Guest dynastygal Posted October 23, 2007 Share Posted October 23, 2007 UK...I think this: "haha you admins honestly have no clue what you are doing do you?" was why he got an infraction...snarky remark (rhetorical question by the looks of it) basically, it seems. And as far as I was aware, all red did was post an image that was potentially controversial (I personally saw nothing wrong with it...it was just his legs that were shown flesh wise). And someone kicked off at him for it...if I can recall. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UK Posted October 23, 2007 Share Posted October 23, 2007 UK...I think this: "haha you admins honestly have no clue what you are doing do you?" was why he got an infraction...snarky remark (rhetorical question by the looks of it) basically, it seems. And as far as I was aware, all red did was post an image that was potentially controversial (I personally saw nothing wrong with it...it was just his legs that were shown flesh wise). And someone kicked off at him for it...if I can recall. Seriously, you don't the half of it. The whole point of infractions are a guideline or a warning to anyone who steps out of the rules line. mcj, as far as I'm aware, did not flame/insult anyone, post porn, spam or have a multiple account. So, why did he get the infraction? And a group of members have been having a problem with rokhed for a long time before you came. The inapproprate images were, for many, the last straw. motion and Fields, two members who stood against rokhed, are now banned. Ant-Shimmin, another one, is now- you guessed it- banned. Stop pretending you know this forum becasue you clearly don't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eddage Posted October 23, 2007 Share Posted October 23, 2007 I know this isn't a forum question but a main site one, but still... Why the hell did you (not sure who posted the news piece) put a spoiler in a headline for a piece of Super Mario Galaxy news?! I was trying to avoid all spoilers, but one of the biggest gets ruined the second I visit the main site! May I suggest the headline gets changed pretty sharpish before it's ruined for someone else! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roostophe Posted October 23, 2007 Share Posted October 23, 2007 Seriously, you don't the half of it. The whole point of infractions are a guideline or a warning to anyone who steps out of the rules line. mcj, as far as I'm aware, did not flame/insult anyone, post porn, spam or have a multiple account. So, why did he get the infraction? And a group of members have been having a problem with rokhed for a long time before you came. The inapproprate images were, for many, the last straw. motion and Fields, two members who stood against rokhed, are now banned. Ant-Shimmin, another one, is now- you guessed it- banned. Stop pretending you know this forum becasue you clearly don't. MCJ got his infraction for rudely questioning the Admin's, which was not on. Motion got banned for arguing and constantly insulting a moderator, Fields got banned for constant misbehaviour, and Ant got banned due to annoying spamming, as well as arguments and flaming before the GTFO stuff. (And I bolded that part of your message because you don't know the forum that well either. Four months isn't enough!) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UK Posted October 23, 2007 Share Posted October 23, 2007 MCJ got his infraction for rAdmin's,udely questioning the which was not on. Motion got banned for arguing and constantly insulting a moderator, Fields got banned for constant misbehaviour, and Ant got banned due to annoying spamming, as well as arguments and flaming before the GTFO stuff. (And I bolded that part of your message because you don't know the forum that well either. Four months isn't enough!) You just don't get, do you? The point is, it isn't against the rules. If it is, please show me it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roostophe Posted October 23, 2007 Share Posted October 23, 2007 You just don't get, do you? The point is, it isn't against the rules. If it is, please show me it. I do believe it is against the rules. Please look in the Rules board! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest dynastygal Posted October 23, 2007 Share Posted October 23, 2007 Seriously, you don't the half of it. The whole point of infractions are a guideline or a warning to anyone who steps out of the rules line. mcj, as far as I'm aware, did not flame/insult anyone, post porn, spam or have a multiple account. So, why did he get the infraction? And a group of members have been having a problem with rokhed for a long time before you came. The inapproprate images were, for many, the last straw. motion and Fields, two members who stood against rokhed, are now banned. Ant-Shimmin, another one, is now- you guessed it- banned. Stop pretending you know this forum becasue you clearly don't. Look. Stop acting all high and mighty and insinuating that I know sweet f all just because I've not been here long. You questioned why he got an infraction, so I gave my view on it as well as on rokhead - whom I've seen do nout apart from post a picture of his fricking legs with some sort of costume on and as people said before, there are worse images in the 'hot' women threads yet they don't get removed or complained about because it's 'normal' to be perverted towards women yet 'not normal' to see images of a cross dresser or wtv. Someone can be here for years and still not know head nor tail of the forum, just as likewise someone can be here for a while and pretty much get the jist of what is going on. I'm fed up of the attitudes I've received from certain people on here just because I'm new. So damn what. I can have a view just as any member can, no matter the length of time since the activation of the account. I'm also entitled to express my view on the situation as I see it. Don't like it? Tough. Take it up with the mods instead of openly being a condescending