Jimbob

I just wish WWE would give us a red-button option, so we can shut Cole up without spoiling the crowd reactions to the match taking place in the ring. I wanted Austin to take out Cole, after what he did to JR. No matter what Cole says, he is nowhere near the quality or at the level of Good'Ol JR. Biased GM i believe. Swagger got involved in the match to begin with, so Lawler should have won at that point. Cole slaps and pushes Austin first, so Austin retaliates as any normal person would. You saw it in the Attitude era between Triple H and Earl Hebner. There will be a rematch between Cole and Lawler, probably at Extreme Rules. I can see JR being in the corner of Lawler this time around though. I was half expecting Booker T to get involved and pull the microphone from Cole. The arguements them two have on Smackdown is pretty funny. But, it was obvious Booker T had nearly had enough of Michael "i'm better than most of the roster, and kiss the GM's ass" Cole. [quote name=Mokong X-C;1301592What did everyone think of Sin Cara' date=' bloody good he's finally appeared on TV, his promos must have been going for a few months now. Interesting that he'd attack Seamus, I just hope Seamus isn't goin to end up jobbing for him. Also don't like that Seamus changed his ring gear colours to red, white and blue just cuz he's the US Champ. Hell he even got stars on his knee pads I wonder if the WWE made him do that as I know he very much likes forcing home his Irish roots.[/quote] Glad he finally made his debut. Impressed with how quick he is, and the way he got into the ring as well. Early days yet, and i'm going to be watching Sin Cara carefully to see what he brings to the WWE. Sounds better than Mania 27 thats for sure. If WWE do it right this time around, it will be better than Mania 27. They need to do a Sin Cara v Rey Mysterio match, that is something i would love to see. It's not often you get to see two high-flyers go one on one these days in WWE. WWE need more developed Tag teams, it was a mistake splitting the Hart Dynasty in my opinion. All that leaves is the Usos really, and perhaps Nexus and the Corre. But they are groups really. I loved watching the Tag team matches of old, with such teams like Too Sexy, Hardy Boyz, Headbangers, E+C, Dudley Boys. That is what is missing these days, teams like them. They don't need more titles, they need to develop either the US or the Intercontinental Belts. Merge them, would make for more interesting matches between both rosters. Have only one belt and focus on that one, then we'd see some great matches again. The European title was a lower mid-card title which was used to develop young stars making the step to the IC title, it wouldn't work if WWE kept both the US and IC titles. Personally, i would like Rock to beat Cena. Would be great for long-time fans. But WWE would have Cena win, keep the kids happy. Still think WWE ought to merge the WWE and World belts and the IC/US titles. Focus on one belt for each division.

"So, you want to sell Gatwick. Well, you gotta come through me first!!" says Jeremey from Airport.

2-2 draw against Sixty Fourthers. Which secured Recall in the middle league for another season.

Must be Aprils latest idiot, following on from the little bully of March!!

It's a bit far-fetched putting Rock vs Cena at next years Wrestlemania, and quite spooky it is in Miami, Florida. Home of Dwayne "The Rock" Johnson. As far as i know, both Austin and Rock are resuming their movie careers and probably won't be making appearances for some time. I was half hoping that Rock vs Cena would be at Summerslam, because it makes more sense to put it on that event. How in the blue heck are WWE going to hold out a years long rivalry until the match, unless they completly forget about it and don't resume it until Royal Rumble and build it up like they did the Bret Hart - Vince McMahon match at last years Mania (26). They way WWE are at the moment, they couldn't hold onto a glass of water without spilling it. Mania 27 wasn't brilliant, it was the worst one for a long time. And perhaps they know from the fans who have sent messages on the facebook page, and via Twitter it wasn't good. And perhaps they have to do something different this time around to make it better. I doubt that WWE will follow on The Corre attacking Cena and Rock, why do you think they had them both using finishers on The Corre. I think thats the last we shall see of Rock for a few months at least. Unless they surprise us and actually do something. And, could someone please hit Michael Cole. I was expecting Austin to do something after Cole squirted BBQ sauce all over JR, except pour beer on Cole. I know WWE have made Cole a heel, but he slowly heading down the same route as Vickie of pure hatred amongst fans. I was expecting Booker T or Josh to get up and hit him or something. Still, RAW was better than Wrestlemania. And they did half ruin the US title match, too many adverts breaking up the action.

Some of the controls in SMW (VC) are annoying using the GC pad, like running up a wall/platform. I mean why do i have to press the B button to do that, when the rest of the buttons are in easy reach.

Should hear the lie with attendance WWE is coming out with. According to NoDQ and practically any Wrestling news site, WWE said they broke the attendance record in the Georgia Dome with 71,617 beating the previous record of 65,658 which was held by the Backstreet Boys back in 2000. The actual attendance of that concert, which i've checked out (and it is on billboard.com) is 73,337.

Just saw Brookers defending Black speech, good for him i say. I disliked people who took it too far, but i'm with everyone who hates the song and lyrics. I do feel sorry for her, but she is dismissing the hate-comments about her. Still hate the song though.

Righteo then. That was one of the worst Mania's for a long time.

Well, its that time of year again. N-E's resident Schwartzenegger quoter has a birthday. EEVILMURRAY turns a page in the book of life, to page 23. Also celebrating the day, is Arnieboy. Who turns 21 today as well. To celebrate, enjoy!!. Audio Arnold Prank-calls Redneck Family (Also Happy Birthday to Sunshinemiller, smeghead22 and Nintendo Fan)

Well, someone has been watching Good News then!! Latest ones of myself Also can't seem to link this photo direct from facebook, so did it via Tumblr.

And there was me thinking this was to do with Libya. Not heard of this site until today. But, it's always sad to see a site vanish.

Bad news on my front. Had an email from the Tax Office, they've taken on all 150 people for the contact centre jobs. So i won't be getting work for that position. Darn it, was really looking forward to it as well. But.......................

Sweet. I'd go for that as well, £60 a day for doing naff all. Sign me up. Anyway. Had an email from the Tax office after the previous email i had, (linkage here for the post in general). Turns out they have other jobs available for immediate starts, and they asked me to email back to confirm if i would like to be considered/offered one of these jobs. A years contract guaranteed, which would be sweet.

Yes, i was playing the same game as you were. I felt that Nuts and Bolts was nowhere near the quality that Rare were at with the Banjo series. The humour was there, but honestly you cannot judge a game just on that can we. Gameplay no, world no. Rare released that teaser trailer before showing N+B months after, and it showed that Rare could have made it better. But, as i mentioned before, N+B felt like a game which had the Banjo characters and stuff bolted on, like Star Fox Adventures. It seemed a similar situation between Ninty and Microsoft, Ninty thought Dinosaur Planet wasn't going to sell well so told Rare to bolt Star Fox to it. Microsoft thought what-ever the original idea for Nuts and Bolts was wasn't going to work, so got the Banjo characters tied to it. Instead of letting Rare make the game we all wanted. Even though Rare said they had the original Banjo team making Nuts and Bolts, i don't think they did somehow. I agree with darkjak and Zechs, sorry Dyson. Rare were definetly showing huge signs of failure. Why would they give promotional codes for Kazooie with pre-orders for Nuts and Bolts?. Wern't they 100% sure that N+B was going to sell well enough. If Rare managed to make some decent games (minus Viva Pinata and Kameo) on the Xbox, i would imagine that Microsoft would have put a different developer onto make Kinect Sports. Definetly shows to me that Microsoft wasted that money spent on Rare. They bought Rare to make AAA titles, but now they are making party/minigame compilations. Doesn't compute the price spent. If Nintendo bought Rare back from Microsoft, and they made great games as they did on the N64 once again, i'm sure there would be a lawsuit between Microsoft, Rare and Nintendo. Probably with M/S winning by convincing the court that Ninty sold Rare to M/S with instructions to make crappy games until Ninty bought them back at a discount price. I'd laugh if that occured

I took most of that explanation from The Times, but changed quite a few words to make it sound more like something i wrote. Sorry it's a bit complicated.

