Kav

So glad you've started watching it @Hero\-of\-Time

Yeah, announced yesterday. I wonder if the WiiU will get the next one... I wonder if I'll bother actually too.

Cheeky sod... although it's true, for some reason the old birds love me.

Oh man, Hunter X Hunter is getting awesome! Watched episode 50 last. I must say, I loved episode 47!

That's bollocks. These "light-hearted jibes" are allowed by only certain people. Other do get infractions when saying things not as bad. I know cases where it's happened.

Should a moderator not stamp out this post? My reason for posting here and not in the mod forum is because I think this post is bad stuff. Some people get infractions/threats of banning for posting comments not even nearly as provocative as this... I'd take a guess that this goes unpunished but I get warned over my post, as is the way with this forum as of late.

45 episodes of Hunter X Hunter watched now and I'm absolutely loving it!

I watched the first 5 episodes last night and really enjoyed them. I'll continue watching this for sure!

Treat me to a romantic candle-lit dinner.

You may live on your own but I'm in manchester so you've got me bitch! Don't go forgetting about me!!!

I'm still waiting on this (lie) coming true... Mario Kart 8 & Smash Bros best have voice-chat!!!

Part of me would like to thank this post but the Wii is possibly my favourite console of all time. I absolutely loved it... although I do wish the online was better. For me, the biggest problem with the WiiU is Nintendo's attitude to online. A Party Chat type system would alleviate almost all issues for me really.

I'm not saying they wanted rid of Nintendo, but they no doubt wanted to aim to be the best and sell the most if they could... what's unrealistic about that?! Also, regarding the bolded bit; I only need point you in the direction of people in this forum, never mind elsewhere. There are a fair few people on here that are "tired" with the "same old Zelda formula" and "Mario again"... I'm not one of them but there are plenty on this forum that have said so, there's no denying that!

I'm not saying they're comparable, as home consoles are the main focus of both companies, although with Nintendo it's more equal on each front. Yet there's no way Sony put out the PSP without thinking "we're aiming to topple Nintendo". Like when they decided to go forward with the Playstation, it's been famously said that they decided to go after Nintendo after the way they were treated by them in regards to the "SNES CD Drive".

No way are they just a "side project" for Sony. Always at E3 they stress their handhelds are important to them and they show them good support/give them decent stage-time. They're great consoles, they've just underperformed (not so much the PSP). Also, I recall nearly everyone in the industry claiming Nintendo's dominance in the handheld market over when Sony announced the PSP. Everyone expected Sony to dominate. #SonyDefenceForce (this is only a joke everyone, don't fret).

Chelsea have accepted a bid of £37 million for Mata apparently.

I just don't get excited for Naruto anymore, thought the latest chapter was rubbish. One Piece however is simply awesome!

So then Daft should post proof of the bold statement he made first about weak leadership being worse for morale, then Serebii can post his proof of redundancies being worse..? Or we're you just of prong Daft's statement because you like going on at Serebii? I'm not saying that's the case, I'm simply asking because of the way this thread has come across, that's how it appears to me.

Or 2nd Party. I'd not like the idea of 3rd Party exclusives, which could happen. I'd love to buy only one or two consoles.

You misread it then, it wasn't just the "no" that was my answer, my entire post was my answer. Like I said, I didn't care for the proof personally, I said it for the reasons I'd stated. Yet Daft said his absolute first, why aren't people calling out him on it? That's the point I'm making. Daft posted an absolute then told Serebii not to and asked him for proof if his. That's just nuts! That's the whole point of my posts. Which is why I said that it seemed like an attack on Serebii for the sake of attacking him.

No. @Sheikah too... I've posted above how it read, I think asking for proof from Serebii was unfounded given he answered a question directed at him on expressing his views. Given that I felt what seemed like the first absolute came from Daft I felt he should've been the one supplying proof. Hence my posts.

Hold on a sec. Serebii was asked why talk of redundancies were relevant, to which he posted this... Which is fair enough right? He was asked why he thought redundancies were relevant so he gave his thoughts on the matter. It's not an absolute, it's his opinion. He answered as to why he thought they were relevant, ergo an opinion, no? Yet Daft posts this... To me, it appears as though Daft has started on the absolutes. Which is why I saw it as simply attacking Serebii for the sake of it. Daft has said that wasn't his intention so I now know it wasn't, but it's not fair to say Serebii is the one talking in absolutes.

Yeah, I asked Daft to, given that he was the one so adamant proof was required. I didn't actually care for the proof myself, I was just making a point that he was demanding proof yet have none himself. But why should he? If it's his "conviction" then surely it's his to believe, he should have to prove that. By all means disagree but he shouldn't have to prove himself to you. It's his opinion on the matter.

Yet you said this earlier... Serebii posts this... To which you reply... Why don't you prove that it doesn't? Why don't you prove your point here... It just appears that you're attacking Serebii just for the sake of attacking him. Calling him "Mr Journalist", it's a bit snarky don't you think?

A couple images from a work night out on friday... And one with @Blade lurking in the background trying to figure out how to get into the smoking area (wasted, eh Shit-Swig?)...