Julius

Them naming the third version Sinnoh game a metal in line with the Gen II titles instead of another gemstone or high priced item has to be one of the best title teases which went completely unnoticed in the history of gaming Hey, don't defend your mistake unless you're advocating for X & Y being top three/four in all seriousness, though, yeah, I loved the additions made that gen. It still hurts that they nailed the gimmick with Mega Evolution and then actively went and did away with them for much weaker ideas. Oh, and don't forget the introduction of EXP for catching Pokémon! My absolute favourite addition that gen in all honesty, and definitely makes it harder for me want to go back to a game in the series from before 2013 and have the desire to catch them all.

What do you mean? It's simple. They've positioned themselves ever so carefully with very thoughtful long-term planning over the last decade to land exactly where they are in 2024. They mess up the messaging of the Xbox One, tanking the console's sales prospects before it even manages to launch They continue to shoot themselves in both feet, the balls and the ass by bringing their games to PC, bringing console sales screeching to a halt. They continue to release their games in their tentpole franchises with so few changes that they become stale. They see a fairly steep drop-off from one gen to the next and their rival absolutely buries them alive. To turn things around, they announce two SKUs at the start of the next generation, one weak enough compared to the other that it completely botches any sense of ambition, with two stupid names to boot, and yet they still manage to go absurdly over budget on their Day 1 must buy green helmet man game which doesn't release until a year later - and in a month where no-one can even mention it in GOTY conversations. They bury the lede on their acquired smaller studios by putting them shoulder to shoulder with gargantuan acquisitions, the size of which have never before been seen in the industry. They buy up and revitalise Konami. They buy Square Enix. They buy Tencent. They buy PlayStation. They buy Nintendo. Then, they buy Asia. And finally: the moon. You know, I still think it's only a 50/50 shot that they see their numbers start to climb There's simply no way. There's almost certainly some number fudging going on if Game Pass alone is covering things, and if it it at the point where it's beyond breaking even, I imagine those margins are incredibly slim considering that if they were reasonable/huge, they'd be screaming them from every rooftop. It could well do, but I think the problem now is, well, has that ship sailed? Maybe some of the general gaming audience might bite, but given the game is a known quantity filled with bugs, would likely lack mod support on PlayStation, It's certainly not helped by us living in a day and age where we consistently get more high quality releases per year than we did, say, over a decade ago back when Skyrim launched. So I'm not sure if Starfield comes over to too much fanfare, but I have to imagine their approach to the release of Elder Scrolls VI might change following Starfield's. I love BG3, but come on, an entity like Bethesda backed by Xbox shouldn't be having an indie studio wipe the floor with and overshadowing them on virtually every level. Sea of Thieves would be a very interesting choice, and also make complete sense. I'd definitely be down to play it with friends online purely because of how unique an experience it is; it's by no means a console seller, but it does have a dedicated community who deserve to have more people to play with, and the game itself looks incredibly charming. Is it something I'd play weekly? Probably not, I'm sure it'll get stale at some point. But I'd certainly give it a shot! But how else can I sound smart on my podcast? Watch it be the most Nintendo x Xbox move of all time and have Game Pass on Switch locked behind a third NSO tier that no-one will buy

looks up Metacritic scores for the game Holy heck, I agree, those are some harsh scores! I feel like this game should very firmly be swimming in 7s – I wonder if it's down to being a year and a half into the gen and the game being so short for it's launch price, or people expecting a much more fleshed out experience while waiting on the first big hitter of the gen? Either way, I'm not sure whether it was put out to die or if SIE were just really stupid, but it certainly wouldn't have helped the game's commercial potential to have this release just one month before Bloodborne. I mean, come on! But yeah, absolutely needed/needs a sequel. It could've flopped, but I also do genuinely think we could've seen an Uncharted 2 type of situation where the next game could've come on leaps and bounds by building on the foundation of the first. Guess we'll probably never know Those PS5 load times were real nice Yep, definitely up there with the best of last gen, and what I like is that just looking at those four, there's so much variety at the top of the pile in terms of approach, style, music, vibes, and mechanics. Doesn't really feel like we've really seen the genre kick on this gen, though I suppose those four games mentioned did all release in the latter half of the PS4's life, and this year of course looks stacked for JRPGs, so hopefully we come away from this year with some more excellent JRPGs we'll still be praising in a couple of years. I think there's a fairly decent chance you'll gel with it, though I think it really depends on how you approach it – perhaps more than any other From game I've played, the build people go with seems to have a massive impact on their enjoyment of the game. I mentioned how I'd like to see them balance things out more in a sequel/potential DLC, but obviously with the options being there and the game being balanced how it is, it's on From that I think the experience really varies from player to player based on selected build; I'll never fault anyone for taking advantage of what's available, that style of play just bored me and felt much less fulfilling. The game doesn't faff around too much with fluff, with the linearity of missions really making the game feel like it gets to the point; getting S-ranks in missions and the tweaks you can do numbers-wise feeling a bit GT-esque (just, ya know, hulking AC unit rather than a Toyota Yaris); and while it's difficult to speak to how the team's and director's expertise in combat in Sekiro translates to this having not got around to playing that game yet, there's a lot of fun to be had with learning your AC's moveset and honing in on fleshing out your chosen style of play. Plus: mechs. Mechs are just cool.

It's time to bring this up-to-date and finish the fight in this thread. I've posted once or twice here already, so if you want the complete picture: for the first game I played in 2023, the Artorias of the Abyss DLC for Dark Souls, go here; and for some thoughts about Storyteller and SANABI, two brilliant, short, and rarely discussed indie titles released in 2023, go here. Obviously, I'm not going to go out of my way to spoil games - in particular, I've tried to leave story elements and some other things which I think are best saved for when someone experiences the game for themselves completely out of my diary entry - but there are some games I will be talking about where I think discussion of certain elements - mainly mechanics - not necessarily advertised before a game's release are essential to discussion about the game. Everyone's gauge for things being spoiled is going to be different, so consider yourself kindly warned I'm also going to be going a bit more in-depth on some games than others, especially considering that there are some games I've talked about quite a bit in their own dedicated threads, so if there's a crazy variety of write-up lengths, that's why Anyways, enough talk; let's mosey. Bloodborne | 2015 Bloodborne is a living nightmare of a game. Beasts drunk on blood prowl the streets of Yharnam, a pretty traditionally gothic settlement all things considered, with ornate buildings and the spires of cathedrals and clock towers piercing through its dark, foggy skies. You, a Hunter from a foreign land, take to these streets with jagged and clunky weapons, tasked with unraveling the many mysteries of this place and finding a cure for the disease which has seen it all fall from grace. Blood splatters over you as you tear through beast and man alike, drenching your jacket and the cobblestone streets in crimson, you being kept on high alert as danger lurks around every darkened corner - eyes scanning constantly from right to left and back again - before the wretched blood-curdling screams of unholy creatures of all sorts take hold of the night. The few people you do meet - can they be trusted? The places you go, the things you hear - do they unsettle you? The few answers you do find - are they really answers, or just the beginning of a deeper dive into the abyss that is the foils and folly of man? What I love about Bloodborne is that, unlike so many other From Software games of this ilk, it provides you with much more story and context this time around - and yet you are kept guessing by the answers you don't have, and the greater truth you find yourself seeking about the nature of this world and its inhabitants, man and beast alike. This game's narrative wraps you around its finger and slyly grins at you, as you find yourself diving deeper, and deeper, and deeper yet into the cruelty depicted - how could anyone commit such inhumane acts? And, perhaps more importantly: why? - and just when you start to think you have some understanding of what's going on, it rapidly unfurls, pulling the rug from under you and unveiling something so much more. It's rare that a game with so few answers is able to grip me with its story so tightly, and yet here I am, nearly a full year after starting the game, still watching videos and reading articles on different interpretations of the game's events, its characters, and its place. The way in which the unveiling of this through certain mechanics and triggers in the game astounds me, and perhaps my only regret with the game in this regard is that those same mechanics and triggers weren't applied more widely to the game. Bloodborne takes after Demon's Souls and Dark Souls both in its level design; like Demon's Souls, there is a hub you will regularly return to in the form of The Hunter's Dream in order to level up and craft your weapons, whereas, more like Dark Souls, there is also an intricate web of exploration spun by the streets, paths, and buildings you come across your journey, and there were several instances I found myself grinning from ear-to-ear at the absurdity of realising that certain places link to others, and then thinking about it deeper - why, contextually, these places are linked, and why it makes perfect sense. The game does an excellent job of funnelling you in the right direction despite it often feeling so unnervingly cramped, especially while you find yourself in Yharnam early on, and despite the game being so visually dark, it does such a great job of making new areas feel unique in how you explore them. Yharnam as a whole - from top to bottom - might be my favourite place in a From Software game period just for how much is hidden away and overlapping, and I am also a very big fan of Castle Cainhurst and just how different it looks and feels: like a truly gruesome realisation of the Castlevania art I've seen so much of. More than any other game of From's that I've played, it really does realise so much of that Metroidvania-style DNA and apply it in wonderful fashion to what From Software wanted to achieve with this game. The crazy thing is, I've already highlighted a bunch of excellent things about this game, but there is so much more to get to - such as this game's combat! In Demon's Souls, Dark Souls, and Elden Ring, I found myself playing slowly and meticulously, a sword in one hand and a shield raised in the other - not necessarily how I wanted to play those games, as that is not really my style of play given the option, but with how overwhelming those games and their enemies can be at times, and the bosses in particular, it is the path I think most first-timers will find themselves taking. Bloodborne, on the other hand, plays exactly how I wanted to be playing in those other games, which made my time with the game much smoother of an affair than what I'd encountered in From's earlier games - and it achieves this with combat which is fast and fluid, heavily reliant on parrying and dodging, and begging you to slash away at whatever you come across. It does this in a few ways: firstly, there is one shield to find in the entire game, you can't start with it, and it's pretty much a joke just how useless it is. Because of this, dodging is a necessity, and coupled with some wonderful i-frames and how quickly you can dodge from side-to-side, it feels great to dance around an enemy and have that flow and back and forth to battle where stepping in and out of their reach, darting around the place, feels so damn satisfying. But you know what's more satisfying than dodging? Visceral attacks. Either through staggering them after a long beatdown or a well-timed shot of your offhand weapon (most likely a gun of some sort; for me, this was the good old faithful Blunderbuss) enemies will keel over, allowing you to run up to them and jam your weapon into them to deliver a visceral attack, which does an insane amount of damage to them, more often than not resulting in blood spraying all over the place and soaking you red. All weapons are trick weapons, too, meaning that your right-hand weapon of choice comes with additional variety, such as the Saw Cleaver being able to extend out for greater range and reach, but this comes at the cost of delivering slightly less damage - a wonderful give-and-take which keeps every weapon feeling fresh and unique from others. Now, all of this is all well and good - in fact, it's great - and perhaps would have already been enough for Bloodborne to differentiate itself from its predecessors and everything which has come since, but there is one more mechanic in the game which truly ups the ante on how great the combat flows, and breaks you out of the mould of From's previous titles: and that is with the rally system. For a brief period after taking damage, so long as you have not been killed, the health you lost from an attack of an enemy's will be highlighted orange on your otherwise red health bar, and you have the opportunity to regain that health by slicing away at them in turn. This risk/reward system doesn't just feel great by itself, but it ties into the game's core of going wild with bloodlust, in the same way that the visceral attacks deliver on the promise of exacting cruelty with a heavy hand. This is genuinely some of my favourite combat in all of gaming. And, well, what is great combat without great bosses in games like these? And Bloodborne delivers with all of its bosses, whether it be from a narrative perspective in learning something new about the truth that you seek or simply in delivering the thrill of the hunt. Bosses takes all shapes and forms in this games, whether it be a human or a beast, a massive spider or something else all together. One boss in particular is probably the weak link here, but is an optional boss, and I don't think does anything at all to drag the rest of the game's excellently designed boss's down. I won't go into particular boss names simply to avoid spoiling anything, but something I really liked in this game is that I could contextually figure out the best effect to use an enemy from their environment or the enemy type themselves: beasts being burned at stakes implied that beasts take more damage from fire-infused attacks, and other enemies surrounded by water would clearly be weak to lightning-infused hits. This is of course helpful to know during most of the main game against some awesome compositions of mobs, but it's especially useful and unique, I find, for a game like this to do such a great job of subtly telegraphing the best way forward. The music, for me, is also the best in any From Software game I've played - I'm a big fan of classical music and bombastic choirs, and the overwhelming majority of this game's bosses have epic tracks which just fit the bill so well for me and my tastes, and there's an easy argument to be made that some particular tracks could well be some of the best gaming compositions of the 2010s. This game isn't quite flawless, but it is pretty damn close. I think the biggest issue with this game is simply its performance: it struggles, at times, to run at even a solid 30 fps, which is what it caps out at. This is despite numerous patches since its release, and in a game like this, performing so poorly really could have hindered my enjoyment of the game. Thankfully, for me, it didn't get in the way of my enjoyment of the game because I didn't run into issue at vital points, but if I did - in a game as brutal as this one can be - I could see it being very frustrating. I don't know if I agree that this game needs a remake, and I'm aware that there are some technical hurdles getting in the way of this, but that it hasn't yet received a 60 fps re-release despite every other modern From Software title being available to experience in that way in some form or another is a travesty, in my eyes. The other issue I have with this game is the totally optional Chalice Dungeons - they have some cool new bosses and unique enemies down there which tie into certain parts of the main game's lore, but they feel like prototype takes on Elden Ring's catacombs and are generally just a bit of a slog to get through, with some having strange effects in play to try and shake things up as you hunt down particular materials to explore other Dungeons and eventually come face-to-face with a boss hinted at being heavily tied into the main game. Still, it's more Bloodborne and it can be played with friends, so for some people I'm sure it will be less of an issue and more of a lure, but for me it was the only hold-up in me completing the hunt. I do want to speak about the DLC for this game briefly, and that is of course The Old Hunters. This piece of DLC is much more linear in its design than the base game, though it does stick to having some hidden areas and paths to take which overlap at times, but this is excellent in that it provides you with a push to explore new locales with some incredibly strong examples of more excellent level design, fight new and unique enemies - many of whom, as you might have guessed, are hunters; or were, at some point or another - and experience a number of new boss fights, three of which I'd argue are three of the best in the game, and also just three of the best bosses in From Software's tapestry of greats, and, well, gaming in general. The music, once again, is brilliant here, and while I don't want to name bosses or tracks, I do need to highlight the two best tracks I'd argue are the greatest in the game: this one and this one. To provide a little bit of context for those who haven't played the game or this DLC, the first depicts a struggle and dance between a beast and man, whereas the second depicts one of the strongest hunters in the game intent on keeping her secret safe, both doing incredibly interesting things in terms of their composition that I think make them worth listening to even if you haven't played the game or this DLC, especially if you never plan to. The Old Hunters has ruined the bar for what I expect from a DLC - and is, quite easily, the best piece of DLC I've played through, just again for how much it adds to the main game in how it recontextualises certain events and provides a new lens to see the game and some of its characters through. Taking a look at Bloodborne as a whole, I'd say that you don't even need to closely examine Bloodborne to find that every facet - every seam, every thread - of this game is masterfully crafted and beautifully realised, but what ensures its timelessness, relevance, and greatness is that once you start pulling on those seams and those threads, there is so much more for you to discover. Having played them I understand how great Demon's Souls and Dark Souls were before this, so for From Software to then take the risk and violently shake up so much of that tried and true formula really speaks to the talent and ambition of Hidetaka Miyazaki and everyone else over there - to then do it to this degree, and to such a degree that I would declare that Bloodborne doesn't just escape the shadow of the great games before it but usurps those games and overshadows them in almost every way, for me, leaves me simply speechless. Bloodborne is, quite simply, a dream of a game, and if these types games are for you, then I implore you: just go out there and kill a few beasts, it's for your own good. Go ahead, and join the hunt. Sniper Elite V2 | 2012 To avoid sullying the Favourite Games of 2023 thread and to not waste anyone's time here, I'm just going to come out and say it: this was the worst game I played last year. No, I don't mean weakest, in that everything else I played just so happened to be better - this is the worst by merit. The enemy AI sucks. The story and characters are one-note, entirely derivative and very easily forgettable. The enemy AI sucks. The flashback, "I remember the day when..." voiceovers are boring and lifeless as all hell for a guy who was a sniper in WWII. The enemy AI sucks. The level design is about as bland as it could possibly be in a game like this. The enemy AI sucks. You can't change difficulty after starting and realising that the enemy AI sucks. Oh, and the enemy AI sucks. The kill animations where time slows down and you watch a bullet pop through someone and bust their guts out while their bones get crushed are pretty sweet, though. And hearing better things about its sequels and being sure I'll be looking for dumb fun at some point or another, I'm sure I'll get to them...eventually. Maybe. Hmm. Star Wars Jedi: Survivor | 2023 I found Star Wars Jedi: Survivor to be a game of blissfully high highs, but host to a weird and overwhelming amount of middling lows. The highs: Stephen Barton and Gordy Haab returning to compose the score, building on the extremely solid foundation they laid in Fallen Order back in 2019, with Fields of Dusk being my favourite track in the game; the story getting its hooks into me much, much earlier than it did in Fallen Order, albeit after a bit of a slow start; some excellent character work with some great emotional and epic beats throughout the course of the story; plenty of new and fun characters (Turgle and Pili being the standouts for me); getting to see and hear High Republic era stuff in action (!) at long last; excellent antagonists, some of the best we've had in a Star Wars game in a very long time, in fact; some particular fun challenges via the optional Force Tears; it's one of the best-looking third party titles to date; and one of my favourite boss fights in the last few years at the time I played the game (don't worry - we're getting there). Fast Travel with plenty of Fast Travel points, a vastly improved map, unlockable map upgrades for the completionist in all of us, and other general QoL improvements made the game a much, much smoother ride than Fallen Order often was. The customisation options here are once again great for Cal and BD-1, but stealing the show is the level of detail and options available when customising your very own lightsaber. And now, for the lows: as I was concerned about going in, a whole lot of bloat to experience when you start dabbling with the game's side content and trying to explore 100%, made worse, perhaps, by areas being more wide open with some really poor level design outside of the occasional isolated puzzle, meaning the game - by design - can lead you down the wrong path more than once or twice, with a few occasions where I found myself asking "okay, game, where do you want me?" while staring at the map (ahem, Koboh); a hilariously excessive amount of foreshadowing of its Metroidvania elements, coming across tens if not hundreds of opportunities to use an ability you won't get until hours down the line, and not at all being subtle about it in the way the better games with Metroidvania elements handle these moments of foreshadowing; the return of traversal jank from Fallen Order, such as floaty platforming, weird moments where it can be tough to judge distances and falling to your death, to being able to very jankily make your way to somewhere you aren't supposed to be by committing to jumping up an enbankment, for example. There's also the combat, which feels so incredibly unreactive - why no animation cancelling available across the board (apparently it is available for a certain lightsaber stance? But whatever, it rquires a block and isn't at all in line with what I think this game calls for when it comes to animation cancelling) in a game where my character has Force abilities, why no i-frame dodges in bosses clearly calling for it, why am I getting stunlocked by stormtroopers of all things - when I'm playing the role of a heroic acrobatic space wizard with a glowstick capable of disembowling any- and everyone which I can pull from across the room? It's really bizarre to so clearly take inspiration from From Software titles and then completely miss the mark. While this game got a six week delay, it should have been delayed further. Playing it at launch I experienced a crash just five minutes in, and experienced several throughout my playthrough, whether it be during cutscenes, during or event after completing puzzles (again, take from From Software, add fast travel points and treat them as bonfires/lanterns - but then no auto-save on your multi-hundred-million dollar AAA game which crashes all the time, meaning you need to go through things again?). At the time I also experienced some really egregious pop-in, devastating framerate drops (to the -teens, and very much reproducible), and screen-tearing for the first time ever in a game released on PS4 or PS5, on what at the time was a next-gen exclusive, mind you! Shocking that it's since been announced that it will be getting a last-gen version, when by all accounts, it seems like it still isn't quite up to snuff for this gen. It was absolutely embarrasing how much of a mess this game was back at launch. This game isn't a masterpiece, by any means, but it deserved so much more time and attention than it clearly got, and really should have been delayed further, in my opinion. I've railed on the game a good bit, but I did really enjoy my time with it. If you're a Star Wars fan or just someone looking for a summer blockbuster type of game, I think this game is good fun and a great escape, but I still find myself all these months later scratching my head at how this game received the review scores that it did. With Stig Asmussen, director of both Fallen Order and Survivor, having left EA since this game launched, I am very curious to see how the third (and presumably final?) entry in the Jedi series shakes out under new direction. Final Fantasy XVI | 2023 Final Fantasy XVI is, hands-down, not just one of the most epic games I played in 2023, but one of the most epic games I've ever had the pleasure of playing through. I really do think that it's set a new bar for how epic a game can be, and there were times where I could just sense how much it was trying to push the PS5, and squeeze every last drop out of it - the first and so far only game I feel I've really had that experience with a console I've now been playing on for a bit over three years. The music, the boss fights and their varied approaches (ranging from an on-rails experience to a 3D brawler), the story, the pre-rendered cutscenes weaved between and around in-engine cutscenes almost seamlessly, it all just comes together to create an epic experience which is gripping from the very early hours of the game. Active Time Lore (or ATL), a feature which you can access during cutscenes to view details on characters, events, or locations present or referenced, is an awesome addition which I hope more RPGs take note of moving forwards. And yet, as a Final Fantasy game, it feels deeply flawed in some pretty important ways, which splits it fairly down the middle for me across the board - ironic, I think, given that the game flows so well in its first half in and out of different locales, story beats, and forms of play, but the second half of the game lags behind in comparison, feeling more like a checklist of activities between the game's mesmerising setpieces and boss battles. Perhaps this is in part down to Creative Business Unit III's storied history with Final Fantasy XIV, but the vast majority of quests are stale and relatively lifeless outside of a few at the very backend of the game - at which point you might have, understandably, given up on them; on the other hand, some really cool MMO-like elements, like attacks being telegraphed with patterns and lines drawn across from the floor, feel really fresh to the space, whereas as QoL features clearly inspired from their learnings with XIV, like quest markers and just overall quest tracking, are very welcome. The main draw for me with the game, though, which I've said it before, and I'll gladly say it again, is its soundtrack: it's the best OST for a game I've heard in a very, very long time, and Soken knocked it out of the park with his variety of approaches to the game's soundscape with a diverse approach to genres on display between tentpole bombastic displays of orchestral mastery during the game's key moments, and boss fights in particular. To name a few favourites, there's Away (the theme of Phoenix); the main battle theme, Sixteen Bells, which I think is up there with some of the best in Final Fantasy; Catacecaumene; Winter's Bound; Find the Flame; To Sail Forbidden Seas; A Far Cry From Heaven; Hide, Hideaway; All as One; and Lovely, Dark, and Deep, a wondrous forest theme. My favourite track in the entire game, though, has to be Ascension, a track heard partially in one of the game's trailers before release, which punctuates the most intense and epic boss battle of all in the game, and just the way the strings and choir escalate...it's just perfect. What makes this soundtrack so strong, as well, is that while it certainly pushes for fresh and new, it makes sure to pay homage to the feel and styles of older Final Fantasy games. Masayoshi Soken nailed it, as he has for years now in XIV, and I'm so glad that he finally got to put his stamp on a mainline, single-player Final Fantasy with XVI. I also just have to mention how masterfully the environmental tracks seamlessly transition into their respective battle theme variants, and also how the game handles its boss fight music, balancing the point at which you reach a battle cutscene and altering the music to allow it to catch up. The biggest problems with the game are that it lacks the levity and fun distractions of past Final Fantasy titles to break up the pacing and the oftentimes incredibly heavy plot; the combat lacks any serious depth and need for variety, even with flashy and fun combat, it rings hollow when there isn't much else to it and I can spend the entirety of the game with the abilities I pick up and have selected by default as the story progresses, which is doubled down on by the lack of weaknesses and strengths to elements as we've come to expect not just from Final Fantasy but of the genre as whole; and its abhorrent lack of any real sense of RPGness - story, characters, and music aside, there isn't much RPG to experience in this Final Fantasy, whether it be experimenting with different builds or really having an in-depth armour system, which is a huge letdown. Final Fantasy XVI can be a bit of a mixed experience; though at times brilliant, what it lacks so much is the mechanics and subtle mini-joys of a great Final Fantasy, because everything else which makes this series great is here. It has the soul, but not the body, of a brilliant Final Fantasy game. As a first crack, I think Creative Business Unit III did an excellent job and I think this is a really solid foundation to build from, so I can't wait to see what they could possibly do for mainline single-player