ReZourceman Posted January 26, 2011 Posted January 26, 2011 The costume isn't fine, its fucking bad ass.
Shorty Posted January 26, 2011 Posted January 26, 2011 Was there ever a chance you were going to dislike it? You have rose-tinted glasses with marvel-logo shaped lenses.
Dannyboy-the-Dane Posted January 26, 2011 Posted January 26, 2011 Was there ever a chance you were going to dislike it? You have rose-tinted glasses with marvel-logo shaped lenses. Tru fax, these are.
Hamishmash Posted January 27, 2011 Posted January 27, 2011 The costume's fine. I've decided. Let's just deal with it. These shots give no impression of the film whatsoever. I actually don't agree... I think they've very telling that this movie is gonna be VERY practical. As much as I love Sam Raimi and his trilogy, if he were directing this scene I doubt Spider-man himself would be there at all... I'd be guessing it would all be CGI. I'm actually very impressed to see a live-action Spider-Man swinging about. Which is all a good thing.
ReZourceman Posted January 27, 2011 Posted January 27, 2011 Was there ever a chance you were going to dislike it? You have rose-tinted glasses with marvel-logo shaped lenses. I hate a lot of what Marvel has done. Just because I love a lot of what they do doesn't mean I automatically like everything they do. I'm one of the most critical people of the original Spider-Man movie around these parts.
Shorty Posted January 27, 2011 Posted January 27, 2011 I hate a lot of what Marvel has done. Just because I love a lot of what they do doesn't mean I automatically like everything they do. I'm one of the most critical people of the original Spider-Man movie around these parts. 3 words: Web of shadows
ReZourceman Posted January 27, 2011 Posted January 27, 2011 I'd put that down to (my) bad taste rather than bias towards Spider-Man. :p
Retro_Link Posted February 4, 2011 Author Posted February 4, 2011 New images... http://www.comingsoon.net/news/movienews.php?id=73812
Paj! Posted February 5, 2011 Posted February 5, 2011 Lol @ the first one. Reminds me of when Daft accused Marvel of being all about bright colours and shoving crotches in your face. :p
Shorty Posted February 5, 2011 Posted February 5, 2011 (edited) The spider legs 'drip' down his back. I know you're telling me it's nothing but... nurghhh. Edited February 5, 2011 by Shorty
Happenstance Posted February 14, 2011 Posted February 14, 2011 Official Press Release “THE AMAZING SPIDER-MAN™” TO BE RELEASED JULY 3, 2012 CULVER CITY, Calif., February 14, 2011 – Columbia Pictures announced today that the title of the next Spider-Man film will be The Amazing Spider-Man. The studio simultaneously released a photo of Andrew Garfield as Spider-Man, the first shot of Garfield in the famous full mask and suit. The film, which is now in production and is being shot entirely in 3D, will be released on July 3, 2012. The film stars Andrew Garfield, Emma Stone, Rhys Ifans, Denis Leary, Campbell Scott, Irrfan Khan, Martin Sheen, and Sally Field. The film is directed by Marc Webb from a screenplay by James Vanderbilt and Alvin Sargent and Steve Kloves based on the Marvel Comic Book by Stan Lee and Steve Ditko. Laura Ziskin, Avi Arad, and Matt Tolmach are producing the Marvel Entertainment production for Columbia Pictures. The executive producers are Stan Lee, Kevin Feige, and Michael Grillo. The film’s official website is http://www.TheAmazingSpiderMan-movie.com. About Sony Pictures Entertainment Sony Pictures Entertainment (SPE) is a subsidiary of Sony Corporation of America, a subsidiary of Tokyo-based Sony Corporation. SPE's global operations encompass motion picture production and distribution; television production and distribution; home entertainment acquisition and distribution; a global channel network; digital content creation and distribution; operation of studio facilities; development of new entertainment products, services and technologies; and distribution of entertainment in more than 140 countries. Sony Pictures Entertainment can be found on the World Wide Web at http://www.sonypictures.com. http://www.comicbookresources.com/?page=article&id=30828
Retro_Link Posted February 14, 2011 Author Posted February 14, 2011 Shit Just Got Real!! http://uk.movies.ign.com/articles/114/1149570p1.html The Spider-Man reboot now has an official title. And we've also got our first official look at the character with his mask on. Check it! The title is… The Amazing Spider-Man. Just like the comic! And here's the image: Thread name change please! EDIT: haha, dammit!! :p
Happenstance Posted February 14, 2011 Posted February 14, 2011 Its all that fancy bolding you did, took too long :p
Magnus Posted February 14, 2011 Posted February 14, 2011 (edited) The title is… The Amazing Spider-Man. Just like the comic! Writing like this is the reason the writers at IGN get paid the big bucks. Fake edit: The costume looks fine, I guess. Edited February 14, 2011 by Magnus
Hamishmash Posted February 14, 2011 Posted February 14, 2011 The removal of the bloody mechanical web shooters was the best thing Sam Raimi ever did. They better pull it off well here. To be honest, the main reason I'm gonna see this is Andrew Garfield, cos I've been a big supporter and follower of him since Boy A and am really pleased to see him doing well. I'm optimistic about this movie, but he's the only thing so far that's drawn me.
Dan_Dare Posted February 14, 2011 Posted February 14, 2011 Naa! Mechanical shooters work in a lot of ways that biological ones don't. Once you get past the 'omg he's only a kid he can't do that!' wall (artfully demolished in Ultimate Spider-Man, fun fans) they're a strong part of his character.
EEVILMURRAY Posted February 14, 2011 Posted February 14, 2011 Naa! Mechanical shooters work in a lot of ways that biological ones don't. It's true, in the middle of a battle you may have to stop and reload.
Retro_Link Posted February 14, 2011 Author Posted February 14, 2011 Yeah, I liked his mechanical shooters during the 90's cartoon, because yes situations would occur when he wanted to give chase but couldn't, or mid battle he'd run out of web. Just gotta see whether they've managed a decent looking Lizard now!
ReZourceman Posted February 14, 2011 Posted February 14, 2011 I know it was the most obvious title by a country mile but I was talking at Claire just yesterday about how this was blatantly the title. That picture makes me NEED a new avatar and signature. Annoying. I'm busy/incredibly tired right now. Basically bagsy though.
Recommended Posts