Jump to content
N-Europe

David Cameron is common.


ipaul

Recommended Posts

Honestly he is. Here's proof.

 

David Cameron is like a chameleon. Watch as he blends seamlessly into his new urban surroundings.

 

Almost unrecognisable.

 

Paul, your hate for the Conservative Party is profound. You should start going door-to-door convincing Conservative voters to change their ways. Forcing little old ladies to struggle painfully to the door just to have you blab about your great, all powerful leader Eddy Miliband. Oh wait...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Paul, your hate for the Conservative Party is profound. You should start going door-to-door convincing Conservative voters to change their ways. Forcing little old ladies to struggle painfully to the door just to have you blab about your great, all powerful leader Eddy Miliband. Oh wait...

 

Capital idea. you dickhead.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Paul, your hate for the Conservative Party is profound. You should start going door-to-door convincing Conservative voters to change their ways. Forcing little old ladies to struggle painfully to the door just to have you blab about your great, all powerful leader Eddy Miliband. Oh wait...

 

This is the most anti-lol thing I've read this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Paul, your hate for the Conservative Party is profound. You should start going door-to-door convincing Conservative voters to change their ways. Forcing little old ladies to struggle painfully to the door just to have you blab about your great, all powerful leader Eddy Miliband. Oh wait...

 

This is the most anti-lol thing I've read this year

 

Well said.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not debating anything. You're wrong. Recognise that.

On what basis am I wrong? In these matters, there is no right or wrong, just differing opinions.

 

Now, for facts, here it is. I'm fairly wealthy and I'm getting screwed as much as, if not more than, the "common" class. Everyone's getting screwed because they have to deal with the deficit left by the previous administration and you need to accept that is the case.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tory rhetoric. I'm better off than most and it's not hard to see that the 'deficit left by the previous administration' excuse they pedal is just that, an excuse. Tory methods are ideological, political violence.

 

Violence is increased tax on food and decreased taxes on the profits of corporations.

Violence is withdrawing state support for the poorest and giving it to the richest.

Violence is having to borrow £3000, £9000, £30000 from a private company to continue your education.

Violence is the false promise of Big Society to hide the restructuring of life to the needs of the market.

 

Hate to say this but my mother voted for Thatcher. Twice.

Edited by Daft
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tory rhetoric. I'm better off than most and it's not hard to see that the 'deficit left by the previous administration' excuse the pedal is just that, an excuse.

 

Hate to say this but my mother voted for Thatcher. Twice.

It's not an excuse, they're trying to fix it. To fix it, they need to cut spending. It's simple mathematics

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tory rhetoric. I'm better off than most and it's not hard to see that the 'deficit left by the previous administration' excuse they pedal is just that, an excuse. Tory methods are ideological, political violence.

 

Violence is increased tax on food and decreased taxes on the profits of corporations.

Violence is withdrawing state support for the poorest and giving it to the richest.

Violence is having to borrow £3000, £9000, £30000 from a private company to continue your education.

Violence is the false promise of Big Society to hide the restructuring of life to the needs of the market.

 

Hate to say this but my mother voted for Thatcher. Twice.

Just noticed your edits

 

1. Care to state where it has said that they cut the tax on corporations? As I'm self employed, I'd like to see this.

2. They haven't given anything to the rich. They're taxing the rich more by lowering the limit at which you hit the tax bands. They've dealt with benefits so that people can't just sit and live off of them, instead they have to actually go out and get a job. Shocking, I know.

3. Labour are the ones who increased the fees to £3,000 originally and implemented Tuition Fee Loans in order to counter it. Also, if everyone was entitled to free university education, then the Bachelor degrees will become meaningless. A Levels meant something for a while, until everyone started doing them and it's becoming the same of Bachelor degrees.

Nowadays, employers don't care about Bachelor degrees, they want Masters degrees because it shows more dedication. So many people go to university and do ridiculous degrees just so they get the "university experience". It's worthless and I for one and glad that they are doing this. It is making it so the people who go to university go there to learn, not to doss about and get drunk.

4. You have to admit how important the economy is, so yes, they're trying to stabilise it after what Labour did to it.

 

Use your head a bit more and stop being such a cynical Daily Mail opinion spouting person :/

Edited by Serebii
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...