Final Fantasy next, having seen how keen they are to learn from their perceived shortcomings at times with XIV. Armored Core VI | 2023 Let's not beat around the bush with Armored Core VI - I absolutely adored it. It took a little while to get to grips with the game, simply because it plays and feels so different to what I've come to be used to from the From Software titles I have played through, not to mention the slew of options at your disposal from relatively early on in the game to head towards a particular build for your bot; the almost overwhelming level of customisation you can do to your AC unit is incredible, and would be something I'd love to see translate over to other From titles (I mean, come on, at least let me re-colour everything so that it all somewhat matches!). Legs dictate your maximum load, your generator dictates your energy supply to keep everything turned on, you can equip a variety of weapons to your arms and shoulders, there's the core and arms which determine proficiency with weapons and obviously can add weight, there's the booster to help thrust you up into the air or to support your legs with dodges, the FCS (Fire Control System - essentially the main CPU in your AC, determining things like lock-on time and weapon range), as well as the head unit, which stores visual sensors. What you're left with, should you choose to play around with it, is an opportunity to create a mech perfect for your style of play - for me, based on what I love about mechs in anime and what I find cool in combat scenarios, was a focus on speed and flashiness, delivering precise blows and looking awesome while doing so. I probably spent upwards of 10 hours in the game designing mech after mech, tweaking colours, metallics, and the luster to create some designs I adored, all of which was a whole lot of fun! While combat is present throughout the game, it really comes to the fore in one-on-one scenarios, either against other AC pilots (my personal favourite fights) or in boss fights. This is where I think Armored Core VI shines and where I think the most fun comes from mastering the game and, similar to other From games, how you master your mech, learning rough times for deploying your arsenal, reloading, and the like as the game goes on. The game is heavily reliant on staggering your opponents and delivering heavy blows, and some AC and boss fights were absolutely awesome in that I found myself tweaking my AC unit further, perhaps needing a little more speed or sliding in a new generator for more power, but then perhaps this is offset by needing heavier legs to support the weapons I fitted the generator for, and so on. Now, while there is a need to learn enemy patterns and to learn your build (certainly one or two bosses feeling more like they'd belong in a Souls game rather tahn this one), what makes Armored Core so unique compared to other From games is that they are truly three-dimensional, in that they are omni-directional battles - for example, think back to other From titles (or most titles these days, honestly) and battles may be presented in a three-dimensional way, but they'll be completely two-dimensional in design, focusing mainly on the horizontal component of a battle, such as circling an opponent and dodging their attacks, making use of terrain, and so on. In Armored Core VI, however, verticality comes into play, as so many bosses and enemy units will fly around and take the battle into the air, and when combined with having so much to keep track of - your energy, your AP (health), your ammo.capacity for four different armaments, keeping your enemy centred, paying attention to audio cues - it can get very overwhelming at times, and there were definitely moments in first encounters with particular ACs or bosses where I felt a bit lost and found myself spamming buttons a bit. This is where a bit of a problem in AC's design shows itself: an almost one-size-fits-all solution is to get into the face of enemy ACs and just start wailing on them with heavy attacks, which is especially effective if you have a highly defensive and heavy build, with powerful armaments attached. This is a problem in a way because it removes the vertical component of combat, and heavier builds, by their very nature - big legs, tank tracks, quadripeds - have a much higher carry capacity - missiles, machine guns, etc. - and also a much higher health pool; this isn't how I approached the game, at all, but I've played around with heavy builds in revisiting the campaign and online, and I think while you should play how you want to play, it's a good way to get the least enjoyment of the game for someone like me. If you're a function over form type of person aiming to simply beat the game, then have at it, but for me, I found that this game is much more enjoyable with lighter builds and more of a focus on skill when it comes to dodge and attack timing. I played with a friend in 1v1 PvP and beat him for a few hours straight while playing with my lighter build from the very start of the game, before he eventually started to lean towards testing a heavier build, which ultimately meant that the tables turned: my weapons were effectively useless, my speed didn't matter, and his health pool and damage output and range from heavy armament attacks simply meant that he could fly up into the air and rain terror down on me. It took a lot of fun out of duking it out for the both of us, but then, why should my friend rely on a weaker build when he's having trouble fighting me or bosses? Similar to Elden Ring at launch, certain builds and weapons are very simply broken in AC VI, and so I seriously hope that whatever's next for AC, they do a better job of balancing things so that everyone can enjoy the approach they choose to take with the game. To touch briefly on the mission structure, this game felt like an old-school PS2 game, loading into individual missions, at times getting the chance to choose missions from branching paths, and this all feeds into earning more credits to spend on your AC. Missions aren't particularly long - perhaps 15 minutes or so at their longest, if there's a particularly tough boss you come across? - which means the game can probably be beat your first time around in 10 to 20 hours (depending on skill level, and obviously much, much longer if you love to customise your AC!), with alternate endings available through NG+ and NG++, both of which I throughly enjoyed. Replaying the missions you can also go for S-ranks based on the time it takes to complete the mission and credits earned (balanced out by credits spent on your loadout usage - for example, missiles can be pretty costly to use, as can aimlessly unloading a chaingun!), and while some of these can be a bit of a pain because there'll be some trick to getting the highest rank, I had loads of fun going through this game, what, at least four times? NG, NG+, NG++, S-ranks in all missions, not to forget the missions I replayed and didn't S-rank first time. The characters in this game and the overarching narrative from NG to NG++ is really intriguing, I loved learning new bits about certain characters or seeing how different endings played out by aligning with a different faction, and this is all propped up on the shoulders of perhaps modern From Software's best character dialogue (in fairness, driven by a lot more character interaction than in their other games) and some wonderful lines delivered by voice actors who seemed like they were simply having a blast in the booth, with a great sense of levity rarely - if ever - touched upon in their other titles. Armored Core VI was my first Armored Core game, and it certainly won't be my last. This has me interested in seeking out some of the older titles, and praying that substantial DLC or a sequel is already in the works so that I won't be waiting too long for my next mission. Marvel's Spider-Man | 2018 We can keep this one short, I think, seeing as it's a game I've spoken about before when replaying it in the Gaming Diary 2020 thread in preparation for its spin-off/sequel as well as initially playing it back when it launched in 2018, and that is of course Marvel's Spider-Man (the PS5 remaster, which looks awesome). Guess what? It's still awesome. Snappy combat, awesome soundtrack by John Paesano, some really great story beats which still get me emotional returning to the game now, addictively good web-swinging which is a good enough reason to visit everything highlighted on your map, and some awesome voice and motion-capture performances. It also has the same problems as before, such as the pacing tanking early into its final act due to certain world changes slowing your traversal down at times, and a silly amount of crimes to resolve becoming available for the first time in said third and final act. I also replayed and 100%'d The City That Never Sleeps DLC, bridging the gap between this game and Miles, and well, it was more Spider-Man, albeit in bite-sized chunks with some new enemies changing how you approach fights in very subtle ways, which I thought was really awesome. Also, getting more Black Cat was awesome. The Order: 1886 | 2015 Ready at Dawn made The Order: 1886 look absolutely incredible - in fact, it still looks visually better than most games releasing today. You work in an elite taskforce in an alternative world's London, tackling rebellions and hunting beasts as a conspiracy unfolds which threatens to tear London down, and all at the same time Jack the Ripper is lurking the streets. This all comes with some really fun and unique weapons available at times, such as an a thermite gun or a lightning-casting gun, and generally fun gunplay - but, weirdly for a cover-based shooter, enemies are out of focus when taking aim and the camera can often be so close you can barely see where around your cover. There's some stealth gameplay, too, and a uniqe mechanic I haven't come across in other stealth games where the takedown is tied to timing your attack with a repeatedly converging circle - it's a very small thing, but it just adds some stakes and an opportunity for failure, so I'm surprised we haven't seen this implemented in other games of the like. And speaking of other games of the like, it is very much a Naughty Dog-type game, sharing a lot of similarities for me with the first Uncharted - some great ideas, but not stellar execution, but a clearly defined direction, albeit with some shaky and uneven pacing. Considering the leap Uncharted made to Uncharted 2, it's a real shame, then, that this game was perfectly set up for a sequel we'll likely never get. Marvel's Spider-Man: Miles Morales | 2020 Another game I revisited in preparation for Spider-Man 2 is, of course, Marvel's Spider-Man: Miles Morales, which shares so much of its DNA with the first game that, well, you'll need to forgive me for repeating: it's still awesome. Snappy combat, awesome soundtrack by John Paesano (and some excellent new energy infused with the licensed songs added for the game), some really great story beats which still get me emotional returning to the game now, addictively good web-swinging which is a good enough reason to visit everything highlighted on your map, and some awesome voice and motion-capture performances. It is a bite-sized version of its predecessor, and this in some ways allowed Insomniac to react to the lapsed pacing in the final act of the first game, or the insane level of crimes, which you can now trigger at will rather than needing to wait for RNG to come into play. I don't think it's as strong as the first game, but it's still brilliant, and was an incredibly fun way to keep us somewhat occupied while waiting for the sequel. Marvel's Spider-Man 2 | 2023 Spider-Man 2 is a technical marvel, being one of the prettiest games to release on the current generation of consoles. The lighting, the shadows, those traced rays! It's simply beautiful, and I took plenty of screenshots throughout my time with the game. Haptics and adaptive triggers got special attention this time around, and were a noticeable step up from playing the Remastered version of the first game and Miles Morales. I rarely used it - because traversal is so fun in this game - but the speed of fast travel from one area of the map to another in this game is simply astonishing, as are the transitions from playing as Peter to Miles and back again. In terms of gameplay, while they definitely took a minute to get used to, I grew to love the Web Wings - it's just such a pleasant thing to glide around New York, and especially with the map being bigger this time around, the added speed included thanks to the game being exclusive to current consoles is very much warranted. The decision on top of this to do away with Ubisoft-style towers and instead have a map which unravels bit by bit as you see and explore new areas was a really smart move to keep this game feeling fresh compared to its contemporaries, and there's so much to naturally find yourself swinging towards thanks to some awesome environmental cues; I will say, though, that New York felt different this time around, and despite having completed 10 playthroughs in Insomniac's New York between Spider-Man and Miles Morales replays, there were times where I found myself feeling a bit lost. Is it the bigger map? The new coat of paint and new engine? The faster travel? Or is it simply a case of not having got used to this particular NY in this particular game? I'm not sure - maybe my next replay will help me figure that part out. I also adored being able to thread my own web lines across hideouts, which made engaging with the game's stealth so much more free and rewarding than I found it to be in the earlier two games. I was also a big fan of how they decided to shake up the MJ sections returning from the first game, with TLOU-lite sequences, and I'd genuinely be down for a little bit of DLC which fleshed this out some more. Something I found to be pretty hit-and-miss in the game, though, was its newly introduced Parry system, as it seemed superfluous as a mechanic everywhere but in particular boss fights where you had no choice but to rely on it. It can lead to some cool combat moments, but the game simply doesn't call for this added layer of mechanical depth in the way other games might, so I didn't feel a need to learn how to use it because it didn't feel like I was gaining much from using it, which made it even more jarring when I was being forced to use it. This in turn isn't helped by it most commonly being appropriate to use in instances where you're facing off against brutes and a swarm of grunts, who are going to overwhelm you while you try to use a Parry on the brute. I also wasn't a big fan of the AoE attacks that required you to jump to avoid them; perhaps it's because I've spent so long with the first two games now, but while I get it's a fresh idea, I again don't think it was a necessary addition and that dodging would have been fine in those moments. The game's story and characters are once again greatly realised, and I love so much of it that I think it's a bit of a shame that I found it falling apart - in its pacing, in its absurd scale, and in its character motivations (especially a certain one following the final battle) - in the final act. That aside, though, it feels so much like the Spidey I grew up with in the Raimi films, the 90s Animated Series, and the PS1 games, to the point that I'm happy to forgive it. This game also had the best side quests of the year last year, in my opinion, because I was surprised again and again by the direction they would take in setting things up for the future, the pay-off/time investment ratio felt super high (and thus they often felt incredibly rewarding), or just how much they would emotionally resonate with me. They just hit hard in ways I simply didn't expect, some of these quests will stay with me for a long, long time. Peter and Miles also felt much more involved in their communities, too, and the way the game weaves their inclusion and some great moments of inclusivity around this was great to see, on one occasion in particular in a way perhaps only video games can do. I had an absolute blast playing through this game, and it was yet another diamond in the crown that was 2023 for gaming. I can't wait to see what Insomniac do next. Yakuza: Like a Dragon | 2020 I love the Yakuza games; many of us here do. So, when it was announced that the next main series title, Yakuza: Like a Dragon, would be a job-centric, turn-based JRPG way back in 2019, a colossal change in genre and mechanics from the brawler routes of the series, while I think it's probably a bit harsh to say that we were scepitcal, we were certainly taken aback and a bit confused by the prospect - I mean, how couldn't you be? And yet, by and large, as Ryu ga Gotoku's first attempt at a JRPG, the game hit the mark. Almost all of them, in fact. It was certainly helped by the series's long and loud history with the gaudy and peculiar, reeling you in with laughter before punching you in the emotional gut and masterfully dancing between these two extemes, meaning that virtually nothing about the game's tone needed changing in the transition to JRPG-hood as might have been the case for other series making such a drastic leap. Substories were already a natural stand-in for typical side quests, as were many of the long-form side activities available, and in this game they're all a doozy: a business management mini-game which feels like a mobile gaming great without any of the trappings, the wacky and wonderful Mario Kart-like Dragon Kart, the many quizzes of a vocational school, a particularly fun reaction-based game where you need to stave off goats trying to make you fall asleep in the cinema, and a game about racing around on a bike to pick bottles and cans up to recycle. All of this generously feeds into the natural JRPG progession of obtaining money (boatloads, in the case of the management game, fairly early into the game's story), gaining EXP and levelling up (be it your character or their assigned Job), or forming meaningful bonds with your party to perform absurd team attacks. What's more, so much of this is contextualised, with you changing Jobs at a job centre, silly names akin to Dragon Quest being assigned to enemies and Ichiban's role as a hero clearly paying homage to that series through RGG's and Ichiban's clear affinity for those games, the turn-based nature all being a reflection of Ichiban's love for DQ too...it's simply wonderful. To briefly touch on the story - I think it's the best I've played through in the series since Kiwami 2, and probably right up there alongside 0 as the best paced, presented, and told. It benefits greatly from being slowed down by the turn-based nature of the game at times, and in a series at this point known for stunning twists, it perhaps manages to outdo even the best in the series in this regard. I was left floored by the end of the game. Now, there are some elements of this game I'd certainly question or describe as being rough around the edges: there are simply far too many street battles; the combat is pretty boring for the first two thirds of the game, until the difficulty begins to pick up and you have access to more healing and elemental attacks; one particular job having a fairly important out-of-combat ability tied to them but not being pointed out to you, the Foreman, which allows you to break through weak walls/obstacles with a hammer but is accessible by simply swapping to that job and back again, making me question why we need to bother with that at all; the battle menus need some serious tuning up, especially the items; dungeon design is, for the most part, incredibly bland, mostly comprising of a bunch of lifeless hallways; and Part-Time Hero is a bit of a lazy excuse to include fetch quests and have a stupid amount of collectables and craftables in the game. There are points in the game with difficulty spikes which will catch you out if you aren't immediately making your way to dungeons - while the game does point you towards these, they might as well have been made mandatory. I do also think that as the series's first jump into the genre that, and I say this simply because I have a friend who has played through all the other Yakuza games up to this point but had never played a JRPG before, perhaps the game could do a better job of introducing players to the genre, and while I love how it turned out by the game's last act, I do think that there's an argument to be made that, as the first game in the transition to JRPGs for the series, characters should have been assigned particular roles as you'd expect in an entry-level JRPG, and that the job system should have been saved for the next game. The lack of any true post-game leaves you with a bit of a mountain to overcome in terms of grinding when it comes to taking on the post-game dungeon, especially in its second form, and so I hope that Infinte Wealth does a better job of bridging the gap. The game walks the fine line of managing to take from and reference so many of the greatest JRPGs - be it Dragon Quest, Persona, Final Fantasy, or many others - in what should end up being a messy and confused Frankenstein of conflicting styles and aims, but the love and attention given to the game and the clear understanding of what makes a JRPG great means that you do end up with a game much greater than the sum of its parts. It beats out pretty much every other game available today for fun side content; the best way I can describe it is that it's the fun and addicting rewards of the early days of mobile gaming, without all of the gross baggage that comes with modern mobile gaming. The substories remain stellar beacons of hope that a side quest doesn't need to be longer than 5 minutes to make you feel something, and that you can have a side quest have both payoff now and a further 15 hours from now, but that a long string of quests should not be the norm to get to the heart of its message. If you take their not-so-subtle hints and grind when they want you to (when introducing new locations for the first time with a very obvious grind attached to the invite), it's really well paced and a decent enough challenge just at or a bit below the level they want you at. The story, while structurally not too far out from what we've come to expect from RGG, is arguably their most refined since 0, with twists and turns constantly bonking (honk-honking?) you on the head, knowing just when to pull you up for air before throwing you back into its deep end. The characters and all of the ways you can interact with them make you feel like you're actually on a modern day adventure, and they're all so perfectly captured in their voice and motion capture performances. The bow on top of all of this is that it's all stitched together with the soul of a hearty bowl of ramen. Like a Dragon is one of the best turn-based JRPGs to release in a long time, and a serious contender for being one of the best modern JRPGs. This game - and this series - is something special; they continue to cheer me up whenever I'm down, and, for me, I can't think of any greater testament to what this game and RGG continue to achieve and the message they seemingly strive to get across than the way they always make me feel: that there is no price to be put on a lasting smile. Like a Dragon Gaiden: The Man Who Erased His Name | 2023 And after Like a Dragon, it was a blast to the past - in both story and returning brawler mechanics - to Like a Dragon Gaiden: The Man Who Erased His Name. The game focuses on the fallout of Yakuza 6, and what Kiryu has been up to in the gap between 6 and Like a Dragon, as well as during the events of LAD. This game is awesome, and yet there's not so much I really feel driven to say about it? It's by far the shortest Yakuza game since 4, yet despite this is once again another great addition to the series with a stellar - but fairly silly, melodramatic, and at times pretty stupid - story which left me weeping by the time credits rolled, propped up by some fun side content (especially The Castle - well, for the most part), which certainly made up the bulk of my time with the game, as well as some awesome arcade escapes. Swinging guys around with Spider-Man like powers as Kiryu is so daft but just feels so satisfying, too, and I'm excited to see where the customisation options for outfits goes from here. Amazing ensemble, as always in these games, but special shoutout to Takaya Kurada's VA performance as Kiryu in this game; he's aways great, but this time it felt like he crushed this opportunity to show off some greater range and subtle differences to his performance, meaning no punches were pulled in the more exciting and heavier moments in the game. This all being said, there's some weirdness to this outing. The live-action footage being blended in during the game's opening was actually really cool - and smart, I feel - but encounters with real-life hostesses often felt out of place and eerie, a ring light clearly reflecting in their eyes and their performances felt rather stilted. It probably saves them money on developing models and animations for the game - or means that they can put that money towards the girls they want in these games - but the end result has you swinging through this awkward uncanny valley time and again. Overall, this was a worthy and relatively fast escape back into the shoes of the Dragon of Dojima, and a worthy title to bridge the gap between 6, Like a Dragon, and plant the seeds for whatever comes next in Infinite Wealth. I'm really excited to see if RGG decide to pursue another Gaiden outing at some point with a different character, because I think this would be an excellent way