Gaijin von Snikbah Posted May 31, 2007 Posted May 31, 2007 How about an option to have people being able to select an option that merges some of the boards, so that all the popular topics will be more collected? I think that noobs just wants to get to the most popular topics instead of having to choose between 10 different boards.
Shorty Posted May 31, 2007 Posted May 31, 2007 How about an option to have people being able to select an option that merges some of the boards, so that all the popular topics will be more collected? I think that noobs just wants to get to the most popular topics instead of having to choose between 10 different boards. You could just click on "New Posts" at the top of the page.
Calza Posted June 3, 2007 Posted June 3, 2007 Or you subscribe to the threads and go to them through your cp. I think there should be at least a trial for a General gaming chat.
Shorty Posted June 5, 2007 Posted June 5, 2007 this forum needs a point system badlyA 'point' system? Could you be more specific? Are you referring to Reputation? Why do you think we need it 'badly'? If you do mean rep, we already tried it back when we first moved to these boards and iirc, it didn't go to well.
Ashley Posted June 5, 2007 Author Posted June 5, 2007 Or you subscribe to the threads and go to them through your cp. I think there should be at least a trial for a General gaming chat. Like what and why? Come on people. Explain these suggestions a bit more :p
Gaijin von Snikbah Posted June 5, 2007 Posted June 5, 2007 How about a point system that drains your points everyday. So that your popularity is based on daily votes instead of life time votes. You dont have to loose all points each day, and you could have a maximum amount of points, or coolness level. Of course you can only get + points, so it works kinda like Digg in a way.
Shorty Posted June 6, 2007 Posted June 6, 2007 Erm... popularity? Points? Coolness rating? What the hell....? Personally I don't want to see any of that. This isn't secondary school.
ReZourceman Posted June 6, 2007 Posted June 6, 2007 Word. Something like that would (no doubt) propel my ego to an incomprehendable size.
mike-zim Posted June 6, 2007 Posted June 6, 2007 True REZ there is no need for it as we all know you would get uber votes every day. : peace:
Gaijin von Snikbah Posted June 6, 2007 Posted June 6, 2007 Erm... popularity? Points? Coolness rating? What the hell....? Personally I don't want to see any of that. This isn't secondary school. I was just suggesting a rep system that actually works. Nobody can abuse the system either. Its genius. Kids everywhere will love it! For instance it would allow everyone to see how much we love or dont care about someone. Theres no hate in that. No negative feedback.
ReZourceman Posted June 6, 2007 Posted June 6, 2007 We have it on HCRealms, and its great. Only donors can negative rep someone, but hey if this forum tried it and didnt work what ya gonna do.
Tellyn Posted June 6, 2007 Posted June 6, 2007 You just know that if it happens you'll get new members making threads or posting in existing ones saying 'LOLZ GIV ME POSTIV REPXORZ!'.
Twozzok Posted June 6, 2007 Posted June 6, 2007 Reputation has always, and will always be too dramaful to even be considered :/
The Peeps Posted June 7, 2007 Posted June 7, 2007 The problem with rep points is that after a while you start getting elitism. Members with the highest rep will be considered more important or whatever, other members may be put off from joining because they feel they will go unnoticed because of their rep. In general I think rep points are a bad idea, there really is no reason to have them except if you want to feel superior to everyone else, and I don't really see how that is a good thing. Fair enough if it works in some places but it was tried here and it really didn't work at all.
Ashley Posted June 7, 2007 Author Posted June 7, 2007 I was just suggesting a rep system that actually works. Nobody can abuse the system either. Its genius. Kids everywhere will love it! For instance it would allow everyone to see how much we love or dont care about someone. Theres no hate in that. No negative feedback. The reason we removed rep points before is because people were giving too much positive feedback. Its not because the boards turned into a bitchfest.
motion Posted June 8, 2007 Posted June 8, 2007 I'm assuming that because Shorty and Girl's Name both have large avatars, the rest of us can have large avatars right?
Charlie Posted June 8, 2007 Posted June 8, 2007 Rule number 1: Never Assume. Admin's get larger avatars because they're admins.
motion Posted June 8, 2007 Posted June 8, 2007 And that's supposed to be fair/any way to run a message board? Complete bollocks if that is the case. Rules are there to be adhered to, not to be broken by the very people that thought them up.
Charlie Posted June 8, 2007 Posted June 8, 2007 Shouldn't those who give up so much of their time to run the boards be honoured for what they do?
motion Posted June 8, 2007 Posted June 8, 2007 It's an honour to break ones own rules and have something that no other "mere poster" can have? No ones forcing them to run a board, and I'm not trying to be harsh, it just seems very unprofessional. Rules are there for a reason, when the ones who write them out break them themsevelves something is wrong.
Charlie Posted June 8, 2007 Posted June 8, 2007 It's an honour to break ones own rules and have something that no other "mere poster" can have? No ones forcing them to run a board, and I'm not trying to be harsh, it just seems very unprofessional. Rules are there for a reason, when the ones who write them out break them themsevelves something is wrong. No one is forcing you to be here. There's nothing unprofessional about it at all. We're not a democracy, the rules made are for you to obide by, not us. We obide to them as a matter of courtesy to you guys, we're doing you a favour buy obeying our own rules.
motion Posted June 8, 2007 Posted June 8, 2007 we're doing you a favour buy obeying our own rules. Uhh, no you're not (see: what I've been saying about avatars). Horribly unprofessional. Meh. Never mind.
conzer16 Posted June 8, 2007 Posted June 8, 2007 I semi-agree with motion here. On one hand you don't want elitism creeping into the boards, and on the other you are creating that elitism by using something which every other FM can't have. Admins are admins - we accept they have power over us. But if you don't want any form of elitism don't implement it yourselves. Only my 2 cents worth...
mike-zim Posted June 8, 2007 Posted June 8, 2007 I agree rules are rules. admin are here to make sure they get stuck to. Not to break them themselves.
Recommended Posts