Serebii

Everyone is responsible for their own actions. If a human forced a person to kill others, the person would still be liable but the circumstances would be considered during sentencing, as it would be here. However, the judicial system doesn't allow for scientific theory so the chemical imbalance in the brain which caused the person to either hear things that weren't real or in a massively hypothetical situation, a being outside of our dimension, would be classed as a mental disorder

I'm not a practicing scientist. I'm a Pokémon webmaster, remember. However, I've always been adept at physics and I keep watch on all the happenings on it. I'd love to be properly in the field doing stuff, but I fucked up stuff at GCSE level and went on a diploma instead of A levels and I'm, frankly, too lazy to go back and fix that. Anyway, I was just saying that there are plausible explanations for these things that would explain them as being real as opposed to figments of other people's minds.

I'm a scientist. My entire philosophy is to question and to think "What if?" To think of the possibilities and how they may or may not be possible. However, dismissing the possibility that things may not be as you have taught is foolish.

You just proved my point with this. We have no way to know with our current level of knowledge. All I'm saying is that it is possible. Open your mind up. Stop taking everything we "know" as absolute fact. Science, understanding, pretty much everything cannot advance if we just take everything people state through observations and tests as PURE fact. There are loads of mitigating factors. This is why most scientific theories end up being classed as true and then disproven within 50 years.

While we know a lot of how the eye works, we don't know completely what it can take in. How would we know if it can take in visual evidence of particles from another dimension? Or if the molecules they're made of are phased 180 degrees out of our normal visual spectrum. All we can tell is what the eye can take in based on what we know, not all of what it can and cannot without being able to test.

The eyes aren't what cause hallucinations. The brain is. Any and all hallucinations are usually classed as a chemical imbalance in the brain. If, and I stress the word if, the things people class as ghosts aren't ghosts but are things inhabiting another dimension, it is highly possible that a chemical imbalance in the brain could allow for the ability to see things beyond the current visual spectrum in the human eye.

We know so little about how the brain works. You can't just dismiss it.

That's not evidence. That is what is classed as circumstancial evidence and should not be admissable Without figures (I'm too lazy to check), let's assume that the majority of the people who see ghosts suffer various hallucinations. Could that be the cause of the visions? Perhaps. Or, could it be that they have a mutation in the brain that allows them to see into another dimension and see beings inhabiting that dimension that runs in conjunction with ours Or is there? I'm sure rats would say that about the giants that suddenly place them in mazes

If we just ignored things without evidence, very few of the scientific theories that ended up with some of the great discoveries in the 20th and 21st century would have happened. Ideas based on hunches are quite common...brilliance comes not from following the path, but from having an idea and THEN finding that it works. You cannot dismiss things solely based on no evidence. Evidence against it? Sure. No evidence either way? No. And as I said, what is perceived as ghosts, if real, may not be the souls of the deceased, but could be anything...extra dimensional beings, lizard people...anything.

Ok. This is coming from a scientist. You need to take a step back. We don't understand everything...or even much of anything at all. Yes they're no evidence of ghosts, there's no evidence against them either. For all we know, the figures that people call ghosts are actually interdimensional creatures trying to phase through to our reality. You can't outright say that there are no aliens, no ghosts, no paranormal anything. That is also bein gullable, just on the flipside of the argument. You're taking the view that there is no possibility at face value. Be open for any possibility. Leave your mind open.

Next gen, the handheld will fuse to your hands and will read the nerve impulses so no need for a controller anymore...but you'll be stuck to it forever...that's a good attachment ratio ... I'll get my coat...

Part 2 was also very gppd Also, the reports of the doctor having infinite regenerations was not quite accurate :P

That's what the slider is for I laugh at one of the comments; "hopefully this will be released on the superior PSP2 hardware"

You can get them on live at the moment for 1600 Points...all three, normally 2400 points seperate. Bargain

Yeah, and they're in the Star Wars episodes (Well Roger is in the first and the third this christmas will have American Dad characters)

Batman & Spy Kids

Part 1 was pretty good, despite the poor Shansheeth...I mean come on, worst DW universe aliens...so rigid but other than that, it was really good. Looking forward to Part 2 tomorrow

I want a lottery win ;; Got my eye on a really nice flat, but I can't afford it...I could if I win the lottery

The most apocalyptic story ever...

He should really just let it go though. He has demonstrated in the past decade that his writing skills are subpar in comparison to most of the other writers these days.

Could have sworn that I previously read that the live action series got canned

So Caprica's ratings are falling badly so they think another spinoff prequel is a good idea??

CELEBI! WIN!

Right when they turned sparkly