Jump to content
N-Europe

Recommended Posts

Posted
  arab_freak said:

What the hell was she doing in there, anyway?

 

Using the toilet?

 

  Quote
Her mother Annabel, 37, tried to lift Lucy off the toilet seat but found she could not move her

 

(That makes it sound like she was disabled.)

Guest Stefkov
Posted

what makes it worse as they said is that it was put on a disabled toilet, intending on doing this to disabled people,

 

how sad people are in our society today are...... dickheads

Posted
  fieldsofanfieldroad said:
No need, it's obvious enough already. See Mr. Odwin's post above.

 

  Quote
Her mother Annabel, 37, tried to lift Lucy off the toilet seat but found she could not move her

 

Yes, she couldn't lift her off because she was glued!

Posted
  arab_freak said:
Yes, she couldn't lift her off because she was glued!

Man thats some pretty strong glue.

Pretty sick thing to do, it was obviously aimed at disabled people. But gives me an idea for a prank to do at home, but wouldnt you see the glue? But then again there are many types that could blend in..

 

Pretty out of order, even worse that a baby fell victim to it.

Posted

Theres several reasons she could have been there. Didn't know it was a disabled toilets, the ladies was full, she couldn't wait, simple disobediance.

Posted

I was using the disabled [or even the actual ladies] at the student union at Leeds Uni, the blokes was a maze away.

 

I remember hearing about this done in a Maccy Dees toilet too.

Posted

they could be using the disabled because the ladies could be to small for the mother and daughter to both get in there! and i also use the disabled toilets in work sometimes!

Posted
  arab_freak said:
Yes, she couldn't lift her off because she was glued!

I still think the article suggests she was disabled. Why are you making such a big deal about this anyway? Did she deserve to be glued to the seat if she wasn't disabled?

Posted
  fieldsofanfieldroad said:
Why are you making such a big deal about this anyway?

 

You were the one who started the argument.

 

  Quote
Did she deserve to be glued to the seat if she wasn't disabled?

 

Of course not.

Posted
  Ninja Mullet said:
I'm confused as to why she had lumps on her leg, was it a rash from the glue?

sick stuff:sad: , some low lifes trying to make someone elses life miserable.

 

dont get that either...

Posted

Here's some family fun.

Put some cling film over the toilet seat crisply on the inner edge so it doesn't make any noise.

Someone comes in and takes a crap and the heat of their arse lifts the cling film up and shit goes all down their legs.

 

Classic.

 

edit: damn beat me to it ^

Posted
  Mr_Odwin said:
arab_freak sometimes you just act like a total nob. You're so aggressive; chill out a bit.

 

:confused:

 

How the hell was I being aggressive? I'm totally calm, even now.

Posted

I've used disabled toilets; you have no idea how long the line for the ladies room can get sometimes. So then why not have people use that toilet? Especially since there's rarely any disabled people around and if there are, I'm sure they would understand and wait a minute.

 

Also, does no one like, wipe the seat before they sit down? I always always do that, even at home. Or like, not even sit down when it's a greasy public toilet...

×
×
  • Create New...