Chris the great Posted September 4, 2008 Share Posted September 4, 2008 Is it just me, or did the Joker suggest two different ways he obtained his horrendous scars in the movie? yeah, i loved that aspect, he seemed a lot more messed up, like he didnt know himself, or he was just a lying sone of a bitch. edit ok what? its fine not to like pirates of the carabian as a movie, but to not think depp was good in them? tell me, have you suffered head trama at all? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
navarre Posted September 4, 2008 Share Posted September 4, 2008 yeah, i loved that aspect, he seemed a lot more messed up, like he didnt know himself, or he was just a lying sone of a bitch. Phew. You're actually the first person who I've talked to who agrees with me there. I initially thought I wasn't paying attention, but at least other people picked it up too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EEVILMURRAY Posted September 4, 2008 Share Posted September 4, 2008 Apart from in Edward Scissorhands. And Sweeney Todd. Those movies were shit. Is it just me, or did the Joker suggest two different ways he obtained his horrendous scars in the movie? He did. It was summarised by people here that he was insane and didn't know his own past. My theory is that Nolan is full of shit and didn't want to stick to anything. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paj! Posted September 4, 2008 Share Posted September 4, 2008 Those movies were shit. He did. It was summarised by people here that he was insane and didn't know his own past. My theory is that Nolan is full of shit and didn't want to stick to anything. I don't understand why you insist on wanting an origin? Part of the reason he worked well was because he didn't have the obligatory "Jack into vat of chemicals". It's far more comic accurate to not have an origin, as Batman (in the comics) doesn't truely know it, even. Would have made the movie way worse, taking LONGER to develop him as a character. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ReZourceman Posted September 4, 2008 Author Share Posted September 4, 2008 You know, Chris hasn't said that he's going to make another one You know, Chris hasn't said that he's going to make another one You know, Chris hasn't said that he's going to make another one You know, Chris hasn't said that he's going to make another one Just wanted to hammer that home before I stroll in here, and see another "X to play X in TDK sequel" post. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris the great Posted September 4, 2008 Share Posted September 4, 2008 he hasnt said it, but its sort of implied, don't you think, i remeber a while ago hearing trillogy, and he left an open end, and the fact that he confirmed twoface as dead surgests hes got a sequal on the card, i mean, why bother disscussing two faces fate if its never going to come up? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mundi Posted September 4, 2008 Share Posted September 4, 2008 It hasn´t been said but the ending of TDK and the money it rolled in say otherwise Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ReZourceman Posted September 5, 2008 Author Share Posted September 5, 2008 he hasnt said it, but its sort of implied, don't you think, i remeber a while ago hearing trillogy, and he left an open end, and the fact that he confirmed twoface as dead surgests hes got a sequal on the card, i mean, why bother disscussing two faces fate if its never going to come up? He didn't. It says in the script something like "Lies dead, neck broken in several places" or something to that affect, and then Aaron Eckhart confirmed it blah blah blah. Christian Bale signed on for three films, and the studio will obviously want a sequel. But it doesn't mean much before we get word from the Nolans. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Patch Posted September 5, 2008 Share Posted September 5, 2008 Christian Bale signed on for three films, and the studio will obviously want a sequel. But it doesn't mean much before we get word from the Nolans. Even if the Nolan's aren't interested, that probably won't stop the studio. Granted, the next film probably wouldn't be half as good without them, but it's probably going to be history repeating itself. Batman (Burton), Batman Returns (Burton), Batman Forever (Schumacher). But then again, we never saw a Titanic sequel, did we? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ReZourceman Posted September 5, 2008 Author Share Posted September 5, 2008 Even if the Nolan's aren't interested, that probably won't stop the studio. Granted, the next film probably wouldn't be half as good without them Hence why it wouldn't be worth mentioning. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan_Dare Posted September 5, 2008 Share Posted September 5, 2008 But then again, we never saw a Titanic sequel, did we? I wouldn't be so sure Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris the great Posted September 5, 2008 Share Posted September 5, 2008 He didn't. It says in the script something like "Lies dead, neck broken in several places" or something to that affect, and then Aaron Eckhart confirmed it blah blah blah. Christian Bale signed on for three films, and the studio will obviously want a sequel. But it doesn't mean much before we get word from the Nolans. look in the interview with the guy who plays two face, he talks about how he asked nolan if two face was dead, and was told yes. i realise this isnt confirmation, but if we dont get a sequal, i will buy a hat and eat it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ReZourceman Posted September 5, 2008 Author Share Posted September 5, 2008 look in the interview with the guy who plays two face, he talks about how he asked nolan if two face was dead, and was told yes. i realise this isnt confirmation, but if we dont get a sequal, i will buy a hat and eat it. I don't understand your logic. That confirms nothing other than what it confirms. It doesnt lead or give off any kind of speculation in re to a sequel. Its for TDK only. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris the great Posted September 5, 2008 Share Posted September 5, 2008 i suppose, though i dont see why any one would care if two face was dead if there wasnt to be a sequal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EEVILMURRAY Posted September 6, 2008 Share Posted September 6, 2008 I don't understand why you insist on wanting an origin? Well they spent almost a whole movie on Batman, why not a mention on his apparent biggest nemesis? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LegoMan1031 Posted September 6, 2008 Share Posted September 6, 2008 Watched this again the other day. I still think it's a fantastic film Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McPhee Posted September 6, 2008 Share Posted September 6, 2008 Well they spent almost a whole movie on Batman, why not a mention on his apparent biggest nemesis? They did mention him, right at the end of the film. There's then a few months between Begins and TDK where The Joker is growing in prominence in Gotham City. His "origin" probably happened at the same time as Batman Begins was happening. By the end of that film he'd created enough trouble to get Gordon to take note of him and as him to look in to the situation. By the time The Dark Knight rolls around The Joker has grown to be a significant force in Gotham City. We don't see an origin, but we do see his rise to power. He goes from not being worth mentioning, to being a minor problem for Batman to deal with, to ripping off banks and finally becomes the guy the criminal underworld look to to deal with thier Batman problem. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Klimop Posted September 7, 2008 Share Posted September 7, 2008 John Malkovich would make a great Joker! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Maase Posted September 9, 2008 Share Posted September 9, 2008 Another news that make me happy and ReZourceman angry http://splashpage.mtv.com/2008/09/08/dark-knight-exclusive-michael-caine-says-johnny-depp-is-the-riddler-philip-seymour-hoffman-is-the-penguin/ URL of the link says all, pretty much Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Noodleman Posted September 9, 2008 Share Posted September 9, 2008 That link doesn't confirm anything tbh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris the great Posted September 9, 2008 Share Posted September 9, 2008 John Malkovich would make a great Joker! i was thinking more heath ledger... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tellyn Posted September 9, 2008 Share Posted September 9, 2008 "I read it in the paper." I'm pretty sure he's having a joke... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ReZourceman Posted September 10, 2008 Author Share Posted September 10, 2008 Hahahah! Lol. Again, nothings concrete till we hear from the Nolans or directly from WB, or a legitimate possible rumour from a reliable source that would be posted on Aint it cool. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happenstance Posted September 10, 2008 Share Posted September 10, 2008 Bruce Timms take: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paj! Posted September 10, 2008 Share Posted September 10, 2008 Bruce Timms take: Blah. I miss the original DCUA. Can't believe they just ended it after JLU. I suppose the DVD movies are somewhat elseworld tales of that universe, but yeah. The Batman is rubbish compared to the 90's Batman show/s. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts