stuwii Posted December 9, 2008 Posted December 9, 2008 Has anyone got a game that is always nearly fun, nearly decent apart from just a little something TP seems to be other peoples vote but mine is Fifa 09- love it but players just don't grow should I upgrade the coach- and what is growth information. Coupled with no-one owns this game is just depressing
Tellyn Posted December 9, 2008 Posted December 9, 2008 Can someone lock this? It's about the sixth thread he's created or used to try and get help with FIFA 09 when it's pretty clear that no one knows how to solve your problem.
stuwii Posted December 9, 2008 Author Posted December 9, 2008 Can someone lock this? It's about the sixth thread he's created or used to try and get help with FIFA 09 when it's pretty clear that no one knows how to solve your problem. WHAT... DO.. YOU... SUGGEST
ShadowV7 Posted December 9, 2008 Posted December 9, 2008 We suggest you keep quite about it and stop posting how you keep needing help. And Fifa is crap
Tellyn Posted December 9, 2008 Posted December 9, 2008 WHAT... DO.. YOU... SUGGEST I suggest that you email EA Sports with your query and stop spamming Wii Discussion with pointless threads.
darksnowman Posted December 9, 2008 Posted December 9, 2008 If it stays on the topic of: Has anyone got a game that is always nearly fun, nearly decent apart from just a little something Then it should be ok. If its all about Fifa then...
stuwii Posted December 9, 2008 Author Posted December 9, 2008 It's not just Fifa, it's NFS carbon- where muscle cars are uncontrollable etc
Rowan Posted December 9, 2008 Posted December 9, 2008 SSX Blur - it's not too bad. However thing's like the cartoony style and the same courses just redesigned slightly make the game less than what it could have been. It does not have that right feel compared to the likes of SSX Tricky and SSX 3 which were amazing.
Nicktendo Posted December 9, 2008 Posted December 9, 2008 I agree on SSX Blur. SSX3 was class but Blur was just lacking something @ Stuwii - This is why people avoid EA franchises, especially need for speed
darksnowman Posted December 9, 2008 Posted December 9, 2008 Speaking of SSX, I agree that SSX 3 is sublime but I think that SSX: On Tour just lacks that little something that made SSX 3 so damn great. In the GC On Tour I thought it was great to have the Nintendo stuff, but even at that, the game in general seemed to have no soul.
Retro_Link Posted December 9, 2008 Posted December 9, 2008 Does gamefaqs.com have any info on Fifa 09 that might help?
Jonnas Posted December 9, 2008 Posted December 9, 2008 Keeping with the original topic: -Baten Kaitos lacked good voice acting, and a plot that didn't insult my intelligence in certain parts; -Twilight Princess lacked...something. A connecting string, perhaps; -Super Mario Sunshine had 3 major flaws (check the thread in the GC section for more details); -Starfox Adventures lacked side-quests; -F-Zero GX lacks good multiplayer (still an awesome game, though); -Fire Emblem: PoR lacked difficulty I think those are the only good games with fatal flaws. The other ones are either nearly perfect or have too many flaws.
Emasher Posted December 9, 2008 Posted December 9, 2008 Keeping with the original topic: -Baten Kaitos lacked good voice acting, and a plot that didn't insult my intelligence in certain parts; -Twilight Princess lacked...something. A connecting string, perhaps; -Super Mario Sunshine had 3 major flaws (check the thread in the GC section for more details); -Starfox Adventures lacked side-quests; -F-Zero GX lacks good multiplayer (still an awesome game, though); -Fire Emblem: PoR lacked difficulty I think those are the only good games with fatal flaws. The other ones are either nearly perfect or have too many flaws. I agree with all of these except TP and Fire Emblem. Some others would be: Sonic And The Secret Rings: The motion controls just weren't utilized very well and because of this the game ended up very awkward, though I've looking forward to Sonic And The Black Knight. Pokemon Battle Revolution: It was a great game for what it was, but it lacked lifespan. Though I still maintain that it was worth the full price just for the online. Dragon Blade: Wrath of Fire: It was a great game with just the right amount of difficulty, and great motion controls. It just lacked polish. Pokemon Ranger: It was a great fun game, but it was just too short and way to easy. Wii Play: While it was fun for a little while, the games in it got boring much to fast. Plus it really needed 4 player. Metroid Prime: Hunters: While the multiplayer was nothing short of amazing, the single player campaign was just lazy.
