Jump to content
N-Europe

The Red Dwarf Mafia


Jimbob

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 638
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Um, what? He has said that he tried to do something, yet was unsuccessful due to drunkenness. It doesn't really get much clearer than that.

 

But I know that he wasn't roleblocked, which is why the initial statement confused me and I asked for is to be put clearer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No Lynch - Rummy, Nintendohnut, Jonnas, Jon Dedede, Cube, Magnus Peterson, Sheikah (8)

7 voters, 8 votes

 

 

No Lynch - Dud, Magnus Peterson, Rummy, Sheikah (4)

Magnus Peterson - Cube, bob, Yvonne, Moogle (4)

4 voters and 4 votes for each.

 

Therefore double voter is one of the following:

Nintendohnut, Jonnas, Jon Dedede

 

I would appreciate knowing who. Denials would also help.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And that's a valid point. But until you pointed that out, there wasn't a single good argument against Magnus, yet four people had already voted for him, and that worries me.

 

I voted as a joke by the way.

 

Remove vote

 

Not that it'll make a difference. The day is ending in 45 minutes, and I doubt a majority will be reached by then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I voted because lynches are the only way for town to win!

 

chair used to argue that as well. And he had pretty sound reasoning as well.

 

 

Although it's really irritating when I die early on when I'm a townie. So I'm not sure I would want to inflict that on anyone else without at least a smidge of evidence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Again I ask, before Cube pointed out his actual argument, what exactly did we have on Magnus? Nothing. He said from the beginning that his action was unsuccessful due to getting drunk. The only reason Cube started to question this was because he had info to the contrary. Until then nobody had batted an eyelid, because it's a completely common occurence with a standard explanation and thus elicited no suspicions. Magnus's only "crime" was a bit of roleplaying, something we've only lauded other players for doing and which is even less surprising considering it's his first game, yet suddenly he's being called "vague" when he has been perfectly clear from the beginning about what transpired.

 

Of course, now we actually do have a contradiction, making Cube's suspicion valid, but I am looking at the people ready to pounce when there was nothing on him. The easiest argument would be to say they were mafia trying to jump on an innocent, but the more worrying explanation is that people are often way too eager to jump on minutiae that result in innocents being lynched. How many times have we actually caught mafiosos with that strategy? And how often has it simply removed our focus from the actual mafiosos?

 

Aaand now it's night time. Apologies, I took a while writing my post and so missed the switch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lynches are the way forward but too often people don't assess whether people are out of character, instead comparing people against their preconceived idea of a 'perfect' townie. In this case it's difficult because I don't have any idea what Magnus's behaviour is like.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


×
×
  • Create New...