Dan_Dare Posted July 28, 2009 Posted July 28, 2009 New Muliplayer Video Jizz in my pants Bring the rain!!!
Zechs Merquise Posted July 28, 2009 Posted July 28, 2009 The graphics look amazing and I'm sure it'll be great. But it looks very much like a beefed up version of the first so I'm not going to go overboard just yet.
Dyson Posted July 28, 2009 Author Posted July 28, 2009 Sweet!!!!!! I really don't know which console to get this for. I may end up getting it on 360 and ps3 just stop me thinking about it! lol You know it makes sense to get it on the 360, it's where the CoD4 players have always been
Babooo Posted July 28, 2009 Posted July 28, 2009 You know it makes sense to get it on the 360, it's where the CoD4 players have always been Agreed. 360 all the way baby!
Zechs Merquise Posted July 29, 2009 Posted July 29, 2009 Agreed. 360 all the way baby! The 360 pad is also better than the PS3 one.
MATtheHAT Posted July 29, 2009 Posted July 29, 2009 Sweet!!!!!! I really don't know which console to get this for. I may end up getting it on 360 and ps3 just stop me thinking about it! lol I thought about it for about 3.5 seconds, and I have decided to get it on PS3. It all boils down to your own preference, they will be the exact same game on both machines. But for me, I prefer the DuelShock, and all my virtual friends are on PSN. I also own both 4 and W@W on the PS3, so I would like to keep the continuity. The only advantage the Xbox has got will be the timed exclusive Map Packs. Don't listen to the Xbots Mike, make up your own mind.
Dante Posted July 29, 2009 Posted July 29, 2009 Modern Warfare 2 will sport a resolution of 600p like its predecessor. Infinity Ward once again justifies a sub-HD video game during a high definition console era with Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2. The resolution, which is 1024 by 600 pixels, has been confirmed by the pixel counters on the Beyond3D technical forums, who recently brought us the resolution of Ghostbusters: The Video Game on the PlayStation 3. Like its predecessor, Modern Warfare 2 will be 600p on both the Xbox 360 and PlayStation 3. Modern Warfare 2's native rendering resolution will result in 307,200 pixels less than if it was running at the high-definition 720p. The question is whether this matters for Infinity Ward's upcoming game? Unlike Ghostbusters, Modern Warfare 2 will be an extremely impressive game both graphically and in its framerate; Infinity Ward is again targeting 60 frames-per-second, when most graphically impressive video games struggle to hit 30 frames-per-second. A sub-HD rendering resolution is surely a compromise worth taking considering the benefits? Infinity Ward recently released the first Modern Warfare 2 multiplayer gameplay footage, which you can find here. www.gamezine.co.uk
Caris Posted July 29, 2009 Posted July 29, 2009 Haha! I was the one who asked that question on Beyond 3D
Deathjam Posted July 30, 2009 Posted July 30, 2009 Totally worth it for the silky smooth framerate. After finally playing COD4, I wholeheartedly agree.
LegoMan1031 Posted July 30, 2009 Posted July 30, 2009 You know it makes sense to get it on the 360, it's where the CoD4 players have always been Tempting! Agreed. 360 all the way baby! Tempting x2! The 360 pad is also better than the PS3 one. Tempting x3! I thought about it for about 3.5 seconds, and I have decided to get it on PS3. It all boils down to your own preference, they will be the exact same game on both machines. But for me, I prefer the DuelShock, and all my virtual friends are on PSN. I also own both 4 and W@W on the PS3, so I would like to keep the continuity. The only advantage the Xbox has got will be the timed exclusive Map Packs. Don't listen to the Xbots Mike, make up your own mind. Yeah, thanks for that matt. This my problem though, i have virtual friends on both consoles and i also have 'real' friends on both consoles also. I originally had CoD4 on 360, then when i had sold my 360 and bought a ps3 i got it again on that (thats how much i loved it). However when WaW came out i got that on 360... Normally the 360 is my automatic choice for multi-platform games but for this im really undecided! I still have some months to decide i suppose!
Dyson Posted August 7, 2009 Author Posted August 7, 2009 And it's certainly not a game you can afford to buy two copies of at that price
Cube Posted August 9, 2009 Posted August 9, 2009 There's something much, much worse than the price hike... 50 Cent is in the game. Which means that MW2 will be utterly terrible.
gaggle64 Posted August 9, 2009 Posted August 9, 2009 (edited) Relax, it's just for a bit of incidental voice work. Just as long as he doesn't rap over the credits. Which he almost certainly will. Edited August 9, 2009 by gaggle64
Cube Posted August 9, 2009 Posted August 9, 2009 Relax, it's just for a bit of incidental voice work. Just as long as he doesn't rap over the credits. Which he almost certainly will. They could have gotten people from war films/shows instead (like Halo does with Sci-Fi).
Emasher Posted August 10, 2009 Posted August 10, 2009 Aiming at the lowest common denominator. Vast majority of tv people buy, will struggle to do half of COD's resolution in motion anyway. Its amusing hearing people raving about 1080p in games like Wipeout when they have a Samsung that only manages 300p. Some people in a class I took last year thought 1080p meant the graphics were better. I have a feeling a lot of people don't know what any of these terms mean and just use in in "fanboy" arguments.
Cube Posted August 10, 2009 Posted August 10, 2009 I remember a conversation I had with a not-so-big "gamer", where he claimed that the graphics on his PS3 on his HDTV could not be beaten. I thought it was fuzzy, so I asked what cable he used. He looked confused and said "the one that came with it" (i.e. the Yellow, Red, White one). I didn't bother explaining the problem to him.
MATtheHAT Posted August 10, 2009 Posted August 10, 2009 Meh, as I have said before, its worth the upscaled 720p for the 60 frames per second. That engine just looks so goooood.
Dyson Posted August 10, 2009 Author Posted August 10, 2009 You mean outdated. loooooooooooooooooooool
Zechs Merquise Posted August 11, 2009 Posted August 11, 2009 You mean outdated. Modern Warfare 2 will no doubt look better than any other console FPS ever.
Caris Posted August 11, 2009 Posted August 11, 2009 Haha no it wont. I loved the original but i agree with Choze for once, the game had some horrible textures and shadows. Nothing will be beating Killzone for a while yet!
Daft Posted August 11, 2009 Posted August 11, 2009 Yeah, you can say what you want about how KillZone 2 plays but it looks stunning.
Recommended Posts