so-n-so towards me. I tried being nice to people, but it seems even that isn't good enough for some. Sad really. Truly sad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UK Posted October 23, 2007 Share Posted October 23, 2007 Look. Stop acting all high and mighty and insinuating that I know sweet f all just because I've not been here long. You questioned why he got an infraction, so I gave my view on it as well as on rokhead - whom I've seen do nout apart from post a picture of his fricking legs with some sort of costume on and as people said before, there are worse images in the 'hot' women threads yet they don't get removed or complained about because it's 'normal' to be perverted towards women yet 'not normal' to see images of a cross dresser or wtv. Someone can be here for years and still not know head nor tail of the forum, just as likewise someone can be here for a while and pretty much get the jist of what is going on. I'm fed up of the attitudes I've received from certain people on here just because I'm new. So damn what. I can have a view just as any member can, no matter the length of time since the activation of the account. I'm also entitled to express my view on the situation as I see it. Don't like it? Tough. Take it up with the mods instead of openly being a condescending so-n-so towards me. I tried being nice to people, but it seems even that isn't good enough for some. Sad really. Truly sad. If I insulted you, please, show me. I'm not taking the mick because you're new. I'm entitled myview on this situation. I have, however, got a problem with the fact you come here and start stirring things. Why notcheck out the forum's hostory on rokhed and not just base it on a few pics you were here on time to see. As I said, if it were the pics alone, I would've dealt with it, but they were the last straw. mr-paul who's fairly new, I has no problem with. He didn't stir anything, and kept out of discussions he knew nothing about. Just base it on facts next time, not your opinion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AshMat Posted October 23, 2007 Share Posted October 23, 2007 1:Seriously, you don't the half of it. 2:The whole point of infractions are a guideline or a warning to anyone who steps out of the rules line. mcj, as far as I'm aware, did not flame/insult anyone, post porn, spam or have a multiple account. So, why did he get the infraction? 3:And a group of members have been having a problem with rokhed for a long time before you came. The inapproprate images were, for many, the last straw. motion and Fields, two members who stood against rokhed, are now banned. Ant-Shimmin, another one, is now- you guessed it- banned. 4:Stop pretending you know this forum becasue you clearly don't. 1: She knows enough, he psoted fully clothed pictures, he was enver the cause of the locked threads, you and a hanful of other whining were. 2.mcj Flamed the mods. 3. The images were not innapopriate, have you even been int he hot people gallery? 4. Stop acting like YOU know these forums, you've hardly been here that long and you seem to know more about this forum's history than some others who have been here longer. rokhed has ALWAYS been that sarcastic way, it's a hanful of you newish people trying to kick him out, it's enver gonna work. And no one is going to get unbanned! Give up asking everyone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shino Posted October 23, 2007 Share Posted October 23, 2007 Wtf is this? A 4 month old member patronizing? Just shut up dude. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest dynastygal Posted October 23, 2007 Share Posted October 23, 2007 Stop pretending you know this forum becasue you clearly don't. Seriously, you don't the half of it. Just base it on facts next time, not your opinion. Insulting and condescending ^^. You don't even have a clue what I've seen. You just assume that I've only seen such and such due to my join date. People lurk before they join, you know. And I do use the search function and have read old topics before. And everything you say is based on YOUR opinion too. Since the day I joined and before I've seen nothing that is worthy of moaning about concerning him. You seem to feel otherwise. Your opinion is not fact. It's an opinion just like mine. So less of the condescending tone and thinking your posts are more worthy than mine just because you've been here a couple more months than me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UK Posted October 23, 2007 Share Posted October 23, 2007 1: She knows enough, he psoted fully clothed pictures, he was enver the cause of the locked threads, you and a hanful of other whining were. 2.mcj Flamed the mods. 3. The images were not innapopriate, have you even been int he hot people gallery? 4. Stop acting like YOU know these forums, you've hardly been here that long and you seem to know more about this forum's history than some others who have been here longer. 1) Yes, he was. You, as well, are not basing it on fact either and that's your main downfall. 2) I don't know if you know the difference between a rhetorical question and an insult (and a mod and admin) so here's a quick English lesson: Rhetorical Question- Do you admins know how to do your jobs properly? Insult- You admins are fucking fuckers grow up you pricks and start acting your age.* 3) I have been in the hot people gallery. But, as far as I'm aware no pictures have been posted so far of a middle-aged man in women's clothing. You can clarify this, and that the whole purpose of hot people's thread is to post hot people. 4) How does the shite taste up that arse your licking? i admit, I've been here hardly at all, but long enough to make a full decision on who my friends and enemies are, and long enough, obviously, for rpkhed to act his usual self. *I do not mean this as a direct insult at the admins, so don't ban me plz! