solitanze

Still this Red Steel review drought is apparent, the only one coming up is Nintendo Power giving the game 8/10 with no internet link as it comes from a magazine.

Fortunately thats only the case for one UNIFORM RESOURCE LOCATOR (URL) being Gamespot.com. We'll have our redemption in two editorial reviews time: http://www.gamerankings.com/htmlpages2/928519.asp

To which some would be rather disappointed with the "weak effort" demonstrated with the PS3 smashing. Its more durable due to having a lot more components inside but a few smashes on the thin sides and it would've done massive damage exposing the centre, smash away.

& one last thread about a secret that doesn't exist. LOCK THREAD.

What difference is there other than saying 1 player similtaneously instead of 4 and not having the grey large rumble pack symbol?

These sorts of ideas need to be heard by developers. Grapevine [unofficial word of mouth], do your stuff.

The PS3 one wasn't fun for me, it was rather underwhelming as I mentioned above, way too little damage. Could've swung harder the guy that was using the sledgehammer, obviously wasn't exerting full power. I'd only give that particular video 3/10, a rather disappointing effort, especially if I had been silly enough to give away my money, I'D WANT MAXIMUM DAMAGE equalling maximum value for money.

I knew it was coming to PSP, a typo I made that I didn't notice, was too busy reading other threads, i'll edit the above post...

Heres a post in Gamespot forums that will annoy some even more... It's Zelda, people. Matthew Rorie, Game Guides Editor Since I know people are upset about the review (which is odd considering how few people have played this game at the moment), I figured I'd share some opinions based on playing through the first five hours or so of the game. It's the same damn game we've all been playing for the last 15-odd years. Hey, guess what? You get to go into dungeons...and find items...and put together pieces of heart to make new heart containers. I haven't gotten very far into it, but I'm going to go out on a limb and guess that Triforce is in the mix at some point. There's a difference between tradition and ossification, and Nintendo's been content to let this series stay the same for too damn long. What's more, in a lot of ways it's actually getting to be pretty annoying. The helper characters, in particular, seem to be intended to be cute, but they wind up being maddeningly insufferable. In a lot of ways, Midna, the helper character from Twilight Princess, is even worse than Tingle from Wind Waker. And I don't know whose idea it was to make the first dungeon in the game feature a large number of monkeys that follow you around making incessent monkey noises, but they should be shot. Most annoying. sound. ever. When you have the pointer active, it also makes a shimmering sound as you move the Wiimote around. It never ever stops making this sound, and it got so damn annoying that I simply turned the pointer off completely. Since every game in this series is more or less the same, outside of minor details, choosing among them is more or less a matter of deciding which style suits you best. Wind Waker had, at the very least, a graphical sensibility that was unique, whereas Twilight Princess just seems...generic. For a game that plays up its theoretically realistic graphical style, it also has to do a bit better job of representing the world; it's fine that the Wii isn't as powerful as a 360 or a PS3, but at the very least it should be capable of matching the best-looking games on the GameCube. From top to bottom, Twilight Princess is a game that was transparently designed for the GameCube and hacked to work on the Wii. The controls feel kind of shoddy in a lot of ways. I guess what disappoints me most about this game is the lack of ambition and innovation. The Wii has some promising ideas behind it, but if they're content to have their flagship title be Just Another Zelda Game then they're getting off on the wrong foot. I guess if you like the Zelda formula, then you'll like this game. Speaking for myself, though, I can't imagine how anyone really gets excited for them anymore; the recycling of game mechanics ventured into self-parody territory years ago. I really think the series needs to take a cue from Resident Evil 4 and reinvent itself completely. Heck, even the Final Fantasy games manage to make some big changes to the series' conventions with each installation. As it is, everything about Twilight Princess, and pretty much every game in the series aside from The Adventure of Link, smacks of Nintendo being content to play it safe with their big-money series. Give me something new!

With minimal effort expanding on whats already been posted, this WITHOUT A DOUBT would be my ultimate nightmare:

Theres been a drought of reviews in this past day...

Is there any difference of this compilation game to the PSP version other than the fact that it has Wii mote controls?

Every game they can scab from cube should be put on Wii to have reduced drought of decent games.

Good that we can still get around the region limitations for GC games for the one or two times i'll actually play a GC game on Wii.

One Piece: Of software I won't be purchasing...

How about Lemmings Wii?

World War Wii will commence as soon as Wii is released in all regions.

How many defective Wiis are there compared to defective PS3s?

They destroyed so little of the PS3 yet completely destroyed the Wii, only half of the PS3 was actually damaged. They say they're going to do a more comprehensive version in a few days and I hope they do. The PS3 smashing was underwhelming, not enough damage. V.S.

Its set to 15 reviews, not 20. At the top of the default 20 reviews page, press the down arrow where it says minimum reviews/votes and then select 15, Twilight Princess is not in the default list where the games have at least 20 reviews as it only has 16 editorial reviews. But for the 16 it has, it current has the 2nd highest average ratio.

Nah I think he meant Soul Calibur on Dreamcast.

Same, even though I put so much into aggregate scores [probably more so than anyone else in this forum], i'll be enjoying this game no matter what in the end. But Nintendo did make a promise and I expect them to fulfill it with not only my expectations of the game, but acknowledgement from the general public that this game is a classic and that is reflected through having a high average ratio.

I'm in agreeance with the others regarding Twilight Princess and how revolutionary it is, in that IT ISN'T. But I don't care, I just want to see the game score high with aggregate review scores and thus for Nintendo to 99% completely fulfill their promise of this being the best Zelda game ever made [only being behind Ocarina of Time and thus not being 100% fulfilled but I wasn't expecting to pass anyway. OOT > Twilight Princess in regards to bringing gaming to a new level]. Otherwise, to me they have misled and deceived (that is if the game doesn't at the very least end up with 96.00% average ratio score - Either the Wii or GC version can achieve this).

I'm most certainly going to keep an eye on this. I'm expecting a 10 million units plus sales increase when PS3 has it first price cut.

Twilight Princess average ratio now 96.8% with 16 editorial reviews. 4 to go until it becomes part of the official default ratings screen.