rokhed00 Posted December 23, 2008 Posted December 23, 2008 God....so epic. So fucking epic. Fingers are easiest to find it, but if you get in the right position a penis can devastate a G-Spot. A tongue is better.
nightwolf Posted December 23, 2008 Posted December 23, 2008 Long tongue? Oh wait...don't go there *childish voice* G spots seem overrated!
Eenuh Posted December 23, 2008 Posted December 23, 2008 yEEEEEEEEEEEP! Indeed! ^__________^' ...Am I seriously being "explicit"? I'm just assuming the sex thread is the place for expousing those sexy tidbits. Are there any boundaries? Actually this is the sexuality thread, not the sex thread (which we used to have someday). Plus since this board also has younger people visiting it, I'm not sure it's such a good idea to be explicit, but hey!
Falcon_BlizZACK Posted December 23, 2008 Posted December 23, 2008 Actually this is the sexuality thread, not the sex thread (which we used to have someday). Plus since this board also has younger people visiting it, I'm not sure it's such a good idea to be explicit, but hey! You're right... might mess up their insides
Ashley Posted December 23, 2008 Posted December 23, 2008 Yes, as Eenuh said this is a discussion for sexuality, not sex. In other words not a chance to say "hehe boobs!"
Pookiablo Posted December 23, 2008 Posted December 23, 2008 G spots seem overrated! You wouldn't be saying that if I were to come across yours!
Dannyboy-the-Dane Posted December 23, 2008 Posted December 23, 2008 I recently read something about a (Norwegian?) scientist having made tests regarding G-spots. His results seemed to indicate that only one fourth of all women even have a G-spot, but his results were criticised by other scientists claiming he had far too few participants in the tests to deem them reliable. *wanders off again*
Falcon_BlizZACK Posted December 23, 2008 Posted December 23, 2008 Bjork feels the majority of human beings are bisexual but believes that due to different factors (culture, politics etc) people suppress it. Who is in agreement with this and why? I think I'm inclined to believe her, mainly because I feel I am close to being psychic and I know human nature all too well. Even the so-called 'straightest' of guys will have an "urge" to peek at you while you're changing in the changing rooms... why?
Slaggis Posted December 23, 2008 Posted December 23, 2008 Bjork feels the majority of human beings are bisexual but believes that due to different factors (culture, politics etc) people suppress it. Who is in agreement with this and why? I think I'm inclined to believe her, mainly because I feel I am close to being psychic and I know human nature all too well. Even the so-called 'straightest' of guys will have an "urge" to peek at you while you're changing in the changing rooms... why? The "peeking" thing, is human nature. There was a study about it, that I read of somewhere. There was a picture of a guy playing baseball, and then some men and women had the movements of their eye tracked. The women focused mainly on the head, whilst the men focused on both the head and the crotch. It doesn't suggest Bisexuality...it's just men sizing up the competition.
Dannyboy-the-Dane Posted December 23, 2008 Posted December 23, 2008 Bjork feels the majority of human beings are bisexual but believes that due to different factors (culture, politics etc) people suppress it. Who is in agreement with this and why? I think I'm inclined to believe her, mainly because I feel I am close to being psychic and I know human nature all too well. Even the so-called 'straightest' of guys will have an "urge" to peek at you while you're changing in the changing rooms... why? Hm, interesting viewpoint ... however, if it's true, we suppress it to extreme degrees.
chairdriver Posted December 23, 2008 Posted December 23, 2008 I'm slightly bisexual, in the sense that I don't actively masturbate to women or seek women out, but in the right circumstances can see myself having lovely sex.
Paj! Posted December 23, 2008 Posted December 23, 2008 Humans are sexual beings. They will fuck anyone and anything, depending on their own personal desires. But at the very basis, doesn't sexual gratification come from pleasuring oneself (no matter the how)? In that respect she's right. (Kudos for quoting Bjork)
Dannyboy-the-Dane Posted December 23, 2008 Posted December 23, 2008 Thinking about it, I'm not sure I agree. Biologically, the objective of sex is to reproduce. That's why we love it so much: We've been genetically designed to want to do it as much as possible. With that in mente, it wouldn't make sense that we're all born bisexual. But again, we still really have no explanation for alternative sexual preferences, so nothing is really certain.
mr_bogus Posted December 23, 2008 Posted December 23, 2008 I'm sure i remember Sting having made a similar statement to Björk's at some stage... I definitely believe it.