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mcj metroid Posted October 23, 2007 Share Posted October 23, 2007 12.mcj Flamed the mods. . That's a matter of opinion i don't believe i was flaming the mods. You of all people should know the difference. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AshMat Posted October 23, 2007 Share Posted October 23, 2007 Seriously, you don't the half of it. The whole point of infractions are a guideline or a warning to anyone who steps out of the rules line. mcj, as far as I'm aware, did not flame/insult anyone, post porn, spam or have a multiple account. So, why did he get the infraction? And a group of members have been having a problem with rokhed for a long time before you came. The inapproprate images were, for many, the last straw. motion and Fields, two members who stood against rokhed, are now banned. Ant-Shimmin, another one, is now- you guessed it- banned. Stop pretending you know this forum becasue you clearly don't. 1) Yes, he was. You, as well, are not basing it on fact either and that's your main downfall.[/b] 2) I don't know if you know the difference between a rhetorical question and an insult (and a mod and admin) so here's a quick English lesson: Rhetorical Question- Do you admins know how to do your jobs properly? Insult- You admins are fucking fuckers grow up you pricks and start acting your age.*[/b] 3) I have been in the hot people gallery. But, as far as I'm aware no pictures have been posted so far of a middle-aged man in women's clothing. You can clarify this, and that the whole purpose of hot people's thread is to post hot people. 4) How does the shite taste up that arse your licking? i admit, I've been here hardly at all, but long enough to make a full decision on who my friends and enemies are, and long enough, obviously, for rpkhed to act his usual self. *I do not mean this as a direct insult at the admins, so don't ban me plz! 1. I know exactly what rokhed has done, i've been here pretty much since R-E started, so don't act like i don't know anything. 2. Shut the fuck up, you little faggot, i know exactly what a rhetorical question is, stop trying to act clever, and shut the fuck up you little shit. The admins are acting perfectly their age, did you read Shorty's explanation 2 pages back? 3. The women in that thread wear barely anything, sometimes are naked, and somtimes half naked men are posted. A cross dressing man is barely worse. 4. I'm not licking his arse in any way, rokhed is a fine member, a very old member (in the way he's been here for a long time), he's respected by oher older members, and newfags like you aren't gonna take him down. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dante Posted October 23, 2007 Share Posted October 23, 2007 Looks like more people are going to get banned. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mcj metroid Posted October 23, 2007 Share Posted October 23, 2007 1. 2. Shut the fuck up, you little faggot, i know exactly what a rhetorical question is, stop trying to act clever, and shut the fuck up you little shit. The admins are acting perfectly their age, did you read Shorty's explanation 2 pages back? . see what i mean? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AshMat Posted October 23, 2007 Share Posted October 23, 2007 You can't complain about me for having an opinion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McMad Posted October 23, 2007 Share Posted October 23, 2007 Jesus UK, everything you say is just full of hypocrisy,... and shit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mcj metroid Posted October 23, 2007 Share Posted October 23, 2007 You can't complain about me for having an opinion. It's called flaming my dear and what you have said is far worse than i have.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UK Posted October 23, 2007 Share Posted October 23, 2007 1. I know exactly what rokhed has done, i've been here pretty much since R-E started, so don't act like i don't know anything. 2. Shut the fuck up, you little faggot, i know exactly what a rhetorical question is, stop trying to act clever, and shut the fuck up you little shit. The admins are acting perfectly their age, did you read Shorty's explanation 2 pages back? 3. The women in that thread wear barely anything, sometimes are naked, and somtimes half naked men are posted. A cross dressing man is barely worse. 4. I'm not licking his arse in any way, rokhed is a fine member, a very old member (in the way he's been here for a long time), he's respected by oher older members, and newfags like you aren't gonna take him down. Can't you read or something you prick? I just said at the bottom, next an asterix, I was joking. I would like you to link me to a naked woman. I dare you. rokhed has been here a long time. But, you stupidly forgot, that you're contradicting yourself. Your standing up for a newbie, then insulting me on being a newbie? WTF? Just,. seriously, stop. Now Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
conzer16 Posted October 23, 2007 Share Posted October 23, 2007 Can UK and Retro stop flaming each other? We don't need to lose more members. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AshMat Posted October 23, 2007 Share Posted October 23, 2007 Which newbie am i standing up for then? You didn't say you were joking, you said it wasn't an insult to the admins. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McMad Posted October 23, 2007 Share Posted October 23, 2007 Can UK and Retro stop flaming each other? We on't need to lose more members. I think we could lose at least one more... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UK Posted October 23, 2007 Share Posted October 23, 2007 I'm sorry Ashmat Take this to MSN. Try to get on, hey hey? I'm in a bad mood right now Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dante Posted October 23, 2007 Share Posted October 23, 2007 I remember the day that Rokhed joined the old boards asking users to troll the sci-fi uk forums because they were bad mouthing Nintendo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts