ReZourceman Posted October 21, 2009 Share Posted October 21, 2009 Wolverine 2? i thought we were suppose to be getting Origins: Magneto? Its still coming! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Retro_Link Posted October 21, 2009 Author Share Posted October 21, 2009 Wolverine 2? i thought we were suppose to be getting Origins: Magneto?Latest news: http://uk.movies.ign.com/articles/103/1036527p1.html Don't Wait for Magneto Producer says X-Men villain prequel on the back burner. US, October 19, 2009 - If you're holding your breath for that much talked about Magneto prequel ... well, don't. In an interview with Empire Online, X-Men series producer Lauren Shuler Donner said, after praising David Goyer's screenplay for Magneto, "I'm not sure that film is going to be made. The studio has a wealth of potential stories, and they have to stand back and decide which ones to make. And Magneto, I think, is at the back of the queue. Maybe it'll get made in five years - who knows?" The producer did confirm that if and when Magneto does before cameras it will star someone other than Ian McKellen in the title role. Shuler Donner said the de-aging visual effects used on McKellen for X-Men: The Last Stand are too cost prohibitive to be done for an entire film. McKellen may appear as the elder Magneto in a few scenes, but she said another actor will be cast to play his younger incarnation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ashley Posted October 21, 2009 Share Posted October 21, 2009 Frick on a stick Toy Story 3's release date in the UK is July 23rd, a month after America I wanted to be relatively spoiler free (don't mind watching trailers and such). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cube Posted October 21, 2009 Share Posted October 21, 2009 Frick on a stick Toy Story 3's release date in the UK is July 23rd, a month after America That's very good when it comes to Disney/Pixar. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Retro_Link Posted October 21, 2009 Author Share Posted October 21, 2009 Frick on a stick Toy Story 3's release date in the UK is July 23rd, a month after America I wanted to be relatively spoiler free (don't mind watching trailers and such).Where will the spoilers come from if you just dont look into the movie? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ashley Posted October 21, 2009 Share Posted October 21, 2009 That's very good when it comes to Disney/Pixar. Well yes but Wall-E was like a week and this is a fairly big film. I expected better :p Where will the spoilers come from if you just dont look into the movie? Most of the things I look at are American and some people don't really think about others and blurt out stuff. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paj! Posted October 21, 2009 Share Posted October 21, 2009 Oh god. The mention of "child-actors" in relation to an X-Men reboot. No. Please. Take me away. *collapses in a swoon* They obviously WANT this to be shit. P.S Wolverine 2 will porbably be better than 1 (not hard, it had no story/point as far as I remember), but I hated the shit japan bit of his story in the comics. But then I only like Wolverine in the X-Men, not solo. Deadpool might be fun. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cube Posted October 21, 2009 Share Posted October 21, 2009 They obviously WANT this to be shit. The mention of "we want it to be like Harry Potter" makes it even more obvious. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Retro_Link Posted October 29, 2009 Author Share Posted October 29, 2009 Bit of news from today: http://uk.movies.ign.com/articles/104/1040308p1.html Aykroyd's Ghostbusters 3 Update Aykroyd advised Noury that screenwriters Gene Stupnitsky and Lee Eisenberg are currently "hacking out a first draft" and that Sony is enthusiastic about the project. Although he gave the impression that Ghostbusters 3 was far from a go project, Aykroyd did say that for the first time in years it seems closer to a reality than it's ever been and that both the cast and studio are all eager to finally make it happen. http://uk.movies.ign.com/articles/104/1040350p1.html Alien Prequel Plot Details For the first time, director Sir Ridley Scott has gone into at least a little bit of detail about his upcoming prequel to Alien. Talking to Empire at a premiere, he was asked if the movie would tell the story of how the extra-terrestrial critters found their way to LV-426 - the infested planet that John Hurt, Sigourney Weaver and co discovered at the beginning of Alien. Apparently not: "It's a brand new box of tricks," said Scott. "We know what the road map is, and the screenplay is now being put on paper. The prequel will be a while ago." He went on: "It's very difficult to put a year on Alien, but [for example] if Alien was towards the end of this century, then the prequel story will take place 30-years prior." How this fits into Alien lore we're not sure, but Ridders is certainly excited by the project: "I never thought I'd look forward to a sequel. But a prequel is kind of interesting. I'm looking forward to doing that." http://uk.movies.ign.com/articles/103/1039854p1.html Just One Villain in Spidey 4? We've heard a juicy - albeit unconfirmed - rumour about Spider-Man 4. MarketSaw is reporting that there will only be one villain in the superhero sequel, with The Lizard alone facing off against Peter Parker. This rumour hasn't been confirmed by the studio, but if true would rule out the gossip linking the likes of Carnage and Morbius to the project. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr_Odwin Posted October 30, 2009 Share Posted October 30, 2009 Bit of news from today: The spidey news is good in my opinion. Three was just villain overload. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roostophe Posted October 30, 2009 Share Posted October 30, 2009 Yeah, everybody knows just having one Villain is good enough. [/Narcissism] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paj! Posted October 30, 2009 Share Posted October 30, 2009 Oh Jesus. Lizard is recipe for disaster. To make him a good villain, he'll have to be the classic "talking" version, as opposed to the various beastial incarnations. And that's just going to look fucking stupid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Retro_Link Posted October 30, 2009 Author Share Posted October 30, 2009 Oh Jesus. Lizard is recipe for disaster. To make him a good villain, he'll have to be the classic "talking" version, as opposed to the various beastial incarnations. And that's just going to look fucking stupid.After seeing Venom I'm inclined to agree!Mind you, Gollum was made to work extremely well in an otherwise human [played] cast, so it can be done. