Jump to content
N-Europe

Forum User Photos


Goafer

Recommended Posts

I find your need to pigeonhole her into a gender role offensive. It's obvious that society has conditioned you to need to know gender so that you can make assumptions.

 

It's not easy being this angry at the world all the time. I hope you people appreciate what I'm doing for you. Martyrdom FTW.

 

I could also ask if they feel they are transgendered, whether that is pre-op or not. Or whether they feel they is something else they define themselves by.

 

Then we can also get into their sexuality - hetrosexual, homosexual, asexual, pansexual...I could go on.

 

 

<3

Link to comment
Share on other sites

pansexual? What's that?

 

*gets visions of scenes from Pan's Labyrinth*

 

Bisexuality for hipsters.

 

(It basically means bisexuality but also including attraction to transgendered people, which I find kind of stupid because it gives the assumption that bisexual people have a dislike for transgendered.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

(It basically means bisexuality but also including attraction to transgendered people, which I find kind of stupid because it gives the assumption that bisexual people have a dislike for transgendered.)

 

Surely it also implies that trans are different, whereas I assume that someone who is attracted to trans is pro-trans and would therefore class them as the gender they choose and not see them as a separate gender.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Surely it also implies that trans are different, whereas I assume that someone who is attracted to trans is pro-trans and would therefore class them as the gender they choose and not see them as a separate gender.

 

Exactly. I understand some of the reasoning, as "bisexual" suggests that there are only 2 types of gender, but really I think we need to stop the constant stream of new labels. It seems to be a bit of a contradiction.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bisexuality for hipsters.

 

(It basically means bisexuality but also including attraction to transgendered people, which I find kind of stupid because it gives the assumption that bisexual people have a dislike for transgendered.)

 

Why stop there, why have heterosexual and homosexual at all?

 

Pansexuality refers to being 'gender blind'. It encompasses a sexuality that goes beyond just physical attraction, too. To be completely honest, it's probably a better term than bisexual since, as you said, that reinforces gender binaries.

 

If people want to self identify as pansexual, then why not? You can't just accept some labels and think others are stupid because they are all socially constructed.

 

Calling it 'bisexuality for hipsters' just undermines the identity and is actually quote offensive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why stop there, why have heterosexual and homosexual at all?

 

Pansexuality refers to being 'gender blind'. It encompasses a sexuality that goes beyond just physical attraction, too. To be completely honest, it's probably a better term than bisexual since, as you said, that reinforces gender binaries.

 

If people want to self identify as pansexual, then why not? You can't just accept some labels and think others are stupid because they are all socially constructed.

 

Calling it 'bisexuality for hipsters' just undermines the identity and is actually quote offensive.

 

Thank U, India.

jg1mae.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why stop there, why have heterosexual and homosexual at all?

 

Pansexuality refers to being 'gender blind'. It encompasses a sexuality that goes beyond just physical attraction, too. To be completely honest, it's probably a better term than bisexual since, as you said, that reinforces gender binaries.

 

If people want to self identify as pansexual, then why not? You can't just accept some labels and think others are stupid because they are all socially constructed.

 

Calling it 'bisexuality for hipsters' just undermines the identity and is actually quote offensive.

 

Well that "bisexuality for hipsters" thing was quite clearly me just being stupidly offensive for the sake of it, hence why I explained it better underneath. I find the distinction between Bi and Pan kind of offensive myself as I've stated above, as it suggests things about Bisexuals and Transgendered people that they probably don't want.

 

(And I won't even go into the whole debate about "offense" and what the fuck it actually means. Whose offense is more legitimate? Who fucking cares?)

I really, really understand the idea of Pansexuality and do think technically it is a better word than Bisexual, but I find the contradiction in the Queer community interesting where half the time everyones "we don't need labels for love, our love is no different to yours" while also bringing out a new label for ourselves every couple of weeks.

 

I don't have a problem with people identifying however they like, just find it an interesting "digging ourselves a hole" scenario. Thingy. Yeah...

Edited by Hamishmash
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Surely it also implies that trans are different, whereas I assume that someone who is attracted to trans is pro-trans and would therefore class them as the gender they choose and not see them as a separate gender.

 

Ah ok, never heard that term before. Even tho i fit into that category, i'll still just call myself bi ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well that "bisexuality for hipsters" thing was quite clearly me just being stupidly offensive for the sake of it, hence why I explained it better underneath. I find the distinction between Bi and Pan kind of offensive myself as I've stated above, as it suggests things about Bisexuals and Transgendered people that they probably don't want.

 

(And I won't even go into the whole debate about "offense" and what the fuck it actually means. Whose offense is more legitimate? Who fucking cares?)

I really, really understand the idea of Pansexuality and do think technically it is a better word than Bisexual, but I find the contradiction in the Queer community interesting where half the time everyones "we don't need labels for love, our love is no different to yours" while also bringing out a new label for ourselves every couple of weeks.

 

I don't have a problem with people identifying however they like, just find it an interesting "digging ourselves a hole" scenario. Thingy. Yeah...

 

It's definitely a good view on it, there's also gender queer and all sorts to think about when getting into this type of discussion, it's an interesting one and it's always difficult to find out what people actually define themselves as even when they come out with a label, because so many don't understand the terms themselves.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You could try at the Tattoo Convention in September (there is probably several around the country, but I know there's one in London in Sept).

 

2ihnua0.jpg

"That's not just some guy I picked up in a dog bar. Paul and I are in a committed relationship."

"Is he a cross dresser?"

"Goodness no. Paul is a gender dysmorphic bigenetalian pansexuaaaal."

2u7vjbp.jpg

 

(the 'pansexual' is obviously spelt phonetically there because Jenna always speaks naahhshuralee)

 

Labels. Fun for all the family.

 

Or something.

 

It's slightly related.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...