darksnowman Posted December 9, 2008 Posted December 9, 2008 Keeping with the original topic: I like your style! However... -F-Zero GX lacks good multiplayer (still an awesome game, though); -Fire Emblem: PoR lacked difficulty I thought GX had great multiplayer! We spent many a night up thrashing around in it in four player. Honestly, the game gets better the tireder you and your mates become. Imo, what GX lacked was in the music department. And PoR lacked difficulty? Well... maybe thats why I like it so much then!
jammy2211 Posted December 9, 2008 Posted December 9, 2008 Super Mario Galaxy lacked difficulty. Twilight Princess lacked Difficulty Metroid Prime 3 Lacked Difficulty. Pah, perhaps I'm just getting too old for this.
Jonnas Posted December 9, 2008 Posted December 9, 2008 I thought GX had great multiplayer! We spent many a night up thrashing around in it in four player. Honestly, the game gets better the tireder you and your mates become. Imo, what GX lacked was in the music department. F-Zero GX didn't allow you to race 30 cars like in single-player, though. Racing with just 4 cars gets old quickly As for the music...opinions, opinions And PoR lacked difficulty? Well... maybe thats why I like it so much then! Probably. On one hand, it's good that my units don't die frequently (considering PoR is on a home console). On the other hand, Hard Mode was too easy. For the record, those 2 are still awesome games. I was just pointing out the single gripe I had with them.
stuwii Posted December 9, 2008 Author Posted December 9, 2008 Chances are that, yes, yes they do. No, no they don't- I am the only person who has bought this game ON THE ENTIRE forum.
Tellyn Posted December 9, 2008 Posted December 9, 2008 No, no they don't- I am the only person who has bought this game ON THE ENTIRE forum. I'd say so. Come on, just ring or email EA Sports and have done with it, you could have had this issue solved ages ago.
ShadowV7 Posted December 9, 2008 Posted December 9, 2008 No, no they don't- I am the only person who has bought this game ON THE ENTIRE forum. And, what does this tell you? Have you actually tried GameFAQs? They have an answer for everything. And mimicing my post was just low dude
Emerald Emblem Posted December 9, 2008 Posted December 9, 2008 If only you had a 360/PS3 and got that FIFA version, would save everyone a headache. Just sayin'.
Emasher Posted December 9, 2008 Posted December 9, 2008 No, no they don't- I am the only person who has bought this game ON THE ENTIRE forum. Have you actually just tried googling it? I think EA also has their own forum, surely someone there will have this game.
Jonnas Posted December 9, 2008 Posted December 9, 2008 No, no they don't- I am the only person who has bought this game ON THE ENTIRE forum. N-europe isn't the only place you can get this solved. Go to gamefaqs.com, contact EA about it... But N-europe can't help you, apparently.
Hellfire Posted December 9, 2008 Posted December 9, 2008 Metroid Prime 3 Lacked Difficulty. Pah, perhaps I'm just getting too old for this. No it doesn't, Normal mode is challenging enough and Hyper mode is hard. Not Ninja Gaiden hard. Regardless of skill it's easy to know what's too hard or too easy. Also, TP had challenging dungeons that placated the ridiculously easy enemies and I bet if Galaxy had less lives people wouldn't say it's so easy. It's something that has become increasingly apparent to me lately, not that I'm saying the game is hard (some stars are), but people think or don't notice that if they just had a game over screen more often, with the exact same difficulty they'd say the game is hard/harder, when the only result being forcing them to repeat loads of stuff again, the actual difficulty of the game would remain the same and the incredibly fun aura surrounding Galaxy would be gone. And I'm glad some devs have started to notice this, I've heard that in PoP for example, when you fall, whatshername picks you up. Of course this needs balancing you can't just go "lulz you cant die" in every game, but I think some things need to be rethought in this area. Also GX had amazing multiplayer and the music was awesome too ^^ Never played PoR though, doesn't it have a hard mode? Want to finish the others first and I have the game lying arround, my mom gave it to me and bought it full price, sometimes I wonder if that was a good idea considering I'll only play it later in the future -.- Emasher, Hunters single player was just a late addition the game is all about mp. Why the hell am I here just defending games? Ugh... *thinks of something to add* Nope nothing, this is silly, what're we gonna do state flaws of every single game? pff
Recommended Posts