Retro_Link

I just googled Shake Dimension to be reminded of it's lovely visuals, and instead was reminded of those horrendous borders... Why are they there again?

Mine to...

And look at Bulbasaur just spurring him on! "Saur him in half... go on!! Saur... saaaaaaaur!!"

Yep, that's exactly the style I think it should go for. I made this last time it came up using a Ni No Kuni screenshot

Huber has completely grown on me. When he first started at GT I thought he was crazy, but I've come to love his passion and now I think he's great. Yes he's over the top, but it's nice to have someone like that... I do think he's mellowed slightly as he's grown in confidence and settled in, which is good. I will say, I've always watched GT's/EZA's stuff as opposed to listen to it. I imagine seeing what he's doing helps damped it somewhat :p

I'm actually more excited for Spidey because it will be a different origins story this time round. They've already said they wont go into the spider bite stuff - hopefully they stick to that and it'll be some throwaway line in Civil War - so maybe the story of him first meeting Tony, going to Stark Industries for a science internship, revealing what he's been through to Tony and having him mentor him/build him a suit...

68.4% from what I'm reading. Worse than the recent Fantastic 4, the same as X-Men Origins: Wolverine, and only bettered in comic book history by Hulk 2003 on 70%. 5th biggest fall in cinema history for a film taking over $100million in it's first week.

Why is that GameExplain video the first I've heard about you being able to significantly speed up or slow down your ship?... Have all the slower gameplay videos we've seen just been because it's being demoed on slow? That level that looks a bit like the Death Star trench has frustrating design!!... "Fox!!..." "Just fly 5 meters to your left or right and you'll avoid all the obstacles and asteroids"

The drop off was one of the biggest ever recorded from what I've read. That article is confusing though yeah. It's not saying WB are planning to release fewer DC movies off the back of BvS' performance, as you'd expect... but that DC will release fewer original movies... presumably so that if the movies do underperform, they still have a financial base to fall back on. Very strange.

Benedict Cumberbatch is going to drop the first Doctor Strange trailer on Jimmy Kimmel, April 12th! Whoop Whoop!!

Batman and Superman movies presumably.

I'm more excited for Aquaman and The Flash than anything else DC have lined up. I see the Aquaman movie as DC's Thor, and The Flash just has great potential to be awesome.

Makes too much sense. I'd rather put my home console in a suit case... you know the way everyone does when they travel to gaming tournaments... Because Serebii doesn't seem to understand this concept?

You were talking terrible home console "story" : peace: (new use for that emoji!) based games.

lol. Serebii the games are not now on home console..... there's just a home console Pokémon game.

What would be keeping them from continuing to go?

There is. But until you know how many people only buy Pokémon because it's portable, you have no argument for the loss of portability affecting sales.

One of the best examples of motion controls... that Goldeneye 007 peek.

What's the percentage of Pokémon users that buy a Pokémon game purely because they have the option to take it out of their house? Hopefully you can provide me with that statistic... but personally I would think it's incredibly small. As in, if they could still buy a Pokémon game, but they would have to play the whole thing at home, they would still do so. And of those that do use the portable aspect, I would have thought a large percentage of those would sacrifice it to have a different, more story driven experience with Pokémon, once every... say, 5 years.

Online would compensate. It would be a different Pokémon experience. I think you're severely overestimating the number of people who buy a Pokémon game purely for the fact it's portable. People buy it now because it's the only option. Didn't that new home console Digimon game prove there's an audience?... and that game was nothing compared to what a Pokémon game could be. It was extremely basic in it's options and presentation and yet people were all over it. Anyway. It's not up to me or anyone else here to convince you why it would work. We all have our own valid reasons. It's up to The Pokémon Company, Nintendo and any other company they may partner with to do that... in much the same way Nintendo are trying to do with StarFox.

I don't believe the 3DS has the power to create that kind of open 3D world - that you would be able to look around in First Person - that I'm talking about. To create a beautifully crafted RPG story experience. I also doubt whether it has the capabilities to stream Pokémon Stadium-esque online matches for you to spectate on live. Perhaps even interact with in real-time. i.e. If the audience shows more support for one side of the battle that combatant is rewarded in some way. Besides even if it could do everything and more, every single aspect of the game would be compromised over what could be produced on a home console version.

@Hero\-of\-Time That's where Level 5 come in

It would bring the game to a whole new audience - the home console audience. It also has the potential to be the best example of home console online Nintendo has ever done, with players meeting up for tournaments in the stadium in the 'online city'. Other players would also be able to go to this arena/'take a seat' to spectate on matches being played. For once a Pokémon game could be made to look gorgeous and cinematic. If it had been done of the Wii U, the Gamepad could have been used to look around in first person to photograph Pokémon, and to locate and scan them in them in the environment.

Note: Ripped from Star Fox Zero thread. --------------- I know right. There are those that can't even fathom a Pokémon adventure on the home console.

I know right. There are those that can't even fathom a Pokémon adventure on the home console. Note: subsequent conversation has moved to separate thread