to return to and flesh out some previously playable characters, as well as see some new perspectives in the world of Yakuza/Like a Dragon. It's dangerous to go alone! Read this! Going into this last game in particular, I want to reiterate that while I won't be going out of my way to spoil things (particularly in terms of story beats), I will be talking about parts of the game not shown in pre-release footage - both in terms of my experiences, and in a more general sense. If somehow you've successfully actively avoided Tears of the Kingdom until now as part of some sort of media blackout, I suggest coming back to read this if and when you play the game for yourself, if you'd like to read my thoughts on it. I'd hate to spoil something for you, but it's impossible to talk about this game analytically without considering what it does and does not do differently to its predecessor, Breath of the Wild. The Legend of Zelda: Tears of the Kingdom | 2023 The Legend of Zelda: Breath of the Wild was a game which came out to much critical acclaim back in 2017 for the way that it tackled its open world, rewarding players for their exploration and giving them the freedom to traverse Hyrule, complete puzzles, and handle combat situations how they saw fit. However, here at N-E, the game split opinion, and I'd go so far as to venture that there are likely more people here who weren't fans than were, whether it be down to the combat, the menus, the overarching narrative being weak and scattered, the open nature of puzzle solutions, the game's perceived poor excuses for dungeons, the overwhelming silence of much of Hyrule during your adventure compared to Zelda soundtracks of old, the game feeling pointlessly vast and wide, and much more. While I don't agree with all of the criticisms I've seen of Breath of the Wild on here, I can certainly sympathise for longtime fans of the series who came away underwhelmed, and after experiencing the game for myself back in 2019, I do share the sentiment that there were a number of ways the game's sequel could look to improve on the foundation set by Breath of the Wild. I've said it before, but for me, Breath of the Wild is a good, if not great, game, overshadowed by it being a truly magnificent and unique experience in the landscape of gaming. The Legend of Zelda: Tears of the Kingdom, then, I found to be a sequel filled with having taken half-steps forward in some spots, and strides forward in others, held back at times by the familiar. Tears of the Kingdom borrows much from Breath of the Wild's open world Hyrule at the surface level; though the world has started to change and rebuild in the wake of Breath of the Wild's Great Calamity, though, the vast majority of these changes just don't feel as meaningful and plentiful as they perhaps should do. Vast plains and fields often remain vast plains and fields, and though changes in the world, like pirates taking hold of Lurelin Village seeing its inhabitants scattered across Hyrule while their home remains unsafe, many of these changes are tied to quests and are often short-lived. In the few places where changes have been made, though, they are stark and heavily contrast with Breath of the Wild, injecting some much-needed freshness to the world and adventure of Tears of the Kingdom. My favourite addition to the land of Hyrule was with its caves,which felt like mini-adventures for me to experience along my stay in Hyrule, and which repeatedly wowed me into realising new things about the game or viewing how to traverse the world slightly differently might give me more options for exploration. Which leads us to the game's Sky Islands, where your journey truly begins, and a plane which you will often find yourself returning to, which I personally loved to explore. Seeing certain spots above the clouds from up in the sky or even down at ground level adds this feeling of cohesion to the world, where you can find yourself seamlessly thrown up into the air and gliding blindly through a storm, adding a whole new layer of "what if I do this?" when it comes to exploration and traversing this enormous world. The game also smartly uses a unique mix of white stone and golden leaves and grass on the Sky Islands to make these locations feel so distinct visually from what is at ground level, as well as taking a softer approach to its music here with subtle shifts in composition to, again, retain that sense of identity for this particular plane. I loved diving off the edge of a Sky Island to swiftly make my way to the ground below, as well as many of the unique challenges found in the skies above Hyrule, and, for me, the Sky Islands never once got old during my playthrough. The way the structures and islands in the sky also interact with the sun rising or setting, or the Blood Moon taking hold of the sky, casting shadows across the land, just felt amazing to witness at times. This is all in stark contrast to The Depths, the black-as-night underbelly of Hyrule introduced to players relatively early on into the game. Chasms emanating gloom - this game's rebranding of malice from Breath of the Wild, I guess, because it is visually almost identical in appearance as a dark sludge giving off wisps of red - are easily identifiable on ground and at sky level, and diving into these chasms take you into an underground section you'll soon discover is as large as the entire map of Hyrule. Brightbloom Seeds acquired elsewhere in the game can be used to light up small areas in this abyss, surely one of the visually darkest areas in gaming in a very long time to the extent it almost feels like it was a risk to have this plane exist, and during your travels down in The Depths you'll find Lightroots which, when interacted with, will light up a pretty large area and unravel some of The Depths in your map. The place is infested with unique flora, such as a tree which looks like it blooms with the feathers of peacocks, and it all just adds to this sense that perhaps you shouldn't be down there. It would almost always be a relief to find Lightroots because of this, and similar to how I would go about marking Skyview Towers when in view and adding them to my map to seek out later on in my journey at the ground level, I also did the same here for Lightroots, their soft orange hue subtly piercing the dreadful black of the underground area. The Depths is filled with hard-hitting enemies, especially at the start of the game when you'll have very few hearts and little stamina to use to run away, and to make matters worse, each strike by an enemy down there will temporarily disable your hearts for the damage dealt until you either interact with a Lightroot , make your way back up to the surface, or through eating food cooked up with a certain ingredient for the desired effect of restoring these temporarily disabled hearts. This results in needing to cautiously make your way from one Lightroot or point of interest to another, and for me in particular, this meant treating The Depths more as something to be charted and traversed - like planning your route up a mountain face - rather than somewhere I would be going out of my way to seek out fights. There are many benefits to exploring The Depths, such as finding legendary armour and clothes previously tied to amiibo in Breath of the Wild, as well as finding rare items, unique enemies, tough challenges, but I think I only really see one unique biome while I was down there. Because of the approach I felt the game coaxed me towards - planning routes from Lightroot to Lightroot while avoiding combat - as well as the lack of diversity to the place, I honestly probably had most of my fill of The Depths some 5 or 10 hours into exploring it, and in later parts of the game this resulted in me only diving down chasms to light up the nearest Lightroot, see if anything interesting took my fancy in the immediate vicinity, and if not, to then move on, rather than taking the slow and measured approach of charting paths from one Lightroot to another to uncover large swathes of the underground map. It's a bit of a shame, really, and ultimately I understand Nintendo's decision to not reveal this before the game in pre-release footage because that initial "oh, wait, they did what?!" moment was amazing for me, but I find myself wishing there was more diversity to the biomes found in The Depths and would much rather they were dedicated pockets designed with certain ideas in mind rather than what they ended up being, which in turn might have freed up some resources to make more drastic changes to the ground level of this game. This brings me onto the new abilities introduced in the game, which were so vital to this adventure. I loved them. Perhaps it's just the way my mind works or how I've grown as a player since my last visit to Hyrule, but I much prefer the abilities added in this game to those present in Breath of the Wild. In Breath of the Wild, with the Bombs in particular, I found myself having rough ideas but having a bit of a finicky time executing on them, whereas there is very little room for interpretation when it came to realising what I was trying to do in Tears of the Kingdom, whether it be using Recall to summon a thrown weapon from across the room to catch it mid-fight or grab onto a chunk of rock recently fallen from the sky to ride it back up for a better view and an angle to glide down form; using Ultrahand to carefully place objects or items where and how I wanted, and construct structures, vehicles and weapons of varying degrees of craziness and mass destruction; or using Ascend to quickly make my way up to the summit of a mountain from a cave deep in its underbelly. What I loved most, though, was using all of these in conjunction with one another; one combination I found relatively early on in the game which supported much of my puzzle-solving throughout was to use Ultrahand to have, for example, a plank of wood move from one area to another carefully from the ground and through the air, before then climbing on top of it and using Recall to take it back through that line of movement, and hop off at a higher point and then glide down, oftentimes to open up a chest I had trouble reaching otherwise. Zonai devices being gacha'd out to you throughout the game are really fun to use on the fly, and while it does take a bit of time to get used to Ultrahand, once it clicks, I found myself constructing exactly what I wanted within the space of a minute, and then being able to test it out. I loved that these devices weren't doled out without care, but instead that accessing more of them were paced with your exploration, meaning that unless you were grinding for the currency required to use the ancient Zonai gacha towers, you typically found yourself in a risk/reward situation of deciding whether or not you wanted to make use of, say, your rockets, which almost definitely would get you to where you want to go...but I would find myself second-guessing those plans, asking if it was worth risking being wrong about that and losing out on using these rockets later? The other ability in the game, Fuse, is also a really interesting idea, giving you a way to add item effects to arrows during combat, or to recover the durability of a weapon (by fusing it with another), but because you find yourself inundated with weapons as reward for your exploration throughout the game, you often don't have any choice but to fuse weapons together long before the message pops up about them being at risk of breaking, meaning that this supposed workaround and fix for one of Breath of the Wild's biggest issues - weapon durability - isn't well, fixed. Adding item effects to an arrow is cool, and can be down by holding up on the D-pad with an arrow being aimed, but because you end up with so many types of items throughout the course of your journey and because Nintendo want to give you the option to do whatever you want, you end up needing to swipe right or left through a temporary menu of tens of items to decide what to attach; and, sure, you can sort by most used or most powerful, but this then almost immediately narrows down the options you'll have visible and will be likely to use, thus going away from the central idea at the core of these new abilities, which is to try new ideas out. Along similar lines, to fuse weapons together, one must be equipped and the other must be on the ground, meaning that you'll either be accessing the sub-menu which pops up when you aim to throw an item and then swipe around to select and throw a weapon you want to fuse at the floor, or just going through the standard menu and selecting an item to drop on the ground before fusing it with the weapon already equipped. Unfortunately, this slows down the possibility of creativity when it comes to Fuse greatly when compared with the other new abilities, and I found myself questioning why you couldn't save certain weapon fusions in a similar way to how at some point you unlock the ability to save items crafted with the Ultrahand, then use materials to build those saved fused weapons immediately. But then...why not just use the blacksmith strengthening idea so many of us hoped for after experiencing weapon durability in Breath of the Wild? I get what they were trying to go for, but I said it when it was first unveiled - this is the most Nintendo-like solution to this particular criticism, and having now played the game, I think it falls far short of having truly solved the issue so many had with weapon durability from before. Some other abilities you gain access to elsewhere in the game are good, but perhaps not all-around as strong as their Breath of the Wild counterparts, and needing to dig into menus to constantly to turn these particular abilities on and off was nothing short of an absolute pain. With the talk about abilities out of the way, I want to move onto Shrines: which, generally speaking, I think were just as good as, if not overall better than, their alternatives in Breath of the Wild. This, of course, is down in large part to me preferring the abilities available to Link from the start of the game this time around, but I also think the ideas showcased were unique and fresh in the face of being a sequel to a game which was already host to a crazy number of these things. Learning perhaps from how Eventide Island was such a widely talked about place in Breath of the Wild with how it took away your items and weapons, a number of Shrines in this game do the same for some short-lived Eventide-like challenges, but fall far short of the overall challenge and freshness Eventide Island injected into Breath of the Wild when compared with almost every other location in that game. Temples, on the other hand, weren't very well represented back in Breath of the Wild, with many - myself included, despite Breath of the Wild being the first Zelda game I saw to completion - left gutted by the shared design tenets across the Divine Beasts meaning they lacked any real traits which made them each feel unique, the sameyness of the bosses which lacked any serious challenge, and disappointing music. Tears of the Kingdom, thankfully, fixes much of that, and while I don't think these will go down collectively as the greatest temples in a Zelda game, the gauntlets leading up to each temple, seeing how the events of each temple was impacting the locals, their design philosophies and themes, puzzles and use of unique abilities means that it does signify something of a return to form, or at least the regularly scheduled programming, when it comes to temples. One temple in particular outshined the rest, though, and even has a boss theme which could well go down as the most memorable we've encountered in this version of Hyrule; I know my hairs were left standing on end when it finally kicked into high gear! What's perhaps most interesting, though, is that this is likely the first temple most players will reach first, purely down to the game seemingly pushing you towards it early on, which does does mean that the experience in temples in this game probably peaked for most with the first one. I mentioned before when talking about abilities that Ultrahand + Recall could be an OP combo throughout the game, and one minor annoyance when it comes to the temples is that with some smart use of these abilities, you really could find yourself completing a number of puzzles without needing to follow the intended path; similarly, in one or two instances, I would be able to awkwardly angle myself so that I could use Ascend to skip following the clearly intended path. Personally, I don't think this takes away from my experience with these temples or that it makes them broken simply because it was clear to me what was being asked of me, I just had a completely different answer to what was being asked, but I can imagine this might not be for everyone. To speak to this game's combat for a moment, I feel that it shares a very similar problem with the combat found in Breath of the Wild, with it probably peaking for each person's playthrough about 10 to 20 hours in and then becoming a chore, because it lacks any serious depth; although, this time around, I will say, I personally felt much more comfortable and confident in my ability to parry or time a dodge just right in order to gain access to a Flurry Rush. Similar to how I ended up avoiding fights in The Depths, I found myself eventually just skirting on by the majority of encounters simply because it seemed like a waste of resources and weapon durability, and also got in the way of me exploring, which is honestly a much bigger draw for me. They did, however, add much greater enemy variety this time around, with plenty of new and unique enemies found on each plane of this world, which is why I can't sit here and say that I could immediately pick up the combat where I left it in Breath of the Wild, because there was still more to see and new enemies to face down. The true highlight of the combat this time around was the bosses, whether it be in temples or just while roaming the overworld, with small but meaningful tweaks made to a lot of returning mini-bosses, and some really cool and unique ideas to be found in newly introduced mini-bosses. I particularly want to highlight Flux Constructs, because I would seek them out for bouts when I could see them off in the distance, as these battles felt much more in tune with what I thought the Divine Beasts would be like in Breath of the Wild, allowing you to use your abilities on these mini-bosses in a number of ways to gain the upper hand in puzzle-like showdowns, perhaps more akin to Shadow of the Colossus than anything else. Safe to say, I was a big fan! A lot of discourse around Breath of the Wild was centred around its story, or rather, its overwhelming absence of one. While I don't think every game needs a strong narrative, given that this is a series with a long history of clearly pushing hard for strong character moments and memorable story beats, going into Tears of the Kingdom, seeing the changes they made to their approach with the story was high on my list, and I think they genuinely delivered this time around. While there are still beats for you to experience through flashbacks obtained through interacting with certain elements out in the wide and sprawling open world, the decision to have players locate these through tracking down a spot on a geoglyph visible from tall mountains and up in the sky made it a much smoother experience than it was last time around in Breath of the Wild with its approach to visit previously photographed locations housed on the Sheikah Slate. There are a number of main quest lines in this game to shoot yourself down, too, some intertwining with others, and all giving you a great sense of direction should you want it, which I do feel the previous game was sorely lacking - despite loving the freedom I found myself with, a self-driven adventure can be a very difficult to push forwards with if you simply aren't in the mood. With Breath of the Wild I fell off some 40 hours into the game before returning to it later on that same year, whereas with Tears of the Kingdom I found myself falling off (due to other games coming out which seemed a bit more focused in terms of narrative) some 60 hours in, before returning to devour what was left of the game. A number of characters returned from Breath of the Wild, and I felt that they were all fleshed out much more than they were during that particular adventure, with some fun VA performances given across the board and every member of the secondary cast seemingly getting at least one moment to shine. This was reinforced by some wonderful updated music for a number of them, with the highlights for me being those for Sidon and Yunobu, and to touch on the music in a more general sense, while still absent during general exploration, I feel that this game did a much better job of providing you with a lot more moments to come across some excellent musical moments, as well as punctuating important story beats and boss fights with some great compositions, too. The sense of being a hero and trying to rebuild Hyrule is revisited regularly throughout the game with how frequently you end up helping out the strangers you come across, much more so than I felt was the case in Breath of the Wild, and this happens often in a variety of unique ways, which I really appreciated. I think the biggest problem I have with this game's story - and perhaps, even, the game overall - is just how little it acknowledges of Breath of the Wild. Long gone are the Sheikah Slate, the Sheikah Towers, the Sheikah Shrines, and the Guardians, having miraculously disappeared over night, but there's also so little said about the Great Calamity, and heck, even a number of characters will act like they've never seen Link before. For me, this results in the game at times feeling more like an enhanced, 2.0 version of Breath of the Wild rather than a true sequel, which I found disappointing, as I was really looking forward to seeing and feeling the impact Link and Zelda had been able to have in the time between the two games. While this is something I do not want to speak about with any real sense of depth - I think I'll dedicate some time to doing that in the game's own thread, in spoiler tags - I do need to touch on this game's ending, which for me, was an epic culmination more than worthy of the adventure I'd been on. The story, characters, and certain game mechanics are weaved into the narrative so tightly at the end of this game that it felt so incredibly satisfying and rewarding to see it all play out, with my jaw left agape at certain points as credits neared because of what I was experiencing, and I seriously think this will be an ending remembered for a very long time. For me, having only finished Ocarina of Time outside of Breath of the Wild before this (I know...) but seeing how much that game nailed its ending - I think this one lives up to the legacy of the series. Ultimately, I find myself reflecting on my time with Tears of the Kingdom incredibly fondly, especially in the early going; just thinking about certain moments in this game restores a sense of childlike awe and wonderment in me. There's a level of cohesion and forward-thinking here that I adore, and the few times where the game mixed interactivity between the different layers of the world, or figuring out certain connections between the Lightroots and this game's Shrines, were probably the highlights of my 100+ hours with - and 118 shrines completed - in the game. I will also reiterate comments I've made before about how I found I enjoyed Breath of the Wild most by playing a certain way, because in this game I once again found the most joy by turning off the Shrine Sensor and turning the Pro HUD on (which thankfully excludes health until in combat, this time around, making for some cleaner screenshots!); I'm of the opinion that this is the best, and perhaps even intended, way to experience the game, as so much more of this game's excellent design becomes apparent once you've freed yourself of the burden that is being turned onto everything around you, and simply enjoying the journey you're on. I am also very firm in saying that this game's sequel - or the next Zelda, seemingly destined to follow in the open world footsteps of Breath of the Wild and Tears of the Kingdom - cannot be set in this world again. It just can't. I think some of the magic was lost this time around with so much of the world being so similar, and while I think this was made up for more often than not by the new additions made as well as the new layers added, I came away feeling that this was the definitive way to experience this version of Hyrule, with the game perhaps serving more as an enhanced adventure rather than a fresh one which boldly and loudly continued on from what came before. Like Breath of the Wild, I think it is a great but flawed game at times overwhelmed and held back by its most simple functions, yet an experience truly unique unto itself, and I still find myself absolutely awestruck by some of the ideas I witnessed coming to fruition in this game, and that final stretch of the game was on a whole other level for me - it's going to be one talked about for a long time, I'm sure. There are very few experiences to be found in gaming like Breath of the Wild, and even fewer that I feel surpass the sense of freedom, adventure and respect afforded to you by that game, and yet here I am, willing and confident in saying that, while not perfect, I think Tears of the Kingdom did just that - and then some. And that does it for me and 2023. To anyone crazy enough to read all that, thanks, and I look forward to talking games and what I'm playing in 2024!

