Dannyboy-the-Dane Posted November 3, 2010 Share Posted November 3, 2010 It makes it likely that you are evil, yes. This is simply not true, though, as double voters are just as often good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MadDog Posted November 3, 2010 Share Posted November 3, 2010 Hmmm. MadDog was the fifth person to vote for MadDog. Considering his double vote....if he was mafia....they probably really wouldn't have wanted him to push it that bit further to majority. lolwut? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Diageo Posted November 3, 2010 Share Posted November 3, 2010 MadDog voted for MadDog? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ReZourceman Posted November 3, 2010 Share Posted November 3, 2010 **Sméagol not MadDog lol. MadDog was the fifth person to vote for Sméagol . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Diageo Posted November 3, 2010 Share Posted November 3, 2010 This is simply not true, though, as double voters are just as often good. I said the conjunction of a double vote and night power. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ReZourceman Posted November 3, 2010 Share Posted November 3, 2010 And I don't think its ouuuuuutttt of the question for a double voter to have a night power. Not at all. But an investigative power is what piqued my interest. But then I've just thought about the last thing I've mentioned. We need to discuss further. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
heroicjanitor Posted November 3, 2010 Share Posted November 3, 2010 Yeah a double voter voting for Sméagol... I was happy in ignorance Rez. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Diageo Posted November 3, 2010 Share Posted November 3, 2010 I don't know, that seems like a good reason. Although he might have been hiding his double vote or just thought that Sméagol was done for. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MadDog Posted November 3, 2010 Share Posted November 3, 2010 I interrogate people, so i find out different things depending on whoever i target i suppose. I know Ell is good, it didn't take much for heroicjanitor to talk apparently. And my targeting of Diageo failed, i was then bribed by a young polite man, and he learned my target. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Diageo Posted November 3, 2010 Share Posted November 3, 2010 And that's how you know Ellmeister is good? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MadDog Posted November 3, 2010 Share Posted November 3, 2010 Affirmative. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
heroicjanitor Posted November 3, 2010 Share Posted November 3, 2010 it didn't take much for heroicjanitor to talk apparently. Well I don't mind giving info if it "isn't worthy" so it's all good. What did I tell you anyway? Diageo makes nice tea? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Diageo Posted November 3, 2010 Share Posted November 3, 2010 You know Ellmeister is good because he bribed you... I don't get your reasoning. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MadDog Posted November 3, 2010 Share Posted November 3, 2010 Just that you were innocent. You know Ellmeister is good because he bribed you... I don't get your reasoning. nono. I targeted Ell first night, he said he's innocent and that'll he'll give me money if i let him be, i think it's just Jonnas beefing the PM up abit, i didn't actually receive anything. I think my interrogation methods are similar to those of Jack Bauer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zell Posted November 3, 2010 Share Posted November 3, 2010 I think there's enough reason to be suspicious of Maddog. But I'm still suspicious of Diageo, mainly because of his reluctance to vote for Smeagol, and all this arguing is confusing me. I'm not going to vote for anyone yet, but I will if the day is about to come to an end. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MadDog Posted November 3, 2010 Share Posted November 3, 2010 I think there's enough reason to be suspicious of Maddog. But I'm still suspicious of Diageo, mainly because of his reluctance to vote for Smeagol, and all this arguing is confusing me. I'm not going to vote for anyone yet, but I will if the day is about to come to an end. Can i ask what makes you suspicious of me? Nobody has said anything vote worthy yet about me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ReZourceman Posted November 3, 2010 Share Posted November 3, 2010 I'm actually absolutely willing to believe MadDog right noweth, thus Removeth voteth. And now I would like to potentially highlight something else, as we need to do something in terms of lynching. I think we are building up a fairly nice bank of good names though. If MadDog is good, he confirms Ell as good, Cube and I seem to believe each other to be good, heroicjanitor and Diageo seem to be able to back each other up. Potential townies MadDog Ellmeister Cube ReZourceman Diageo heroicjanitor Now lets just take a quick look at the list of people who did not vote for Sméagol. Its just something to contemplate slightly. -aqu1la (The Peeps now) -dan-likes-trees -Diageo -Eenuh -Ellmeister -gmac -Jayseven -mr-paul -Nintendohnut -ReZourceman -Rummy -Zell But here is a post that is causing me a touch of concern. I don't know who to go for now. Peeps, you say you aren't 100% sure you targeted Smeagol last night? And now Diageo is asking a lot of questions... We don't have anything too solid at this point, especially if I am not misunderstanding Peeps when he says his targets may have got a little confused? Is there any more information out there on these two subjects? I am so confused. Everyone seems to think Smeagol's evil, and apparently he confirmed it, but in the post above he sounds good? I don't get it! All I know is he admited to targeting cube to blind him, which definitely sounds evil. Let's see what happens Vote: Smfunnylineabovetheeagol I've kind of noticed a trait of Dohnut when he is playing as a mafia member. He slightly tones down on accusations, he plays dumb and (well he posts less, however I know for a fact he's been pretty busy recently) but even despite this I have a huge problem with the above few posts. Call it a bad hunch along with my general suspicion of him. I believe he has only made these two posts too. (And he only voted for Smigz when Smigz himself outed...himself) 'Dohnut is super intelligent and really good at mafia, and for him to say he is confused in a very easy to follow (and awesome) mafia game...worries the hell out of me. Thuseth Voteth : Nintendohnut EDIT. That list should be; -aqu1la (The Peeps now) -dan-likes-trees -Diageo -Eenuh -Ellmeister -gmac -Jayseven -mr-paul -ReZourceman -Rummy -Zell Removed Nintendohnuts name. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Diageo Posted November 3, 2010 Share Posted November 3, 2010 I much rather go after the inactives then the actives, and I am less likely to believe that MadDog is mafia. Withdraw vote. But since you are basically asking us to trust your instinct, I am not eager to go for Nintendohnut either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eenuh Posted November 3, 2010 Share Posted November 3, 2010 Yeah, at the moment I believe MadDog I think. There's not really anything that proves he's evil, just a lot of finger pointing going on. I can also confirm that Ellmeister is most likely good. You may be onto something ReZ, maybe. I'll cast a vote now too, just to put some pressure. =P Vote: Nintendohnut Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
heroicjanitor Posted November 3, 2010 Share Posted November 3, 2010 I much rather go after the inactives then the actives, and I am less likely to believe that MadDog is mafia. Withdraw vote. But since you are basically asking us to trust your instinct, I am not eager to go for Nintendohnut either. We'll have to trust someone's instinct if we have no proof. We lost the pokemafia from requiring definitive proof. Remove Vote Vote: Nintendohnut Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Diageo Posted November 3, 2010 Share Posted November 3, 2010 You can just say changevote: Nintendohnut instead of remove vote and then voting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MadDog Posted November 3, 2010 Share Posted November 3, 2010 He's amazing at these games, and contributes alot. The fact that he's playing dumb is weird for him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
heroicjanitor Posted November 3, 2010 Share Posted November 3, 2010 You can just say changevote: Nintendohnut instead of remove vote and then voting. That didn't occur to me... But I'm glad you voted for Nintendohnut after all :p Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Diageo Posted November 3, 2010 Share Posted November 3, 2010 It is true that what Rummy and Nintendohnut have said about this game being confusing is weird. And I will vote: Nintendohnut because of it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cube Posted November 3, 2010 Share Posted November 3, 2010 MadDog, just one more question I want clearing: What is your job (or title)? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts