m_fergy Posted February 26, 2007 Posted February 26, 2007 But then what makes a good racing game, and what makes a not so good racing game? Well to me a good racing game is when iv had a go on it I want to play it again. And after playing RR7 I will not want to play it again. The sliding on the game is just not real imo and the handling doesnt feel right. I loved the RR's is the past but not they are just getting silly Man if some fighting gamers were in this forum, you'd so get slattered for saying VF5 is a bad copy of DOA4. It plays nothing alike. There's a difference of disliking a game and a bad game. VF series is one the of most wellknown series for been all about perfection in gameplay. It's a so balanced fighter and it's a game that is about skill, not about bashing buttons 2 me a fighting game isnt about skill. Anyone can beat anyone thats the great thing about a fighting game. Im just saying what I think about VF5 and I think its just a copy of DOA just different characters and moves
Owen Posted February 26, 2007 Posted February 26, 2007 Well I love car games and fighting games. GT HD is a good car car RR7 is NOT. DOA 4 is a good fighting game VF5 is not If you play VF5 its just a bad copy of DOA 4 You not won over by VF5 m_fergy? I'm quite surprised. I think it's a great game. Slightly confused at the Quest Mode though and why every-time i pick an opponent and win, another challenger comes and it goes on and on and on...is that suppose to happen? So you win more items and rank-up or something? Graphically outstanding as well. I had to change a few control options though, i'm sure the control method when you first play is made for a Arcade Stick. The £39.99 price-point for first-party games is superb! That means there be like £37.99 on Gameplay, so much better then £49.99. Also, the prices of the online-games aren't too bad. I just hope we don't have to wait long to download PSONE classics onto our PSP's. I want Crash Bandicoot!
That Guy Posted February 26, 2007 Posted February 26, 2007 Oh come on. People complain no matter what Sony do. Even when they make their games cheaper!It does say launch titles though, so maybe you can pay more later if you want to wait. Totally agree with this, unbelievable that people are moaning at cheaper games. Also, fighters are ALL about skill, and ALL about learning the moves, VF is one of the most balanced fighters ever, maybe not great at bringing in new fans like Tekken and Soul Calibur, but once master is easily as good. I also can't believe the reason for why RR7 is a 'shit' game is it's not one you'd go back to. Loads of people play it, so that isn't a reason. Not liking a game is different to a game being shit. I hate Gran Turismo, but I can apreciate a good game. P.S. Crash Bandicoot FTW.
KKOB Posted February 26, 2007 Posted February 26, 2007 The £39.99 price-point for first-party games is superb! That means there be like £37.99 on Gameplay, so much better then £49.99. totally true, 360 prices better come down!
Cube Posted February 26, 2007 Posted February 26, 2007 Well I love car games and fighting games. GT HD is a good car car RR7 is NOT. DOA 4 is a good fighting game VF5 is not Speaking of GT HD...Am I the only person who thinks it looks worse than normal GT? I mean...all HD seems to do to it is make it extremely obvious that half the stuff you see is 2D...
Caris Posted February 26, 2007 Posted February 26, 2007 Speaking of GT HD...Am I the only person who thinks it looks worse than normal GT? I mean...all HD seems to do to it is make it extremely obvious that half the stuff you see is 2D... sorry Cube but i have to say this, if you think you think GT:HD Looks worse than the other Gran Turismos you are totally mad. Its the best looking game ive ever seen...
Fierce_LiNk Posted February 26, 2007 Posted February 26, 2007 Well to me a good racing game is when iv had a go on it I want to play it again. And after playing RR7 I will not want to play it again. The sliding on the game is just not real imo and the handling doesnt feel right. I loved the RR's is the past but not they are just getting silly You make a fair point, and I think I'd feel the same as you about not playing it again if I didn't like the handling. I think replay value is quite a big factor in racing games, as sometimes you have to master ever twist or turn on a track, so if you can't bring yourself to play it then it just won't work. Still, give it a try again in the future, you never know you're opinion might change.
Owen Posted February 26, 2007 Posted February 26, 2007 Speaking of GT HD...Am I the only person who thinks it looks worse than normal GT? I mean...all HD seems to do to it is make it extremely obvious that half the stuff you see is 2D... Sorry mate, but i disagree. Have you seen it running on a TV? That may change your mind! Two words: Mountains + Tarmac, fantastic.
The Bard Posted February 26, 2007 Posted February 26, 2007 Man if some fighting gamers were in this forum, you'd so get slattered for saying VF5 is a bad copy of DOA4. It plays nothing alike. There's a difference of disliking a game and a bad game. VF series is one the of most wellknown series for been all about perfection in gameplay. It's a so balanced fighter and it's a game that is about skill, not about bashing buttons. Wait, what? Who the hell would say that? Any Dead or alive sucks major balls when you put it next to one of the most beautiful fighting engines created (VF4:E). It's quite frankly ridiculous when people say these things. VF is a game created with hardcore/ pro fighters in mind, and if you don't give it a hell of a lot of time, you're never going to understand it.
That Guy Posted February 26, 2007 Posted February 26, 2007 Wait, what? Who the hell would say that? Any Dead or alive sucks major balls when you put it next to one of the most beautiful fighting engines created (VF4:E). It's quite frankly ridiculous when people say these things. VF is a game created with hardcore/ pro fighters in mind, and if you don't give it a hell of a lot of time, you're never going to understand it. Totally spot on there. I guess you guys havn't heard of opinions? Opinions can be wrong in my opinion. :p
rokhed00 Posted February 26, 2007 Posted February 26, 2007 The £39.99 price-point for first-party games is superb! That means there be like £37.99 on Gameplay, so much better then £49.99. Actually they're still £39.99 on Gameplay, and out of the few that are that price there's only 2 tops that are worth buying. http://shop.gameplay.co.uk/webstore/plat_shop.asp?platform=PS3
ZeldaFreak Posted February 27, 2007 Posted February 27, 2007 When the 360 came out 1st party games were £44.99, while the others were £49.99. So I have had a thought could we be getting the 3rd party games at £44.99, if 1st party games are only £39.99
Owen Posted February 27, 2007 Posted February 27, 2007 Actually they're still £39.99 on Gameplay, and out of the few that are that price there's only 2 tops that are worth buying. http://shop.gameplay.co.uk/webstore/plat_shop.asp?platform=PS3 Ah damn. Still, they may lower them later in the year! I'm positive some 360 titles were lowered to £37.99 from £39.99 to compete with their competition. £39.99 is still better then £50 though, and you normally get it a day earlier. Shop-to net are even quicker and cheaper (normally), but i haven't used them yet.
rokhed00 Posted February 27, 2007 Posted February 27, 2007 When the 360 came out 1st party games were £44.99, while the others were £49.99. So I have had a thought could we be getting the 3rd party games at £44.99, if 1st party games are only £39.99 No, £49.99 for most third party titles.
ZeldaFreak Posted February 27, 2007 Posted February 27, 2007 No, £49.99 for most third party titles. But surely they realise if there are 200k people at selling a game at £50 they may only sell 50k, but if they sold their games at £39.99 - they would be able to sell higher volumes. If gameplay can sell 360/ps3 games at £40. Why can't the likes of game stores do that - yes they don't have to pay the maintence on each shop and not employ that many people. But come on - mass market don't want to pay this much for a game, actually to be frank with all of you guys here for a console game at the mo £29.99 is more than adequat. I just hope the governmet interferes and sticks a price cap on games for consoles.
Owen Posted February 27, 2007 Posted February 27, 2007 No, £49.99 for most third party titles. I'm slightly confused on why third-party games are more expensive then first-party ones? It will probably mean, that i will buy the 'Sony' games for my PS3 (obviously) and any third-party titles which come out on both PS3 and 360, on the 360. Unless for some reason, the PS3 version is better then the 360 one...
rokhed00 Posted February 27, 2007 Posted February 27, 2007 I just hope the governmet interferes and sticks a price cap on games for consoles. Why would they want to do that, it'd be less VAT for them to collect.
ZeldaFreak Posted February 27, 2007 Posted February 27, 2007 Why would they want to do that, it'd be less VAT for them to collect. Well they can collect extra vat from those who have prison records and those on he sex offenders list as far as I am concerned. We need someone to say right we are going to sell games at £29.99. Of course publishers will complain. However if they spent less bleedin' money on advetising costs. You could charge games at a lower cost.
rokhed00 Posted February 27, 2007 Posted February 27, 2007 Well they can collect extra vat from those who have prison records and those on he sex offenders list as far as I am concerned. And how would that work, would shops have access to police records and nothing could be bought without proof of ID? We need someone to say right we are going to sell games at £29.99. Of course publishers will complain. However if they spent less bleedin' money on advetising costs. You could charge games at a lower cost. Yep, that's going to help, cut advertising and you get less sales. If anything development costs need to be lowered, but that's never going to happen with the PS3.
ZeldaFreak Posted February 27, 2007 Posted February 27, 2007 And how would that work, would shops have access to police records and nothing could be bought without proof of ID? Yep, that's going to help, cut advertising and you get less sales. If anything development costs need to be lowered, but that's never going to happen with the PS3. What I meant was instead increase income tax for those groups of people. As mark rein said you don't need alot of people to create an epic game - just a 20-30 odd inspired people who believe in the product their creating. And yeah advertising costs are way to high. All they need is send it into the media to be reviewed. Then people who visit those websites/buy the magazine. Would generate the hype that way instead and hopefully get more units sold
That Guy Posted February 27, 2007 Posted February 27, 2007 Advertising doesn't work like that. You want to get to the people who don't read games websites and magazines. No advertising no sales. See Dreamcast for that.
rokhed00 Posted February 27, 2007 Posted February 27, 2007 What I meant was instead increase income tax for those groups of people. As mark rein said you don't need alot of people to create an epic game - just a 20-30 odd inspired people who believe in the product their creating. And yeah advertising costs are way to high. All they need is send it into the media to be reviewed. Then people who visit those websites/buy the magazine. Would generate the hype that way instead and hopefully get more units sold You're living in dream land there.
ZeldaFreak Posted February 27, 2007 Posted February 27, 2007 I don't see why nintendo can't charge less money for its software. Neither can I understand why microsoft and sony charge the prices they are thinking off. Really we should just say we won't buy any more games until they reduce the prices. We as a forum can make a difference
Recommended Posts