to Jurassic Park? Of course, because it was amazing. Literally amazing, but to say The Lost World and 3 were shit is just false. They were both good and entertaining movies. Well, I hate to be with the majority here, but... Lost World was ok, now JP3 was just awfull.
Intensity Posted March 11, 2008 Posted March 11, 2008 Jurassic Park 2 had its moments, Jurassic Park 3 was garbage. Jurassic Park 4 should not be made unless Speilberg directs.
Paj! Posted March 11, 2008 Posted March 11, 2008 JP2 was interesting as it took a totally different viewpoint from the frst one. JP3 went back the first one in terms of how it played out, and I enjoy it. It's more fun that The Lost World.
Recommended Posts