weeyellowbloke Posted December 23, 2008 Posted December 23, 2008 Pope attacks blurring of gender Pope Benedict XVI has said that saving humanity from homosexual or transsexual behaviour is just as important as saving the rainforest from destruction. He explained that defending God's creation was not limited to saving the environment, but also about protecting man from self-destruction.The Pope was delivering his end-of-year address to senior Vatican staff. His words, later released to the media, emphasised his rejection of gender theory. Speaking on Monday, Pope Benedict XVI warned that gender theory blurred the distinction between male and female and could thus lead to the "self-destruction" of the human race.Gender theory explores sexual orientation, the roles assigned by society to individuals according to their gender, and how people perceive their biological identity. Gay and transsexual groups, particularly in the United States, promote it as a key to understanding and tolerance, but the Pope disagreed. When the Roman Catholic Church defends God's Creation, "it does not only defend the earth, water and the air... but (it) also protects man from his own destruction," he said. "Rainforests deserve, yes, our protection, but the human being ... does not deserve it less," the pontiff said. It is not "out-of-date metaphysics" to "speak of human nature as 'man' or woman'", he told scores of prelates gathered in the Vatican's sumptuous Clementine Hall. "We need something like human ecology, meant in the right way." The Catholic Church opposes gay marriage. It teaches that while homosexuality is not sinful, homosexual acts are. Rev Sharon Ferguson, chief executive of Britain's Lesbian and Gay Christian Movement, described the Pope's remarks as "totally irresponsible and unacceptable". "When you have religious leaders like that making that sort of statement then followers feel they are justified in behaving in an aggressive and violent way," she said. Opinions? Frankly I find it pretty shocking, but highly unsurprising. I find extremely doubtful homosexuality is going to bring about the extinction of humanity. What I do find surprising though is that there is a Lesbian and Gay Christian Movement. Now that's progress. As for the "everyone's slightly bisexual" thing, I've kissed a couple of guys and it didn't really do anything for me and I don't have any inclination to look at other men in changing rooms. Who knows, maybe I just don't fancy those particular guys.
gaggle64 Posted December 23, 2008 Posted December 23, 2008 Yes, as Eenuh said this is a discussion for sexuality, not sex. In other words not a chance to say "hehe boobs!" Yeah. That's the "How Was Your Day" thread's job.
chairdriver Posted December 23, 2008 Posted December 23, 2008 I just hate shit, and the Catholic Church. It's like, just get over yourselves. I'd probably be more inclined to follow their teachings if they didn't ordain and defend paedophile priests.
gaggle64 Posted December 23, 2008 Posted December 23, 2008 In Catholicisms defense, their are rather a lot of Catholic Gay & Lesbian groups who are particularly upset by all of this.
Dannyboy-the-Dane Posted December 23, 2008 Posted December 23, 2008 "Human ecology"? Am I the only one who immediately thought of social darwinism, eugenics, and racism? Anyway, far from all Christians are against alternative sexualilties. Christians focusing on Jesus' message of love find homosexual love to be just as good as any other form of love.
Ashley Posted December 23, 2008 Posted December 23, 2008 Wait til Butler finds out. I'd imagine she's a dirty fighter. (its all kind of laughably silly really in my opinion. very discrimnatory of course but sitll..)
Eenuh Posted December 23, 2008 Posted December 23, 2008 Thinking about it, I'm not sure I agree. Biologically, the objective of sex is to reproduce. That's why we love it so much: We've been genetically designed to want to do it as much as possible. With that in mente, it wouldn't make sense that we're all born bisexual. But again, we still really have no explanation for alternative sexual preferences, so nothing is really certain. I think a lot of people are sort of bisexual, but not all to the same degree (so some people might never realise it). And heh, not everyone wants to reproduce or wants to have sex all the time (or at all). Genetic mistakes? Maybe, but I don't think so. The human race has established itself well enough already that I feel reproducing isn't all that necessary anymore (too many people already living on this earth, I don't see the need to create any more). =P
chairdriver Posted December 23, 2008 Posted December 23, 2008 One could hypothesize that the proportion of bi/homosexuals increases as a species becomes more successful.
Dannyboy-the-Dane Posted December 23, 2008 Posted December 23, 2008 I think a lot of people are sort of bisexual, but not all to the same degree (so some people might never realise it). And heh, not everyone wants to reproduce or wants to have sex all the time (or at all). Genetic mistakes? Maybe, but I don't think so. The human race has established itself well enough already that I feel reproducing isn't all that necessary anymore (too many people already living on this earth, I don't see the need to create any more). =P Bisexual without knowing? Hm, perhaps. I for one don't personally feel even the slightest hint of bisexuality. One could hypothesize that the proportion of bi/homosexuals increases as a species becomes more successful. Interesting theory.
Eenuh Posted December 23, 2008 Posted December 23, 2008 Bisexual without knowing? Hm, perhaps. I for one don't personally feel even the slightest hint of bisexuality. I think a lot of people are sort of bisexual, but not all to the same degree (so some people might never realise it). =P But yeah, not saying it would be for everyone, but I do think there's a bit of bisexuality in most people. I know I have a bit of it, as I like looking at pretty women (though anything more than that I don't know...). It doesn't have to mean you will want to sleep with the same sex though, if you only have a small percentage of bisexuality in you. And yes, this might not make sense to anyone but me, haha.
Dannyboy-the-Dane Posted December 23, 2008 Posted December 23, 2008 And yes, this might not make sense to anyone but me, haha. I think you're right about this. :p But yeah, maybe you're right. I dunno.
Recommended Posts