Gizmo Posted May 20, 2009 Share Posted May 20, 2009 Dyson isn't a very good hooker. He failed to roleblock, thus why Moogle's targetting of me worked :p I thought he said it didn't work? Now I'm very confused. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ellmeister Posted May 20, 2009 Share Posted May 20, 2009 Well he still managed a fumble, I thought he did manage to use his power. OH I'M SO CONFUSED. LOUD NOISES. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gizmo Posted May 20, 2009 Share Posted May 20, 2009 A quick look through the thread finds me this post: No I'm not the zombie. Yes I am the undertaker. No I'm not in the mafia. My role is investigator. I didn't get a pm but I'm guessing I was roleblocked by the whore or J7 didn't pm me. Or my info only appears in the write up. I targeted Ell last night so I'm guessing he's the horse. So as far as I can see it did fail. So Dyson is more than likely a roleblocker, although I've known that role to be from both allegiances so I don't think we can say anything more concrete than that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dyson Posted May 20, 2009 Share Posted May 20, 2009 I can tell you this, I'm not a roleblocker. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gizmo Posted May 20, 2009 Share Posted May 20, 2009 So what do you do then, and why were you targeting Moogle? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dyson Posted May 20, 2009 Share Posted May 20, 2009 Because it was the first night, everyone targets somebody random on the first night. I'm not answering what my role is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ellmeister Posted May 20, 2009 Share Posted May 20, 2009 Moogle wasn't roleblocked, otherwise there wouldn't have been information about him in the write up feeling me up! (He had cold hands ) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MoogleViper Posted May 20, 2009 Share Posted May 20, 2009 Dyson isn't a very good hooker. He failed to roleblock, thus why Moogle's targetting of me worked :p Maybe he just stopped me from getting info. Oh wait never mind. I've only just read this page. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gizmo Posted May 20, 2009 Share Posted May 20, 2009 Moogle wasn't roleblocked, otherwise there wouldn't have been information about him in the write up feeling me up! (He had cold hands ) Can you pinpoint which part of the writeup you're referring too here? Also Dyson, if you don't give us anything else, then why should we believe you when you say you aren't a roleblocker, etc? I'm getting more and more concerned about you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eenuh Posted May 20, 2009 Share Posted May 20, 2009 I think if a doctor is wanting to cure Dyson, they're probably gonna want more proof that he is actually good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dannyboy-the-Dane Posted May 20, 2009 Share Posted May 20, 2009 Gah, this is confusing. I might need to re-read the write-up - though that doesn't necessarily mean I'll understand it any better! :p Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MoogleViper Posted May 20, 2009 Share Posted May 20, 2009 So what is a prostitutes role if she's not a role-blocker? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dannyboy-the-Dane Posted May 20, 2009 Share Posted May 20, 2009 So what is a prostitutes role if she's not a role-blocker? Cocksucker? Sorry, couldn't resist ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Maase Posted May 20, 2009 Share Posted May 20, 2009 I don't really see any point in a Slut, unless Jayseven pulled the famous "You have to search for someone" card. I, however, am getting too suspicious of Dyson. Vote Lynch: Dyson Call it Instinct, but not only does he sound suspicious, as he will possibly turn into a Zombie, which can cause us problems. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dannyboy-the-Dane Posted May 20, 2009 Share Posted May 20, 2009 I don't really see any point in a Slut, unless Jayseven pulled the famous "You have to search for someone" card.I, however, am getting too suspicious of Dyson. Vote Lynch: Dyson Call it Instinct, but not only does he sound suspicious, as he will possibly turn into a Zombie, which can cause us problems. To be honest, I think it's a little too early to point fingers and lynch people. It's the always present dilemma of what to do with no concrete info. Lynch someone with the likely risk of hitting a good guy, or do nothing and watch as another one bites the dust. This early in the game, I don't think lynching someone on weak grounds is a good option. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gizmo Posted May 20, 2009 Share Posted May 20, 2009 Cocksucker? Sorry, couldn't resist ... I expect better from you, Danny. Moogle, yes. ReZ, yes. But you? =P Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dannyboy-the-Dane Posted May 20, 2009 Share Posted May 20, 2009 I expect better from you, Danny. Moogle, yes. ReZ, yes. But you? =P Have you not noticed that I share many hunour genes with those people? I cannot always come up with intelligent and witty jokes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jayseven Posted May 20, 2009 Author Share Posted May 20, 2009 (edited) *is amazed how hard it is to not join in the debate* Standings, or whatever! Vote Dyson 4 death (1): Maase N-no-nooo! Lynch No! (2): jimbob, Dyson (I think. I really am rather crap at this :P) Have you not noticed that I share many hunour genes with those people? I cannot always come up with intelligent and witty jokes. You mean wintelligent jokes? or Witelligent. I can't decide. Edited May 21, 2009 by jayseven Automerged Doublepost Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jonnas Posted May 21, 2009 Share Posted May 21, 2009 You mean wintelligent jokes? or Witelligent. I can't decide. I'm just trying to figure out wether he meant "Humour" or "Honour" Anyway, I believe lynching Dyson is far too early. Sure, finishing a zombie sounds appealing, but a cure might exist. I'm also betting that killing the original zombie can cure Dyson. So, I'll Vote: No Lynch for having no further grounds on info, or suspicion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dyson Posted May 21, 2009 Share Posted May 21, 2009 No, really. All I can ask you to do is trust me. It's a straightforward role, but I'm not disclosing it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eenuh Posted May 21, 2009 Share Posted May 21, 2009 Yeah, seems we don't have quite enough leads yet to go on for now, so maybe we should move on to the next night and see what happens. Vote: No lynch Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
not_so_tiny Posted May 21, 2009 Share Posted May 21, 2009 I thnk at the moment there is not enough evidence to lynch anyone. We all know who we think are suspicious so we can keep an eye on them and see what happens next. Vote: No lynch Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nintendohnut Posted May 21, 2009 Share Posted May 21, 2009 Agreed, plus if we leave dyson we'll find out what happens to people who turn into zombies (unless the person with the cure targets him of course) Vote: No Lynch and let's hope we get something more solid tonight. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jayseven Posted May 21, 2009 Author Share Posted May 21, 2009 (edited) Votes: 10 is majority Dyson (1): Maase No Lynch (7): jimbob, Dyson, jonnas, eenuh, not_so_tiny, nintendohnut Edited May 21, 2009 by jayseven Automerged Doublepost Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eenuh Posted May 21, 2009 Share Posted May 21, 2009 Votes: 10 is majorityDyson (1): Maase No Lynch (7): jimbob, Dyson, jonnas, eenuh, not_so_tiny, nintendohnut Hmm a double vote again? Or a miscalculation? Am a bit confused by this really. I checked the previous voting when we had a double vote as well, and none of the names match up except for mine and Dyson's. I don't think I have a double vote, and Dyson doesn't seem to have either (as a bit up there the tally was normal with both Dyson and Jimbob voting). So does this mean there's more people with double votes? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts