Sheikah

Cool @Guy. The only ones I have are the water frog starter, charmander and squirtle. So I guess I need all the rest. :p Please can I get some?

Something you know? I'll be posting later with some choice questions for players. Someone's gotta get the beans spilling.

I hope you paid the iron price for that

@Esequiel just want to confirm something, who did you target last night?

In a public place any of those people could be there too. This is basically the opposite of what I believe in. Punishing people for expressing unhappiness with a company (even colourfully), not in a personal/harassing way and not even to them. You don't compete well and people will bitch. Deal with the cause and not the effects. The privacy isn't the issue. It's that they should never have reacted that way in the first place. At least they admitted fault. Close, but at least in that comparison the GAME staff could have overheard it without actively going out of his way. Either way, I find it really unlikely he'd have cancelled your order and banned you from the shop.

He wasn't in the shop though...this is the equivalent to being at a separate public venue and talking to your friend about the company, while an employee of the company has gone out of their way to get close to you to find out what you're saying about them. It's weird...

Yup, KH2 was better.

Bloody awesome. Loved KH2. Never played BBS. Looks like this'll be great.

Yeah same. The super boss in hollow bastion wasn't too bad on proud at max level. Just that one annoying move where you've gotta press release.

I blitzed third gym with Charizard and flying moves. All the fighting types were super weak to it.

The Wii was popular but damaging to Nintendo's general appeal towards the latter half of its life. It was cheap and started a craze, which no doubt helped it become universally popular in its early life. However...the choices they made when making the console really screwed it later. A low power non-HD console that couldn't run most modern exclusives without a separate version meant it couldn't really get most exclusives even if devs wanted to put them on. No decent in-built or replaceable hard drive for game downloads and a pisspoor online service at a time when the other companies were introducing theirs. It was bad. This kind of way of thinking carried over. Except they handled it really badly with the Wii U. Now it was not only a generation behind technically like the Wii (so bound to be automatically denied exclusives by default) but it was also priced not much cheaper than the alternatives, this time round. Anyway, that's my 2 cents. The Wii was the start of Nintendo's hunger for the average Joe. And the point when their units stopped being technically impressive.

I wonder traded an Oddish and got the fossil pokemon that I didn't choose (the one from the sail fossil). Was pretty happy with that.

Anyone on the GTS service requesting Xerneas or Yvetal who are not themselves offering a legendary should not be allowed to use the GTS service.

The setting has changed. No longer are Nintendo seemingly able to keep up spec-wise with the competition regarding home console and this no doubt has a negative impact on third party support and their overall image. Becoming a third party would eliminate that worry. It's also incredibly unfair to bring in the Wii. The Wii was an unexpected craze and it's highly unlikely any of the home console 'innovations' Nintendo are currently doing will have anywhere near the same effect. It told Nintendo that there was a different market for gamers and that they could get away with (what are effectively) last gen consoles with some tacked on gimmick. The Wii had quite a harmful legacy for Nintendo and its fans.

For me this is the first Pokemon game where I haven't just breezed through with a high level starter Pokemon. My team are pretty evenly levelled and all quite useful in battle.

Who knows who has jumped on the bandwagon of claiming to have targeted me or to have found the same thing as someone else? It's just straw grasping at the moment.

Added back both @King_V and @The_Peeps

Hey I added you ages back, add me 3523-2023-5626

How can Yvonne obviously do that? I'd be seriously disappointed if a lie detector made it so obvious on D2.

(if we're assuming he is Rebecca that is). So that comment about not being the creator of the Animus is true.

He's the creator of the animus 2.0 (not the original). In the game, the bad guys (Abstergo) made the first one. The second one was developed by Rebecca, one of the assassins (good guys).

Then explain how a shed load of people who targeted me went to someone/somewhere else. So you were told to go to your own machine, assuming you're the animus 2.0 creator (which logically might mean an instruction to go to your character/their position, since you would expect your character to be with their machine). I'm nor sure why Jimbob is giving different information on the same thing to different people. Anyway this outcome would make sense - you didn't go to me, you went to yourself who had been switched. ^ or attempted to, then failed.

It's not that I really care what your character is, it's that the answer would confirm if someone else who tried to target me reached you or not. One person definitely went to you, and if you are Rebecca then that means 2 people meant for me went to you. 2 people going from person A to person B spells target switch. As for what happened to the others, additional player abilities or lies are my firm favourites.

Hey, we're all assuming all the time. And his response makes me think I was right.

I'm just going to go ahead and assume you're Rebecca Crane. So if 2 separate people who targeted me went to you to you then I was clearly switched.