On May 5th 2011, the United Kingdom will go to the polls to vote on the referendum for an alternative vote. If it passes, it will change the way we vote in the UK forever. As you know the UK has a coalition government running the country at the moment, due to no party winning a clear number of votes. To save us all going back to the polls, or Labour taking over again, the Conservatives (who won most votes, but not a majority to take parliament) formed a joint government with the Liberal Democrats and together they run the country. Part of the deal to get the Lib-Dems to join the Conservatives, was for the Lib-Dems referendum (if they won government) to go through. Their referendum is for an Alternative Vote system. Which, in their eyes would prevent a joint government from occuring again. I'll explain this as best as i can now. Present Voting System At the moment, we go to the polls and pick 1 candidate by marking the box next to their name with an X. It gets put into a ballot box, and gets counted. The candidate with the most votes wins. Alternative Voting System The "proposed" system, which will take over the present one if voted "Yes" on will change the way we vote forever. Basically, we would go to the polls as usual. But instead of voting with an X to just 1 candidate, we vote with numbers. With me so far, ok.... It works like a ranking system instead, we would place a "1" next to the candidate who you would like to win. But now, we have a choice to make. We can either leave the "1" in the box and post as usual, or we can mark numbers down next to other candidates aka "2", "3" etc. In the case that we can't decide on just 1 candidate, we could vote for anything upto 4 candidates or more on the same ballot sheet(s). When it comes to counting votes, they are all counted up to get an overall number. Then, they are counted by numbers. Aka, the candidate with the number 1 would go into 1 pile, the candidate with the number 2 would go into another pile. If the candidate who has the number 1 written next to their name gets more than 50% of the vote, they win that vote. Still with me, right gets more interesting now. If after all the votes are counted, and the candidate with the number 1 doesn't have 50% of the votes, then the candidate with the lowest votes would be elimintated. Their votes would be distributed amongst the remaining candidates. Aka, if the candidate with number 1 is voted on a sheet of the candidate who was eliminated, then if the candidate who is number 1 is rated on that sheet as number 2, they would win that vote. Other candidates would have the votes, if they were voted number 2 on the eliminated candidates sheet. If no-one has reached 50% yet, the process begins again, this time candidate with number 1 would get votes marked as number "3", same goes for the other candidates. And it will continue until one candidate has 50% of the vote. So in the end, a candidate could win even if they don't have 50% of the votes to themselves, because eliminated candidates votes could go to them, even if they were not the initial choice for that voter. You would in-fact vote for a candidate to win, and not particulary want them to win. Bit of a complicated system, which makes even more work for the vote counters. I've read both the "Yes" and "No" campaigns, which are found on the corresponding word. In my eyes, there is nothing wrong with the current system. It is simple, which is what is needed with the voters. By making things more complicated, it will deter voters in my opinion. Plus, as i mentioned above. It would prevent a joint government. I believe it won't, because a candidate would get clear votes to win. But, the party would need a majority of candidates to win voters in order to win government still. This part doesn't change. What do you peeps think about this?.

I'm actually very surprised that TNA still employ Jeff Hardy, that was the second time he was sent home due to not being in a fit state. Concerning that match vs Sting, TNA could have and should have prevented Jeff from coming out for the match, but they decided to send him out anyway. That is what annoys the fans with Jeff at the moment. His court-case still gets continuances each and everytime as well. And, i believe TNA have lost quite a number of fans since that disaster of a main event. They spent more time coming out for the match than actually wrestling. And i've tried countless times to "get" TNA, but time and time again it doesn't work. Yes, the action itself is better in places, but everything else sucks. That includes the storylines, the commentators and everything.

I like my hyphens, to be fair!.

They could temporally change Cena to heel like they did with HBK before his match with Hogan. Turned HBK back to a babyface the night afterwards. Worked then, could work again. Not that it matters, Cena gets boo'd anyway.

To be fair, even though they were hyping Rock, Miz and Cena more throughout the nght, i thought the Triple H-Taker promo was done 10x better. I honestly didn't expect HBK to come out either, just goes to show that these two guys (Triple H and Taker) know how to do things right. However, the Rock, Miz and Cena promo. Meh really. I was expecting Rock to take it to Cena, but i guess WWE are saving that for Mania. I know they are giving Miz credibility, but that was a bit too much to be fair. And they buggered up with A-Ri, wasn't he fired/no longer allowed to be with Miz?. Unless i missed something, which i probably did. It was as i guessed with Cena and Rock. Cena gets booed, Rock gets cheered. Should have heard the boo's coming when Cena hit the AA, and the cheers with the Peoples Elbow hitting Miz. It's setting up for either Rock to hit both Miz and Cena with Rock Bottoms at Mania, or for Rock to either cost Cena the title/attack him after the match. I believe WWE know it makes sense to have Cena Rock bottomed at Mania, it will be more electrifying. Sorry, i should have modded Cena's name with "Homeless Power Ranger", classic!!. And Esequiel, i hope they don't do another one of them hand-over matches. I would love Rock to beat Cena and show he still has it, even though he ain't wrestled in years. Would be a sell-out, and would keep long-time fans happy.

Yep. Thats the way i want to spell it.

This practically sums up Apples marketing/products in my opinion. Apple is too pricey for what it can do i think. I know, you can rant at that statement if you like. Apple bring out a new version of the current product, then leave the old model out at a similar price. Surely, if you are bringing out a new I-Pad you would discontinue making/distributing the older model. Ditto, i don't like Apple's stuff. It could be a "British" version, with socks and sandels as you said. For thos who have an I-Pad2, a solution to what to do with the I-Pad

Yeah, them as well.