Mikey Posted January 27, 2008 Posted January 27, 2008 Abuse + disruptive and disorderly + breach of the peace + discrimination + threatening behavior + inciting others to commit crime. Yeah, they'd be nicked here. When you start punishing speech, where does it end? How about the state minds its own business instead? Also, I've never heard those whack jobs threatening any one or inciting any one to commit violence. They've just said they hate fags, and they're going to hell for it.
Slaggis Posted January 27, 2008 Author Posted January 27, 2008 Defintely not. Opinions shouldn't get you in trouble. You're not serious? So people should be allowed the picket, shout abusive comments and cause offence to someones family at the funeral of someone thats done absolutely nothing wrong? You're kidding, right?
Mikey Posted January 27, 2008 Posted January 27, 2008 You're not serious? So people should be allowed the picket the funeral of someone thats done absolutely nothing wrong? You're kidding, right? Yep. Non violent expression shouldn't be punished as it's taking away freedom. Once you start giving the state the power to restrict things like this, they can easily just keep making more and more laws punishing every single thing they don't like.
Slaggis Posted January 27, 2008 Author Posted January 27, 2008 Yep. Non violent expression shouldn't be punished as it's taking away freedom. Once you start giving the state the power to restrict things like this, they can easily just keep making more and more laws punishing every single thing they don't like. I'm sorry, but I think thats just being a) paranoid and b) taking the idea of free speach to far. Every person on earth (Minus the obvious) deserve respect and should be given it. Also, she said they would go wherever his "carcus" goes and picket. Surely thats a little more than "free speech" and they should be stopped?
Mikey Posted January 27, 2008 Posted January 27, 2008 I'm sorry, but I think thats just being a) paranoid and b) taking the idea of free speach to far. Every person on earth (Minus the obvious) deserve respect and should be given it. Also, she said they would go wherever his "carcus" goes and picket. Surely thats a little more that "free speech" and they should be stopped? I'd draw the line at slander, but other than that, people should be able to say whatever they want. Unless it's private property, then people should be able to go anywhere they want and say what they want. Also, why do laws need making for a very small cult like this? The vast vast vast majority of people don't picket funerals, so why should other people be restricted on what they can and can't say and where by laws like this which can be abused? The state really needs to mind its own business when it comes to what I say and where I say it.
The fish Posted January 27, 2008 Posted January 27, 2008 Yep. Non violent expression shouldn't be punished as it's taking away freedom. Once you start giving the state the power to restrict things like this, they can easily just keep making more and more laws punishing every single thing they don't like. It's a very aggressive, abusive, and purposeful way of going about it, however.
Mikey Posted January 28, 2008 Posted January 28, 2008 It's a small price to pay for the freedom of every one.
The fish Posted January 28, 2008 Posted January 28, 2008 It's a small price to pay for the freedom of every one. Or, you can have everyone being free, without people abusing it and attempting to take away the freedom of others...
Mikey Posted January 28, 2008 Posted January 28, 2008 Most people are not bad, a very small percentage of people abuse others. We really don't need the state putting restrictions on us all. Sure there should be some laws, but they should be minimal.
The fish Posted January 28, 2008 Posted January 28, 2008 Most people are not bad, a very small percentage of people abuse others. We really don't need the state putting restrictions on us all. Sure there should be some laws, but they should be minimal. If you don't have abuse to say, then not being allowed to has no effect on you whatsoever.
emikael Posted May 1, 2008 Posted May 1, 2008 I didn´t listen to the radio interview and I don´t know anything about Shirley Phelps but I do believe that God judges all of the sins that people have done and everyone´s responsible of their own acts. Fact is that everyone has sinned and everyone needs to repent and to believe in Jesus Christ and then God forgives our sins.
Hem Posted May 1, 2008 Posted May 1, 2008 I didn´t listen to the radio interview and I don´t know anything about Shirley Phelps but I do believe that God judges all of the sins that people have done and everyone´s responsible of their own acts. Fact is that everyone has sinned and everyone needs to repent and to believe in Jesus Christ and then God forgives our sins. Fact is, your precious Bible is a fairytale... ONLY JOKING! Or aaammmmmm I?!
Ninty 182 Posted May 1, 2008 Posted May 1, 2008 I do believe that God judges all of the sins that people have done and everyone´s responsible of their own acts. Fact is that everyone has sinned and everyone needs to repent and to believe in Jesus Christ and then God forgives our sins. Where are you getting all this from? What have you seen, heard etc. that makes you believe this. I'm not having a go i'm just genuinely curious.
Chris the great Posted May 1, 2008 Posted May 1, 2008 ah leave the guy alone. ok, resurecting old threads isnt cool but give him a chance to learn. he has a wii code so clearly owns a wii, so isnt just here to preach. if he wants to disscuss what he belives who are we to say he cant?
Recommended Posts