Yeah, I noticed this earlier today too - fine this morning, much slower as the day went on. It seems to be running a bit faster than it was now (?), but there's still a pretty noticeable half beat for me between opening up a thread and then it loading up.

Gesicht. Curious if you've watched Monster? I really enjoyed the anime adaptation of Pluto, but I really feel like Monster is where Urasawa's character writing and story planning gets to be shown off best, without the constraints of paying respect and homage to another great's work and with a comparatively much longer time to spend with it's characters. It's a very slow burn, mind you!

I have all the other stuff still in pretty great condition from when I picked up back at launch all the way back in 2010 while on a family holiday to York, but that outer cardboard box...yeah, that was never going to last for most, can certainly see why it bumps the value up so much my childhood copy of Ruby ended up being resigned to a simple GBA cartridge protector, too Absolutely excellent remakes, and for the first time I finally got to visit Johto! In retrospect perhaps it's a little too faithful at points (there's still that huge level gap between the second bout against the Elite Four and Red to overcome, and Kanto was still a bit weird in general) but, yeah, they'll always hold a very special place in my heart. The vibe? The recreated soundtrack which balances being in Gen IV with the traditional nature of Johto, which bleeds through in certain pieces with the use of certain instruments? That National Park theme You'll get Brilliant Diamond & Shining Pearl recreations which have been brutally forced out in under a year get overshadowed by the original GBC games being re-released and you'll like it! Black & White, Black 2 & White 2, X &– I'm just going to assume you misspoke here, Glen, because that golden era started one game earlier with Platinum, and certainly does not include X & Y It took everything great about Gen IV, remade already brilliant games with a new injection of colour and character with plenty of care and consideration...and I don't think any of the extra content missed, either? Every time I go back just to crit path the game and enjoy the vibe, I still end up pumping hours into the Battle Frontier and Pokéathlon. It's "side" content which feels essential to the main dish for me, the latter especially! I still need to play it so maybe I shouldn't be invoking it's name, but as far as remakes which effectively replace the original go for all but the more hardcore fans, this really should be in the conversation along with Resident Evil Remake. Guess we need to wait for my generation to break into games journalism (is my generation even trying to do that? No idea) but I've just read through a couple of "best remakes of all-time" lists and it took a few to even see HGSS show up! Trust them to start doing that with the games where the originals mean the most to me Gen III was my first gen, Gen IV was the gen where I probably got what was closest to a traditional Gen I/Gen II experience at school (rumours, trading, battling, etc.), and Gen V, well, is brilliant, and a wonderful way to close out the DS era. Makes me very nervous going into this year, actually, and the potential to see Unova revisited in remakes. Omega Ruby & Alpha Sapphire had some heart - even if they aren't the best way to visit Hoenn - at least, compared to the cold, corporate-sponsored corpse of a game that was Brilliant Diamond & Shining Pearl, and that's before even questioning how exactly you'd even want to go about remaking Black & White because of their sequels being a thing. Anyways, great pick-up @martinist!

Yeah, I've definitely got a lot of love for GT3! My first and only GT that I owned - kind of surprisingly? But maybe not considering Sport and me missing out on the PS3 - prior to 7, actually (think I played 5 Prologue at a friend's house at some point?). I never got particularly far in it, mind, besides probably having 100+ hours in it I replayed the start of Career - with the MX-5, of course! - so many times back then! I'm really excited to losing myself in everything GT, but from 3 up to and including 5 in particular, as I feel like there's a real sweet spot there which could be exactly what I want from going. Very much looking forward to sinking teeth into those games...but not before I see if I can get accustomed to the PS1 games and go through their Careers, too I haven't got the PS2/RAD2X set up yet but I have popped the first game into the PS3 for a few goes around Trial Mountain. Definitely going to take some time to get used to using the D-pad, but my times are improving, so hopefully that sticks and I can start winning some races Sure thing turns out one of my older PS2 cables is a bit worse for wear, so I've ordered a replacement which should be arriving tomorrow, so hopefully I'll get around to testing it out then or Monday once it's all set up! Yeah, I figured I'd start there (and will probably try my best to go through these series on retro consoles in order) purely for the reason that the tech and mechanics evidently advanced so much between games in a series back then, much more so obviously than we see today (because now we just get bloated sequels for me to complain about ), and so not going through a series in order just makes going back a much tougher prospect. Looking forward to it – heard a lot of great things about the series over the years, but really only know the absolute basics about it mechanically and plot-wise. It was actually rewatching the EZA Hall of Greats videos which convinced me to pick it up, and I'm pretty sure Huber could hype me up enough to buy lint in a launderette Yeah, I know I said I was on the fence about seeing if I'd get the first game physically, and while I'm interested in potentially doing so, I guess I'd be breaking one of my above rules in tracking down a physical copy for a silly amount when it's still available on PSN for a bit over £5 so, thanks! You pushed me to do it and it's now sitting on my PS3! I also cheekily used up my PS Stars points on some credit and so got it for "free", which feels real good Much more interested in making sure I can get a decent copy of Silent Hill 2, from what I gather the Director's Cut only got a Platinum release over here? Which, well, yelp, gives me an interesting conundrum. Either the DC or the standard edition look to cost a pretty penny; I'm going to the Birmingham Gaming Market in a few months, where - based on watching YouTube videos from last year's event and seeing at least 5 different copies strewn about the place - I'm much more confident I'll be able to track down a copy, as well as some of the other more costly items on my retro wishlist!