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EEVILMURRAY Posted October 30, 2009 Share Posted October 30, 2009 After seeing Venom I'm inclined to agree!Mind you, Gollum was made to work extremely well in an otherwise human [played] cast, so it can be done. What ruined Venom for me was the voice, after hearing it's proper evil voice in the cartoon I was expecting something even more sinister. Sadly Topher Graces' voice doesn't have it. Bring on Mysterio. As for the Magneto movie, I was told that McKellen would be narrating. Thing is Wolverine was "created" whereas Magneto's powers are 100% natural, and the "origin" was pretty much explained at the beginning of the first film. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paj! Posted October 30, 2009 Share Posted October 30, 2009 I never understood why a Magneto origin needed to be made, as you said, it was done perfectly and succinctly (and quite harrowingly) at the start of X-Men. It's not like he did much other than meet Charles Xavier in between being a child and becoming Magneto. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chairdriver Posted October 30, 2009 Share Posted October 30, 2009 I'd be more interested in a Storm origin tale (which would probably be quite boring). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paj! Posted October 30, 2009 Share Posted October 30, 2009 I'd rather they just made a really good series of animated X-Men movies. Or they somehow resurrect the X-Men movie franchise. I'd prefer they just brought Cyclops back to life so that the movies could be whole again. [/atomic kitten] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EEVILMURRAY Posted October 30, 2009 Share Posted October 30, 2009 Here's hoping they don't make another shitty animated series so soon after another, like what Batman did with... *sigh* "The Brave and the Bold" Christ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paj! Posted October 30, 2009 Share Posted October 30, 2009 Wolverine & The X-Men actullay impressed me with it's first season. When's that back on, does anyone know? But yeah, DC will top the 90's animated universe of Batman/TNBA/Superman/Justice League/JLU/Batman Beyond. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ReZourceman Posted October 30, 2009 Share Posted October 30, 2009 I remember a Wizard cover I've got from like 5 years ago, and it poses a velociraptor from Jurassic Park in a lab coat, (basically) as a Movie Lizard. I know it sounds mega retarded, but I think it actually looked SO good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paj! Posted October 30, 2009 Share Posted October 30, 2009 No no no. I hate the original raptor-face Lizard, not intimidating at all. His more usual "crocodile" longer face is far better. (PS. I loved Luke Ross' art on Spidey - not sure what happened to him other than I remember reading a comic where the art was done by "luke ross" but it was pretty different in style?- but I hated how he drew Martha Connors there. So unbelievable, if you just saw your home destoryed and son in mortal danger from being devoured by your husband) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan_Dare Posted October 31, 2009 Share Posted October 31, 2009 What ruined Venom for me was the voice, after hearing it's proper evil voice in the cartoon I was expecting something even more sinister. Sadly Topher Graces' voice doesn't have it.. What they should have done is given him a double 'echo' voice, with the symbiote talking over Brock. Did Venom even use the royal we in the film? I only recall nightmares from seeing it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EEVILMURRAY Posted October 31, 2009 Share Posted October 31, 2009 (edited) What they should have done is given him a double 'echo' voice, with the symbiote talking over Brock. Didn't they do something like a double voice [albeit exceedingly wank]? I can't remember very well as I've only seen it once. EDIT: Tried searching the Tube for the part from the movie, but only found some shizzle from the game: I don't think it sounded like this in the movie, but this isn't that great. Did Venom even use the royal we in the film? I only recall nightmares from seeing it. I can't remember that either, he barely spoke. Edited October 31, 2009 by EEVILMURRAY Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Retro_Link Posted November 12, 2009 Author Share Posted November 12, 2009 http://uk.movies.ign.com/articles/104/1044585p1.html Caine: Batman 3 Might Not Happen UK, November 12, 2009 - Michael Caine doesn't sound that enthusiastic about the future of the Batman franchise. In an interview with British magazine Shortlist, the actor - who played Butler Alfred in Batman Begins and The Dark Knight - said: "As for the future... if they ever make another Batman I will be in, I will be the butler..." He went on: "But I don't know if they are ever going to make another Batman. If they do it won't be for quite a while." Sounds like bad news for fans of the Caped Crusader then, with Batman 3 seemingly a long way off. I'm actually more relieved by this news than anything. Because innevitably there will be a third Batman movie, but for a while there it was looking like they wanted to rush on with the threequel, even if it meant moving on without Christopher Nolan. At least this news makes it seem that Warner Bros. have carmed down, and are probably now prepared to wait on Nolan, or at least give the film alot more thought and development time, all of which are fine by me! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
or else you will DIE Posted November 12, 2009 Share Posted November 12, 2009 i will never forgive WB for turning down Burton's Batman III Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts