Emasher Posted October 29, 2007 Posted October 29, 2007 Not liking a game shouldn't be any reason to rate someone's sig down.
Slaggis Posted October 30, 2007 Posted October 30, 2007 Not liking a game shouldn't be any reason to rate someone's sig down. I think he meant of the sig emasher. I'm "not a big fan" of your new one either. 6.3/10
rokhed00 Posted October 30, 2007 Posted October 30, 2007 Saving the cheerleader gets more insignificant every time I see it - 5.4/10
Daft Posted October 30, 2007 Posted October 30, 2007 Is a pretty cool sig! It matches your avatar (which personally I'm not a fan of, but that is probably just me) the font is pretty cool and the tag line "Pretty in pink" is funny. It also seems to reflect your personality and is definitely one of the best sigs on the forum. 9/10
conzer16 Posted October 30, 2007 Posted October 30, 2007 Really don't like it. Not something I like to look at. 1/10
Paj! Posted October 30, 2007 Posted October 30, 2007 9/10 Funnier everytime I see it. Like you pondering why we exist.
Paj! Posted October 30, 2007 Posted October 30, 2007 Not liking a game shouldn't be any reason to rate someone's sig down. It can be. It's actually perfectly feasible. I dislike/never got the attraction of WWE, so I'm obviously not going to like a sig based around that. And when (I think) Ant_Shimmin had an amazing one by Fresh, I rated it lower cause it had a footballer in it. 8/10, Daft.
Mr-Paul Posted October 30, 2007 Posted October 30, 2007 The woman is very scary, but overall, cool avatar 7.5/10
Mr_Odwin Posted October 31, 2007 Posted October 31, 2007 Makes me think you're a fun guy for some reason. The black outline is cool. Ties in nicely with your sig. And there's boob cleavage too! 8/10
gaggle64 Posted October 31, 2007 Posted October 31, 2007 8/10 Wins big bonus points for it's tongue in cheek attitude.
rokhed00 Posted October 31, 2007 Posted October 31, 2007 8/10 - very distinctive, no idea where it's from but I always think of it as a baby with a couple of band aids on its forehead.
rokhed00 Posted October 31, 2007 Posted October 31, 2007 Thats disgusting 0. But if you stick yours up mine we could get some serious action going.
rokhed00 Posted October 31, 2007 Posted October 31, 2007 Not up to your usual standards tbh, I liked the fifties feel of your previous sigs. - 6/10
Slaggis Posted October 31, 2007 Posted October 31, 2007 @ Emasher - I like it, but the mix of the background and the Rabbid just doesn't look right. 7/10 @Rokhed - Personally, I think it's horrible. (Unlike your sig which is much better). 1/10
rokhed00 Posted October 31, 2007 Posted October 31, 2007 I'm sure I answered this earlier, something about grey toning a TV show, didn't come out well, but I'll be generous and give you 4/10. BTW, thought you blocked my av, so how can you rate it?
Dyson Posted October 31, 2007 Posted October 31, 2007 I think when an image is blocked it only blocks the certain URL - since you've uploaded a new one it won't be blocked yet. As for the avatar...The signature is much better. That's probably against the rules this time. 2.173/10
rokhed00 Posted November 1, 2007 Posted November 1, 2007 Too many fake flame effects for top ranking. Good effort though - 7/10
ipaul Posted November 5, 2007 Posted November 5, 2007 Simple yet effective, although perhpas just a bit too much black space for my liking. 8/10
Recommended Posts