Went and picked up the games from my last trip to my local retro game shop on Tuesday, after they'd been priced: I then also went ahead and picked up a few games today, some of which were curiosity pick-ups, but one of which is to replace a game I experienced - but did not complete - in my childhood, which I've mentioned before: That childhood game was Dino Crisis, in case anyone was wondering had to pick it up because my dad wasn't able to find my childhood copy given to us by a family friend, but if it's ever found, I have a feeling it'll be very much worse for wear. Cost a pretty penny because of the excellent condition that it's in, but I honestly don't mind - look forward to getting to it and conquering my childhood trauma with the game! He also dropped off most (but not all) of my childhood PS1 and PS2 games, including my AU copy of Battlefront II I picked up when living over in Australia, but perhaps most fitting for this thread and my nostalgia-driven affinity for them: Retro shelf has filled up quite nicely over the last week got to set up my old fat childhood PS2 with the RAD2X I picked up at some point, and while there are still a few more games I'll likely pick up off eBay in the coming weeks and some games I'll still actively be hunting down in decent enough condition (such as the remaining GT games - the DF Retro on them really inspired me to pick them all up and have them be my FIFA replacement!), I think my next main target following that is going to be picking up particular higher value or more rare items: namely, some Armored Core titles, and Silent Hill 2 (and maybe the first one? I know that's on PS3 as a Classic, though, so we'll see). I'm going back in a couple of weekends with some friends, but yeah, it's hard not to love the place. A little cramped but some really friendly folks who are happy to help you move things around and find particular items you're hinting for, and of course, some great games! Since Tuesday they've got in a couple of copies of The Thousand Year Door, someone came in while I was there to sell Path of Radiance, Wind Waker with the bonus disc, etc. Just some really great stuff. Thank the gaming gods I don't have a Wii or a GameCube to hand, eh? Also some Wii games like Other M (which maybe I should've picked up...) and Metroid Prime 3 in very good condition, as well as a copy of Mario Galaxy 2 in its cardboard box sleeve which was still sealed, and on DS they had the DQ remakes and Chrono Trigger (thank goodness I already own those, eh?). Asked about Suikoden V (the only mainline Suikoden game not on PS3 as a classic?! What's up with that by the way?!?!) but unfortunately no luck there. They'd sold the Suikoden and Suikoden II copies that I'd mentioned last time already! Also, thankfully for my wallet, I spotted a Super Famicom version of Chrono Trigger in near-mint condition (with the box in a case), which I'd want on my shelf similar to how I picked up JP copies of some other games I love dearly last month at Birmingham Comic Con, but it had been put aside for a member of staff (also had Final Fantasy IV, V, and VI for Super Famicom in his pile in similarly great condition). Anyways, I guess don't expect me to be gone from this thread for too long really enjoyed focusing on picking up some retro stuff lately, just feels like there's more to say about the experience of buying it or seeking something out when compared to, say, picking up a brand new game? If that makes sense?

Slight correction, which in fact I think makes the situation that bit more crazy: Brad didn't even review Hogwarts Legacy; in fact, no-one over at EZA did. The only time I can recall Brad - or anyone, actually - talking about playing the game after release was in an episode of Frame Trap, which came with a very clear message from Blood before it was talked about (which is what the video below is linked to). Strange the blowback it got even with that long disclaimer from Blood at the time, but in retrospect, it was just the very vocal minority of their audience pushing things too far. I do think there are boundaries individuals need to draw, but I feel so much of this has been spoken about here before - with Red Dead 2, LEGO Star Wars, and Hogwarts Legacy. It is down to the individual, and so long as they don't support, condone or spread the message that people involved with the creative side may be putting out there, I don't think there's a problem with it Life is far too short for stuff like this, I'll never get it. The crazy thing is that everyone at EZA has and always have been very consistent in their handling of sensitive subjects like that - remember when they talked about BLM back in 2020 and they told any "fans" sticking around who were against that to do one? Man, vocal minorities really suck

Not to add to the pile-on, but yeah, I've also been noticing some slowdown (on desktop and mobile) between loading pages, submitting posts, opening up emoticons, etc. Like H-o-T mentioned, there was a good bit of slowdown over the holidays, it seemed to go away for a couple of days and then returned.

Opening movie (linking the Japanese version to avoid the age restriction): Yep, that's a Persona opening alright visually looks fantastic, but, well, could anything ever compare to 5's opening with Wake Up, Get Up, Get Out There? The answer is a resounding "no", by the way

World trailer: Reminder that this is out in just two weeks!

So, this trailer/ad (I mean, I guess they're all ads?) for the games coming up on PlayStation in 2024 is interesting...because the Snake Eater remake and Silent Hill 2 remake are both included. Obviously a huge asterisk that plans can change, and a caveat on the official editorial page for this trailer/ad that: But, I mean, damn? I thought these games were shaking up to be 2025 at the earliest, and it's really curious that they've just been announced to be coming this year, well, here of all places. Even wilder when you consider just last week PlayStation Access dropped that video @Hero-of-Time shared. We've also had a State of Play in Feb or March each year for a while more, so maybe we aren't far off finding out more? So, anyways, Konami, if you could just drop a Silent Hill collection (that works) to drive some hype for the 2 remake, you know..? So I don't need to spend ungodly amounts on picking those up on the retro market? K thx

With E3 officially dead I have a feeling Corporate Keighley is about to truly be unleashed. Going to be really interesting to see how SGF and the TGAs shake out this year. Same! Though I do hope that they get around to dropping news on their new console sooner rather than later - sometime between March and May, to launch roughly 6 months later in that September to November window. Because it's been so long and because we didn't get a Pro, I'm already starting to get fairly sick and tired of the clickbait news articles popping up Very excited for the final round of games, too (while Switch is their main platform, anyways), and I'm curious to see if it sees third parties just start dumping what they can onto the system, especially games from their own legacy catalogues (AHEM, Chrono Trigger, S-E, come onnnnnnnn). Any particular hopes for the final wave of Switch games? I know other games from the series are in line to be remade first, but given the attention they've started giving some of their GameCube titles in the latter half of the Switch's life (Sunshine in 3D All-Stars, Metroid Prime Remastered, the upcoming Paper Mario TTYD remake, and the neverending reports we've been hearing for years on Wind Waker/Twilight Princess re-releases) I'd love to see Path of Radiance be remade PURELY because the retro market is dumb and I've wanted to play it ever since I started maining Ike in Smash Bros. Brawl While I'm sure I'll be excited when a new State of Play or PlayStation Showcase gets announced, I'm kind of there with you? The recent Insomniac leaks kind of killed some of my PlayStation hype going into this year, to be honest – obviously it's not their fault, but just things like Insomniac looking to size down despite their stupid levels of success, and seeing how many attempts at making GaaS games internally (and publicly) have flopped for them and then still being keen to do so...and no hint of info on the next Astro game in the leaks?! They've been leaning on third-party pretty hard this gen up to this point, and it feels like more of the same approach is on the way I genuinely don't think there's anything Xbox can do to make me pick up their console this gen, besides a huge price slash to the Series X so that I can play some of their legacy titles and have a system dedicated to their past, like the older Forza titles and finally playing through the Halo games. I'm sure there would be some hype for announcements like a new Banjo-Kazooie, Evil Within 3, or the next Halo, but Starfield only being a moderate success commercially and critically really felt like the toll of the death knell for them this generation – it felt like their one chance to really turn around the general perspective on their first party content, and I think they absolutely blew it.

Finally got down to the local-ish retro shop I'd mentioned before, which is Vintage Gamer in Halesowen. Today's pick-ups: 3 A-Spec (childhood platinum edition) and Arkham City (steelbook) are replacements for games I already have; Batman: Vengeance and Justice League Heroes I picked up for a mate who's a big DC fan; Lair and Mini Ninjas were purely curiosity picks, I know very little to nothing about those games really nice spot, they were sitting through some boxes for their boss to look through before putting games off for sale and I spied some rarities like Suikoden I and Suikoden II, Legend of Dragoon, and Silent Hill. Anyways, not that I'm collecting, some general rules I've set myself for picking up retro stuff are: • if I've played it before, I'll only pick it up if it's an absolute favourite - and in absolutely great condition. • focus above all else on games I haven't played and don't have access to elsewhere; Onimusha Warlords, for example, was available, but I already have it on PS4 through the remaster released a few years ago. • no need to break the bank - while I'm sure there will be games I want to break the bank for to experience because they're currently locked to old platforms (ahem, Silent Hill 2) • given the chance, do I see myself playing this in the next 6 to 12 months? There may be exceptions if I'm going through a series and see a super rare copy of a game from later in the series, but this is more of a "can I just dive in?" vibe as I want to play more shorter games. I feel like this also stops me from just picking up 50+ hour JRPGs, as much as I might love them. I've also got some other pick-ups from the same place from a pile which was only just dropped off today, so those are being priced for me to potentially pick up at some point, and I also ordered a couple of retro games from eBay. So...please be excited?

I think I've watched some of their update videos over the years but didn't realise it had come out! Thanks for making me aware, just finished watching it through a first time, and it's already time to watch it a second time me thinks The fan TCW animators are getting into such a great space so quickly, I really hope it pushes LucasFilm to animate some of the cut arcs from latter seasons of the show like Son of Dathomir before fans inevitably attempt to do it themselves!

No, which is exactly what I'm saying Is the discussion how to pronounce "GameFAQs" or "FAQs"? The first one's made up, a website name which combined a word and an initialism into a single entity. If it read "Game FAQs", I would read it as "Game F-A-Qs" and agree that that's the correct pronunciation because the words are separate entities, but the decision to make it a single word - for branding and website name purposes - leaves it open to more discussion. There isn't a "right answer", really, because again if we start going the route of "it's an initialism and should be read as such" doesn't really apply when we're throwing the English language out of the window anyways to discuss how to pronounce a made-up singular word The second I'd pronounce "F-A-Qs". There's an actual precedent for it's pronunciation and it's not exactly uncommon to hear it said out loud. Right, agreed, and it's the exact same with FAQs in the context of how some of us are pronouncing "GameFAQs" with "facks"; if it were "GameFQs" we were discussing, I guarantee every soul here saying "facks" would be saying "Game F-Qs" and nothing else; the vowel is what pieces it together. I think you're focusing too much on the Q rather than the greater picture of the vowel next to it. Why would it need a 'U' after it if it's part of an initialism or acronym? Q can have a 'k' sound, and even though we can argue that it's not found at the end of any conventional English word I can think of, well, conventions aren't really being applied here. The 's' is pluralising "Frequently Asked Question", not just "Question". Also, just because ROM has become an acronym - it wouldn't be incorrect to also pronounce it as it's initialism, R-O-M. ASAP, LOL...sure, it's more popular these days probably to pronounce those as acronyms, but you also wouldn't be wrong to pronounce them as initialisms. I think the argument here is more about whether the initialism ("FAQs") stays an initialism ("F-A-Qs") in the context of no longer being an initialism ("GameFAQs") by being merged with another word. My point with bringing "CD-ROM" into the conversation was to make the point that (while technically hyphenated) you can combine two initialisms yet only read one as an initialism and the other as an acronym - so why not the same with the word and an initialism allowing you to say that as an acronym? Personally, I don't really think there's a wrong way to say it, either way; again, I don't think normal conventions of the English language really apply. But the first time I read it, have since read it, and would even say it now, is as "GameFacks". I wouldn't correct someone or question it if I heard them say "Game F-A-Qs", though, because I can still understand what they're talking about – and I'm sure people would still understand us "GameFacks" lot. Anyways, turns we've all been saying GameFAQs wrong; per The Great GameFAQs Q&A of 18 years ago (!): Turns out reading FAQs as "facks"/"faks"/"fax" is "official"? ... But we all forgot about the possibility that this guy couldn't pronounce "game" to save his life.

Hey all, hope everyone had a nice Christmas and, of course, Happy New Year! With 2024 upon us and time finally being called on 2023, one of the greatest years for playing from the tippity-top of AAA gaming to the über niche and sleeper-hitting indies, the constant remains clear: N-E's love of video games and, more importantly perhaps, talking about them! Discussing the games we love - and those we don't - with nothing but respect! So, heading into this year, of course the question on my mind is: are there any gaming-related New Year's Resolutions you'd like to declare at the top of this thread? A particular game or series or developer you'd like to scream out your intentions for playing or digging into? A particular console you want to dig out of the No Man's Land that is your storage space of choice? Or a new approach to how you play? Whatever it is: I can't wait to hear it, and I look forward to discussing games aplenty in this thread this year ...after I catch up on the 2023 threads, ahem

Welcome one, welcome all, Happy New Year and welcome to the official The 2024 Eve– –oh, sorry, I'm being told I need to wrap it up Ah well, you know the drill by now! Here's the general events thread for the year of 2024! And announcements season is starting up nice and early this year on New Year's Day, with the first event to be announced this year: Summer Game Fest returns in June! Because Keighley ain't wasting a darn-tootin' second of 2024 without you knowing he's cooking a show scheduled around 5½ months from now

I personally read it (and would say it - though I don't think I've ever actually said it out loud?) as GameFACKS - rolling that FAQs into the word as an acronym instead of an initialism. I think it rolls off the tongue better and sounds more natural to me as "GameFACKS". It also just sounds similar enough to "Game-Facts" that it seems apt to say it that way. Sure, F-A-Qs by itself is technically correct, but if we're trying to be pedantic about it, since when in the English language do we combine a word with an initialism in that way? The routes are in it being a 90s website name, so it's baloney to begin with Bonus point: I'd also love to hear how you guys saying it's Game-F-A-Qs pronounce CD-ROM – what, you say C-D–R-O-M, instead of C-D–Rom (̶,t̶h̶e̶ V̶a̶c̶u̶o̶u̶s̶ S̶p̶i̶d̶e̶r̶)̶? I think I might need to start blocking some people on here if so When it comes to an *actual* initialism like a console name, such as the S-N-E-S or N-E-S, well, I read and say it as an initialism. "Snez" and "Nez" just both sound so wrong to me...and now that I think about it, pretty much every gaming podcast I've stopped listening to has pronounced it that way at some point. Huh. Ain't that a thing.

Just a day after his last appearance on the EZA podcast was uploaded (recorded a few weeks ago), but he did change his Twitter bio, start plugging his Twitch, etc., the last few days, so like you say, not at all unexpected given he's got friends there. Will definitely be checking it out purely to see what Brad's getting up to, sounds like a spiritual successor to Frame Trap (albeit hosted elsewhere), so naturally I'm in excellent name too! Anyways, really, really hope they have some guests, and naturally, I'm praying that Huber gets to turn up at some point if they do Absolutely. He was a huge part of EZA just continuing on with reviews, etc., at a somewhat typical cadence this past year, and really stepped up to the plate after Ben left last summer with hosting Frame Trap. I've been revisiting the Hall of Greats stuff the past few weeks and the difference between Brad during some of these sessions and now, or comparing past Frame Trap appearances as a guest to his role as a host, is pretty much night and day. Not even going to bother checking what the reactions are like elsewhere to him making the move, because I can already guess what it's like – I'm just happy he got a chance to make a quick move to maintain some stability for himself. EDIT: HOLY SMOKES 4+ HOURS FOR THE DEBUT EPISODE?! Already longer than any episode of Frame Trap from what I can remember off the dome. Weekly too. We eating gooooooood

RPG lovers looking at early 2024 like:

Back in October VGC reported that the game had been rated in Brazil and Korea, and the game has now been rated by the ESRB: This seems like it's shaking up to potentially be a H1 2024 release, it doesn't sound that far off at all going by the dates of these ratings. The first half of next year is STACKED with RPGs already, so sure, I guess we might as well add another to the list