Oh, you'll hate this then.
Frank Miller's art on the first one is fairly accessible compared to this. Though I prefer DKSA's art. It's just incredibly unique and I kinda hate that people get so up in arms about it (the entire thing actually), as though it HAD to live up to the first one. I just take it as one big art piece and enjoy it for what it is, not what it isn't. Lynn Varley's colouring is insane.
Same with All-Star Batman...though tbf it was incredibly slow and had the wrong artist on it*, but I don't understand why people are so upset by it's existence. It's not great but it's interesting as a concept. (Though I think DKSA is better for what it is)
*Though using Jim Lee plays into Miller's whole modern mission of critiquing how after his DKR, comics became darker and more gritty; he wants to focus on the awe and brightness of everything superheroic...Jim Lee epitomises that, the 90's connection, all the posing and stuff he used to include (and still does) etc etc. As a statement it works, but I think visually if he'd drawn it himself it would have gelled better.
But yeah, I want a big canvas of Frank Miller art on my wall or something...LOVE it. I wish there was more art like his in mainstream comics...or even just more painted work and other less-seen ways of comic illustration. It just makes things more interesting. People like Alex Maleev add so much.