Paj! Posted July 22, 2009 Share Posted July 22, 2009 Ninja could be Ninjask. It is the "ninja pokemon". Other candidates could be Scyther or Sneasel/Weavile. None of which would seem immediately friendly, but you never know. I have nothing other than these guesses. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ganepark32 Posted July 22, 2009 Share Posted July 22, 2009 Nothing from me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dannyboy-the-Dane Posted July 22, 2009 Share Posted July 22, 2009 Ninja could be Ninjask. It is the "ninja pokemon".Other candidates could be Scyther or Sneasel/Weavile. None of which would seem immediately friendly, but you never know. I have nothing other than these guesses. Having not more than skimmed the roles of the first PokéMafia, can we assume that "evil-like" Pokémon are mafia? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paj! Posted July 22, 2009 Share Posted July 22, 2009 Having not more than skimmed the roles of the first PokéMafia, can we assume that "evil-like" Pokémon are mafia? I can't see Ninjask being described as a ninja, it's more obvious to describe it as a "speedy bug" or something. Whereas Sneasel/Weavile is a good candidate for a "ninja", and it's a Dark type Pokemon. So yeah. If you see a Sneasel...look sharp. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dannyboy-the-Dane Posted July 22, 2009 Share Posted July 22, 2009 I can't see Ninjask being described as a ninja, it's more obvious to describe it as a "speedy bug" or something. Whereas Sneasel/Weavile is a good candidate for a "ninja", and it's a Dark type Pokemon. So yeah. If you see a Sneasel...look sharp. Uhm, that's actually not at all what I asked. What I wondered was if we can assume that Pokémon who normally have an "evil" personality or vibe are mafia? Judging by the previous game, it doesn't seem to be entirely the case, though a lot of the roles seem rather "typecast" (Cyndaquil being good, for example). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jonnas Posted July 22, 2009 Share Posted July 22, 2009 Sneasel is most definitely a shady character. But last game gave us Gengar, Glalie and Gyarados on the side of the town, so...I dunno. Well, so we got nothing thus far... We could start by figuring out who the silenced folk are, though we don't know wether they're good or evil. Or we could lynch someone who is usually inactive... *glares at Coolness Bears* I'll give him the benefit of the doubt...for now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cube Posted July 22, 2009 Share Posted July 22, 2009 I also don't have any information. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
not_so_tiny Posted July 23, 2009 Share Posted July 23, 2009 Yeah sorry guys, no info useful I'm afraid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eenuh Posted July 23, 2009 Share Posted July 23, 2009 Having not more than skimmed the roles of the first PokéMafia, can we assume that "evil-like" Pokémon are mafia? If they are then I wouldn't even know who could be seen as evil-like (I only really know the first 151 Pokémon heh)... But yeah it did seem that way a bit in the last game, but I'm not sure we should expect the same to be the case in this game. Also I kinda agree with Jonnas about possibly voting for non-active players instead of going for no lynch. The town got killed last time because they weren't active enough and didn't wanna take a gamble anymore in lynching. =/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dannyboy-the-Dane Posted July 23, 2009 Share Posted July 23, 2009 If they are then I wouldn't even know who could be seen as evil-like (I only really know the first 151 Pokémon heh)... But yeah it did seem that way a bit in the last game, but I'm not sure we should expect the same to be the case in this game. Also I kinda agree with Jonnas about possibly voting for non-active players instead of going for no lynch. The town got killed last time because they weren't active enough and didn't wanna take a gamble anymore in lynching. =/ Lynching non-active players is always a tactic up for debate. We decrease the majority, making it easier for the mafia to win, but also making it easier to lynch people. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eenuh Posted July 23, 2009 Share Posted July 23, 2009 Lynching non-active players is always a tactic up for debate. We decrease the majority, making it easier for the mafia to win, but also making it easier to lynch people. Yeah I'm not always a fan of it either, but it seems like mafia members are often pretty quiet during the game (I noticed this especially during the last one with Raining_again and Mundi) so it is possible by lynching non-active players you hit a mafia member. Plus non-active players kinda ruin the game anyway. But yeah, on the other hand there's a chance you're lynching a townie of course so I can see why it's not preferable to do it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MoogleViper Posted July 23, 2009 Share Posted July 23, 2009 Just want to say I have nothing to add but am still playing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tellyn Posted July 23, 2009 Share Posted July 23, 2009 No useful information obtained from last night, sorry guys and girls. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dannyboy-the-Dane Posted July 23, 2009 Share Posted July 23, 2009 Well, if there is no one with information, perhaps we should just vote no lynch and end the day, see if we get something useful tomorrow? I don't want to vote off any non-players yet because ... well, it's just too early. We should give them a chance. If nothing else turns up, I'm gonna Vote: No Lynch for now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ganepark32 Posted July 23, 2009 Share Posted July 23, 2009 In that case, it's a Vote: No Lynch from myself as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ReZourceman Posted July 23, 2009 Author Share Posted July 23, 2009 Well its been well over 24 hours, so I'm happy to call this a day. Night Two Players 21 ; Tellyn, not_so_tiny, Eenuh, Sprout, Ellmeister, Dyson, Dannyboy-The-Dane, mr-paul, martinist, Jonnas, Cube, Nintendohnut, Zell, Raining_Again, Gaggle64,Coolness_Bears, Paj_Meen_Ah, SPAMBOT4000, Strider, GanePark32, MoogleViper. Get me your PMs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dannyboy-the-Dane Posted July 23, 2009 Share Posted July 23, 2009 A post to prevent automerge. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jonnas Posted July 23, 2009 Share Posted July 23, 2009 Guys, I'd like to say that I'll be gone for a few days (about a week or so) Sorry that I won't be able to participate during this time. If there's a Good silencer out there, feel free to target me so that I won't get in the way of the majority. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ellmeister Posted July 23, 2009 Share Posted July 23, 2009 Could you not pass your role onto someone else? Or ReZ do it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jonnas Posted July 24, 2009 Share Posted July 24, 2009 That could work. Maybe Molly could take upon my role? As long as she didn't know anything I wouldn't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ellmeister Posted July 24, 2009 Share Posted July 24, 2009 Vote: No lynchmon Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cube Posted July 24, 2009 Share Posted July 24, 2009 Vote: No lynchmon Erm...It's night. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ReZourceman Posted July 24, 2009 Author Share Posted July 24, 2009 Night Two (Lol) (Oh beaten by Cube) BUt yeah Molly probably wouldn't be able to on account of her knowledge. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MoogleViper Posted July 24, 2009 Share Posted July 24, 2009 Why did danny post to prevent automerge? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ReZourceman Posted July 24, 2009 Author Share Posted July 24, 2009 Why did danny post to prevent automerge? Anticipiative. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts